Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

From the Ocean to the Gulf: One Region’s Identity in the Context of Neomodernity

Abstract

The paper examines specific features of international relations in Western Asia and North Africa (WANA) in a broader context of transformation of the contemporary international relations system. The author approaches the issue of a new world order emergence within the framework of fundamental changes taking place in the public sphere. In the paper these processes are considered in terms of transition from postmodernity to neomodernity. On the basis of critical examination of postmodernist writings the author defines the phenomenon of neomodernity and outlines its key features. This approach provides a new perspective on the essence and possible contours of the emerging new world order. According to the author, its key characteristics are to include volatility, flexibility, and instability which, in their turn, will engender a multitude of collective identities and a multitude of foreign policy narratives, a growing role of ideological factors and an increasing securitization of international relations. The author demonstrates that these transformational changes have already taken place in the WANA region and the concept of neomodernity allows to identify two coexisting patterns of political self-identification and, correspondingly, two possible scenarios for the development of a regional IR system. The first pattern considers the WANA region in a traditional modernist sense as the Middle East, whereas the second one accentuates its premodern features and conceptualizes it as part of the Islamic world. The concepts of the Middle East and of the Islamic world present fundamentally different perspectives on the nature of actors, the role of political narratives, the attitude towards borders and sovereignty, and on the very foundations of the world order. And if the former is put to the test by postmodernist relativism in the WANA space and some of its basic elements are eroding, the latter, on the contrary, regains its relevance. The author emphasizes that within the framework of neomodernity these two concepts may evolve in parallel, transforming uncertainty and ambivalence of the regional IR subsystem into major feature of a new century.

About the Author

V. A. Kuznetsov
Institute of Oriental Studies
Russian Federation

Vassily A. Kuznetsov — PhD (History), Head of the Center for Arab and Islamic Studies, Institute of Oriental Studies, the Russian Academy of Sciences; Associated Professor at the Chair of Regional Issues of the World Politics, School of World Politics, Lomonosov Moscow State University

12 Rozhdestvenka st., Moscow, 107031



References

1. Alekseenkova E.S. 2015. Khaos i igra bez pravil: O sovremennom krizise doveriya v otnosheniyakh Rossii i Zapada [Chaos and game without rules: On modern crisis of trust in relations between Russia and the West]. Politiya, no. 1 (76), pp. 67–81. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2015-76-1-7-67-81. (In Russ.)

2. Barabanov O.N., Bordachev T.V., Lisovolik Ya.D. 2018. Zhizn’ v osypayushchemsya mire. [Living in a crumbling world]. Valdai Discussion Club Report. Available at: http://valdaiclub.com/files/20155/ (accessed: 05.02.2019). (In Russ.)

3. Baranovskii V.G. 2017. Transformatsiya global’nogo miroporyadka: dinamika sistemnykh izmenenii [Transformation of global world order: Dynamics of systemic changes]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 3, pp. 71–91. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.03.05. (In Russ.)

4. Baranovskii V.G., Naumkin V.V. ‘Mir very’ i ‘mir neveriya’: ekspansiya i reduktsiya religioznosti [World of faith and world of disbelief: Expansion and reduction of religiosity]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 6, pp. 8–31. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.06.02. (In Russ.)

5. Baranovskii V.G., Naumkin V.V. (eds.). 2018. Blizhnii Vostok v menyayushchemsya global’nom kontekste [The Middle East in the changing global context]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Bogaturov A.D. 2018. Sistemnoe i konglomerativnoe videnie sovremennogo mira [Systemic and conglamerative vision of the contemporary world]. In Sovremennaya politicheskaya nauka. Metodologiya [Contemporary political science. A methodology]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ., pp. 594–610. (In Russ.)

7. Bodriiyar Zh. 1998. V teni tysyacheletiya, ili priostanovka goda 2000 [In the shadow of the millennium (or the suspense of the year 2000]. Available at: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000326/ (accessed: 16.02.2019). (In Russ.)

8. Vasil’ev A.M. 2018. Ot Lenina do Putina. Rossiya na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke [From Lenin to Putin. Russia in the Near and Middle East]. Moscow, Tsentrpoligraf Publ. (In Russ.)

9. Voskresenskii A.D. 2012. Kontseptsii regionalizatsii, regional’nykh podsistem, regional’nykh kompleksov i regional’nykh transformatsii v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [Concepts of regionalization, regional subsystems, regional complexes and regional transformations in contemporary IR]. Comparative Politics Russia, no. 2 (8), pp. 30–58. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2012-3-2(8)-30-58. (In Russ.)

