fmpВестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV. Международные отношения и мировая политикаLomonosov World Politics Journal2076-7404Московский государственный университет имени М.В.Ломоносова10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-1-57-86fmp-35Research ArticleИНОСТРАННАЯ ПОМОЩЬFOREIGN ASSISTANCEЭффективность международной помощи развитию: от анализа проектов к оценке стратегического воздействияAid Effectiveness: From Project Appraisal to Strategic Impact EvaluationДегтеревД. А.DegterevD. A.

Дегтерев Денис Андреевич — доктор политических наук, кандидат экономических наук, доцент, заведующий кафедрой теории и истории международных отношений РУДН; доцент кафедры мировой экономики МГИМО (У) МИД России

117198, г. Москва, ул. Миклухо-Маклая, д. 6

Denis A. Degterev — Doctor of Sciences (Political Science), PhD (Economy), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and History of International Relations, RUDN University; Associate Professor, Department of World Economy, MGIMO University

Miklukho-Maklaya str.6, Moscow, 117198

degterev-da@rudn.ruРоссийский университет дружбы народовRUDN University2020191120201215786Copyright © Дегтерев Д.А., 20202020Дегтерев Д.А.Degterev D.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/35

Многомиллиардные объемы помощи развитию, оказываемой международными донорами странам-реципиентам, обусловливают необходимость разработать механизмы оценки эффективности подобных проектов. Критерии оценки при этом существенно разнятся и зависят от целеполагания и интересов стран-доноров, продвигаемых посредством содействия международному развитию (СМР).

Данная статья посвящена анализу систем и методик мониторинга и оценки эффективности оказания международной помощи, используемых ведущими мировыми донорами. Показан переход от оценки эффективности помощи к более комплексному анализу эффективности развития в теории и практике СМР, а также к включению индикаторов дипломатической деятельности и безопасности в систему оценки помощи.

Особое внимание уделено иерархии целеполагания в системе СМР. На примере США показано несколько уровней целеполагания — от Стратегии национальной безопасности до планирования отдельных проектов и программ. Проанализированы возможности применения зарубежного опыта оценки проектов помощи в Российской Федерации.

A sheer volume of multibillion concessional flows from leading international donors makes monitoring and evaluation of aid projects a sine qua non of development discourse and practice. The assessment criteria vary significantly and depend on the objectives and interests of donor countries promoted through development cooperation.

This paper examines national systems of monitoring and evaluation of aid effectiveness established by leading donors. Among the most noticeable recent trends the author emphasizes a transition from aid effectiveness to development effectiveness paradigm and an inclusion of indicators of diplomatic engagement and security provision in evaluation matrices.

Special attention is paid on the hierarchy of goals in national systems of development cooperation, which is illustrated with an example of the United States. The US case shows key principles of ensuring policy coherence at different levels of goal-setting — from the National Security Strategy to planning individual projects and programs. In conclusion the author shares his view on the applicability of foreign experience in evaluating development assistance projects in the Russian Federation.

