The military-political situation in Central Asia in the context of the growing instability in Afghanistan

The Central Asian region due to its economic potential and strategic signifi -cance has traditionally been of particular importance for Russia’s foreign policy. 
It was therefore not surprising that a serious deterioration of the political situation in Afghanistan in summer-autumn 2021 caused by the military defeat and the subsequent collapse of the pro-Western regime followed by the seizure of power by the Taliban raised serious concern of the Russian leadership. The developments in Afghanistan have attracted an increasing attention of the expert community, prompting a fl urry of comments and forecasts. Although many of these papers were published hastily, their assessments and conclusion were usually based on the long-term observations. This paper attempts to provide an overview of the military-political situation in the Central Asian region as it was caught by a new crisis in Afghanistan and as it is seen by both Russian and foreign experts. The fi rst section outlines positions and interests of the key regional and non-regional actors that have a signifi cant impact on the military-political situation in Central Asia. The second section examines the response of the Russian Federation to the situation in Afghanistan after the Taliban took power. Finally, the third section provides an overview of the latest expert comments and reports that attempt to assess possible implications of those events for the regional military-political dynamics and the national security interests of the Russian Federation.

1. Anashkina E.B. 2021. Integratsiya gosudarstv Tsentral’noi Azii i pozitsiya SShA [U.S. foreign policy interests in the integration of Central Asian states]. USA & Canada: Economy, Politics, Culture, vol. 4, no. 51 (4), pp. 34–45. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300014337-0. (In Russ.)

2. Belobrov Yu.Ya. 2019. Voenno-politicheskaya kooperatsiya gosudarstv v formatakh SNG i ODKB na sovremennom etape [Military-political cooperation of states in the formats of the CIS and the CSTO at the present stage]. Vestnik Diplomaticheskoi akademii MID Rossii, no. 3 (21), pp. 6–23. (In Russ.)

3. Blokhina A.O. 2017. Institutsional’nye izmeneniya i politicheskaya stabil’nost’ v Kirgizskoi Respublike [Institutional changes and political stability in the Kyrgyz Republic]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6 (57), pp. 102–115. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2017-6-57-102-115. (In Russ.)

4. Vinogradov A.V. 2021. Kitaiskii proekt dlya bol’shoi Evrazii [China’s project for Greater Eurasia]. International Trends, vol. 19, no. 2 (65), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2021.19.2.65.2. (In Russ.)

5. Gegelashvili N.A. 2021. Uzbekistan i Kazakhstan — fokusnye gosudarstva Tsentral’noi Azii v politike Vashingtona [Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan as the focal states of Central Asia in Washington policies towards the region]. USA & Canada: Economy, Politics, Culture, no. 51 (4), pp. 51–68. DOI: 10.31857/ S268667300014782-0. (In Russ.)

6. Grozin A. 2020. Politika i interesy Irana v Tsentral’noi Azii s uchetom ekonomicheskogo i logisticheskogo faktorov [Iran’s policy and interests in Central Asia, with regard to energy and logistical factors]. Geoekonomika Energetiki, no. 3, pp. 106–130. DOI: 10.48137/2687-0703_2020_11_3_106. (In Russ.)

7. Elagin D.P., Mamedova N.M. (eds.). 2020. Ekonomika Afganistana [The economy of Afghanistan]. Moscow, MGIMO-University Publ.

8. Zamaraeva N.A. 2019. KNR i problemy mirnogo uregulirovaniya v Afganistane [The PRC and problems of peaceful settlement in Afghanistan]. Problemy Dalnego Vostoka, no. 3, pp. 41–53. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120005264-1. (In Russ.)

9. Zarudnitskii V.B. 2021. Faktory dostizheniya pobedy v voennykh konfl iktakh budushchego [Victory factors in future military confl icts]. Voennaya mysl’, no. 8, pp. 34–47. (In Russ.)

10. Zverev R., Savin I., Belyaev V. 2018. Rossiisko-kirgizskie otnosheniya: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Russia–Kyrgyzstan relations: History and present day]. Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii, no. 1, pp. 106–125. DOI: 10.20542/2073- 4786-2018-1-106-125. (In Russ.)

