British Edition of the Monroe Doctrine versus ‘Com- munist Militarism’: Collisions between the USSR and the UK in Eastern Countries in the mid-1920s
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2023-15-3-125-159
Abstract
The new US foreign policy concept in the Western hemisphere introduced by the American President J. Monroe in December 1823 has become a milestone both in the country’s history and in the theory and practice of international relations in general. For Great Britain, the principles of the Monroe Doctrine acquired new relevance after the end of the First World War. The prospect of unfettered Bolshevik expansion into British colonies and dependent territories in Asia and Africa became a matter of particular concern for the UK ruling circles. It was this threat that forced the military and political elites of Great Britain to turn to the experience of their overseas counterparts and develop a set of measures that can be described as the British edition of the Monroe Doctrine. These measures were directed right against the Bolsheviks’ attempts to revolutionize the national liberation movement and to use it to undermine the ‘colonial rear’ of the imperialist powers. British decision-makers interpreted these attempts as a Bolsheviks’ endeavor to revive the foreign policy practices of the Russian Empire and denoted them as ‘communist militarism’. It is through the lens of the collision of the British edition of the Monroe Doctrine and the concept of ‘communist militarism’ that this study examines the dynamics of the Soviet-British confrontation in Central Asia in the mid-1920s. Special attention is paid to the struggle that took place between the two countries in Iran (Persia), Afghanistan, northwest India, Xinjiang and Tibet. This competition for influence over local rulers took a variety of forms: from information and propaganda campaigns to rivalry in the field of infrastructure and logistics projects. At the same time, it was accompanied by a constant clash of interests of various factions within the USSR and Great Britain, which prevented them from pursuing a coherent policy in the region. Together, these circumstances endowed the Soviet-British rivalry in Central Asia in the 1920s with a number of unique features that does not allow it to be interpreted as just yet another round of the ‘Great Game’.
About the Author
E. Yu. SergeevRussian Federation
Evgeny Yu. Sergeev — Doctor of Sciences (History), Chief Research Fellow; Professor
32A Leninskii prospect, Moscow, 119334
6 Miusskaya sq., Moscow, 125993
References
1. Abdullaev K.N. 2009. Ot Sin’tszyana do Khorasana. Iz istorii sredneaziatskoi emigratsii XX veka [From Xinjiang to Khorasan. From the history of Central Asian emigration of the 20th century]. Dushanbe, Irfon Publ. (In Russ.)
2. Airapetov O.R. 2020. Vneshnyaya politika Sovetskoi Rossii i SSSR v 1920–1939 godakh i istoki Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [Foreign policy of Soviet Russia and the USSR in 1920–1939 and the origins of the Second World War]. Moscow, Rodina Publ. (In Russ.)
3. Andreev A.I. 2006. Tibet v politike tsarskoi, sovetskoi i postsovetskoi Rossii [Tibet in the politics of Tsarist, Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia]. Saint-Petersburg, Izdatel’stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Izdatel’stvo A. Terent’eva ‘Nartang’ Publ. (In Russ.)
4. Barmin V.A. 1999. Sovetskii Soyuz i Sin’tszyan 1918–1941 gg. Regional’nyi faktor vo vneshnei politike Sovetskogo Soyuza [The Soviet Union and Xinjiang, 1918–1941. Regional factor in the foreign policy of the Soviet Union]. Barnaul, Izdatel’stvo BGPU Publ. (In Russ.)
5. Vertinskii A.V. 1986. Komissiya Saimona i bor’ba v politicheskikh krugakh Velikobritanii vokrug indiiskoi konstitutsionnoi reformy (1927–1930 gg.) [The Simon commission and the struggle in the political circles of Great Britain over the Indian constitutional reform (1927–1930)]. In: Grigortsevich S.S. (ed.). Iz istorii burzhuaznoi diplomatii i mezhimperialisticheskikh protivorechii v pervoi polovine XX v. [From the history of bourgeois diplomacy and inter-imperialist contradictions in the first half of the twentieth century]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta Publ., pp. 57–73. (In Russ.)
