Russia and NATO’s ‘Open Door’ Policy in the Post-Bipolar Period

A major problem for Russia in formulating and defending its national interests after the Cold War was to fit in the European political order, dominated by the collective West and its institutions. The North Atlantic Alliance (NATO) was not dissolved after completing the mission it had been created for; moreover, it started taking on ever new responsibilities to keep the European allies in the U.S. sphere of influence. In this respect, the ongoing NATO enlargement — primarily by accession of the former Warsaw Treaty allies of the USSR — has become one of the key policy tools for Washington after the breakup of the bipolar system in Europe. This study sets a dual goal, i.e. to identify the changing logic of the NATO’s eastward expansion and assess its consequences for the alliance itself, as well as to trace shifts in Russia’s official position in the light of these developments. The first section of the article highlights the main stages of the NATO enlargement in the post-bipolar period. The author argues that the Western countries, viewing the ’open door’ principle as a next phase of the containment policy under new geopolitical circumstances and reaping tangible security benefits throughout its implementation, realized at a certain point that a swift accession of post-Soviet states to NATO was unattainable, and switched attention to the Nordic countries. The second section analyzes Russia’s response to the alliance’s maneuvering. The study emphasizes that the concern of the Russian leadership about its possible marginalization in the Euro-Atlantic institutions gradually gave way to resolute actions to counter the NATO’s ‘open door’ policy as the alliance was expanding beyond its purview. The author concludes that NATO enlargement has had an ambiguous impact on both the European security architecture, and the alliance itself. On the one hand, it gave the United States new opportunities to project power and consolidate its hegemonic status in Europe. On the other hand, the viability and effectiveness of this policy are being questioned by a number of serious challenges for the West both in Europe and beyond. Given these uncertainties, NATO will gradually give up the ‘open door’ principle in favor of more flexible formats of military and political cooperation with non-member countries.

1. Avreiski N. 2013. SAShch i Evropa. Evropeiskata politika na Vashington [USA and Europe. Washington’s European policy]. Veliko T’rnovo, Faber Publ. (In Bulg.)

2. Arbatov A.G. 2006. Rasshirenie NATO i natsional’nye interesy Rossii [NATO enlargement and Russia’s national interests]. Politiya, no. 2, pp. 94–103. DOI: 10.30570/2078-5089-2006-41-2-94-103. (In Russ.)

3. Arlyapova E.S., Ponomareva E.G. 2023. Treshchiny i razlomy: vneshnepoliticheskie orientiry zapadnobalkanskikh stolits v usloviyakh ukrainskogo krizisa [Cracks and fault lines: Foreign policy orientations of Western Balkan capitals in the context of the Ukrainian crisis]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 153–179. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2023-3-90-153-179. (In Russ.)

4. Baranovskii V.G. 2021. Mezhdunarodnyi landshaft: epokha peremen. Izbrannaya analitika [The international landscape: An era of change. Selected analytics]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Bartosh A.A. 2023. NATO v sovremennoi mirovoi politike [NATO in modern world politics]. Moscow, Goryachaya liniya — Telekom Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Batyuk V.I. 2020. NATO i Rossiiskaya Federatsiya: evolyutsiya vzaimootnoshenii [The evolution of the NATO-Russia relations]. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3–31. DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-1-3-31. (In Russ.)

7. Boguslavskaya Yu.K. 2016. ‘Vozvrashchenie k osnovam’? NATO i Rossiya v novoi strategicheskoi obstanovke [‘Back to basics’? NATO and Russia in new strategic environment]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, no. 3, pp. 93–108. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2016.308. (In Russ.)

8. Glinskii-Vasil’ev D.Yu. 2000. Rasshirenie NATO na vostok kak problema rossiiskoi i evropeiskoi bezopasnosti [NATO’s eastward enlargement as a Russian and European security problem]. In: Trenin D.V. (ed.). Rossiya i osnovnye instituty bezopasnosti v Evrope: vstupaya v XXI vek [Russia and the main security institutions in Europe: Entering the 21st century]. Moscow, S&P Publ., pp. 101–131. (In Russ.)

9. Gorokhov A., Vasil’ev K. 2022. Dogovorennosti o nerasshirenii NATO na vostok podtverzhdayutsya arkhivnymi istochnikami [Agreements on nonenlargement of NATO to the east are confirmed by archival sources]. Russian Political Science, no. 1 (22), pp. 30–40. (In Russ.)

10. Grishin Ya.Ya. 2007. Amerikanskie bazy v Vostochnoi Evrope [American bases in Eastern Europe]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 191–201. (In Russ.)

11. Davydov Yu.P. 2000. Rasshirenie zony otvetstvennosti NATO [Expansion of NATO’s purview]. In: Utkin A.I. (ed.). SShA i Evropa. Perspektivy vzaimootnoshenii na rubezhe vekov [USA and Europe. Prospects for relations at the turn of the century]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., pp. 107–127. (In Russ.)

12. Danilov D.A. 2022. Finlyandiya i Shvetsiya u otkrytykh dverei NATO [Finland and Sweden on the threshold of NATO’s open door]. Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN, no. 2 (26), pp. 16–23. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran220221623. (In Russ.)

