The 2019 Social Protests in Latin America: Global Context and Ecuadorian Case-Study

The paper examines the phenomenon of global social protests that spread in 2019 across more than 20 countries. The author considers the most striking manifestations of this phenomenon that occurred in the Middle East, North Africa, Western Europe, and Asia. The paper provides a periodization of several waves of anti-globalization movement in the 21st century, whereby the current global unrest represents the third wave. The author identifies specific features of each stage and outlines a growing trend towards politicization and exacerbation of violence. Particular emphasis is made on how the protests in Latin America developed in time and space, as they spread to at least eight states of the region: Haiti, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, and Columbia. In each country, protests were triggered by a peculiar set of internal factors which are not susceptible to easy generalization. In order to come nearer to the understanding of the new global phenomenon the author puts forward several socio-philosophical hypotheses. In particular, the possibility of internationalization of the French ‘yellow vests’ movement, its transfer and adaptation to other countries affected by protests, is noted. In that regard the paper outlines certain ‘channels’ for exporting the French protests to Latin America, including migration and cultural ties. The author stresses that although socio-economic explanations of the global protest phenomenon that focus on such issues as the growth of inequality and social polarization, are correct, they are insufficient for a comprehensive understanding of the new and complex phenomenon. As an alternative, the author suggests using the concept of ‘social singularity’. The paper considers the key features of this concept, including the idea that contemporary global social sphere is functioning in an online mode, allowing for increased speed of social interaction and communication on a global scale. Finally, the paper examines the causes and the development of the social unrest that broke out in Ecuador and served as a starting point for escalating the protest movement in Latin America in 2019.

global protests, ‘yellow vests’, anti-globalism, Latin America, conflict triggers, social singularity, Ecuador, ‘Civil Revolution’, Indian movements, IMF, neoliberalism

1. Abramova M.G. 2020. Latinskaya Amerika — prosnuvshiisya vulkan? (vzglyad iz Evrosoyuza) [Latin America — awakened volcano? (View from the European Union)]. Evropeyskii soyuz: fakty i kommentarii, no. 98, pp. 120–123. (In Russ.)

2. Borejko A.N. 2018. Kontseptsiya prav cheloveka i sotrudnichestvo Kuby s Venesueloj i Ekvadorom v sotsial’noi sfere [The concept of human rights and cooperation of Cuba with Venezuela and Ecuador in social sphere]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 6, pp. 19–29. (In Russ.)

3. Borzova A.Yu., Savicheva E.M. 2017. Osobennosti arabskoi migratsii v strany Latinskoi Ameriki [The main characters of Arab migration to Latin America]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 8, pp. 48–59. (In Russ.)

4. Burmo D., Lapina N.Yu. 2019. Dvizhenie ‘zheltykh zhiletov’: vzglyad iz Rossii i Frantsii. [Movement of ‘Yellow Vests’: View from Russia and France]. Rossiya i sovremennyi mir, no. 3 (104), pp. 37–63. DOI: 10.31249/rsm/2019.03.03. (In Russ.)

5. Vizgunova Yu.I., Vorotnikova T.A., Dabagyan E.S. et al. 2017. Politicheskie konflikty v Latinskoi Amerike: vyzovy stabil’nosti i novye vozmozhnosti [Political conflicts in Latin America: Challenges of stability and new opportunities]. Moscow, ILA RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Vorotnikova T.A. 2019. Levye rezhimy v Bolivii i Ekvadore: desyat’ otlichii [Left regimes in Bolivia and Ecuador: Ten differences]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 11, pp. 15–25. (In Russ.)

7. Galibina-Lebedeva E.S. 2019. Presledovanie Dzhuliana Assanzha kak otrazhenie finansovoi zavisimosti Ekvadora ot SShA [Julian Assange persecution as a reflection of Ecuador’s financial dependence on the United States]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 9, pp. 38–50. (In Russ.)

8. Davydov V.M. 2019. Ustoichivoe razvitie kak obshchii znamenatel’ [Sustainable development as a common denominator]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, no. 10, pp. 32–45. (In Russ.)

9. Diyakova L.V. 2018. Chili: reviziya starykh kompromissov [Chile: Revision of old compromises]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 2, pp. 5–15. (In Russ.)

10. Korotaev A.V., Shishkina A.R., Isaev L.M. 2016. Arabskaya vesna kak trigger global’nogo fazovogo perekhoda? [Arab spring as a global phase transition trigger]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 3, pp. 108–122. (In Russ.)

11. Korotaev A.V., Shishkina A.R., Lukhmanova Z.T. 2017. Volna global’noi sotsial’no-politicheskoi destabilizatsii 2011–2015 gg.: kolichestvennii analiz [The global socio-political destabilization wave of 2011 and the following years: A quantitative analysis]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 6, pp. 150–168. (In Russ.)

12. Kudeyarova N.Yu. 2017. Epokha massovykh migratsii v Latinskoi Amerike: globalizatsiya vs lokalizatsiya [The mass migration epoch in Latin America: Globalization vs. localization]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 2, pp. 76–91. (In Russ.)

