The die is cast: Sweden and Finland’s long road to NATO

The accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO came as a shock to many politicians and experts, who until the last moment had believed that these two states would not renounce their traditional neutrality policy. The surprise effect was further enhanced by a remarkable coherence of the countries’ approaches to their membership in the alliance. In order to provide a better understanding of this fundamental shift in Sweden and Finland’s foreign policy courses, this paper examines the evolution of their policies of neutrality during the tribulations of the Cold War. The first section considers the formation of the non-aligned strategies of Finland and Sweden in the aftermath of World War II, which took the form of the so-called Paasikivi-Kekkonen and Unden doctrines, respectively. The author emphasizes that, despite the formal resemblance, the approaches of Sweden and Finland to the neutrality policy varied substantially, since their ambitions and aspirations, as well as their role in the emerging bipolar order were also very different. However, the two states had tended to coordinate their foreign policies already back then and this trend only strengthened in the following decades of the Cold War. The second section shows how the Finnish neutrality model, initially focused on building special relations with the USSR, and a more flexible Swedish non–aligned policy, facilitated convergence of the two states, as well as their cooperation with the Nordic members of NATO. The third section outlines the determinants of the foreign policy transformation of the Northern European neutrals in the aftermath of the Cold War. The author notes that it was the collapse of the bipolar order that paved the way for the comprehensive engagement of Finland and Sweden in the activities of the alliance. It is shown that apart from this cooperation with NATO, a number of regional initiatives involving the Nordic and Baltic countries strengthened foreign policy coordination and contacts between Finland and Sweden. The formal accession of both to NATO thus became only the end point of these processes and the result of the conscious refusal of these countries’ leadership from the original and time-tested non-alignment policy. The consequences of this decision have yet to be assessed by politicians and experts, but one its immediate effect is clear — the emergence of a new security dilemma for the countries of the region.

1. Aleksandrov-Agentov A.M. 1994. Ot Kollontai do Gorbacheva: Vospominaniya diplomata, sovetnika A.A. Gromyko, pomoshchnika L.I. Brezhneva, Yu.V. Andropova, K.U. Chernenko i M.S. Gorbacheva [From Kollontai to Gorbachev: Memoirs of the diplomat, adviser to A.A. Gromyko, assistant to L.I. Brezhnev, Yu.V. Andropov, K.U. Chernenko and M.S. Gorbachev]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Andreev S. 2022. Novaya geopoliticheskaya real’nost’: vzglyad iz Khel’sinki [The new geopolitical reality: A view from Helsinki]. Russian International Affairs Council. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/novaya-geopoliticheskaya-realnost-vzglyad-iz-khelsinki/?ysclid=lznxzk8ms959910832 (accessed: 09.09.2024). (In Russ.)

3. Belousov A.S., Manykin A.S. 2021. ‘Kholodnaya voina’ kak forma konfliktnogo vzaimodeistviya sverkhderzhav v bipolyarnom mire [Cold war as a form of conflict interaction between superpowers in a bipolar world]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8: History, no. 5, pp. 97–117. (In Russ.)

4. Belukhin N.E. 2019. Severnoe oboronnoe sotrudnichestvo (NORDEFKO) — 10 let spustya [Nordic Defense Cooperation (NORDEFCO) — 10 years’ anniversary]. Journal of International Analytics, no. 4 (30), pp. 28–39. (In Russ.)

5. Vezhlivtseva N.Yu. 2019. Neitralitet Finlyandii kak chast’ ee natsional’noi identichnosti [Finland’s neutrality as part of its national identity]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2 (65), pp. 86–100. DOI: 10.24833/20718160-2019-2-65-86-100. (In Russ.)

6. Vorkunova O.A. 1985. Skandinaviya i razvivayushchiesya strany: seredina 70-kh — seredina 80-kh gg. [Scandinavia and developing countries: mid-1970s — mid-80s]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)

7. Voronov K.V. 2018. Severnyi neitralizm: istoricheskii final ili transformatsiya? [Nordic neutralism in the XXI century: Historical finale or a new transformation?]. Contemporary Europe, no. 1 (80), pp. 80–89. DOI: 10.15211/ soveurope120188089. (In Russ.)

