E.V. From ‘Greater’ to ‘Global Britain’: The New and the Old in the Foreign Policy of the United Kingdom

The UK withdrawal from the European Union forced the country to reevaluate its relations with the outer world. These political and ideological searches culminated in the concept of Global Britain. At the same time, they have drawn attention of the academic community to similar intellectual endeavors at the turn of the 19th-20th centuries, when British politicians also faced the need for a qualitative reassessment of the empire’s place in the world. In this context historical references can both help to place the concept of Global Britain within a broader ideological and political framework and shed light on some of its less obvious aspects. And it is particularly interesting to compare it with the concept of Greater Britain, which was extensively discussed during that period. The first section of the paper identifies the origins of the Greater Britain concept, as well as its key provisions. The author notes that the idea of ‘Greater Britain’, aiming to create a sort of federation that would bring together the metropole and the dominions, emerged as a response to growing centrifugal tendencies within the British Empire and intensification of colonial rivalry between the great powers. The second section outlines the conceptual core of the ‘Global Britain’, which involves expanding the scope of the UK foreign policy opportunities after leaving the European Union by establishing a more active interaction with countries and regions that were once part of the empire. The paper emphasizes the migration factor, which served as a fundamental element of the British statehood in various periods of its history and became an integral part of the British political identity. The author argues that there is a certain continuity in the ideological and philosophical content of the two concepts, which were both formulated in similar conditions, both originated from the search for new guidelines for the UK policy in a changing world. However, these concepts shouldn’t be confused. Whereas ‘Greater Britain’ was aimed at consolidating the crumbling empire, ‘Global Britain’ is intended primarily to bridge various divides across the society, which in turn implies re-examination of the UK national identity in general. The author concludes that the concept of Global Britain in its current form cannot address these issues, on the contrary, it rather epitomizes the lack of innovative ideas and solutions among contemporary British elites.

1. Boitsov M.A. 2006. Istoriya i globalizatsiya. Vyzhivet li Klio pri globalizatsii? [Will Clio survive globalization]. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, no. 2, pp. 91−108. (In Russ.)

2. Buller A., Linchenko A.A. 2020. Kul’turnaya pamyat’ migrantov i prinimayushchego obshchestva v epokhu mul’tikul’turalizma [Cultural memory of migrants and the host society in the epoch of multiculturalism]. Journal of Frontier Studies, vol. 5, no. 2 (18), pp. 27−59. DOI: 10.46539/jfs.v5i2.202. (In Russ.)

3. Voloshina T.G. 2018. Nekotorye aspekty ponyatiya Anglosfery v epokhu globalizatsii [The peculiarities of modern Anglophenina phunctioning]. In: Gulyaev G.Yu. (ed.). Sovremennaya nauka: aktual’nye voprosy, dostizheniya i innovatsii [Contemporary science: Current issues, achievements and innovations]. Penza, MTsNS ‘Nauka i Prosveshchenie’ Publ., pp. 153−155. (In Russ.)

4. Godovanyuk K.A. 2020. ‘Global’naya Britaniya’ kak sledstvie istoricheskikh diskussii ob identichnosti [‘Global Britain’ as an outcome of historical disputes over UK identity]. Contemporary Europe, no. 6 (99), pp. 181−190. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope62020181190. (In Russ.)

5. Kostornichenko V.N. 2019. Kontseptsiya Anglosfery kak osnova vneshnepoliticheskogo kursa angloyazychnykh stran [The concept of the Anglosphere as the basis of the foreign policy of English-speaking countries]. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Social sciences, no. 2 (835), pp. 106−117. (In Russ.)

6. Liven D. 2012. Imperii i vlast’. Razmyshlyaya nad sovremennoi istoriografiei istorii imperii [Empires and power. Reflecting on the contemporary historiography of the history of empires]. In: Lipkin I.V. (ed.). V poiskakh istiny: Sbornik k yubileyu akademika A.O. Chubar’yana [In search for the truth. Compendium for the anniversary of Academician A.O. Chubaryan]. Moscow, IVI RAN Publ., pp. 279–301. (In Russ.)

7. Savchenko D.V. 2022. Kontseptsiya Imperskoi Federatsii v Britanskoi imperii vo vtoroi polovine XIX v.: pervyi opyt sozdaniya kolonial’noi federatsii [The concept of an Imperial Federation in the British Empire in the second half of the 19th century: The first experience of creating a colonial federation]. Locus: Peоple, Soсiety, Culture, Meaning, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 56–70. DOI: 10.31862/2500-2988-2022-13-3-56-70. (In Russ.)

8. Sagimbaev A.V. 2021. Kontseptsiya Britanskogo Sodruzhestva v deyatel’nosti gruppy ‘Kruglogo stola’ v nachale XX veka [Concept of British Commonwealth in activities of Round Table Group at beginning of XX century]. Scientific Dialogue, no. 7, pp. 449–462. DOI: 10.24224/2227-1295-2021-7-449-462. (In Russ.)

