Debates on Changes in the Foreign Policy of Contemporary China (A Case Study of the English Language Academic Publications)

Due to a rapid economic growth over the past several decades China has significantly strengthened its international positions. This growth in its own turn was to a large extent due to a pragmatic and sound foreign strategy that the country has been pursuing since mid-1970s. However, in recent years both within and outside China there has been an on-going debate on the alleged radical transformation of the PRC’s perceptions of its national interests, its place in world politics, and its foreign policy. The variety of opinions becomes increasingly complicated as the number of discussants grows and new arguments are adduced in support of different positions. Whereas outside China this debate structures around the narrative of the Chinese assertiveness, within the country the main dispute is between the advocates of a traditional policy of ‘keeping a low profile’ (taoguang yanghui) and proponents of a new ‘striving for achievements’ (fenfa youwei) strategy. The present paper aims to provide a framework for a systematization of debates on the contemporary foreign policy of China in the English language academic literature based on two criteria: whether a researcher admits that the Chinese foreign policy is changing and how he assesses implications of these changes. Such an approach undoubtedly entails certain schematization of the presented views and arguments. However, it differs favorably from traditional, more narrative approaches to conceptualization of the debate since it establishes a clear, transparent theoretical framework aimed to identify the substantive core of the presented views. This, in turn, can bring about a better understanding of the current state and possible evolution of Chinese foreign policy in general. The author concludes that although these debates are far from being over, most researchers admit the PRC’s foreign policy strategy is undergoing a radical transformation. Since the latter half of 2000s there has been a steady trend in the foreign policy of China towards greater assertiveness. At the same time this transformation ensures continuity of the basic principles of Chinese diplomacy. All this means that further debates on the Chinese foreign policy should focus primarily on potential implications of this transformation for the PRC, the regional dynamics and international relations system as a whole.

1. Grachikov E. N. 2015a. Vneshnyaya politika Kitaya: strategii v kontekste identichnosti i global’noi perspektivy [China’s foreign policy: Strategies in the context of identity and global perspective]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 3, pp. 290-306. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.3.14641. (In Russ.)

2. Grachikov E. N. 2015b. Geopolitika Kitaya: egotsentrizm i prostranstvo setei [Geopolitics of China: Egocentrism and space of networks]. Moscow, Rusains Publ. DOI: 10.15216/978-5-4365-0419-3. (In Russ.)

3. Denisov I. E. 2017. Vnesh nyaya politika Kitaya pri Si Tszin’pine: preemstvennost’ i novatorstvo [China’s foreign policy under Xi Jinping: Continuity and innovation]. Outlines o f Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 83-98. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2017-10-5-83-98. (In Russ.)

4. Korsun V. A. 2002. Vneshnyaya politika Kitaya na poroge XXI veka [China’s foreign policy on the threshold of the XXI century]. Moscow, MGIMO Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Leksyutina Ya. V. 2014. Novoe soderzhanie vneshnei politiki Kitaya kak otrazhenie usileniya ego natsional’noi moshchi [New content of Chinese foreign policy as a reflection of its growing national power]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University, series 6, no. 2, pp. 138-145. (In Russ.)

6. Luzyanin S. G. 2012a. Vneshnyaya politika Kitaya v global’nom i regional’nom izmerenii [China’s foreign policy in global and regional aspects]. VestnikRossiyskoy akademii nauk, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 307-322. (In Russ.)

7. Luzyanin S. G. 2012b. Kitai: vneshnepoliticheskie orientiry (2012-2022). Prognozno-analiticheskie stsenarii [China: Foreign policy guidelines (2012­-2022). Forecasting and analytical scenarios]. VestnikSibirskoy akademiiprava, ekonomiki i upravleniya, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4-11. (In Russ.)

8. Lukin A. V. 2019. Diskussiya o razvitii Kitaya i perspektivy ego vneshnei politiki [Discussion on the development of China and prospects for its foreign policy]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 1, pp. 71-89. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.01.06. (In Russ.)

9. Mamonov M. 2010. Inertsiya i novatsii vo vneshnei politike Kitaya [Change and continuity in China’s foreign policies]. International Trends, vol. 8, no. 3 (24), pp. 40-56. (In Russ.)

10. Voskresenskii A.D. (ed.). 2019. M odel’ razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: otsenki, diskussii, prognozy [Model of development of modern China: Assessments, discussions, forecasts]. Moscow, MGIMO Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Portyakov V. Ya. 2011. Vneshnepoliticheskii instrumentarii Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki v protsesse peremen [The PRC foreign policy tools in the process of modification]. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, no. 1, pp. 135-149. (In Russ.)

12. Portyakov V. Ya. 2012. Vneshnepoliticheskie zavety Den Syaopina i ikh sovremennaya interepretatsiya [Deng Xiaoping’s foreign policy precepts and their modern interpretation]. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, no. 5, pp. 14-27. (In Russ.)

13. Portyakov V. Ya. 2019. O sovremennoi vneshnei politike KNR [On modern foreign policy of the PRC]. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, no. 1, pp. 13-21. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120003917-9. (In Russ.)