6. Volodarskii M.I. 1985. Sovety i ikh yuzhnye sosedi Iran i Afganistan (1917–1933) [The USSR and its southern neighbors Iran and Afghanistan (1917–1933).]. London, Overseas Publications Interchange Ltd. (In Russ.)
7. Gus M.S. 1926. Britanskii imperializm i Vostok [British imperialism and the East]. Khar’kov, Ukrainskii rabochii Publ. (In Russ.)
8. Zhirova N.S. 2018. Sotrudnichestvo indiiskoi partii ‘Gadar’ s Kominternom (1922–1943) [Cooperation of the Indian Ghadar Party with the Comintern (1922–1943)]. PhD Thesis. Lipetsk. (In Russ.)
9. Kapitonova N.K., Romanova E.V. 2016. Istoriya vneshnei politiki Velikobritanii [History of Great Britain’s foreign policy]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)
10. Magadeev I.E. 2021. V teni Pervoi mirovoi voiny. Dilemmy evropeiskoi bezopasnosti v 1920-e gody [In the shade of the First World War. Dilemmas of European security in the 1920s]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ. (In Russ.)
11. Mazdur I. 1933. Britanskii imperializm v Indii i podgotovka interventsii protiv SSSR [British imperialism in India and preparations for intervention in the USSR]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnyi agrarnyi institut Publ. (In Russ.)
12. Nazemtseva E.N. 2013. Russkaya emigratsiya v Sin’tszyane (1920–1930-e gg.) [Russian emigration to Xinjiang (1920s−1930s)]. Moscow, Nobel’ Press Publ. (In Russ.)
13. Obukhov V.G. 2007. Skhvatka shesti imperii. Bitva za Sin’tszyan [The battle of the six empires. In struggle for Xinjiang]. Moscow, Veche Publ.
14. Ostapenko G.S., Prokopov A.Yu. 2012. Noveishaya istoriya Velikobritanii: XX — nachalo XXI veka [Contemporary history of Great Britain in the 20th — at the beginning of the 21st century]. Moscow, Vuzovskii uchebnik, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ.)
15. Sagimbaev A.V. 2018. Kolonial’naya politika Velikobritanii v mezhvoennyi period: prichiny i osobennosti transformatsii [The colonial policy of Great Britain in the interwar period: Causes and features of transformation]. Moscow, TsIOGNIS Publ. (In Russ.)
16. Sergeev E.Yu. 2012. Bol’shaya igra, 1856–1907: mify i realii rossiisko-britanskikh otnoshenii v Tsentral’noi i Vostochnoi Azii [The Great Game, 1856–1907: Myths and realities of Russian-British relations in Central and East Asia]. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdanii KMK Publ. (In Russ.)
17. Sergeev E.Yu. 2019. Bol’sheviki i anglichane. Sovetsko-britanskie otnosheniya, 1918–1924 gg.: ot interventsii k priznaniyu [The Bolsheviks and the British. Soviet-British relations, 1918–1924: From intervention to recognition]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
18. Sudeikin A.G. 1976. Kolonial’naya politika leiboristskoi partii Anglii mezhdu dvumya mirovymi voinami [Colonial policy of the British Labour Party between the two world wars]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)
19. Tikhonov Yu.N. 2008. Afganskaya voina Stalina. Bitva za Tsentral’nuyu Aziyu [Stalin’s Afghan war. The battle for Central Asia]. Moscow, Eksmo, Yauza Publ. (In Russ.)
20. Tikhonov Yu.N. 2007. Politika velikikh derzhav v Afganistane i pushtunskie plemena (1919–1945) [The great power politics in Afghanistan and the Pashtun tribes (1919–1945)]. Moscow, Lipetsk, Inform Publ. (In Russ.)
21. Tikhonov Yu.N. 2022. Rol’ ‘Bukharskogo voprosa’ pri zaklyuchenii sovetsko-afganskogo ‘Dogovora o druzhbe’ 1921 g. [The role of the ‘Bukhara question’ in the conclusion of the Soviet-Afghan ‘Treaty of Friendship’ of 1921]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 1, pp. 151–163. DOI: 10.31857/S013038640018270-5. (In Russ.)