13. Zverev Yu. 2021. Tsentry informatsionno-gibridnoi voiny NATO i ES v Pribaltike i Finlyandii [NATO and EU centers of information and hybrid warfare in the Baltic states and Finland]. Evraziya.Ekspert. Available at: https://eurasia.expert/tsentry-informatsionno-gibridnoy-voyny-nato-v-pribaltike-i-finlyandii/ (accessed: 21.02.2024). (In Russ.)

14. Ivankov K.V. 2023. Rossiisko-ukrainskie otnosheniya v 2014–2022 gg.: osnovnye geopoliticheskie izmereniya [Russian-Ukrainian relations in 2014–2022: The main geopolitical dimensions]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 66–80. DOI: 10.55959/MSU0868-4871-12-2023-1-1-66-80. (In Russ.)

15. Krejčí O. 2005. Geopolitics of the Central European region: The view from Prague and Bratislava. Braislava, Publishing House of the Slovak Academy of Sciences ‘Veda’ [Russ. ed.: Kreichi O. 2010. Geopolitika Tsentral’noi Evropy. Vzglyad iz Pragi i Bratislavy. Moscow, Nauchnaya kniga Publ.; Praga, Ottovo Nakladatelství Publ.].

16. Neimark M.A. (ed.). 2024. Krizisnaya geopolitika i Rossiya [Crisis geopolitics and Russia]. Moscow, Dashkov i Kº Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Mikhailov V.A., Volovikov A.G. 2023. Rasshirenie NATO s pozitsii predstavitelei politicheskogo realizma [NATO enlargement from the position of representatives of political realism]. Etnosotsium i mezhnatsional’naya kul’tura, no. 7 (181), pp. 59–68. (In Russ.)

18. Sakwa R. 2017. Russia against the rest: The post-Cold War crisis of world order. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press [Russ. ed.: Sakva R. 2020. Rossiya protiv ostal’nykh. Krizis mirovogo poryadka posle okonchaniya kholodnoi voiny. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ.].

19. Sarotte M.E. 2021. Sderzhivanie posle kholodnoi voiny. Kak Vashington poteryal postsovetskii mir [Post-Cold War deterrence: How Washington lost the post-Soviet world]. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 44–60. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2021-19-6-44-60. (In Russ.)

20. Troitskii M.A. 2004. Transatlanticheskii soyuz: modernizatsiya sistemy amerikano-evropeiskogo partnerstva posle raspada bipolyarnosti [Transatlantic alliance: Modernization of the US-European partnership system after bipolarity]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

21. Shtol’ V.V. 2015. NATO: ot regional’nogo bloka k global’nomu dominirovaniyu [NATO: From a regional bloc to global dominance]. Observer, no. 11 (310), pp. 21–35. (In Russ.)

22. Art R.J. 1998. Creating a disaster: NATO’s open doors policy. Political Science Quarterly, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 383–403. DOI: 10.2307/2658073.

23. Asmus R.D. 2002. Opening NATO’s doors: How the alliance remade itself for a new era. N.Y., Columbia University.

24. Brzezinski Z. 2009. An agenda for NATO: Toward a global security web. Foreign Affairs, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 2–20.

25. Brzezinski Z. 1995. A plan for Europe. Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 26–42. DOI: 10.2307/20047017.

26. Coffey L., Kochis D. 2021. The U.S. must defend NATO’s open-door policy at the 2021 Brussels summit. The Heritage Foundation. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/IB6084.pdf (accessed: 15.03.2024).

27. Conklin M.E. 2015. U.S. Decision making and post-Cold War NATO enlargement. PhD Thesis. Monterey, Naval Postgraduate School.

28. Daalder I., Goldgeier J. 2006. Global NATO. Foreign Affairs, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 105–113.

29. Goldgeier J.M. 1999. Not whether but when: The U.S. decision to enlarge NATO. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.

30. Larrabee S.F. 2006. The United States and the European security and defense policy: Old fears and new approaches. In: Strategic yearbook 2006. European security and defence policy: A European challenge. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation, pp. 171–185.

31. Hamilon D., Spohr K. (eds.). 2019. Open door: NATO and Euro-Atlantic security after the Cold War. Washington, D.C., Foreign Policy Institute / Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs, Johns Hopkins University SAIS.

32. Rice M.J. 2016. NATO’s new order: The alliance after the Cold War. Origins: Current Events in Historical Perspective. Available at: https://origins.osu.edu/article/natos-new-order-alliance-after-cold-war?language_content_entity=en (accessed: 11.01.2024).

33. Sarotte M.E. 2021. Not one inch. America, Russia, and the making of postCold War stalemate. New Haven, Yale University Press.

34. Waltz K. 2000. NATO expansion: A realist’s view. Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 23–38. DOI: 10.1080/13523260008404253.

35. Wolff A.T. 2015. The future of NATO enlargement after the Ukraine crisis. International Affairs, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 1103–1121. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12400.

36. Yost D.S. 1998. NATO transformed: The alliance’s new roles in international security. Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace Press.

37. Zhang H. 2022. The nature of NATO expansion — A realist view. Taihe Institute. Available at: www.taiheglobal.org/Content/2022/08-04/1720367064.html (accessed: 24.02.2024).