14. Bhattacharya A. 2015. Chinese sphere of influence in the Asian region. In: Gaur M. (ed.). Studies on China. Country-specific study project. New Delhi, Foreign Policy Research Centre, no. 3, pp. 77-85.

15. Bisley N. 2011. Biding and hiding no longer: A more assertive China rattles the region. Global Asia, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 62-73.

16. Callahan W. A. 2004. National insecurities: Humiliation, salvation and Chinese nationalism. Alternatives, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 199-218. DOI: 10.1177/030437540402900204.

17. Chen D., Pu X., Johnston A. 2013/2014. Debating China’s assertiveness. International Security, vol. 38, по 3, pp. 176-183. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_c_00151.

18. Chen D., Wang J. 2011. Lying low no more? China’s new thinking on the Tao Guang Yang Hui strategy. China: An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 195-216. DOI: 10.1142/S0219747211000136.

19. Diamond L., Schell O. (eds.). 2018. Chinese influence & American interests. Promoting constructive vigilance. Report of the working group on Chinese influence activities in the United States. Stanford, California, Hoover Institution at Leland Stanford Junior University.

20. Huiyun Feng, Kai He, Yan Xietong (eds.). 2019. Chinese scholars and foreign policy. Debating international policy. Routledge.

21. Christensen T. J. 2011. The advantages of an assertive China: Responding to Beijing’s abrasive diplomacy. Foreign Affairs, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 54-67.

22. Chubb A. 2020/2021. PRC assertiveness in the South China Sea. Measuring continuity and change, 1970-2015. International Security, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 79-121. DOI: 10.1162/isec_a_00400.

23. De Spiegeleire S., Chivot E. 2013. Assessing assertions of assertiveness. Are China and Russia really becoming more assertive? HCSS Strategic Monitor. HCSS. DOI: 10.13140/2.1.2697.6322.

24. Demir E. 2019. Understanding the transformation in Chinese foreign policy: A historical evaluation from 1949 to 2019. Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies (CJAS), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 6-24. DOI: 10.38154/cjas.11.

25. Feng H., He K. 2014. Examining China’s assertiveness through the eyes of Chinese IR scholars. RSIS Working Paper, no 281.

26. Ferdinand P. 2016. Westward ho — the China dream and ‘One Belt, One Road’: Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 941-957. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12660.

27. Glaser B. S., Dooley B. 2009. China’s 11th ambassadorial conference signals continuity and change in foreign policy. China Brief, vol. 9, no. 22, pp. 7-11.

28. Grossman M. 2005. Role theory and foreign policy change: The transformation of Russian foreign policy in the 1990s. International Politics, vol. 42, pp. 334-351.

29. He K., Huiyun F. 2012. Debating China’s assertiveness: Taking China’s power and interests seriously. International Politics, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 633-644. DOI: 10.1057/ip.2012.18.

30. He K., Huiyun F. 2013. Xi Jinping’s operational code beliefs and China’s foreign policy. Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 209­-231. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pot010.

31. Hermann C.F. 1990. Changing course: When governments choose to redirect foreign policy. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 3-21. DOI: 10.2307/2600403.

32. Hollandsworth J. G. Jr. 1977. Differentiating assertion and aggression: Some behavioral guidelines. Behavior Therapy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 347-352. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(78)80140-3.

33. Hoo T. B. 2017. Hardening the hard, softening the soft: Assertiveness and China’s regional strategy. Journal o f Strategic Studies, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 639-662. DOI: 10.4324/9781315628981-1.

34. Hoo T. B., Mingjiang L., Char J. 2017. Introduction to the special issue: New trends in Chinese foreign policy. Asian Security, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 81-83. DOI: 10.1080/14799855.2017.1286158.

35. Hung-Jen W. 2018. China’s assertive relational strategies: Engagement, boycotting, reciprocation, and pressing. Issues & Studies, vol. 54, no. 3. DOI: 10.1142/S1013251118500066.

36. Jerden B. 2014. The assertive China narrative: Why it is wrong and how so many still bought into it. The Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47-88. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pot019.

37. Johnston A. I. 2013. How new and assertive is China’s new assertiveness? International Security, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 7-48.

38. Kaufman A. A. 2010. The ‘century of humiliation’, then and now: Chinese perceptions of the international order. Pacific Focus, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1976-5118.2010.01039.x.

39. Kerr P., Harris S., Yaqing Q. 2008. China’s new diplomacy: Tactical or fundamental change? Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.

40. Lam W. W.-L. 2007. Chinese politics in the Hu Jintao Era: New leaders, new challenges. New York, M.E. Sharpe. DOI: 10.2307/20066347.

41. Lang K. 2004. Did China’s foreign policy really change in the post-Cold War era? Taiwan Journal o f Political Science, no. 21, pp. 19-47. (In Chinese.)

42. Liu R., Liu F. 2016. To ally or not to ally? Debating China’s non-alliance strategy in the 21st century. Griffith Asia University. Working Paper Series, no. 2.

43. Lootz M. 2014. China’s new assertiveness in foreign affairs. Strategic Outlook.

44. Mastro O. S. 2015. Why Chinese assertiveness is here to stay. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 151-170. DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2014.1002161.