11. Naumkin V.V. (ed.). 2013. Interesy Rossii v Tsentral’noi Azii. Soderzhanie, perspektivy, ogranichiteli [Russia’s interests in Central Asia. Content, prospects, constraints]. Moscow, Spetskniga Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Kadyrzhanov R., Abdykaimova N. 2020. Formirovanie natsional’noi identichnosti Kazakhstana v kontekste integratsionnykh otnoshenii s Rossiei [Kazakhstan: National identity in the context of integrational relationships with Russia]. Central Asia and the Caucasus, vol. 23, no. 3. DOI: 10.37178/cac.20.3.04. Available at: https://ca-c.org/online/2020/journal_rus/cac-03/04.shtml (accessed: 20.06.2021). (In Russ.)

13. Karyakin V. 2020. Pantyurkizm: tsivilizatsionnyi proekt sovremennoi Turtsii [Pan-Turkism: A civilizational project of modern Turkey]. Central Asia and the Caucasus, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 31–36. DOI: 10.37178/ca-c.20.3.038. (In Russ.)

14. Kokoshina Z.A. 2018a. Antiterroristicheskie ucheniya Shankhaiskoi organizatsii sotrudnichestva [Shanghai Cooperation Organization anti-terrorism exercises]. The International Aff airs, no. 9, pp. 192–204. (In Russ.)

15. Kokoshina Z.A. 2018b. ODKB i ee rol’ v sovremennoi sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [CSTO and its role in the modern system of international relations]. Moscow, LENAND Publ. (In Russ.)

16. Kokoshina Z.A. 2016. Shankhaiskaya organizatsiya sotrudnichestva i interesy natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossii [Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Russia’s national security interests]. Moscow, LENAND Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Krivopalov A.A. 2021. ODKB na iskhode vtorogo desyatiletiya svoei istorii [CSTO: At the close of the second decade of its history]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 126–134. DOI: 10.20542/0131- 2227-2021-65-7-126-134. (In Russ.)

18. Kudayarov K.A. 2018. Turetskaya politika v Kirgizii i ee vliyanie na vneshnepoliticheskuyu strategiyu Rossii v Kirgizskoi Respublike [Turkish policy in Kirghizia and its impact on the foreign policy strategy of Russia towards the Kyrgyz Republic]. PhD thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)

19. Leksyutina Ya.V. 2020. Kitaiskaya initsiativa ‘Poyas i put’: vyzovy i slozhnosti realizatsii [China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Challenges and diffi culties in its implementation]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 4–19. DOI: 10.21638spbu06.2020.101. (In Russ.)

20. Malyshev D.V. 2021. Postsovetskaya Tsentral’naya Aziya v fokuse interesov krupnykh aziatskikh gosudarstv (2019–2020 gg.) [Post-Soviet Central Asia in the focus of interests of major Asian states (2019–2020)]. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 82–99. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-2-5. (In Russ.)

21. Malyshev D.V. 2011. Revolyutsionnye sobytiya 2010 goda v Kirgizii: osnovnye predposylki i reaktsiya mirovogo soobshchestva [The Kyrgyz revolution of 2010: Background and international reaction]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 1, pp. 130–148. (In Russ.)

22. Malyshev D.V. 2017. Terroristicheskaya ugroza s postsovetskogo Yuga (Tsentral’naya Aziya i Kavkaz) [Terrorist threats coming from the Post-Soviet Central Asia and the Caucasus]. Aktual’nye Problemy Evropy, no. 4, pp. 163–187. (In Russ.)

23. Morozov Yu.V. 2020. Tsentral’naya Aziya kak oblast’ stolknoveniya strategicheskikh interesov SShA, Kitaya i Rossii [Central Asia as an area of collision of strategic interests of the USA, China and Russia]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, no. 5, pp. 6–19. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120012441-6. (In Russ.)

