Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

The role of L.M. Karakhan in the Chinese policy of the Soviet Union (1923–1926)

https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2024-16-3-7-52

Abstract

In the 1920s, the young Soviet state pursued several, sometimes mutually exclusive, goals in its policy towards China. On the one hand, the Soviet leadership did its best to achieve international recognition and sought to protect its vital interests. On the other hand, it actively promoted the idea of a world revolution. Under those circumstances, the country’s foreign ministry needed experienced, flexible, and pragmatic diplomats. In this regard, the activities of L.M. Karakhan, who was sent as a Soviet emissary to the Republic of China to address these sensitive issues, are of particular interest. The figure of L.M. Karakhan is all the more remarkable because, being one of the architects of the USSR’s foreign policy towards China, he himself has not received much attention in either Soviet or Russian historiography. On the basis of new archival documents and Chinese primary sources the paper attempts to give a comprehensive assessment of L.M. Karakhan’s tenure first as a plenipotentiary and then as an ambassador of the USSR to China. The first sections consider the tasks of L.M. Karakhan’s diplomatic mission in China and the vicissitudes of the negotiations on the Soviet-Chinese agreement on the establishment of diplomatic relations. To that end, the Soviet diplomat, following the directives from Moscow, flexibly maneuvered between various groupings of Chinese elites and resisted the pressure of other great powers’ representatives. The following sections examine L.M. Karakhan’s activities as a Soviet ambassador. The author concludes that L.M. Karakhan consistently defended the national interests of the USSR, skillfully combining a fine diplomatic game and assertiveness, even rigidity at times. The latter was vividly manifested in the most challenging issues of Soviet-Chinese relations, such as disputes over the status of the Chinese Eastern Railway and Outer Mongolia. At the same time, the ambassador took an active part in organizing and supporting the revolutionary movement in China. In fact, L.M. Karakhan served as a central coordinator of the Soviet aid to the Kuomintang, determining both its forms and substance. The author concludes that L.M. Karakhan proved himself not merely as an agent of the Soviet leadership, but also as a politician in its own right capable to effectively address a wide range of tasks, some of which had not originally been intended by his mission. That said it is worth mentioning that the assertive, tough style of the Soviet diplomat often raised a lot of criticism among foreign representatives, since it was at odds with the declared USSR intentions to break with the foreign policy practices of tsarist Russia.

About the Author

I. N. Sotnikova
Institute of China and Contemporary Asia, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Irina N. Sotnikova — PhD (History), Leading Research Fellow, Centre for Contemporary History of China and its Relations with Russia

32 Nakhimovskii prospect, Moscow, 117997



References

1. Ablova N.E. 1999. Istoriya KVZhD i rossiiskoi emigratsii v Kitae (pervaya polovina XX v.) [The history of the CER and Russian emigration in China (the first half of the 20th century)]. Minsk, ITs Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Borisov O.B., Koloskov B.T. 1980. Sovetsko-kitaiskie otnosheniya, 1945–1980 [Soviet-Chinese relations, 1945–1980]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Van Ven’fen. 2003. Sulyan’ tszaotsi yuan’dun chzhentse shupin [An overview of the early Soviet policy in the Far East]. Tszinan’ dasyue syuebao, no. 6, pp. 34–37. (In Chinese.)

4. Van Dun. 2002. 20 shitszi 20 nyan’dai ‘bu pinden tyaoyue’ koukhao chzhi tszyan’tao [An overview of the slogan of ‘unequal treaties’ in the 1920s]. Shisyue yuekan’, no. 5, pp. 60–67. (In Chinese.)

5. Volkova I.V. 2020. K voprosu o statuse Vneshnei Mongolii v sovetskokitaiskikh otnosheniyakh 1921–1924 gg. [On the status of Outer Mongolia in Soviet-Chinese relations in 1921–1924]. In: Skvoznikov A.V. (ed.). Vneshnepoliticheskie interesy Rossii: Istoriya i sovremennost’: Sbornik materialov VIII Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii, Samara, 30 aprelya 2020 g. [Russia’s Foreign Policy Interests: History and Modernity: Proceedings of the 8th All-Russian Scientific Conference, Samara, April 30, 2020]. Samara, Samarskaya gumanitarnaya akademiya Publ., pp. 24–31. (In Russ.)