8. Gamov V.P. 1988. SDRPSh i shvedskaya politika v otnoshenii razvivayushchikhsya stran (1960-e — pervaya polovina 1970-kh gg.) [The Swedish Social Democratic Party and Swedish policy towards developing countries (1960s — first half of the 1970s)]. Skandinavskii sbornik, no. 31, pp. 5–20. (In Russ.)

9. Gromyko Al.A., Plevako N.S. 2016. O vozmozhnom vstuplenii Shvetsii i Finlyandii v NATO [On the Sweden’s and Finland’s optional membership in NATO]. Contemporary Europe, no. 2 (68), pp. 13–16. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope220161316. (In Russ.)

10. Danilov D.A. 2022. Finlyandiya i Shvetsiya u otkrytykh dverei NATO [Finland and Sweden on the threshold of NATO’s open door]. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, no. 2 (26), pp. 16–23. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran220221623. (In Russ.)

11. Zaretskaya O.V. 2005. Sozdanie Severnogo oboronitel’nogo soyuza: norvezhskaya i shvedskaya politika v kontse 40-kh godov XX veka [The creation of the Northern Defensive Alliance: Norwegian and Swedish politics in the late 1940s]. In: Zharov B.S., Shrader T.A. (eds.). Skandinavskie chteniya 2005 goda: etnograficheskie i kul’turno-istoricheskie aspekty [Scandinavian readings 2005: Ethnographic and cultural-historical aspects]. Saint Petersburg, Muzei antropologii i etnografii im. Petra Velikogo (Kunstkamera) RAS Publ., pp. 81–87. (In Russ.)

12. Kan A.S. 1999. Shvetsiya i Rossiya v proshlom i nastoyashchem [Sweden and Russia in the past and present]. Moscow, Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Ken O.N., Rupasov A.I., Samuel’son L. 2005. Shvetsiya v politike Moskvy, 1930–1950-e gg. [Sweden in Moscow’s politics, 1930s–1950s]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

14. Kilin Yu.M. 2017. Neitral’nye gosudarstva na rasput’e: problema vstupleniya v NATO Finlyandii i Shvetsii [Neutral states at the crossroad: The issue of Sweden and Finland’s membership in NATO]. Contemporary Europe, no. 2 (74), pp. 65–76. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope220176576. (In Russ.)

15. Kislitsyn S.V. 2018. Voenno-politicheskoe sotrudnichestvo SShA s Finlyandiei i Shvetsiei na sovremennom etape [Military and political cooperation of the United States with Finland and Sweden in modern times]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 376–389. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2018.404. (In Russ.)

16. Komarov A.A. 2021. Ideya severoevropeiskogo neitraliteta i ‘rech’ iz karmana pizhamy’ Urkho Kaleva Kekkonena [The idea of Nordic neutrality and Urho Kaleva Kekkonen’s ‘Pajama Pocket Speech’]. In: Dunaeva N.V., Kashchenko S.G. (eds.). Istoriya Rossii i Finlyandii v sovremennykh issledovaniyakh: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov [History of Russia and Finland in current research: Collection of research works]. Saint Petersburg, Prezidentskaya biblioteka imeni B.N. El’tsina Publ., pp. 154–165. (In Russ.)

17. Komarov A.A. 2014. K voprosu o neitralitete Shvetsii [On Sweden’s neutrality]. In: Komarov A.A. (ed.). Baltiiskoe sosedstvo: Rossiya, Shvetsiya, strany Baltii na fone epokh i sobytii XIX–XXI vv. [Baltic neighbourhood. Russia, Sweden and the Baltic states amid the ages and events of XIXth–XXIth centuries]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., pp. 178–188. (In Russ.)