24. Mubarakshin B.N. 2014. Podkhody tsentral’noaziatskikh respublik k realizatsii regional’nogo vodokhozyaistvennogo kompleksa [Central Asian republic’s approaches to the development of the regional hydroeconomic sector]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6 (39), pp. 101–107. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2014-6-39-101-107. (In Russ.)

25. Musavi A.Z., Kurylev K.P. 2020. Politika i opium: puti kontrabandy narkotikov iz Afganistana v Tsentral’nuyu Aziyu [Politics and opium: Drug traffi cking routes from Afghanistan to Central Asia]. Moscow, URSS Publ. (In Russ.)

26. Parkhitko N.P., Kurylev K.P., Stanis D.V. 2020. Voenno-politicheskoe i voenno-tekhnicheskoe sotrudnichestvo gosudarstv Tsentral’noi Azii [Militarypolitical and military-technological cooperation of Central Asian States]. Voennaya mysl’, no. 7, pp. 22–39. (In Russ.)

27. Popov D.S. 2016. Tsentral’naya Aziya vo vneshnei politike SShA. 1991–2016 [Central Asia in the US foreign policy. 1991–2016]. Moscow, RISI Publ. (In Russ.)

28. Mukhametshin F.M. (ed.). 2011. Rossiya — Srednyaya Aziya. T. 2. Politika i islam v XX — nachale XXI v. [Russia — Central Asia. Vol. 2. Politics and Islam in the 20th — early 21st centuries]. Moscow, LENAND Publ. (In Russ.)

29. Rybkin R.Yu. 2018. Strategiya SShA v Tsentral’no-Aziatskom regione [The US strategy in the Central Asian region]. Administrative Consulting, no. 4, pp. 182–187. DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2018-4-182-187. (In Russ.)

30. Tofan A.V. 2016. Strategicheskie interesy SShA, Rossii i Kitaya v Tsentral’noi Azii na sovremennom etape [The strategic interests of the USA, Russia and China in the Central Asia at the present stage]. Interaktivnaya nauka, no. 10, pp. 86–90. DOI: 10.21661/r-115199. (In Russ.)

31. Kheifets B.A., Stepanov N.S. 2019. Initsiativa ‘Poyas i put’ 2.0’ i Rossiya [Belt and Path 2.0 Initiative and Russia]. Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, no. 6, pp. 34–49. DOI: 10.31857/S013128120007999-9. (In Russ.)

32. Shlykov P.V. 2017. Evraziistvo i evraziiskaya integratsiya v politicheskoi ideologii i praktike Turtsii [Eurasianism and Eurasian integration in the political ideologies and practice of Turkey]. Comparative Politics Russia, no. 1, pp. 58–76. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-1-58-76. (In Russ.)

33. Shlykov P.V. 2019. Transformatsiya regional’noi politiki Turtsii v usloviyakh konkurentnoi politsentrichnosti na Blizhnem Vostoke (2000–2010-e gody) [Competitive multipolarity in the Middle East and the transformation of Turkey’s regional policies in the 2000s and 2010s]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 2, pp. 65–106. (In Russ.)

34. Shukuralieva N., Lipin’skii A. 2021. Islamskii ekstremizm i terrorizm v Tsentral’noi Azii: kriticheskii analiz [Islamic extremism and terrorism in Central Asia: A critical analysis]. Central Asia and the Caucasus, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 120–132. DOI: 10.37178/ca-c.21.1.10. (In Russ.)

35. Azizian N. 2021. Easier to get into war than to get out: The case of Afghanistan. The Belfer Center Science and International Aff airs, JFK School, Harvard University.

36. Cordesman A.H. 2021. The new challenges to aid to Afghanistan. Center for strategic & international studies.

37. Emre Sucu A., Iskandarov O.I., Mahmudov R.B., Chernov D.N. 2021. Does Turkey have a Central Asian project? MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 14 (3), pp. 82–96. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-3-78-82-96.

38. Kumar D. 2021. Central Asia’s Afghan predicament. Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defense Studies and Analyses.