6. Gerasimov D.I. 2024. Diplomaticheskaya deyatel’nost’ L.M. Karakhana na dal’nevostochnom napravlenii SSSR (1918 — nachalo 1930-kh godov) [Diplomatic activities of L.M. Karakhan in the Far Eastern direction of the USSR (1918 — early 1930s)]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)

7. Gerasimov D.I. 2022a. Mezhdu Gomin’danom i KPK: politika Sovetskogo gosudarstva v Kitae (1918–1927 gg.) [Between the Kuomintang and the CPC: The policy of the Soviet state in China (1918–1927)]. Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 14–32. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0609.2022.5.38944. (In Russ.)

8. Gerasimov D.I. 2022b. Sovetsko-kitaiskie otnosheniya v 1919–1924 gg.: formirovanie dal’nevostochnogo uzla protivorechii [Soviet-Chinese relations in 1919–1924: Formation of the Far Eastern knot of contradictions]. Human Capital, no. 7 (163), pp. 11–22. DOI: 10.25629/HC.2022.07.01. (In Russ.)

9. Gerasimov D.I. 2023. Faktor gosudarstva Man’chzhou-Go v sovetskoyaponskikh otnosheniyakh v 1931–1935 gg. [The factor of the state of Manchougo in Soviet-Japanese relations in 1931–1935]. Human Capital, no. 4 (172), pp. 36–47. DOI: 10.25629/HC.2023.04.04. (In Russ.)

10. Datsyshen V.G. 2018. ‘Konflikt na KVZhD 1926 g.’ i ‘konflikt na KVZhD 1929 g.’: sravnitel’no-istoricheskii analiz sovetskoi politiki [‘The conflict on the CER in 1926’ and ‘the conflict on the CER in 1929’: Comparative politics]. Comparative Politics Russia, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 67–82. DOI: 10.24411/2221-32792018-10005. (In Russ.)

11. Du Ilin’. 2020. Tszyalakhan’ tszai sulyan’ dui khua chzhentse chzhun de tszoyun yui insyan yan’tszyu (1923–1926) [A study of the role and influence of Karakhan in the policy of the Soviet Union in China (1923–1926)]. Khaerbin’, Kheiluntszyan dasyue Publ. (In Chinese.)

12. Zhen’ Tszyan’shu. 2001. 20 nyan’dai chu lyan’ gun dui khua chzhentse de chzhidin [Formulation of the policy of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union in China in the early 1920s]. Shankhai sinchzhen syueyuan’ syuebao, no. 1, pp. 21–27. (In Chinese.)

13. Baldo B. et al. (eds.). 1971. Istoricheskii opyt bratskogo sodruzhestva KPSS i MNRP v bor’be za sotsializm [The historical experience of the fraternal community of the CPSU and the MPRP in the struggle for socialism]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russ.)

14. Kapitsa M.S. 1970. Lev Karakhan (1899–1937) [Lev Karakhan (1899– 1937)]. In: Astaf’ev G.V. (ed.). Vidnye sovetskie kommunisty — uchastniki kitaiskoi revolyutsii [Prominent Soviet communists — participants in the Chinese revolution]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., pp. 5–21. (In Russ.)

15. Kartunova A.I. 2015. Novaya volna interesa istorikov k problemam kitaiskoi revolyutsii 1925–1927 gg. i neobosnovannaya popytka predat’ eе zabveniyu [New wave of historians’ interest to the events of 1925–1927 Chinese revolution and a vain attempt to forget it]. Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 437–456. (In Russ.)

16. Kartunova A.I. 1983. Politika Kompartii Kitaya v rabochem voprose nakanune revolyutsii 1925–1927 godov [The policy of the Chinese Communist Party on the labor issue on the eve of the revolution of 1925–1927]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Kartunova A.I. 2014. Rol’ G.V. Chicherina v kitaiskoi politike Sovetskoi Rossii [The role of G. Chicherin in Chinese policy of Soviet Russia]. Far Eastern Studies, no. 4, pp. 77–96. (In Russ.)

18. Kryukov M.V. 2010. K voprosu o raznochteniyakh v tekste ‘Deklaratsii Karakhana’ 1919 g. (opyt tekstologicheskogo analiza) [On the discrepancies in the text of the ‘Karakhan Declaration’ of 1919 (textual analysis)]. Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 222–238. (In Russ.)

19. Liloyan G.Ts. 1989. Vydayushchiisya sovetskii diplomat: (K 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya L.M. Karakhana) [Outstanding Soviet diplomat: (On the 100th anniversary of the birth of L.M. Karakhan)]. Istoriko-filologicheskii zhurnal, no. 1, pp. 3–11. (In Armenian.)