22. Ulunyan A.A. 2022. Britanskoe nepriznanie bukharskoi nezavisimosti v 1922 g.: otsenki, prognozy i mekhanizm [The British non-recognition of Bukhara’s independence in 1922: Assessments, forecasts, and mechanism]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 1, pp. 135–150. DOI: 10.31857/S013038640018264-8. (In Russ.)
23. Yuzhnyi K. 1928. Anglo-persidskie treniya v Persidskom zalive [Anglo-Persian tensions in the Persian Gulf]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, no. 7, pp. 41–49. (In Russ.)
24. Ashley W. 1925. The menace of communism. English Review, no. 12, pp. 628–634.
25. Clayton A. 1986. The British empire as a superpower, 1913–39. Athens, The University of Georgia Press.
26. Fisher J. 2000. The Interdepartmental Committee on Eastern Unrest and British responses to Bolshevik and other intrigues against the empire during the 1920s. Journal of Asian History, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–34.
27. Hillmer N. 1981. The Foreign Office, the dominions and the diplomatic unity of the empire, 1925–29. In: Dilks D. (ed.). Retreat from power. Studies in Britain’s foreign policy of the twentieth century. In 2 vols. Vol. 1: 1906−1939. London, Macmillan, pp. 64–77.
28. Howe S. 1993. Anticolonialism in British politics: The left and the end of empire, 1918–1964. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
29. Hughes M. 2006. British foreign secretaries in an uncertain world, 1919–1939. Abingdon, Routledge.
30. Jeffery K. 1982. The Eastern arc of empire: A strategic view, 1850–1950. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 531–545. DOI: 10.1080/01402398208437133.
31. Kapur H. 1966. Soviet Russia and Asia, 1917−1927: A study of Soviet policy towards Turkey, Iran and Afghanistan. Geneva, Graduate Institute of International Studies.
32. Meyer K.E., Brysac S.B. 2001. Tournament of shadows. The Great Game and the race for empire in Asia. London, Abacus.
33. Neilson K. 2006. Britain, Soviet Russia and the collapse of the Versailles order, 1919–1939. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
34. Nyman L.-E. 1977. Great Britain and Chinese, Russian and Japanese interests in Sinkiang, 1918–1934. Stockholm, Goeteborg, Esselte Studium.
35. Orde A. 1978. Great Britain and international security, 1920–1926. London, Royal Historical Society.
36. Overy R.J. 1998. The origins of the Second World War. London, New York, Longman.
37. Petrie D. 1972. Communism in India, 1924–1927. Calcutta, Editions Indian.
38. Samra C.S. 1959. India and Anglo-Soviet relations, 1917–1947. Bombay, Asia Publishing House.
39. Shepherd J. 2008. A gentleman at the Foreign Office: Influences shaping Ramsay Macdonald’s internationalism in 1924. In: Conrthorn P., Davis J. (eds.). The British Labour Party and the wider world. London, New York, AAAI Press, pp. 25–47.
40. Smith F.W.F. 1959. The life of F.E. Smith, first earl of Birkenhead. London, Eyre and Spottiswoode.
41. Spector I. 1959. The Soviet Union and the Muslim world 1917–1958. Seattle, University of Washington Press.
42. Sylvest C. 2008. A commanding group? Labour’s advisory committee on international questions, 1918–1931. In: Conrthorn P., Davis J. (eds.). The British Labour Party and the wider world. London, New York, AAAI Press, pp. 48–63.
43. Thomas J.H. 1924. Labour and the empire. World Today, no. 5, pp. 487–489.
44. Thorpe A. 2008. Introduction. In: Conrthorn P., Davis J. (eds.). The British Labour Party and the wider world. London, New York, AAAI Press, рр. 1–24.
45. Toynbee A. 1928. Survey of international affairs. London, Oxford University Press, Humphrey Milford.
46. Warth R.D. 1983. Soviet Russia in world politics. New York, Twayne Publishers.
47. Watt D.C. 1965. Personalities and policies. Studies in the formation of British foreign policy in the twentieth century. London, Longmans.
Review
For citations:
Sergeev E.Yu. British Edition of the Monroe Doctrine versus ‘Com- munist Militarism’: Collisions between the USSR and the UK in Eastern Countries in the mid-1920s. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2023;15(3):125-159. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2023-15-3-125-159