10. Dunaev A.L. 2013. Ponyatiya ‘sistema’ i ‘poryadok’ v istoriografii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: trudnosti interpretatsii [‘System’ and ‘order’ in historiography of international relations: Challenges of conceptual interpretation]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 2, pp. 4–22. (In Russ.)

11. Gantman V.I., Volkova E.D., Baranovskii V.G. 1984. Sistema, struktura i protsess razvitiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [System, structure and the development of international relations]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Gasymov K. 2015. Razlad v stane dzhikhadistov: ideologicheskaya bor’ba Al’-Kaidy s organizatsiei ‘Islamskoe gosudarstvo’ [A discord among the jihadists: Ideological struggle between Al-Qaeda and ISIS]. Indeks bezopasnosti, no. 3 (114), pp. 61–82. (In Russ.)

13. Zvyagel’skaya I.D. 2018. Blizhnii Vostok i Tsentral’naya Aziya: global’nye trendy v regional’nom ispolnenii [Middle East and Central Asia: Global trends in regional execution.]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ. (In Russ.)

14. Zvyagel’skaya I.D. 2019. Simvoly i tsennosti v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh na Blizhnem Vostoke [Symbols and values in international relations in the Middle East]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 1, pp. 105–123. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.01.08. (In Russ.)

15. Zvyagel’skaya I.D., Kuznetsov V.A. 2017. Gosudarstvennost’ na Blizhnem Vostoke. Budushchee nachalos’ vchera [Statehood in the Middle East: The future which started yesterday]. International trends, no. 15 (4), pp. 6–19. DOI 10.17994/IT.2017.15.4.51.1. (In Russ.)

16. Ivanov A.V. 2014. ‘Mnozhestvennye sovremennosti’: dialektika edinstva i raznoobraziya v epokhu globalizatsii [Multiple modernities: Dialectic of unity and diversity in the era of globalization]. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya, no. 6, pp. 654–659. (In Russ.)

17. Kortunov A.V. 2017. Ot postmodernizma k neomodernizmu, ili vospominaniya o budushchem [From post-modernism to neo-modernism]. Russian International Affairs Council. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/ot-postmodernizma-k-neomodernizmu-ili-vospominaniya-o-budushch/ (accessed: 15.01.2019). (In Russ.)

18. Kosolapov N.A. 2005. Rossiya: territoriya v prostranstvakh globaliziruyushchegosya mira [Russia: Territory in spaces of globalizing world]. World Economy and International Relations, no. 7, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.)

19. Kuznetsov V.A. 2017. Posle postmoderna: blizhnevostochnoe izmerenie odnogo trenda [After postmodernism: Middle Eastern dimension of one trend]. Vostok (Oriens), no. 3, pp. 25–37. (In Russ.)

20. Lapkin V.V. 2018. O natsional’nom vs imperskom obustroistve sovremennogo miroporyadka [Nation vs empire in the modern world order]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 37–55. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.04.04. (In Russ.)

21. Makhmutov T.A., Mamedov R.Sh. 2017. Predlozheniya k formirovaniyu sistemy regional’noi bezopasnosti v Zapadnoi Azii i Severnoi Afrike [Proposals on building a regional security system in West Asia and North Africa]. Russian International Affairs Council. No. 38. (In Russ.)

22. Naumkin V.V. 2008. Islam kak kollektivnyi igrok? [Islam as a collective actor?]. In Islam i musul’mane: kul’tura i politika [Islam and Muslims: Culture and politics]. Moscow, Nizhnii Novgorod, Medina Publ., pp. 483–502. (In Russ.)

23. Nikitin A.I. 2018. Sovremennyi miroporyadok: ego krizis i perspektivy [Modern world order: Its crisis and prospects] Polis. Political Studies, no. 8, pp. 32–46. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.06.03. (In Russ.)

24. Sogrin V.V. 2014. Barak Obama: vneshnyaya politika liberal’nogo progressista [Barak Obama: Foreign policy of a progressive liberal]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 3, pp. 57–72. (In Russ.)

25. Fenenko A.V. 2018. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: 1648–1945 [History of international relations, 1648–1945]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ. (In Russ.)

26. Fituni L.L., Abramova I.O. 2018. Musul’manskii polyus mirovoi ekonomiki i dzhinn globalizatsii [Muslim pole of the world economy and the genie of globalization]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. (61), pp. 55–77. DOI 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-55-77. (In Russ.)