20. Lo Syaokhuei. 2002. Lun’ 1924 nyan’ chzhun su vaitszyao guan’si de tszyan’li [On the establishment of Soviet-Chinese diplomatic relations in 1924]. Chzhuchzhou shifan’ gaoden chzhuan’ke syuesyao syuebao, no. 3, pp. 55–59. (In Chinese.)

21. Luzyanin S.G. 1998. Vzaimootnosheniya Rossii, Mongolii i Kitaya v pervoi polovine XX v.: problemy, vyvody i otsenki [Relations between Russia, Mongolia and China in the first half of the 20th century: Problems, conclusions and assessments]. In: Dal’nii Vostok Rossii — Severo-Vostok Kitaya. Istoricheskii opyt vzaimodeistviya i perspektivy sotrudnichestva [Russian Far East — Northeast of China. Historical experience of interaction and prospects of cooperation]. Khabarovsk, Chastnaya kollektsiya Publ., pp. 101–103.

22. Luzyanin S.G. 1996. Komintern, Mongoliya i kitaiskaya revolyutsiya 1925–1927 gg. [The Comintern, Mongolia and the Chinese revolution of 1925–1927.]. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriya i sovremennost’, no. 1, pp. 65–75. (In Russ.)

23. Luzyanin S.G. 1994. Mongoliya, kotoruyu my poteryali [The Mongolia, which we have lost]. Aziya i Afrika segodnya, no. 6, pp. 35–36. (In Russ.)

24. Luzyanin S.G. 1995. Mongoliya: mezhdu Kitaem i Sovetskoi Rossiei (1920–1924) [Mongolia: Between China and Soviet Russia (1920–1924)]. Far Eastern Studies, no. 2, pp. 71–84. (In Russ.)

25. Lu Tszyan’khun. 1994. Su e yui beiyan chzhenfu de tszyan’tszyao shimo [The beginning and end of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Soviet Russia and the Beijing government]. Min’go dan an’, no. 4, pp. 73–77. (In Chinese.)

26. Lyu Li. 2007. Tszya la khan’ dui khua khodun shupin [An overview of Karakhan’s activities in China]. Sinan’ tszyaotun dasyue. (In Chinese.)

27. Lyu Tszinchzhun. 2004. Su e chzhan’lin vai mengu tszi dui khua vaitszyao khodun [Soviet Russia’s occupation of Outer Mongolia and diplomatic activity towards China]. Shisyue yuekan’, no. 2, pp. 70–77. (In Chinese.)

28. Lyu Tszyan’mei. 2020. Tszyalakhan’ chzhun su guan’si shishan syuan’bu feichu dui khua bu pinden tyaoyue de byaochzhi sin zhen’u [Karakhan is an iconic figure in the history of Soviet-Chinese relations, who announced the cancellation of the unequal treaty with China]. Dan shi bo tsai (shan). (In Chinese.)

29. Ornatskaya T.A., Tsipkin Yu.N. 2007. Otnosheniya Dal’nevostochnoi respubliki s Kitaem (1920–1922 gg.) [Relations between Far Eastern Republic and China (1920–1922)]. Russia and the Pacific, no. 3 (57), pp. 17–26. (In Russ.)

30. Sokolov V.V. 1983. Na boevykh postakh diplomaticheskogo fronta. Zhizn’ i deyatel’nost’ L.M. Karakhana [At the combat sites of the diplomatic front. The life and work of L.M. Karakhan]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury Publ. (In Russ.)

31. Sokolov V.V. 1989. Polpred v Kitae Lev Karakhan [Envoy to China Lev Karakhan]. In: Popov N.V. (ed.). Otkryvaya novye stranitsy...: Mezhdunarodnye voprosy: sobytiya i lyudi [Opening new pages...: International issues: Events and people]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ. (In Russ.)

32. Sokolov V.V. 1978a. Stranitsy zhizni i deyatel’nosti L.M. Karakhana [Pages of L.M. Karakhan’s life and work]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 3, pp. 90–103. (In Russ.)

33. Sokolov V.V. 1978b. Stranitsy zhizni i deyatel’nosti L.M. Karakhana [Pages of L.M. Karakhan’s life and work]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 4, pp. 103–112. (In Russ.)