9. Sili Dzh.R. 2013. Britanskaya imperiya: razdelyai i vlastvui! [The British empire: Divide and rule!]. Moscow, Algoritm Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Sledzevskii I.V. 2010. Tsivilizatsionnoe osnovanie i kul’turnaya logika transformatsii britanskogo mira v imperiyu [The civilizational foundation and cultural logic of the transformation of the British world into an empire]. Britanskaya imperiya v XX veke [The British empire in the 21st century]. Moscow, IVI RAN Publ., pp. 24–45. (In Russ.)

11. Ferguson N. 2003. Empire. How Britain made the modern world. London, Allen Lane [Russ. ed.: Fergyuson N. 2013. Imperiya. Chem sovremennyi mir obyazan Britanii. Moscow, Astrel’, Corpus].

12. Khakhalkina E.V. 2017. Velikobritaniya i problemy integratsii, bezopasnosti i dekolonizatsii vo vtoroi polovine 1940-kh — nachale 1960-kh gg. [Great Britain and the problems of integration, security and decolonization in the second half of the 1940s — early 1960s]. Tomsk, Izdatel’stvo Tomskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Khakhalkina E.V. 2021. ‘Global’naya Britaniya’: ot idei k voploshcheniyu [‘Global Britain’: From idea to implementation]. Contemporary Europe, no. 1 (101), pp. 21–32. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope120212132. (In Russ.)

14. Armitage D. 1999. Greater Britain: A useful category of historical analysis? The American Historical Review, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 427–445. DOI: 10.2307/2650373.

15. Bell D. 2007. The idea of Greater Britain: Empire and the future of world order, 1860−1900. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

16. Bell D. 2005. Unity and difference: John Robert Seeley and the political theology of international relations. Review of International Studies, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 559–579. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210505006637.

17. Bennett J. 2002. The emerging Anglosphere. Orbis, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 111−126. DOI: 10.1016/s0030-4387(01)00109-0.

18. Deudney D. 2001. Greater Britain or greater synthesis? Seeley, Mackinder, and Wells on Britain in the global industrial era. Review of International Studies, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 187–208. DOI: 10.1017/S026021050000187X.

19. Dilke Ch.W. 1890. Problems of Greater Britain. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. London, New York, Macmillan & Co.

20. Ward S., Rasch A. (eds.). 2019. Embers of empire in Brexit Britain. London, New York, Bloomsbury Academic.

21. Fedorowich K., Thompson A.S. (eds.). 2013. Empire, migration and identity in the British world. Manchester, Manchester University Press.

22. Gardner A. 2017. Brexit, boundaries and imperial identities: A comparative view. Journal of Social Archaeology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3−26. DOI: 10.1177/1469605316686875.

23. Harries O. 2001. The Anglosphere illusion. National Interest, no. 63, pp. 130−136.

24. Klerides E. 2009. National identities on the move: Examples from the historical worlds of Greater Britain and Hellenism. Comparative Education, vol. 45, no. 3, 435–452. DOI: 10.1080/03050060903184999.

25. Lecourt S. 2013. The Mormons, the Victorians, and the idea of Greater Britain. Victorian Studies, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 85–111. DOI: 10.2979/victorianstudies.56.1.85.

26. Mackinder H.F. 1902. Britain and the British seas. London, William Heineman.

27. Mckinnon S. 2015. Translation at the service of Greater Britain. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 252−263.

28. Pietsch T. 2013. Rethinking the British world. Journal of British Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 441–463. DOI: 10.1017/jbr.2013.53.

29. Potter S. 2003. News and the British world: The emergence of an imperial press system, 1876–1922. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

30. Buckner Ph., Francis R.D. (eds.). 2005. Rediscovering the British world. Calgary, University of Calgary Press.

31. Seeley J.R. 1914. The expansion of England: Two courses of lectures. London, Macmillan and Co., Ltd.

32. Steer Ph. 2016. Gold and Greater Britain: Jevons, Trollope, and settler colonialism. Victorian Studies, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 436–463. DOI: 10.2979/victorianstudies.58.3.02.

33. Taylor H. 1890. Problems of Greater Britain. By the Right Hon. Sir Charles Wentworth Dilke, Bart. Macmillan & Co., London and New York, p. 738. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 313–319. DOI: 10.1177/000271629000100210.

34. Waddie Ch. 1895. The federation of Greater Britain. Edinburgh, Waddie & Co. Ltd.

35. Webb S.S. 2013. Marlborough’s America. New Haven, Yale University Press.

36. Winter J. 2002. Migration, war and empire: The British case. Annales de Démographie Historique, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 143–160. DOI: 10.3917/adh.103.0143.