18. Komarov A.A. 2022. Sovetskii Soyuz i stremlenie Finlyandii k neitralitetu [The Soviet Union and Finland’s aspirations for neutrality]. Peterburgskii istoricheskii zhurnal, no. 3 (35), pp. 136–152. DOI: 10.51255/2311603X_2022_3_136. (In Russ.)

19. Komarov A.A. 2003. SSSR i Skandinavskii oboronitel’nyi soyuz (1948– 1949) [The USSR and the Scandinavian Defense Union (1948–1949)]. Severnaya Evropa. Problemy istorii, no. 4, pp. 90–105. (In Russ.)

20. Komarov A.A., Korobochkin M.L. 2019. SSSR i shvedskii neitralitet. 1945 g. — seredina 1950-kh gg. [The USSR and Swedish neutrality, 1945 — mid1950s]. In: Chubar’yan A.O., Vorob’eva O.V. (eds.) Rossiya v mire: obrazy i grani vzaimodeistviya [Russia in the world: Images and facets of interaction]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., pp. 338–380. (In Russ.)

21. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. 2012. Strany Severnoi Evropy: budet li obshchaya arkticheskaya strategiya? [The countries of Northern Europe: Will there be a common Arctic strategy?]. Contemporary Europe, no. 2 (50), pp. 35–43. (In Russ.)

22. Korunova E.V. 2022. Krizis razryadki i novaya konfrontatsiya: vyzov vneblokovoi politike Shvetsii [Detente crisis and new confrontation: A challenge to Sweden’s non-aligned policy]. Prepodavanie istorii i obshchestvoznaniya v shkole, no. 7, pp. 26–28. DOI: 10.47639/2074-4035_2022_7_15. (In Russ.)

23. Korunova E.V. 2020. Neitralitet ili uchastie? Vtoraya mirovaya voina i evolyutsiya vneshnepoliticheskikh kontseptsii skandinavskikh stran [Neutrality or involvement? World War II and evolution of foreign policy concepts of the Nordic countries]. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 222–256. DOI: 10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-3-222-256. (In Russ.)

24. Korunova E.V. 2021. Ot eventual’nogo neitraliteta k vneblokovoi politike na nachal’nom etape ‘kholodnoi voiny’: opyt Shvetsii [From eventual neutrality to non-aligned policy at the initial stage of the Cold War: The Swedish experience]. Istoriya, vol. 12, no. 7 (105). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016461-6. Available at: https://history.jes.su/s207987840016461-6-1/ (accessed: 09.09.2024). (In Russ.)

25. Korunova E.V. 2023. Politicheskii duet Unden–Khammarshël’d: novaya doktrina shvedskogo neitraliteta v deistvii [Undén–Hammarsjöld political duet: The new doctrine of Swedish neutrality in action]. Istoriya, vol. 14, no. 8 (130). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027802-1. Available at: https://history.jes.su/S207987840027802-1-1 (accessed: 09.09.2024). (In Russ.)

26. Korunova E.V. 2016. Ulof Pal’me — aristokrat s dushoi sotsialista [Olof Palme — an aristocrat with the soul of a socialist]. Prepodavanie istorii i obshchestvoznaniya v shkole, no. 8, pp. 14–26. (In Russ.)

27. Muradov A. 2019. Faktor Shvetsii v dialoge po linii Finlyandiya — NATO [The Swedish factor in the Finland–NATO dialogue]. Russian International Affairs Council. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/columns/europeanpolicy/faktor-shvetsii-v-dialoge-po-linii-finlyandiya-nato/?ysclid=lznxnrhv9y507830251 (accessed: 08.09.2024). (In Russ.)

28. Plevako N.S. 2023. Bezopasnost’ Shvetsii i NATO: doroga s prepyatstviyami [The security of Sweden and NATO: Road with obstacles]. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, no. 1 (31), pp. 26–35. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran120232635. (In Russ.)

