Imperfect bipolarity: The ‘third power’ factor in Soviet-American relations in the nuclear field (1958–1968)

30 years after the end of the Cold War, bipolar structure still dominates in the nuclear sphere, although certain nuclear powers are closing the gap with Russia and the United States in terms of strategic arsenals and the system of world politics in general is moving towards polycentrism. At the same time, as US-Russian relations continue to deteriorate against the backdrop of the ‘Ukrainian crisis’, the prospects for strategic dialogue after the expiration of the Treaty on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (New START) are becoming increasingly vague. The absence of a new agreement in this field threatens to throw international relations back to the beginning of the Cold War, with all the ensuing consequences. To avoid such a scenario, not only the leaders of Russia and the United States should demonstrate political will, but other nuclear powers should also be included in the negotiation process, particularly China. In this regard, the history of the Cold War can provide valuable lessons. The author argues that bipolarity (even at its apex in the late 1950s — early 1970s) had never been an exclusive characteristic of international relations. On the basis of a number of historical cases, the paper demonstrates that during this period the superpowers constantly had to reckon with the ‘third power’ factor. The latter did not only influence the logic and dynamics of Soviet-American relations, but also to a large extent predetermined the direction and nature of their military development and planning. Indeed, it was the ‘third power’ factor, namely China, along with the achievement of strategic parity between the superpowers that became one of the main impulses to the establishment of the non-proliferation regime. In conclusion, the author focuses on yet another important lesson from the Cold War: the experience of arms control negotiations during that period suggests that the meetings of politicians should be preceded by joint brainstorming sessions with scholars from interested countries. In the current situation, representatives of the academic community should take the lead so that by the time the political climate eventually changes, there would already be coherent and viable options for nuclear arms control adapted to new realities. 

1. Bogaturov A.D. 1997. Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane. Istoriya i teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v Vostochnoi Azii posle Vtoroi mirovoi voiny (1945–1995) [Great powers in the Pacific. History and theory of international relations in East Asia after World War II (1945–1995)]. Moscow, Konvert — MONF Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Borisova K.A. 2014. Evolyutsiya politiki FRG v otnoshenii problemy rasprostraneniya yadernogo vooruzheniya: ot MYaS k DNYaO (1960–1969 gg.) [The evolution of FRG policy on the proliferation of nuclear weapons: From MLF to NPT (1960–1969)]. Lomonosov History Journal, no. 5, pp. 86–102. (In Russ.)

3. Vasil’ev A.M. 1997. Proekt ‘Skorpion’ — zamaskirovannye nadvodnye raketonostsy [The ‘Scorpion’ project: Camouflaged surface lunch platforms]. Taifun, no. 4, pp. 26–32. (In Russ.)

4. Vereshchaga A.N., Chernyshev A.K. 2019. Pochemu strany stremilis’ k razrabotke yadernogo oruzhiya. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie [Why have states strive to develop nuclear weapons. Mathematical modeling]. Sarov. (In Russ.)

5. Veselov V.A. 2010. Yadernyi faktor v mirovoi politike: struktura i soderzhanie [Nuclear factor in world politics: Substance and structure]. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, no. 1, pp. 68–90. (In Russ.)

6. Goncharov S.N., Usov V.N. 2006. Peregovory A.N. Kosygina i Chzhou En’laya v Pekinskom aeroportu [Talks between A.N. Kosygin and Zhou Enlai at the Beijing Airport]. In: Kokoshin A.A. (ed.). O Kitae srednevekovom i sovremennom [Medieval and contemporary China]. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 2006, pp. 310–328. (In Russ.)

7. Zharkov V.I. 2002. Podvodnaya lodka proekta 629 [Project 629 submarine]. Taifun, no. 3, pp. 2–21. (In Russ.)

8. Zhdanov V.L. 2005. ‘Teoriya trekh mirov’ Mao Tszeduna [Mao Zedong’s ‘Three Worlds Theory’]. In: Kisilev K.V. (ed.). Politicheskaya nauka i politicheskie protsessy v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i novykh nezavisimykh gosudarstvakh [Political science and political trends in the Russian Federation and the newly independent states]. Ekaterinburg, UrO RAN Publ., pp. 437–440. (In Russ.)