международная помощьсодействие международному развитиюоценкаэффективностьдонорнациональные интересыпрограммы помощиагентства по оказанию помощиdevelopment cooperationforeign aidevaluationaid effectiv nessdonornational interestsassistance programsaid agenciesИсследование подготовлено при финансовой поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований в рамках научного проекта № 17-37-01018-ОГН.The reported study was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research according to the research project 17-37-01018-OGN.ReferencesБартенев В.И. Специфика подходов администрации Д. Трампа к стратегическому использованию ресурсов внешней помощи в нестабильных регионах мира (на примере Ближнего Востока и Северной Африки) // Меняющийся Запад и его роль в регулировании глобальных процессов / Ред. колл.: К.Р. Вода, К.А. Годованюк, А.А. Давыдов и др. Серия: Мировое развитие. Вып. 21. М.: ИМЭМО РАН, 2019. С. 168–178. DOI: 10.20542/9785-9535-0569-7.Bartenev V.I. 2019. Spetsifi ka podkhodov administratsii D. Trampa k strategicheskomu ispol’zovaniyu resursov vneshnei pomoshchi v nestabil’nykh regionakh mira (na primere Blizhnego Vostoka i Severnoi Afriki) [The Trump administration’s approach towards strategic use of foreign aid resources in unstable regions: The case of the Middle East and North Africa]. In K.R. Voda, K.A. Godovanyuk, A.A. Davydov (eds.). Menyayushchiisya Zapad i ego rol’ v regulirovanii global’nykh protsessov (Mirovoe razvitie. Vyp. 21) [The changing West and its role in global regulation (Global development, iss. 21)]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN Publ., pp. 168–178. DOI:10.20542/978-5-9535-0569-7. (In Russ.)Дегтерев Д.А. Основные подходы к оказанию содействия международному развитию // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2011. № 4. С. 99–104.Degterev D.A. 2011. Osnovnye podkhody k okazaniyu sodeistviya mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu [Basic approaches to the international development assistance]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 4, pp. 99–104. (In Russ.)Дегтерев Д.А. Политическая экономия международной помощи // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. 2014. № 4. С. 26–35.Degterev D.A. 2014. Politicheskaya ekonomiya mezhdunarodnoi pomoshchi [Political economy of foreign aid]. World Economy and International Relations, no. 4, pp. 26–35. (In Russ.)Дегтерев Д.А. Содействие международному развитию как инструмент продвижения внешнеполитических и внешнеэкономических интересов // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. 2012. № 1. C. 47–58.Degterev D.A. 2012. Sodeistvie mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu kak instrument prodvizheniya vneshnepoliticheskikh i vneshneekonomicheskikh interesov [Game-theoretic analysis of international development assistance regimes]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2, pp. 47–58. (In Russ.)Дегтерев Д.А., Ли Я., Трусова А.А., Черняев М.С. Приоритетные направления российской и китайской помощи в целях развития странам Азии и Африки: сравнительно-сопоставительный анализ // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. 2018. Т. 18. № 4. С. 888–905.Degterev D.A., Li Ya., Trusova A.A., Chernyaev M.S. 2018. Prioritetnye napravleniya rossiiskoi i kitaiskoi pomoshchi v tselyakh razvitiya stranam Azii i Afriki: sravnitel’no-sopostavitel’nyi analiz [Priorities of Russian and Chinese development cooperation to Asia and Africa: A comparative analysis]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 888–905. (In Russ.)Ермолов М.О. Российский механизм международной помощи: незавершенный проект // Вестник международных организаций. 2015. Т. 10. № 3. С. 134–155.Ermolov M.O. 2015. Rossiiskii mekhanizm mezhdunarodnoi pomoshchi: nezavershennyi proekt [The Russian framework for international assistance: An unfinished plan]. International Organisations Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 134–155. (In Russ.)Максимова А.В. Смена приоритетов в стратегиях ведущих доноров международной помощи в 2014–2016 гг.: цели устойчивого развития и фактор безопасности // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Международные отношения. 2016. Т. 16. № 3. С. 521–537.Maksimova A.V. 2016. Smena prioritetov v strategiyakh vedushchikh donorov mezhdunarodnoi pomoshchi v 2014–2016 gg.: tseli ustoichivogo razvitiya i faktor bezopasnosti [Changing priorities in strategic documents of donor countries in 2014–2016: Security, sustainable development agenda and other factors]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 521–537. (In Russ.)Максимова А.В. Что ценим, то и оцениваем: оценка результативности содействия международному развитию // Вестник международных организаций. 2015. Т. 10. № 1. С. 56–79.Maksimova A.V. 2015. Chto tsenim, to i otsenivaem: otsenka rezul’tativnosti sodeistviya mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu [Measure what you treasure: Evaluating the effectiveness of development assistance]. International Organisations Research Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 56–79. (In Russ.)Alesina A., Dollar D. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? // Journal of Economic Growth. 2000. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 33–65.Alesina A., Dollar D. 2000. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 33–65.Ankersen C., Klimburg A. Civil-military cooperation and the 3D approach — myth or reality? Austrian Institute for International Affairs. Final Report. 2012. Available at: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/324640/publication.html (accessed: 08.05.2020).Ankersen C., Klimburg A. 2012. Civil-military cooperation and the 3D approach — myth or reality? Austrian Institute for International Affairs. Final Report. Available at: http://publications.gc.ca/site/eng/324640/publication.html (accessed: 08.05.2020).Boschini A., Olofsgard A. Foreign aid: An instrument for fighting poverty or communism? Working Paper Series. 2002. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313062 (accessed: 08.05.2020).Boschini A., Olofsgard A. 2002. Foreign aid: An instrument for fighting poverty or communism? Working Paper Series. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313062 (accessed: 08.05.2020).Carlsson J., Kohlin G., Ekbom A. The political economy of evaluation. International aid agencies and the effectiveness of aid. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994.Carlsson J., Kohlin G., Ekbom A. 1994. The political economy of evaluation. International aid agencies and the effectiveness of aid. New York, St. Martin’s Press.Dreher A., Sturm J.-E., Vreeland J. Development aid and international politics: Does membership on the UN Security Council influence World Bank decisions? // Journal of Development Economics. 2009. Vol. 88. No. 1. P. 1–18.Dreher A., Sturm J.-E., Vreeland J. 2009. Development aid and international politics: Does membership on the UN Security Council influence World Bank decisions? Journal of Development Economics, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 1–18.He W. From ‘aid effectiveness’ to ‘development effectiveness’: Evolution of aid concepts and role of Chinese experience // West Asia and Africa. 2011. Vol. 9. P. 120–135.He W. 2011. From ‘aid effectiveness’ to ‘development effectiveness’: Evolution of aid concepts and role of Chinese experience. West Asia and Africa, vol. 9, pp. 120–135.Huntington S. Foreign aid: For what and for whom // Foreign policy. 2010. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/12/30/foreign_aid_for_what_and_for_whom (accessed: 08.05.2020).Huntington S. 2010. Foreign aid: For what and for whom. Foreign policy. Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/12/30/foreign_aid_for_what_and_for_whom (accessed: 08.05.2020).Kindornay S., Morton B. Development effectiveness: Towards new understandings. Issues Brief. Development Cooperation Series. Ottawa: North-South Institute, 2009. Available at: http://www.nsi-ins.ca/publications/development-effectiveness-towards-new-understandings/ (accessed: 08.05.2020).Kindornay S., Morton B. 2009. Development effectiveness: Towards new understandings. Issues Brief. Development Cooperation Series. Ottawa, NorthSouth Institute. Available at: http://www.nsi-ins.ca/publications/developmenteffectiveness-towards-new-understandings/ (accessed: 08.05.2020).Kuziemko I., Werker E. How much is a seat on the Security Council worth? Foreign aid and bribery at the United Nations // Journal of Political Economy. 2006. Vol. 114. No. 5. P. 905–930.Kuziemko I., Werker E. 2006. How much is a seat on the Security Council worth? Foreign aid and bribery at the United Nations. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 905–930.Lawson M.L. Does foreign aid work? Efforts to evaluate U.S. foreign assistance. Congressional Research Service Report 42827, 2016.Lawson M.L. 2016. Does foreign aid work? Efforts to evaluate U.S. foreign assistance. Congressional Research Service Report.Liska G. The new statecraft foreign aid in American policy. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1960.Liska G. 1960. The new statecraft foreign aid in American policy. Chicago, University of Chicago.Lockhart C. From aid effectiveness to development effectiveness: Strategy and policy coherence in fragile states. Overseas Development Institute, 2005. Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publicationsopinion-files/4829.pdf (accessed: 08.05.2020).Lockhart C. 2005. From aid effectiveness to development effectiveness: Strategy and policy coherence in fragile states. Overseas Development Institute. Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publicationsopinion-files/4829.pdf (accessed: 08.05.2020).Morgenthau H. A political theory of foreign aid // The American Political Science Review. 1962. Vol. 56. No. 2. P. 301–309.Morgenthau H. 1962. A political theory of foreign aid. The American Political Science Review, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 301–309.Nye J. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs, 2004.Nye J. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, Public Affairs.Picciotto R., Alao Ch., Ikpe E. et al. Striking a new balance: Donor policy coherence and development cooperation in difficult partnerships. Global Policy Project. London: IPI, 2004. Available at: https://gsdrc.org/document-library/striking-a-new-balance-donor-policy-coherence-and-development-cooperationin-difficult-environments/ (accessed: 08.05.2020).Picciotto R., Alao Ch., Ikpe E. et al. 2004. Striking a new balance: Donor policy coherence and development cooperation in difficult partnerships. Global Policy Project. London, IPI. Available at: https://gsdrc.org/document-library/striking-a-new-balance-donor-policy-coherence-and-development-cooperationin-difficult-environments/ (accessed: 08.05.2020).Quibria M. Development effectiveness: What does the recent research tell us? OED Working Paper 1. Asian Development Bank, 2004. Available at: https://www.adb.org/documents/development-effectiveness-what-does-recentresearch-tell-us (accessed: 08.05.2020).Quibria M. 2004. Development effectiveness: What does the recent research tell us? OED Working Paper 1. Asian Development Bank. Available at: https://www.adb.org/documents/development-effectiveness-what-does-recentresearch-tell-us (accessed: 08.05.2020).Rubbelke D.T. Foreign aid and global public goods: Impure publicness, cost differentials and negative conjectures // International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2005. Vol. 5. P. 151–173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-004-7093-5 (accessed: 08.05.2020).Rubbelke D.T. 2005. Foreign aid and global public goods: Impure publicness, cost differentials and negative conjectures. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, vol. 5, pp. 151–173. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-004-7093-5 (accessed: 08.05.2020).White H. An introduction to the use of randomized control trials to evaluate development interventions // Journal of Development Effectiveness. 2011. Vol. 5. No. 1. P. 30–49. DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2013.764652.White H. 2011. An introduction to the use of randomized control trials to evaluate development interventions. Journal of Development Effectiveness, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–49. DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2013.764652.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.