29. Plevako N.S. 2022. Shvedskii i finskii neitralitet. V proshlom? [Swedish and Finnish neutrality. In the past?]. Scientific and Analytical Herald of the Institute of Europe RAS, no. 2 (26), pp. 24–31. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran220222431. (In Russ.)

30. Rupasov A.I. 2014. Shvetsiya v politike SSSR v kontse 1940-kh — nachale 1960-kh gg. [Sweden in the USSR’s politics in the late 1940s — early 1960s]. Saint Petersburg: Politekhnika-servis Publ. (In Russ.)

31. Rupasov A.I., Samuel’son L. 2014. Sovetsko-shvedskie otnosheniya: vtoraya polovina 1940-kh — nachalo 1960-kh gg. [Soviet-Swedish relations: The second half of the 1940s and the early 1960s]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

32. Sadomtseva A.R. 2024. Vneblokovaya politika Shvetsii v 1949–1962 godakh [Sweden’s non-aligned policy in 1949–1962]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)

33. Trunov F.O. 2018. Severoevropeiskoe izmerenie deyatel’nosti NATO na sovremennom etape [Northern European dimension of the NATO activity during the modern period]. Problemy evropeiskoi bezopasnosti, no. 3, pp. 127–149. (In Russ.)

34. Khudolei K.K., Lanko D.A. 2019. Finskaya dilemma bezopasnosti, NATO i faktor Vostochnoi Evropy [Finnish security dilemma, NATO and the factor of Eastern Europe]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 13–20. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-3-13-20. (In Russ.)

35. Chekov A.D., Vorotnikov V.V., Chechevishnikov A.L., Yakutova U.V. 2023. Posledstviya vstupleniya Finlyandii i Shvetsii v NATO dlya natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossii [Finland and Sweden joining NATO: Consequences for Russia’s national security]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 19–29. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-10-19-29. (In Russ.)

36. Agrell W. 1983. Spelet om neutralitet. Stockholm.

37. Andrén N. 1967. Power-balance and non-alignment. A perspective on Swedish foreign policy. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.

38. Bjereld U., Johansson A.W., Molin K. 2008. Sveriges säkerhet och världens fred: Svensk utrikespolitik under kalla kriget. Stockholm, Santérus.

39. Brundtland A.O. 1966a. The Nordic balance. Past and present. Cooperation and Conflict, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 30–63. DOI: 10.1177/001083676600100403.

40. Brundtland A.O. 1966b. Nordisk balance far og nå. Internasjonal Politikk, no. 5, pp. 491–541.

41. Dalsjö R. 2006. Life-line lost: The rise and fall of ‘neutral’ Sweden’s secret reserve option of wartime help from the West. Stockholm, Santérus Academic Press.

42. Harrison D. 2017. Jag har ingen vilja till makt. Biografi över Tage Erlander. Stockholm, Ordfront.

43. Ludders E. 1991. Sweden and Western intelligence collaboration. A regime study. Stockholm.

44. Malmborg af M. 2001. Neutrality and statebuilding in Sweden. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

45. Rentola K.K. 2018. The Finnish view. In: Arteus G., Zetterberg K. (eds.).Cold War views on Sweden. Stockholm, Medströms Bokförlag, pp. 33–43.

46. Saxi H.L. 2014. Nordic Defence Cooperation (NORDEFCO): Balancing efficiency and sovereignty, NATO and nonalignment. In: Lepojärvi K. (ed.). Perspectives on European Security — STETE Yearbook 2013. Helsinki, The Finnish Committee for European Security (STETE), pp. 68–72. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326986056_Nordic_Defence_Cooperation_NORDEFCO_Balancing_efficiency_and_sovereignty_NATO_and_nonalignment (accessed: 09.09.2024).

47. Walter T.E. 2018. The Norwegian view. In: Arteus G., Zetterberg K. (eds.). Cold War views on Sweden. Stockholm, Medströms Bokförlag, pp. 47–77.