Humanitarian aid under sanctions: From the problem statement to the search for solutions

In the context of a sharp aggravation of interstate rivalry, an increase in natural disasters and the emergence of new epidemiological challenges, the problem of timely provision of humanitarian assistance to the population of the most affected countries and regions becomes especially acute. Its solution, already fraught with a whole complex of objective economic, political and other difficulties, is further complicated by the existing practice of imposing unilateral and multilateral or international sanctions, which have become one of the key instruments of the leading subjects of world politics. And although formally sanctions regimes are provided with humanitarian exceptions designed to minimize their negative consequences for the population of target countries, their imposition inevitably results in new obstacles to the provision of humanitarian assistance to those in need. The paper identifies the key challenges associated with provision of humanitarian aid under the existing sanctions restrictions, and assesses the prospects for addressing them in the contemporary context. The first section examines political and academic debates on the negative humanitarian consequences of sanctions and possible ways to overcome them. In particular, the author identifies the logic behind the transition from comprehensive to ‘smart’ sanctions, as well as the specifics of applying humanitarian exceptions. The second section outlines key aspects of the complex disruptive impact of restrictions on humanitarian assistance, including the technical and political barriers faced in the implementation of humanitarian exceptions. Finally, the third section identifies current trends in the use of humanitarian exceptions by the main initiators of restrictive measures. In this context, particular attention is paid to the UN Security Council Resolution 2664, adopted in December 2022, which mandates the inclusion of standardized exemptions in UN sanctions regimes in order to minimize the impact of restrictive measures on the provision of assistance and to alleviate the suffering of those in need. The author concludes that although there still remain possibilities to address the negative humanitarian consequences of sanctions, this requires strong political will on the part of the international community.

1. Ageeva A.F. 2022. Gumanitarnye posledstviya vseob’emlyushchikh sanktsii [The humanitarian impact of comprehensive sanctions]. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, no. 2, pp. 20–37. (In Russ.)

2. Arapova E.Ya., Kudinov A.S. 2022. Osobennosti sanktsionnogo regulirovaniya v SShA, ES i Velikobritanii: sravnitel’nyi analiz [International sanctions legislation in the U.S., EU and UK: A comparative study]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, no. 6, pp. 151–165. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.06.11. (In Russ.)

3. Bartenev V.I. 2022a. Vliyanie sanktsionnogo davleniya na prodovol’stvennuyu bezopasnost’: traditsionnye i novye izmereniya [The impact of sanctions on food security: Traditional and new dimensions]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, no. 2 (63), pp. 11–37. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2022-2-11-37. (In Russ.)

4. Bartenev V.I. 2022b. Mezhdunarodnaya pomoshch’ i sanktsionnoe davlenie: geometriya vzaimnogo vliyaniya [International assistance and sanctions pressure: Geometry of interlinkages]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 23–37. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.06.03. (In Russ.)

5. Matveev I.A. 2022. Politekonomicheskaya model’ uregulirovaniya situatsii v Sirii v kontekste ukrainskogo konflikta [Settling the Syrian conflict amid the Ukrainian crisis: Political economy perspective]. The Russian International Affairs Council. Working paper No. 67/2022. Moscow, RSMD Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Oganisyan L.D. 2023. ES i strany Blizhnego i Srednego Vostoka: zemletryaseniya v Turtsii i Sirii i eskalatsiya v zone palestino-izrail’skogo konflikta [EU and the countries of the Near and Middle East: Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria and escalation in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict zone]. Evropeiskii soyuz: fakty i kommentarii, no. 111, pp. 118–123. DOI: 10.15211/eufacts12023118123. (In Russ.)

7. Timofeev I.N. 2022a. Politika sanktsii Britanii: institutsional’nye mekhanizmy i rossiiskoe napravlenie [UK policy of sanctions: Institutional design and the Russian track]. Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 4, pp. 22–36. DOI: 10.31857/S0201708322040027. (In Russ.)

8. Timofeev I.N. 2022b. Sanktsii vmesto diplomatii? [Sanctions instead of diplomacy?]. Russia in Global Affairs. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/sankczii-vmesto-diplomatii/ (accessed: 01.08.2023). (In Russ.)

9. Timofeev I.N. 2020. COVID-19 i politika sanktsii: opyt ivent-analiza [COVID-19 and the policy of sanctions: An event analysis]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 449–464. DOI: 10.21638/spbu06.2020.402. (In Russ.)

10. Azar N. 2020. Navigating humanitarian exceptions to sanctions against Syria. Challenges and recommendations. The Carter Center.

11. Biersteker T., Eckert S., Halegua A., Romaniuk P. 2005. Consensus from the bottom up? Assessing the influence of the sanctions reform process. In: Wallensteen P., Staibano C. (eds.). International sanctions: Between war and words in the international system. London, Routledge, pp. 15–30.

12. Breen E. 2021. Corporations and US economic sanctions: The dangers of overcompliance. In: Beaucillon C. (ed.). Research handbook on unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 256–269.

