The USA and the energy transition of the 21st century: Measures to overcome dependence on China in critical minerals

Since the middle of 2010s, international community (developed economies primarily) has been paying increasing attention to the reduction of carbon footprint in the environment by means of large-scale deployment of renewable energy, electrification of transport system and sustainable production of goods. Aspiring to become a global leader of energy transition, the United States of America has already taken a set of measures to stimulate technological growth. Such a challenging task cannot be accomplished without a guaranteed access to the so-called critical minerals. However, the US has encountered growing competition from China in this field. From the beginning of 2000s, China has amassed within its territory a dominant share of global production of critical minerals, acquired access to key foreign extraction centers and thus become virtually a monopolist in the markets. Hence the United States government urgently needs to devise measures to overcome the dependence from China in this regard. The author of the article dwells on the factors which have made the issue of critical minerals (as a recent development of international relations) relevant and politically charged. In its turn, it has led to the securitization of the subject in American official discourse during Trump administration which manifested itself in the ‘mineral security’ concept. The article contains comparative analysis of Trump and Biden administration approaches to navigating the country out of the dependence from China for critical minerals; it also identifies key focus areas of the current US mineral strategy. Respective analysis indicates that Trump administration prioritized bolstering domestic extraction capacity, whereas Biden-Harris administration underscores processing and production segments, mostly due to the pressure from local communities and environmental groups. The author stresses that the Unites States, being unable to contest China’s monopoly as producer and supplier of critical minerals with market instruments, tends to employ human rights discourse to compete with its rival. The ultimate expression of such an approach is Energy Resource Governance Initiative which has been designed to foster high ecological and social standards in global extraction sector. Relying on its partners, the United States intends to use the program to challenge China in commodity markets. The author concludes that despite the effort Washington won’t be able to rid itself of the dependence for Chinese imports in the near future. As for the long-term goals, their achievement is complicated due to both China’s production capacity and experience and insufficient government funding of renewable energy projects in the United States.

1. Matveev V.A. 2021. Bor’ba s izmeneniem klimata — novaya arena protivoborstva Kitaya i SShA [Struggle against climate change as a new arena of ChinaUS confrontation]. Kitai v mirovoi i regional’noi politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’, no. 26, pp. 337–351. DOI: 10.24412/2618-6888-2021-26-337-351. (In Russ.)

2. Seregina A.A. 2021. Obespechenie energoperekhoda redkimi i redkozemel’nymi metallami [Providing energy transition with rare and rare earth metal]. Innovatsii i investitsii, no. 9, pp. 188–195. (In Russ.)

3. Starchukova K.D., Cherskikh N.A. 2020. Analiz struktury torgovykh otnoshenii KNR i SShA i vyyavlenie otraslei ekonomiki naibolee zavisyashchikh ot importa [Analysis of the China-US trade structure and identification of the most import dependent economic sectors]. Modern Science, no. 7-1, pp. 81–85. (In Russ.)

4. Sudakova N.A. 2020. Pozitsii SShA v sfere innovatsii: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya ukrepleniya [U.S. innovation performance: Challenges and opportunities for strengthening]. Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke, no. 1. Available at: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760009042-3-1/ (accessed: 31.01.2022). DOI: 10.18254/ S207054760009042-3. (In Russ.)

5. Tagarov B.Zh. 2020. Prichiny reindustrializatsii ekonomiki razvitykh stran [Reasons for reindustrialization of the developed countries economy]. Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 999–1010. DOI: 10.18334/eo.10.4.111012. (In Russ.)

6. Tkachenko T.Kh., Mironenko K.V., Yangaev P.A. 2015. KNR v redkozemel’noi industrii mira [China’s role in the world rare earth elements industry]. In: Shkvarya L.V. (ed.). Aziya: globalizatsiya: vliyanie na strany Azii [Asia: Globalization: The impact on Asian countries]. Moscow, RUDN University Publ., pp. 252–277. (In Russ.)

7. Fituni L.L. 2019. Na puti k novoi bipolyarnosti: geoekonomika i geopolitika protivostoyaniya v Afrike [Towards a neo-bipolar model of the world order: Scouting game in Africa]. Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, parvo, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 6–29. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-123-6-29. (In Russ.)

8. Bertinelli L., Zou B., Poncin S. 2022. The U.S.-China supply competition for rare earth elements: A dynamic game view. Center for Research in Economics and Management, University of Luxembourg.

9. Cherp A., Jewell J. 2011. The three perspectives on energy security: Intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 202–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.001.

10. Gholz E. 2014. Rare earth elements and national security. Energy report. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2014/10/Energy%20Report_Gholz.pdf (accessed: 20.01.2022).

11. Graham J.D., Rupp J.A., Brungard E. 2021. Lithium in the green energy transition: The quest for both stability and security. Sustainability, no. 13. 11274. DOI: 10.3390/su132011274.

12. Gulley A., Nassar N., Xun S. 2018. China, the United States, and competition for resources that enable emerging technologies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 115, no. 15, pp. 4111–4115. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717152115.

13. Hao X., Zhou Y., Wang H. et al. 2020. Plug-in electric vehicles in China and the USA: A technology and market comparison. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, no. 25, pp. 329–353. DOI: 10.1007/s11027-01909907-z.

14. Klare M. 2012. The race for what’s left: The global scramble for the world’s last resources. New York, Metropolitan Books.

15. Lovins A. 2017. Clean energy and rare earths: Why not worry. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. Available at: https://thebulletin.org/2017/05/clean-energy-and-rare-earths-why-not-to-worry/ (accessed: 03.02.2022).

16. Machacek E., Fold N. 2014. Alternative value chains for rare earths: The Anglo-deposit developers. Resources Policy, no. 42, pp. 53–64. DOI: 10.1016/j. resourpol.2014.09.003.

17. Mancheri N. 2015. World trade in rare earths, Chinese export restrictions, and implications. Resources Policy, no. 46 (2), pp. 262–271. DOI: 10.1016/j. resourpol.2015.10.009.

18. Mancheri N., Sprecher B., Bailey G. et al. 2019. Effect of Chinese policies on rare earth supply chain resilience. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, no. 142, pp. 101–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.017.

19. Murray B., Monast J., Yang Ch.-J. et al. 2011. The United States, China, and the competition for clean energy. Policy brief. Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions, Duke University. Available at: https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/sites/default/files/publications/us-china-competition-for-clean-energypaper.pdf (accessed: 30.01.2022).

20. Nakano J. 2021. The geopolitics of critical minerals supply chains. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/geopolitics-critical-minerals-supply-chains (accessed: 28.01.2022).

21. O’Sullivan M. 2013. The entanglement of energy, grand strategy, and international security. In: Goldthau A. (ed.). The handbook of global energy policy. Chichester, West Sussex, Wiley-Blackwell, a John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication, pp. 30–48.

22. Overland I. 2019. The geopolitics of renewable energy: Debunking four emerging myths. Energy Research and Social Science, no. 49, pp. 36–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.018.

23. Watari T., Nansai K., Nakajima K. et al. 2021. Sustainable energy transitions require enhanced resource governance. Journal of Cleaner Production, no. 312. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621019168 (accessed: 24.01.2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127698.