9. Zinchenko A.V. 2004. Yadernaya politika Frantsii [France’s nuclear policy]. Moscow, URSS Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Spasskii I.D. (ed.). 1996. Istoriya otechestvennogo sudostroeniya: V 5 t. T. 5: Sudostroenie v poslevoennyi period (1946–1991 gg.) [The history of domestic shipbuilding. In 5 vols. Vol. 5: Shipbuilding in the post-war period (1946–1991)]. Saint-Petersburg, Sudostroenie Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Kiryushkin V.D. 2015. Pravda o ‘Kuz’ kinoi materi’ [The truth about ‘Kuzma’s mother’]. Snezhinsk, RFYaTs-VNIITF Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Kokoshin A.A. 2001. Sderzhivanie vo vtorom yadernom veke [Deterrence in the second nuclear age]. Moscow, Institut problem mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Mozzhorin Yu.A. 2000. 50 let v raketno-kosmicheskoi otrasli [50 years in the rocket and space industry]. In: Brusilovskii A.D. (ed.). Tak eto bylo: kniga o Yurie Aleksandroviche Mozzhorine [So it was: A book about Yuri Alexandrovich Mozzhorin]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnaya programma obrazovaniya Publ., рр. 11–345. (In Russ.)

14. Negin E.A., Smirnov Yu.N. 1997. Delilsya li SSSR s Kitaem svoimi atomnymi sekretami? [Did the USSR share its atomic secrets with China?]. In: Velikhov E.P. (ed.). Nauka i obshchestvo. Istoriya sovetskogo atomnogo proekta (40–50-e gody): Trudy Mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma ISAP-96 [Science and society. The history of the Soviet atomic project (40–50-ies): Proceedings of the international symposium ISAP-96]. Moscow, IzdAT Publ., pp. 303–317. (In Russ.)

15. Pil’ko A.V. 2007. ‘Krizis doveriya’ v NATO: al’yans na poroge peremen (1956–1966) [The ‘credibility gap’ within NATO: The alliance on the verge of change (1956–1966)]. Moscow, Moscow University Press. (In Russ.)

16. Semenov Yu.P. (ed.). 1996. Raketno-kosmicheskaya korporatsiya ‘Energiya’ imeni S.P. Koroleva. 1946–1996 [S.P. Korolev rocket and space corporation ‘Energiya’. 1946–1996]. Korolev, RKK ‘Energiya’ Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Yakovlev V.N. (ed.). 1999. Raketnyi shchit Otechestva [Missile defense shield of the fatherland]. Moscow, TsIPK RVSN Publ. (In Russ.)

18. Ryabushkin D.S. 2020. Sovetsko-kitaiskii pogranichnyi konflikt 1969 goda [The Soviet-Chinese border conflict of 1969]. Kazan’, Buk Publ. (In Russ.)

19. Borisov Yu.I. (ed.). 2020. Sistemy vooruzheniya raketno-kosmicheskoi oborony Rossii: V 2 t. T. 1: Sistemy strategicheskoi protivoraketnoi oborony [Weapon systems of Russia’s missile and space defense. In 2 vols. Vol. 1: Strategic missile defense systems]. Moscow, Stolichnaya entsiklopediya Publ. (In Russ.)

20. Degtyar’ V.G. (ed.). 2007. SKB-385, KB mashinostroeniya, GRTs ‘KB im. akademika V.P. Makeeva’ [SKB-385, Machine-Building Design Bureau, State Rocket Center ‘Academician V.P. Makeev Design Bureau’]. Moscow, Voennyi parad Publ. (In Russ.)

21. Skorospelov P.P. 2022. ‘Osobyi sposob osushchestvleniya vneshnei politiki putem ugrozy voinoi imperialistam’. Voenno-politicheskaya deyatel’nost’ Prezidiuma TsK pri N.S. Khrushcheve (1953–1964). Chast’ 1 [‘A special form of making foreign policy by the threat of war to imperialists’. A case study of military-political activity of Central committee Presidium under N.S. Khrushchev, 1954–1964. Part 1]. Vostok (Oriens), no. 2, pp. 9–28. DOI: 10.31857/ S086919080019661-4. (In Russ.)

22. Smirnov Yu.N., Timerbaev R.M. 2001. Pervyi shag k blagorazumiyu v yadernom mire. (K istorii zaklyucheniya Moskovskogo dogovora 1963 goda o chastichnom zapreshchenii yadernykh ispytanii) [The first step towards prudence in the nuclear world. (History of the conclusion of the 1963 Moscow treaty on partial nuclear test ban)]. Yadernyi kontrol’, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73–87. (In Russ.)