13. Brockmann K., Preble K.A. 2021. Mitigating humanitarian impact in a complex sanctions environments. The European Union and the sanctions regimes against Iran. SIPRI.

14. Bruderlein C. 1998. Coping with the humanitarian impact of sanctions: An OCHA perspective. OCHA.

15. Carter B.E. 1987. International economic sanctions: Improving the haphazard U.S. legal regime. California Law Review, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1153–1278.

16. Craven M. 2002. Humanitarianism and the quest for smarter sanctions. European Journal of International Law, no. 13 (1), pp. 43–61. DOI: 10.1093/ejil/13.1.43.

17. Crystal C. 2023. Landmark UN Humanitarian Sanctions Exemption is a massive win but needs more support. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/2023/03/20/landmark-unhumanitarian-sanctions-exemption-is-massive-win-but-needs-more-supportpub-89311 (accessed: 01.08.2023).

18. Debarre A. 2019. Safeguarding humanitarian action in sanctions regimes. International Peace Institute.

19. Drezner D.W. 2011. Sanctions sometimes smart: Targeted sanctions in theory and practice. International Studies Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 96–108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.01001.x.

20. Drezner D.W. 2021. The United States of sanctions. The use and abuse of economic coercion. Foreign Affairs, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 142–154.

21. Fazio A., Reggiani T., Sabatini F. 2022. The political cost of sanctions: Evidence from COVID-19. Health Policy, vol. 126, no. 9, pp. 872–878. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.06.008.

22. Ferraro T. 2021. International humanitarian law, principled humanitarian action, counterterrorism and sanctions: Some perspectives on selected issues. International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 103, no. 916–917, pp. 109–155. DOI: 10.1017/S1816383121000965.

23. Giumelli F. 2016. The purposes of targeted sanctions. In: Beirsteker T., Eckert S., Tourihno M. (eds.). Targeted sanctions. The impacts and effectiveness of United Nations action. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 38–59.

24. Gordon J. 2015. The invisibility of human harm: How smart sanctions consumed all the oxygen in the room. Social Research, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 863–874. DOI: 10.1353/sor.2015.0060.

25. Gordon J. 2011. Smart sanctions revisited. Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 315–335. DOI: 10.1017/S0892679411000323.

26. Haass R.N. 1997. Sanctioning madness. Foreign Affairs, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 74–85.

27. Hausmann P., Pearson E., Liechti M. 2022. Assessing the impact of sanctions on humanitarian work. Geneva Graduate Institute.

28. Hudáková Z., Biersteker T., Moret E. 2021. Sanctions relaxation and conflict resolution lessons from past sanctions regimes. The Carter Center.

29. Hufbauer G., Shott J., Elliott K., Oegg B. 2009. Economic sanctions reconsidered. 3rd ed. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

30. Huvé S., Brubaker R. 2022. Humanitarian exemptions in UN sanctions regimes. UN sanctions and humanitarian action policy memo 3/4. United Nations University, Center for Policy Research.

31. Huvé S., Brubaker R., Day A., Hudáková Z. 2022. Enforcing UN sanctions and protecting humanitarian action. Towards a coherent and consistent approach. United Nations University, Center for Policy Research.

32. Marks S.P. 1999. Economic sanctions as human rights violations: Reconciling political and public health imperatives. American Journal of Public Health, vol. 89, no. 10, pp. 1509–1513.

33. Moret E.S. 2023. Barriers to Afghanistan’s critical private sector recovery. Norwegian Refugee Council.

34. Moret E.S. 2014. Humanitarian impacts of economic sanctions on Iran and Syria. European Security, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 120–140. DOI: 10.1080/09662839.2014.8934.

35. Müller J., Müller K. 1999. Sanctions of mass destruction. Foreign Affairs, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 43–53.

36. Peksen D. 2019. When do imposed economic sanctions work? A critical review of the sanctions effectiveness literature. Defence and Peace Economics, pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2019.1625.

37. Schott J.J. 2021. Raising a caution flag on US financial sanctions against China. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

38. Cortright D., López G. (eds.). 2002. Smart sanctions: Targeting economic statecraft. New York, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

39. Thompson E. 2015. Technical assessment. Humanitarian use of Hawala in Syria. Beechwood International.

40. Tostensen A., Bull B. 2002. Are smart sanctions feasible? World Politics, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 373–403.

41. U.S. and European Sanctions on Syria. 2020. The Carter Center.

42. Walker J. 2020a. Navigating humanitarian exceptions regarding international sanctions. Pt. 1: Challenges, opportunities and realities for the COVID-19 pandemic response. ACAMS.

43. Walker J. 2021. The public policy of sanctions compliance: A need for collective and coordinated international action. International Review of the Red Cross, vol. 103, no. 916–917, pp. 705–716. DOI: 10.1017/S181638312100093X.

44. Walker J. 2020b. Risk management principles guide for sending humanitarian funds into Syria and similar high-risk jurisdictions. ACAMS.

45. Weiss T.G. 1999. Sanctions as a foreign policy tool: Weighing humanitarian impulses. Journal of Peace Research, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 499–509.