The EU Public Diplomacy in the United States under the D. Trump Administration: Challenges, Key Projects and Outcomes

Public diplomacy is one of the key foreign policy instruments of the European Union for strengthening its international stance. In that regard, Brussels pays special attention to ensuring trust-based relations with the United States, which traditionally acts as the EU’s leading trade and military partner. The apparent cooling in transatlantic relations provoked by harmful rhetoric and practices of D. Trump administration forced the EU to focus on non-traditional channels of interacting with the American audience. In this context, the analysis of the EU’s attempts to adapt its public diplomacy programmes in the United States to the new realities is of particular interest. The first section outlines the political, economic, administrative, and image risks faced by EU diplomats in this area during the presidency of D. Trump (2017−2020). The second section examines the main thematic priorities, mechanisms and projects of the EU public diplomacy aimed at the American audience. The author argues that during the period under review the EU placed special emphasis on advocacy, cultural diplomacy, and exchange programmes for young people. The author concludes that, although European diplomats failed to achieve a qualitative improvement in transatlantic relations during D. Trump’s tenure, the EU public diplomacy demonstrated resilience and flexibility in the face of adverse circumstances. Indeed, the EU diplomats proved their creativity in developing innovative programmes which can be instrumental for future development of the EU public diplomacy in general.

1. Gromyko A.A. 2018. Raskolotyi Zapad: posledstviya dlya Evroatlantiki [The West divided: Consequences for Euro-Atlantic]. Contemporary Europe, no. 4 (83), pp. 5−16. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope420180516. (In Russ.)

2. Gromyko A.A., Nosov M.G. (eds.). 2015. Evropeiskii soyuz v poiskakh global’noi roli: politika, ekonomika, bezopasnost’ [The European Union in search of a global role: Politics, economics, security]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Eremina Ya.V. 2020. ‘Myagkaya sila’ v politike Evropeiskogo soyuza: obrazovatel’nyi component [‘Soft power’ in the politics of the European Union: Educational aspects]. Vestnik Diplomaticheskoi akademii MID Rossii. Rossiya i mir, no. 3 (25), pp. 106−121. (In Russ.)

4. Marchukov A.N. 2022. Sovremennye vyzovy dlya publichnoi diplomatii ES [Contemporary challenges for EU public diplomacy]. Contemporary Europe, no. 6 (113), pp. 51−66. DOI: 10.31857/S0201708322060043. (In Russ.)

5. Pak S. 2020. Torgovaya voina Kitaya i SShA: chto budet s kitaiskoi ekonomikoi? [Trade conflict between the U.S. and China: What are the impacts on the Chinese economy?]. International Organisations Research Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 213−235. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-10. (In Russ.)

6. Portanskii A.P. 2019. SShA — Evropa: Soyuznicheskie otnosheniya pod ugrozoi [US-Europe: Allied relations under threat]. Contemporary Europe, no. 6 (92), pp. 30−40. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope620193039. (In Russ.)

7. Lebedeva M.M. (ed.). 2017. Publichnaya diplomatiya: teoriya i praktika [Public diplomacy: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Romanova T., Pavlova E. 2018. Ot grazhdanskoi i normativnoi sily k stressoustoichivosti? Evolyutsiya ideinykh osnov vneshnei deyatel’nosti ES [From civilian and normative power to resilience: Ideational foundations of the EU’s external policy]. International Trends, vol. 16, no. 2 (53), pp. 73‒90. DOI: 10.17994/1T.2018.16.2.53.5. (In Russ.)

9. Sutyrin V.V. 2021. Transformatsiya publichnoi diplomatii ES: ot soderzhatel’nogo krizisa k povestke vneshnei ugrozy [EU public diplomacy transformation: From the crisis of substance to external threat]. Contemporary Europe, no. 6 (106), pp. 17‒29. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope620211729. (In Russ.)

10. Utkin S.V. 2018. ‘Faktor Trampa’ v transatlanticheskikh otnosheniyakh: reaktsiya Evropeiskogo soyuza [The Trump`s factor in transatlantic relations: European Union reaction]. Problemy evropeiskoi bezopasnosti, no. 3, pp. 25−46. (In Russ.)

