The Korean Peninsula as a Hotbed of Cold War 2.0

Contemporary international relations witness an ever-increasing tension between the United States and China. In an attempt to capture and conceptualize this trend, a new term was introduced in the IR academic discourse — a ‘Cold War 2.0’ (or new Cold War). Ambiguous and vague as it is, it may nevertheless be instrumental for the study of certain aspects of contemporary world politics. In particular, it allows one to consider the developments of the Korean Peninsula nuclear issue (KPNI) within the broader framework of emerging US-China confrontation. The first section examines current debates over the ‘Cold War 2.0’ concept both in Russian and foreign academic literature, and identifies its country-specific interpretations in the United States, Russia and the PRC. The second section shows that, despite its contested and controversial nature, the ‘Cold War 2.0’ concept provides useful insights on how concrete steps of global and regional actors aimed at enhancing their military capabilities are threatening to turn the Korean Peninsula into the arena of a new bipolar confrontation. In the third section, drawing on the Harvard negotiation model and the experience of 2005 Agreement, the author attempts to identify the zone of potential agreement on the KPNI under new conditions. The author concludes that both the leading powers and the countries of the Korean Peninsula utilize the ‘Cold War 2.0’ rhetoric to get additional domestic and foreign policy dividends. Thus, the DPRK relies upon the nuclear factor, while the Republic of Korea tries to balance between the great powers and to gain more weight in the international arena by building on the ‘medium power’ concept. In the long term, such policies are fraught with uncontrolled escalation that could lead to a new full-scale war on the Korean Peninsula.

1. Asmolov K.V. 2022. Militarizatsiya Yuzhnoi Korei pri Mun Chzhe Ine [Militarization of South Korea under Moon Jae-in]. In: Ivanov K.V., Oleinikov I.V. (eds.). Rossiya i Koreya v sovremennom informatsionnom prostranstve [Russia and Korea in the modern information space]. Irkutsk, Izdatel’stvo Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ., pp. 53−60. (In Russ.)

2. Asmolov K.V. 2020. Nachalo novogo etapa kitaisko-severokoreiskikh otnoshenii (2018–2020 gg.) [The beginning of a new stage in China — North Korea relations (2018–2020)]. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity, vol. 25, no. 25, pp. 243−261. DOI: 10.24411/2618-6888-2020-10015. (In Russ.)

3. Asmolov K.V. 2021. Yuzhnaya Koreya mezhdu SShA i KNR [South Korea between China and the USA]. China in World and Regional Politics. History and Modernity, vol. 26, no. 26, pp. 227−241. DOI: 10.24412/2618-6888-2021-26-227-241. (In Russ.)

4. Asmolov K.V., Zakharova L.V. 2022. Sovremennaya Severnaya Koreya: pervoe desyatiletie epokhi Kim Chen Yna (2012−2021) [Modern North Korea: The first decade of Kim Jong-un’s era]. Moscow, ICSA RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Vorontsov A., Ponka T., Varpakhovskis E. 2020. Kontseptsiya ‘srednei sily’ (middle power) vo vneshnei politike Respubliki Koreya: teoriya i praktika [Middle power manship in Korean foreign policy]. International Trends, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 89−105. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2020.18.1.60.5. (In Russ.)

6. Garbuzov V.N. 2020. Bol’shie konfrontatsionnye osi sovremennogo mira [Modern world and the great confrontation axes]. Russia and America in the XXI Century, no. 4, pp. 11. DOI: 10.18254/S207054760013408-5. (In Russ.)

7. Gromyko A. 2020. Ob illyuziyakh novoi bipolyarnosti [Illusions of a new bipolarity]. RSMD. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/ob-illyuziyakh-novoy-bipolyarnosti/ (accessed: 10.01.2023). (In Russ.)

8. Gulin V.P. 1997. O novoi kontseptsii voiny [On the new concept of war]. Military Thought, no. 2, pp. 13–17. (In Russ.)

9. Davydov O.V. 2018. Problemy Koreiskogo poluostrova i vozmozhnye puti ikh resheniya [The problems of the Korean Peninsula and their prospective solutions]. Russia and the Pacific, no. 3 (101), pp. 68−83. DOI: 10.24411/10268804-2018-10034. (In Russ.)

10. Dutkevich P. 2022. Grandioznyi raskol [A great split]. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 22−34. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2022-20-6-22-34. (In Russ.)

11. Zhebin A.Z. 2019. Denuklearizatsiya Koreiskogo poluostrova: zabytye aspekty [Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula: Forgotten aspects]. East Asia: Facts and Analytics, no. 2, pp. 29−39. DOI: 10.24411/2686-7702-2019-10009. (In Russ.)

12. Zhebin A.Z. 2014. KNDR: nesmenyaemyi vektor [DPRK: Unchanging vector]. Far Eastern Studies, no. 3, pp. 46−66. (In Russ.)

13. Ilinskiy I.M. 2015. Kholodnaya voina: novyi etap [Cold War: A new stage]. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, no. 3, pp. 5−17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17805/zpu.2015.3.1. (In Russ.)

