The evolution of the Gulf Coopera-tion Council approaches to security issues after the Arab Spring

The painful consequences of political, economic and social shocks provoked by the Arab Spring forced the political elites of the Middle Eastern states to revisit traditional approaches to maintaining stability and security in the region. 
This inevitably aff ected the activities of the Gulf Cooperation Council, which was from the outset established in order to enhance cooperation between the countries of the region primarily in the fi eld of security. This paper attempts to identify the key milestones, factors and trends that have shaped the GCC decision-making process in the security sphere over the past 10 years since the beginning of the Arab Spring. The author shows that the Arab Awakening has encouraged the GCC member-states to deepen military-political integration, aimed at strengthening their defense capabilities, as well as their abilities to respond to external and internal challenges. The author notes that the GCC countries still view Iran as the main source of all these threats; moreover, con-sidering substantial strengthening of Iran’s infl uence in the Middle East their position has even hardened. Tehran is accused of meddling in the internal aff airs of the GCC member-states, supporting illegal Shiite groups operating on their territory, and instigating religious discord. In this context, it is quite natural that the Iran’s nuclear programme is of particular concern to the GCC. At the same time, the author emphasizes, that although the GCC member-states declare common approach towards Iran, their practical actions can vary signifi cantly. In particular, it was Qatar which opposed an excessively hard-line approach towards Iran. This fact, as well as accusations against Doha of supporting terrorist and extremist groups, led to two crises that shook the GCC in the 2010s. However, the fact that these crises have been eventually settled shows that security issues still press regional actors towards strengthening the capacities of the GCC. 
Especially since military threats have been compounded by a new threat — of the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The author concludes that this new threat, which has already incited the GCC to promote cooperation in a health sector, will also strengthen the member-states’ focus on various nonmilitary challenges including epidemiological and environmental ones.

1. al-Malik A.A. 2007. Аl-Mamlaka al-Arabiya al-Saudiya fi mia amm. alSiyasa al-kharidjiya [Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in a hundred years. Foreign policy]. Riyadh, Ministry of Foreign Policy. (In Arabic.)

2. Baranovskii V.G., Naumkin V.V. 2018. Blizhnii Vostok v menyayushchemsya global’nom kontekste: klyuchevye trendy stoletnego razvitiya [The Middle East in a changing global context: The key trends of centennial development]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 5–19. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-5-19. (In Russ.)

3. Naumkin V.V., Popov V.V., Kuznetsov V.A. (eds.). 2012. Blizhnii Vostok, Arabskoe probuzhdenie i Rossiya: chto dal’she? [The Middle East, Arab awakening and Russia: What comes next?]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

4. Evseev V.V., Sazhin V.I. 2009. Iran, uran i rakety [Iran, uranium and missiles]. Moscow, Institute of Middle Eastern Studies Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Kozhanov N.A. 2020. Iran v poiskakh svoego mesta v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Iran in search for its place in international relations]. In: Zvyagelskaya I.D. (ed.). Blizhnii Vostok. Politika i identichnost’ [The Middle East: Politics and identity]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., pp. 235–243. (In Russ.)

6. Naumkin V.V., Malysheva D.B. (eds.). 2015. Konfl ikti i voini XXI veka. Blizhnii Vostok i Severnaya Afrika [Confl icts and wars of the XXI century. The Middle East and Northern Africa]. Moscow, Institute of Middle Eastern Studies Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Kosach G.G. 2019. Saudovskaya Araviya: transformatsiya vlasti i politiki [Saudi Arabia: Transformation of power and policy]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 59–67. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019- 63-4-59-67. (In Russ.)

8. Kosach G.G., Melkumyan E.S. 2012. Sovet sotrudnichestva arabskikh gosudarstv Zaliva kak regional’naya voenno-politicheskaya organizatsiya [The Gulf Cooperation Council as a regional military-political organization]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 4, pp. 39–69. (In Russ.)

9. Melkumyan E.S. 2018. Istoriya arabskikh stran. Gosudarstva Zaliva v XX — nachale XXI v. [History of the Arab countries. The Gulf states in the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century]. Moscow, Yurait Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Melkumyan E.S. 2016. Istoriya gosudarstv Arabskogo zaliva v XX — nachale XXI v. [History of Arab Gulf states in the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century]. Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Melkumyan E.S. 2008. Region Zaliva: konfl ikty, kompromissy, sotrudnichestvo [The Gulf region: Confl icts, compromises, cooperation]. Moscow, Institute of Oriental Studies, Institute of Middle Eastern Studies Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Melkumyan E.S. 2019. Sovet sotrudnichestva arabskikh gosudarstv Zaliva: istoriya, klyuchevye dostizheniya i perspektivy razvitiya [The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf: History, key achievements and development prospects]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 108–137. (In Russ.)

13. Melkumyan E.S. 2013. Sovet sotrudnichestva arabskikh gosudarstv Zaliva: kontseptual’nye osnovy obespecheniya bezopasnosti [The Gulf Cooperation Council of the Arab States: Conceptual bases for ensuring security]. In: Panarin S.A., Polyvyannyi D.I. (eds.). Bezopasnost’ na Zapade, na Vostoke i v Rossii: predstavleniya, kontseptsii, situatsii: materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii [Security in the West, East and Russia: Views, concepts, and situations: Conference proceedings]. Ivanovo, Ivanovo University Publ., pp. 166–173. (In Russ.)

14. Abozaid A.M. 2020. Bitter years: Qatari crisis and the future of GCC countries. Contemporary Arab Aff airs, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 108–137. DOI: 10.1525/ caa.2020.13.4.108.

15. Adler E., Barnett M. 1998. Security communities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511598661.

16. Butterfi eld H. 1951. History and human relations. London, Collins.

17. Glaser C.L. 1997. The security dilemma revisited. World Politics, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 171–201.

18. Herz J. 1951. Political realism and political idealism: A study in theories and realities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

19. Kamrava M. (ed.). 2011. The international politics of the Persian Gulf. New York, Syracuse University Press.

20. Jervis R. 1976. Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

21. Kamrava M. 2011. The changing international relations of the Persian Gulf. In: Kamrava M. (ed.). The international politics of the Persian Gulf. New York, Syracuse University Press, pp. 1–20.

22. Katz M. 2017. The Gulf and the great powers: Evolving dynamics. Middle East Policy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 102–109. DOI: 10.1111/mepo.12271.

23. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. One hundred years in the service of Arabs and Arab aff airs. 2002. Beirut, Dar al-Liwaa for Press and Publishing.

24. Lawson F.H. 2011. Security dilemma in the contemporary Persian Gulf. In: Kamrava M. (ed.). The international politics of the Persian Gulf. New York, Syracuse University Press, pp. 50–72.

25. Tang S. 2009. The security dilemma: A conceptual analysis. Security Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 587–623. DOI: 10.1080/09636410903133050.