23. Sotnikov V.I. 2003. Yadernaya problema v indiisko-pakistanskikh otnosheniyakh (vtoraya polovina XX — nachalo XXI veka) [The nuclear problem in Indian-Pakistani relations (The second half of the 20th — the beginning of the 21st century)]. Moscow, Nauchnaya kniga Publ. (In Russ.)

24. Timerbaev R.M. 1986. Polnoe zapreshchenie yadernykh ispytanii [Total nuclear-test ban]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

25. Timerbaev R.M. 1999. Rossiya i yadernoe nerasprostranenie, 1945–1968 [Russia and nuclear non-proliferation, 1945–1968]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

26. Tutnova T.A. 2020. Raketno-kosmicheskaya deyatel’nost’ KNR: vozrastayushchaya rol’ v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [China’s rocket and space activities: An increasing role in international relations]. Moscow, Institut vostokovedeniya RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

27. Khaitsman V.M. 1970. SSSR i problema razoruzheniya. 1945–1959: Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh peregovorov [The USSR and the problem of disarmament. 1945–1959: History of international negotiations]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

28. Chenchzhi L. 2013. Razvitie kitaiskikh kosmicheskikh tekhnologii [The development of Chinese space technologies]. Saint Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya Publ. (In Russ.)

29. Yungblyud V.T., Vorob’eva T.A. 2018. Sovetsko-kitaiskii raskol v amerikanskoi politike razryadki mezhdunarodnoi napryazhennosti (1968–1973 gg.)

30. [The Soviet-Chinese split in the U.S. policy of détente (1968–1973)]. Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, no. 1, pp. 47–57. (In Russ.)

31. Mikhailenko E.B. (ed.). 2017. Yadernyi mir: novye vyzovy rezhimu yadernogo nerasprostraneniya [Nuclear world: New challenges for the non-proliferation regime]. Ekaterinburg, Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo universiteta Publ. (In Russ.)

32. ABM research and development at Bell laboratories. Project history: October 1975. Part I: History of ABM development. The Stanley R. Mickelsen Safeguard Complex. 25.07.2022. Available at: https://srmsc.org/pdf/004438p0.pdf (accessed: 10.03.2023).

33. Baucom D.R. 1992. The Origins of SDI: 1944–1983. Lawrence, University Press of Kansas. Buchonnet D. 1976. MIRV: A brief history of Minuteman and multiple reentry vehicles. Livermore, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory. Available at: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/NC/mirv/mirv1_1.html (accessed: 10.03.2023).

34. Bunn G. 1992. Arms control by committee: Managing negotiations with the Russians. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

35. Burr W. 2001. Sino-American relations, 1969: The Sino-Soviet border war and steps towards rapprochement. Cold War History, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 73–112. DOI: 10.1080/713999930.

36. Chang I. 1995. Thread of the silkworm. New York, Basic Books.

37. Ross R.S. (ed.). 1993. China, the United States and the Soviet Union: Tripolarity and policy making in the Cold War. London, Routledge.

38. Debs A., Monteiro N.P. 2016. Nuclear politics: The strategic causes of proliferation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

39. Goldman E.O., Eliason L.C. (eds.). 2003. The diffusion of military technology and ideas. Redwood City, Stanford University Press.

40. Dobbs C.M. 2010. Triangles, symbols, and constraints: The United States, the Soviet Union, and the People’s Republic of China, 1963–1969. Lanham, University Press of America.

41. Freedman L. 1977. US intelligence and the Soviet strategic threat. London, Basingstoke, Macmillan.

42. Gavin F.J. 2015. Strategies of inhibition: US grand strategy, the nuclear revolution, and nonproliferation. International Security, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 9–46. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00205.

43. Goh E. 2004. Constructing the U.S. rapprochement with China, 1961–1974: From ‘red menace’ to ‘tacit ally’. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

44. Horowitz M.C. 2010. The diffusion of military power: Causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

45. Horsburgh N. 2015. China and global nuclear order: From estrangement to active engagement. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

46. Jones M. 2017. The official history of the UK strategic nuclear deterrent. Vol. I: From the V-bomber era to the arrival of Polaris, 1945–1964. London, Routledge.