13. Kuznetsova A.V. 2019. Levoradikal’nye politicheskie partii i dvizheniya Kanady [Radical left political parties and movements in Canada]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya: Politologiya, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 58–66. (In Russ.)

14. Lunev S.I. 2015. Sotsial’nye protesty v Indii [Social protests in India]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 4 (43), pp. 198–207. (In Russ.)

15. Manukhin А.А. 2019. SShA i vooruzhennye sily stran Latinskoi Ameriki: v poiskakh novykh form vliyaniya [The United States and the Latin American military: In search for new forms of influence]. Possiya i Amerika v XXI veke, no. 1, p. 14. DOI: 10.18254/S207054760004711-9.

16. Okuneva L.S. 2020. Latinskaya Amerika prishla v dvizhenie: v chem smysl sotsial’nykh protestov oktyabrya 2019 goda? [Latin America has set in motion: What is the meaning of social protests in October 2019?]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 1, pp. 8–21. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0007755-9. (In Russ.)

17. Popova A.V., Abramova M.G. 2018. Tekhnologicheskaya singulyarnost’ kak tochka nevozvrata: nazad v budushchee? (filosofsko-pravovoi vzglyad) [Technological singularity as a point of no return: Back to the future? (philosophical legal view)]. Rossiiskii zhurnal pravovykh issledovanii, no. 3 (16), pp. 39–47. (In Russ.)

18. Pyatakov A.N. 2007. Latinoamerikanskii al’terglobalizm — novyi faktor v regional’noi politike [Latin American alterglobalism — a new factor in regional politics]. Moscow, ILA RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

19. Pyatakov A.N. 2017. Pobeda Lenina Moreno v Ekvadore [Lenin’s Moreno’s victory in Ecuador]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 6, pp. 17–27. (In Russ.)

20. Rozental’ D.M. 2019. Anatomiya politicheskogo krizisa v Venesuele [The anatomy of the political crisis in Venezuela]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, no. 1 (56), pp. 22–33. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2019-1-22-33. (In Russ.)

21. Sergeev S.A. 2018. Sotsial’nye dvizheniya i levye radikaly v nachale XXI veka [Social movements and left radicals at the beginning of the XXI century]. Upravlenie ustoichivym razvitiem, no. 4 (17), pp. 83–89. (In Russ.)

22. Strel’tsov D.V. (ed.). 2016. Sotsial’nyi protest na sovremennom Vostoke [Social protest in the modern East]. Moscow, MGIMO, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ.)

23. Taleb N. 2009. Chernyi lebed’. Pod znakom nepredskazuemosti [Black swan. Under the sign of unpredictability]. Moscow, KoLibri Publ. (In Russ.)

24. Kharlamenko E.N. 2003. Klassovye i sotsial’nye otnosheniya kak sfery obshchestvennoi real’nosti [Class and social relations as spheres of society reality]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

25. Kheifets V., Khadorich L. 2019. Soyuz yuzhnoamerikanskikh natsii: tumannye perspectivy [Union of South American Nations: Clouded prospects]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 85–93. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-2-85-93. (In Russ.)

26. Chernyshev A.L. 2020. Postelektoral’nii krizis 2019 g. v Bolivii: regional’nii faktor i rol’ silovykh struktur [2019 post-electoral crisis in Bolivia: The regional factor and the role of the law enforcement agencies]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 1, pp. 22–32. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0007756-0. (In Russ.)

27. Shinkarenko A.A. 2019. Ekvador na puti k postekstraktivistskoi real’nosti [Ecuador on the route to post-extraсtivism’s reality]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 3, pp. 38–49. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0004002-1. (In Russ.)

28. Shumakov A.A. 2019. ‘Zheltye zhilety’: genezis dvizheniya [‘Yellow Vests’: The genesis of the movement]. Izvestiya Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 1, pp. 19–32. (In Russ.)

29. Yakovlev P.P. 2018. Ispaniya na krutom politicheskom virazhe [Spain on a steep political U-turn]. Svobodnaya mysl’, no. 4 (1670), pp. 99–112. (In Russ.)

30. Astakhova E.V. 2016. Particularidades del discurso politico del partido español PODEMOS. Iberoamerica, no. 1, pp. 117–133.

31. Billion D., Ventura Ch. 2020. Por qué protesta tanta gente a la vez? Nueva sociedad, no. 286, pp. 37–52.

32. Borders M. 2018. The social singularity: How decentralization will allow us to transcend politics, create global prosperity, and avoid the robot apocalypse. Social Evolution.

33. Galtung J. 1995. Conflict resolution as conflict transformation: The first law of thermodynamics revisited. In Rupesinghe K. (ed.). Conflict transformation. London, Macmillan.

34. Khenkin S. 2016. Sistema político de España: transformación radical. Iberoamerica, no. 1, pp. 99–116.

35. Mitchell R., Christopher R. 2002. Beyond resolution: What does conflict transformation actually transform? Peace and Conflict Studies, vol. 9, no. 1.

36. Ohmae K. 1999. The borderless world. Power and strategy in the interlinked economy. London, HarperBusiness.