27. Shumilin A.I. 2015. Politika SShA na Blizhnem Vostoke v kontekste ‘arabskoi vesny’ [U.S. policy in the Middle East in the context of the Arab Spring]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

28. Axworthy M., Milton P. 2016. A Westphalian peace for the Middle East. Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/europe/2016-10-10/westphalian-peace-middle-east?fbclid=IwAR3F61jVm485HGTWymw65jdbY4OG5w-QUrAO0X1LpF_bWW4AtcyyWpz2D3A (accessed: 01.02.2019).

29. Aydin C. 2017. The idea of the Muslim world. A global intellectual history. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

30. Bin Saqer A. 2016. Al-Khalij fi ‘am 2014–2015. Al-Ittihad al-khalijiy al‘arabiy huwa-l-mustaqbal. Qadaya al-aman wa-l-difa‘ fi duwal al-majlis al-ta‘aun alkhalidjiy. Jeddah, Markaz al-khalidjiy li-l-abhath. Available at: http://www.grc.net/data/contents/uploads/Dr_Sager_paper_3507.pdf (accessed: 09.02.2019). (In Arab.)

31. Bourriaud N. 2009. Altermodern: Tate triennial 2009. London, Tate Publishing.

32. Bunzel C. 2015. From Paper State to Caliphate: The ideology of the Islamic State. The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World. Analysis Paper. No. 19.

33. Dussel E.D. 2012. Transmodernity and interculturality: An interpretation from the perspective of philosophy of liberation. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, no. 1 (3), pp. 28–55.

34. Eisenstadt S.N. 2000. Multiple modernities. Daedalus, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 1–29.

35. Haass R. 2008. The age of nonpolarity. What will follow U.S. dominance. Foreign Affairs. Available at: http://www.cfr.org/united-states/age-nonpolarity/p16034 (accessed: 05.02.2019).

36. Haass R. 2014. The unraveling: How to respond to a disordered world. Foreign Affairs, no. 93 (6), pp. 70–79.

37. Harrison R. 2016. Toward a regional framework for the Middle East. Takeaways from other regions. MEI Policy. No. 10. Available at: https://www.mei.edu/sites/default/files/publications/PP10_Harrison_RCS_regionalframework_web_1.pdf (accessed: 15.02.2019).

38. Hutcheon L. 2002. The politics of postmodernism. New York, London, Routledge.

39. Kamel L. 2019. There is no Thirty Years’ War in the Middle East. National Interest. Available at: http://nation-alinterest.org/feature/there-no-thirty-years-warthe-middle-east-17513 (accessed: 10.02.2019).

40. Katz M. 2018. Balancing act: Russia between Iran and Saudi Arabia. Middle East Centre Blog. Available at: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mec/2018/06/26/balancingact-russia-between-iran-and-saudi-arabia/ (accessed: 07.05.2018).

41. Kirby A. 2009. Digymodernism. How new technologies dismantle the postmodern and reconfigure our culture. London, Continuum.

42. Kuznetsov V. 2019. Western Asia and North Africa in the neo-modernity context: Between the Middle East and the Islamic World. Russia in Global Affairs, no. 1, pp. 124–146.

43. Lucas S. 2015. The effects of Russian intervention in the Syria crisis. Birmingham, UK, GSDRC, University of Birmingham.

44. Mahbubani K. 2017. How the ASEAN ‘miracle’ is a model for the Middle East. Asia Society. Available at: https://asiasociety.org/blog/asia/how-asean-miraclemodel-middle-east (accessed: 11.02.2019).

45. Nye J.S. Jr. 2015. Is the American century over? Cambridge, Malden, Polity Press.

46. Qatar-Russia relations touch new heights. 2018. The Peninsula. Available at: https://thepeninsulaqatar.com/article/02/08/2018/Qatar-Russia-relations-touchnew-heights (accessed: 02.01.2019).

47. Samuels R. 2008. Auto-modernity after postmodernism: Autonomy and automation in culture, technology, and education. In McPherson T. (ed.). Digital youth, innovation, and the unexpected. Cambridge, The MIT Press, pp. 219–240. DOI: 10.1162/dmal.9780262633598.219.

48. Sazak C.S. 2016. No Westphalia for the Middle East. Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/middle-east/2016-10-27/nowestphalia-middle-east?fbclid=IwAR0CqSLEdwyYxL13orlVbP71PECF3jvyBRNJRrRUZvQZXaAzGTiq64uLm7s (accessed: 07.02.2019).

49. Vermeulen T., Akker R. Van der. 2010. Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, vol. 2. DOI: 10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677.


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsov V.A. From the Ocean to the Gulf: One Region’s Identity in the Context of Neomodernity. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2019;11(2):9-38. (In Russ.)

Views: 279


ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)