47. Joyner D.H. 2009. International law and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

48. Kaplan L.S. 2006. History of the office of the secretary of defense. Vol. V: The McNamara ascendancy, 1961–1965. Washington, D.C., Office of the Secretary of Defense, Historical Office. Available at: https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/secretaryofdefense/OSDSeries_Vol5.pdf?ver=2014-05-28-133758-613 (accessed: 10.03.2023).

49. Kaplow J.M. 2022. Signing away the bomb: The surprising success of the nuclear nonproliferation regime. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

50. Kent G.A. 2008. Thinking about America’s defense: An analytical memoir. Santa Monica, Arlington, Pittsburgh, RAND Corporation. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/occasional_papers/2008/RAND_OP223. pdf (accessed: 10.03.2023).

51. Lanoszka A. 2018. Atomic assurance: The alliance politics of nuclear proliferation. Ithaca, London, Cornell University Press.

52. Lewis J.W., Di H. 1992. China’s ballistic missile programs: Technologies, strategies, goals. International Security, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 5–40.

53. Lewis J.W., Litae X. 1988. China builds the bomb. Stanford, Stanford University Press.

54. Lodgaard S. 2011. Nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation: Towards a nuclear-weapon-free world? London, Routledge.

55. Lüthi L.M. 2012. Restoring chaos to history: Sino-Soviet-American relations, 1969. The China Quarterly, vol. 210, pp. 378–397. DOI: 10.1017/ S030574101200046X.

56. Mallard G. 2014. Fallout: Nuclear diplomacy in an age of global fracture. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

57. Marsh G.E. 2019. Crossing the red line: The nuclear option. London, World Scientific Publishing Co.

58. Mauroni A. 2019. The rise and fall of counterproliferation policy. The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 26, no. 1–2, pp. 127–141. DOI: 10.1080/10736700. 2019.1593691.

59. Mehta R.N. 2020. Delaying doomsday: The politics of nuclear reversal. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

60. Mukherjee R. 2022. Ascending order: Rising powers and the politics of status in international institutions. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

61. Narang V. 2017. Strategies of nuclear proliferation: How states pursue the bomb. International Security, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 110–150. DOI: 10.1162/ ISEC_a_00268.

62. Ray A. 2021. Tracing the undersea dragon: Chinese SSBN programme and the Indo-Pacific. London, Routledge India.

63. Riedel B.O. 2015. JFK’s forgotten crisis: Tibet, the CIA, and Sino-Indian War. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.

64. Roberts B.H. 1996. Weapons proliferation and world order: After the Cold War. Boston, Kluwer Law International.

65. Schrafstetter S. 2002. Preventing the ‘smiling Buddha’: British-Indian nuclear relations and the Commonwealth nuclear force, 1964–68. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 87–108. DOI: 10.1080/01402390412331302785.

66. Smith B.C., Spaniel W. 2021. Do nonproliferation agreements constrain? Journal of Peace Research, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1163–1177. DOI: 10.1177/0022343320971355.

67. Spaniel W. 2019. Bargaining over the bomb: The successes and failures of nuclear negotiations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

68. Taliaferro J.W. 2019. Defending frenemies: Alliances, politics, and nuclear nonproliferation in US foreign policy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

69. Watson R.J. 1997. History of the office of the secretary of defense. Vol. IV: Into the missile age, 1956–1960. Washington, D.C., Office of the Secretary of Defense, Historical Office. Available at: https://history.defense.gov/Portals/70/Documents/secretaryofdefense/OSDSeries_Vol4.pdf (accessed: 10.03.2023).

70. Whitlark R.E. 2021. All options on the table: Leaders, preventive war, and nuclear proliferation. Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.

71. Xia Y. 2006. Negotiating with the enemy: US-China talks during the Cold War, 1949–1972. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.

72. Yuan J. 2022. External and domestic drivers of nuclear trilemma in Southern Asia: China, India, and Pakistan. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 296–314. DOI: 10.1080/25751654.2022.2158700.

73. Zhihua Sh., Xia Y. 2012. Between aid and restriction: Changing Soviet policies toward China’s nuclear weapons program 1954–60. Working paper № 2. Nuclear Proliferation International History Project, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. Available at: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/soviet_policies_twrds_chinas_nuclear_weapons_prgm_-_ver_2.pdf (accessed: 10.03.2023).