14. Kashin V.B. 2017. Kitaiskie reformy sistemy upravleniya voennymi innovatsiyami: otvet na amerikanskuyu ‘tret’yu strategiyu kompensatsii’? [Chinese reforms of military innovation management system: A response to the U.S. Third Offset Strategy?]. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, no. 4, pp. 42−66. (In Russ.)

15. Kashin V. 2022. Obostrenie voenno-politicheskoi situatsii vokrug Taivanya v 2022 g.: prichiny i perspektivy razvitiya [The 2022 escalation of the military and political situation around Taiwan: Causes and prospects for further evolution]. Pathways to Peace and Security, no. 2 (63), pp. 188−203. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2022-2-188-203. (In Russ.)

16. Zhebin A.Z. (ed.). 2018. KNDR i RK — 70 let [The DPRK and the ROK: The 70th anniversary of foundation]. Moscow, IDV RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Kokoshin A.A. 2016. Voennaya reforma v KNR: voenno-strategicheskie, politicheskie i organizatsionno-upravlencheskie aspekty [Military reform in China: Military-strategic, political, organizational and managerial aspects]. The International Affairs, no. 12, pp. 47−67. (In Russ.)

18. Kokoshin A.A. 2019. Voprosy prikladnoi teorii voiny [The issues of the applied theory of war]. Moscow, Izdatelskii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ. (In Russ.)

19. Kupriyanov A.V. 2021. Kholodnaya voina kak osobyi tip konflikta [Cold War as a special type of conflict]. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 35−49. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-4-35-49. (In Russ.)

20. Malashenko O.A. 2011. Voenno-politicheskie otnosheniya Frantsii i NATO: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Political and military relations between France and NATO: Past and present]. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, no. 4, pp. 42−56. (In Russ.)

21. Podlesnyi P.T. 2018. Kholodnaya voina 2.0. i politika sderzhivaniya Rossii [Cold War 2.0. and policy of containment]. Russia and America in the XXI Century, no. 3, pp. 10. DOI: 10.18254/S0000043-4-1. (In Russ.)

22. Rogov S.M. 2020. Novaya kholodnaya voina: posledstviya dlya rossiiskogo obshchestva [The new Cold War: Consequences for Russian society]. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 90, no. 3. pp. 279−292. DOI: 10.31857/ S0869587320030196. (In Russ.)

23. Davis P.K., Bennett B.W. 2022. Nuclear-use cases for contemplating crisis and conflict on the Korean Peninsula. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1−26. DOI: 10.1080/25751654.2022.2053426.

24. Ferguson N., Schularick M. 2007. ‘Chimerica’ and the global asset market boom. International Finance, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 215−239. DOI: 10.1111/j.14682362.2007.00210.x.

25. Kupchan C. 2021. Bipolarity is back: Why it matters. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 123−139. DOI: 10.1080/0163660x.2021.2020457.

26. Lankov A.N. 2013. The real North Korea: Life and politics in the failed Stalinist utopia. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

27. Legvold R. 2014. Managing the new Cold War: What Moscow and Washington can learn from the last one. Foreign Affairs, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 74−84.

28. Lippmann W. 1947. The Cold War: A study in US foreign policy. New York, Harper & Row.

29. Lucas E. 2008. The new Cold War: How the Kremlin menaces both Russia and the West. London, Bloomsbury.

30. Crump L., Erlandsson S. (eds.). 2019. Margins for manoeuvre in Cold War Europe: The influence of smaller powers. London, Routledge.

31. Mnookin R.H., Peppet R.H., Tulumello A.S. 2000. Beyond winning: Negotiating to create value in deals and disputes. Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

32. Wan W. (ed.). 2020. Nuclear risk reduction: Closing pathways to use. Geneva, UNIDIR.

33. Park J.S. 2005. Inside multilateralism: The six‐party talks. Washington Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 73−91. DOI: 10.1162/0163660054798726.

34. Rid T., Hecker M. 2009. War 2.0: Irregular warfare in the information age. Westport, CT, Praeger Security International.

35. Toloraya G. 2008. The six party talks: A Russian perspective. Asian Perspective, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 45−69. DOI: 10.1353/apr.2008.0004.

36. Xuetong Y. 2020. Bipolar rivalry in the early digital age. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 313−341. DOI: 10.1093/cjip/poaa007.

37. Xuetong Y. 2013. For a new bipolarity: China and Russia vs. America. New Perspectives Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 12−15. DOI: 10.1111/npqu.11366.

38. Yang Y. 2018. Escape both the ‘Thucydides trap’ and the ‘Churchill trap’: Finding a third type of great power relations under the bipolar system. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 193−235. DOI: 10.1093/ cjip/poy002.

39. Zhao S. 2022. The US–China rivalry in the emerging bipolar world: Hostility, alignment, and power balance. Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 31, no. 134, pp. 169−185. DOI: 10.1080/10670564.2021.1945733.