11. Khauer-Tyukarkina O.M. 2017. Sovremennaya imidzhevaya politika Evropeiskogo soyuza [Modern image policy of the European Union]. Moscow, Goryachaya liniya — Telekom Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Shumilin A.I. 2020. Evrosoyuz — SShA: na puti k ‘novoi normal’nosti’ [European Union — USA: On the way to a ‘new normality’]. Contemporary Europe, no. 5 (98), pp. 54−64. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope520205464. (In Russ.)

13. Abratis J. 2021. Communicating Europe abroad: EU delegations and public diplomacy. Los Angeles, Figueroa Press.

14. Borrell J.F. 2021. European foreign policy in times of COVID-19. Luxemburg, Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/630ef499-8d1b-11eb-b85c-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed: 29.11.2022).

15. Chaban N., Elgström O. 2020. A perceptual approach to EU public diplomacy: Investigating collaborative diplomacy in EU-Ukraine relations. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 488−516. DOI: 10.1163/1871191XBJA10029.

16. Cowan G., Arsenault A. 2008. Moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: The three layers of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 616, no. 1, pp. 10–30. DOI: 10.1177/0002716207311863.

17. Cull N. 2019. Public diplomacy: Foundations for global engagement in the digital age. Cambridge, Polity Press.

18. Cull N. 2008. Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 616, no. 1, pp. 31−54. DOI: 10.1177/0002716207311952.

19. De Martino M. 2015. The Jean Monnet programme as a tool to reinforce the role of the EU as a regional and global actor. RUDN Journal of Political Science, no. 1, pp. 28−38. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2015-1-28-38.

20. De Martino M. 2020. Promotion of political values through international programs of academic mobility. RUDN Journal of Political Science, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 312−319. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-2-312-319.

21. Duke S. 2015. Diplomatic training in the European Union. In: Spence D., Bátora J. (eds.). The European External Action Service: European diplomacy Post-Westphalia. London, Palgrave Macmillan, рр. 403−418.

22. Fanoulis E., Revelas K. 2023. The conceptual dimensions of EU public diplomacy. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 50–62. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2022.2043836.

23. Hedling E. 2021. Transforming practices of diplomacy: The European External Action Service and digital disinformation. International Affairs, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 841–859. DOI: 10.1093/ia/iiab035.

24. Higgott R., Boers E. 2019. Rhythms of soft power influence and transatlantic higher education relations. European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 24, no. 2 (1), pp. 119–136. DOI: 10.54648/eerr2019022.

25. Manor I. 2016. Are we there yet: Have MFAs realized the potential of digital diplomacy? Results from a cross-national comparison. Leiden, Brill.

26. Maurer H., Raik K. 2018. Neither fish nor fowl. How EU delegations challenge the institution of diplomacy: The cases of Moscow and Washington. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57−74. DOI: 10.1163/1871191x13010034.

27. Melissen J. 2013. Conclusions and recommendations on public diplomacy in Europe. In: Davis Cross M.K., Melissen J. (eds.). European public diplomacy: Soft power at work. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 204−212.

28. Melissen J. 2005. The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. In: Melissen J. (ed.). The new public diplomacy. Studies in diplomacy and international relations. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3−27.

29. Nitoiu C., Pasatoiu F. 2023. Public diplomacy and the persistence of the conflict and cooperation dichotomy in EU-Russia relations. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21−34. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2022.2100983.

30. Pamment J. 2020. The EU’s role in fighting disinformation: Taking back the initiative. Future trends, future solutions. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Pamment_-_Future_Threats.pdf (accessed: 29.11.2022).

31. Pamment J. 2018. Public diplomacy. In: Heath R.L., Johansen W. (eds.). The international encyclopedia of strategic communication. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., р. 1−9.

32. Saliu H. 2021. The specifics and complexity of EU public diplomacy. Social Science Forum, vol. 37, no. 96−97, pp. 189–207. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3935983.

33. Smith M. 2021. The EU and the United States: Competition, convergence, and crisis in a strategic relationship. In: Ferreira-Pereira L.C., Smith M. (eds.). The European Union’s strategic partnerships. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97–120.

34. Song W., Ai W. 2023. Role conflict, its compromise, and the European Union’s public diplomacy in China. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 35−49. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2022.2056731.

35. Thiel M. 2023. EU public diplomacy in the United States: Sociopolitical challenges & EU delegation agency. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 8−20. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2022.2084049.