45. Nien-Chung C. L. 2016. The sources of China’s assertiveness: The system, domestic politics or leadership preferences? International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 817-833. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12655.

46. Nien-Chung C. L. 2018. Winds of change: Assessing China’s assertive turn in foreign policy. Journal o f Asian and African Studies, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 880-895. DOI: 10.1177/0021909618762477.

47. Onnis B. 2014. The new ‘selective diplomacy’ of the People’s Republic of China: Towards a ‘partial’ interference in global affairs? In: The Quandaries of China’s Domestic and Foreign Development. Lodz, Lodz University Press, pp. 43-57.

48. Pang Z. 2020. From Tao Guang Yang Hui to Xin Xing. China’s complex foreign policy transformation and Southeast Asia. Trends in Southeast Asia, no. 7. Singapore, ISEAS — Yusof Ishak Institute.

49. Poh A., Li M. 2017. A China in transition: The rhetoric and substance of Chinese foreign policy under Xi Jinping. Asian Security, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 84-97. DOI: 10.1080/14799855.2017.1286163.

50. Qin Y. 2014. Continuity through change: Background knowledge and China’s international strategy. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 285-314. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pou034.

51. Reeves J. 2013. China’s unraveling engagement strategy. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 139-149. DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2013.861720.

52. Rosenau J. N. 1976. Restlessness, change and foreign policy analysis. In Rosenau J.N. (ed.). Search o f global patterns. New York, Free Press, pp. 369-376.

53. Shi Y. 2018. Diplomacy with ‘correct conception’. ARCID China Update, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99-101.

54. Sorensen C. T. N. 2015. The significance of Xi Jinping’s ‘Chinese dream’ for Chinese foreign policy: From ‘Tao Guang Yang Hui’ to ‘Fen Fa You Wei’. Journal o f China and International Relations, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53-73. DOI: 10.5278/ojs.jcir.v3i1.1146.

55. Yuyan Zhang (ed.). 2020. Study on international politics in contemporary China. Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co.

56. Su C. 2009. On China’s overseas interests. World Economics and Politics, no. 8, pp. 13-20.

57. Swaine M. D. 2010. China’s assertive behavior. Part 1: On ‘core interests’. China Leadership Monitor, no. 34.

58. Swaine M. D. 2011. China’s assertive behavior. Part 2: The maritime periphery. China Leadership Monitor, no. 35.

59. Swaine M. D. 2012. China’s assertive behavior. Part 3: The role of the military in foreign policy. China Leadership Monitor, no. 36.

60. Turcsanyi R. Q. 2018. The puzzle of Chinese assertiveness. In: Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea. Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-29.

61. Volgy T. J., Schwarz J. E. 1994. Foreign policy restructuring and the myriad webs of restraint. In: Rosati J.A., Hagan J.D., Sampson M.W. III (eds.). Foreign policy restructuring: How governments respond to global change. Columbia, S. C., University of South Carolina Press, pp. 22-42.

62. Wang H. 2014. From ‘Taoguang Yanghui’ to ‘Yousuo Zuowei’: China’s engagement in financial minilateralism. CIGI Paper, no. 52, pp. 1-10.

63. Xiong G. 2010. China’s diplomatic strategy: Implication and translation of ‘Tao Guang Yang Hui’. International Strategic Studies, no. 4, pp. 1-4.

64. Xu J. 2016. Debates in IR academia and China’s policy adjustments. The Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 459-485. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pow014.

65. Xu J., Du Z. 2015. The dominant thinking sets in Chinese foreign policy research: A criticism. The Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 251-279. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pov002.

66. Xuetong Y. 2014. From keeping a low profile to striving for achievement. The Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 153-184. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pou027.

67. Xuetong Y. 2013. New values for new international norms. China International Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 15-28.

68. Ye Z. 2002. On ‘keeping a low profile’ and ‘get some things done’. Pacific Journal, no. 1, pp. 62-66.

69. Zhang B. 2010. Chinese foreign policy in transition: Trends and implications. Journal o f Current Chinese Affairs, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 39-68. DOI: 10.1177/186810261003900202.

70. Zhang F. 2012. The Tsinghua approach and the inception of Chinese theories of international relations. Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 73-102. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/por015.

71. Zhang J. 2014. The domestic sources of China’s more assertive foreign policy. International Politics, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 390-397. DOI: 10.1057/ip.2014.11.

72. Zhang S. 2009. Diplomatic management of national overseas interests. World Economics and Politics, no. 8, pp. 6-12.

73. Zhao S. 2011. China’s new foreign policy ‘assertiveness’. Motivations and implications. ISPIAnalysis, no. 54, pp. 1-6.

74. Zheng C. 2016. China debates the non-interference principle. The Chinese Journal o f International Politics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 349-374. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/pow010.

75. Zhou F. 2016. Between assertiveness and self-restraint: Understanding China’s South China Sea policy. International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 869-890. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12657.

76. Zhu L. 2010. China’s foreign policy debates. ISS. Chaillot Papers, no. 121.

77. Zhu Z. 2019. A critical decade. China’s foreign policy (2008-2018). Series on Contemporary China, vol. 46.