34. Sokolov V.V. 1978c. Stranitsy zhizni i deyatel’nosti L.M. Karakhana [Pages of L.M. Karakhan’s life and work]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 5, pp. 116–127. (In Russ.)

35. Sopel’nyak B.N. 2015. Tainy russkoi diplomatii [Secrets of Russian diplomacy]. Moscow, Veche Publ. (In Russ.)

36. Sun’ Tsaishun’. 1997. Pin chzhun su tszaotsi vai mengu ven’ti chzhi tszyaoshe [A commentary on the first Sino-Soviet negotiations on Outer Mongolia]. Khuaibei mei shi yuan’ syuebao, no. 1, pp. 6–10. (In Chinese.)

37. Su e di i tsy dui khua syuan’yan’ dui chzhun su guan’si de in syan (Khu Tszishen’ i) [The influence of the First Declaration of Soviet Russia on China on Soviet-Chinese relations. Trans. by Hu Jishen]. 1988. Danshi yan’tszyu yui tszyaosyue. no. 5, pp. 77–78. (In Chinese.)

38. Syue Zhuikhan’. 2003. Tsunchzhun su tszetszyue syuan’an’ dagan sedin de tsyan’din kan’ su e tszaotsi dui khua chzhentse [A look at the early policy of Soviet Russia towards China since the signing of the general agreement on the settlement of unresolved cases between China and the Soviet Union]. Lishi tszyaosyue, no. 2, pp. 44–46. (In Chinese.)

39. Tyan’ Baogo. 1999. Min’go shitsi chzhun su guan’si (1917–1949) [Sino-Soviet relations during the Republic of China (1917–1949)]. Tszinan’ chuban’she. (In Chinese.)

40. U Mensyue. 1993. Tszyalakhan’ shi khua khe tszyu vaitszyao tuan’ de tszeti beitszin — chzhenfu khoutsi de i chan vaitszyao tszyuechzhu [Karakhan’s mission to China and the collapse of the old diplomatic corps — Diplomatic rivalry in the late period of the Beijing government]. Tszin’dai shi yan’tszyu, no. 2, pp. 169–181. (In Chinese.)

41. U Yuan’kan. 2006. 1925 nyan’di chzhungun yui gomin’dan yupai tan’pan’ yuan’in’ byan’si [Analysis of the rationale behind the negotiations between the CPC and the right-wing Kuomintang at the end of 1925]. Khefei syueyuan’ syuebao, no. 2, pp. 51–54. (In Chinese.)

42. Khuan Dintyan’. 2004. Tsunchzhun su sedin dao su zhi sedin i 1924 nyan’ tsyan’khou sulyan’ de dui khua dui zhi vaitszyao [From the Soviet-Chinese agreement to the Soviet-Japanese agreement — The relations of the Soviet Union with China and Japan circa 1924]. Syueshu tszyaolyu, no. 3, pp. 157–162. (In Chinese.)

43. Khuan Tszilyan. 1982. Tszyalakhan’ i vaigo paichzhu chzhungo de di i zhen’ da shi [Karakhan is the first foreign ambassador to China]. Lishi tszyaosyue, no. 8, pp. 43–44. Available at: http://jds.cssn.cn/webpic/web/jdsww/UploadFiles/ztsjk/2010/11/201011181341001397.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2024). (In Chinese.)

44. Chzhao Ven’lyan, Khu Siyuan’. 1999. Tszyalakhan’ yui sulyan’ tszao tsi duikhua vaitszyao [Karakhan and the early Chinese diplomacy of the Soviet Union]. Khenan’ shifan’ dasyue syuebao (chzhesyue shekhuei kesyue ban’). (In Chinese.)

45. Chzhou Khai. 2005. Chzhun e sedin shi su e vaitszyaotszyan’ de chan’u [The Sino-Russian agreement is a product of Soviet-Russian diplomatic practice]. Lyaonin shi chzhuan’ syuebao, no. 5, pp. 135–136. (In Chinese.)

46. Yan Kuisun. 1990. Dagemin tsyan’tsi de gogun guan’si yui gunchan’ gotszi [Relations between the Kuomintang, the CPC and the Comintern in the early period of the Great Revolution]. Ven’ shi chzhe, no. 6, pp. 48–55. (In Chinese.)


Review

For citations:


Sotnikova I.N. The role of L.M. Karakhan in the Chinese policy of the Soviet Union (1923–1926). Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2024;16(3):7-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2024-16-3-7-52

Views: 151


ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)