Military security in the Arctic: New threats to Russia

In recent years, the military and political landscape in the Arctic has changed significantly. This region has been rapidly losing the status of a ‘zone for peace and cooperation’, turning into an arena of increasingly intense interstate rivalry. The accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO became a landmark event in the evolution of the military and political situation in the Arctic. This article attempts to identify the causes and driving forces behind these processes, as well as to assess the threats they pose to Russia’s national security. In the first section the authors argue that the NATO countries under the pretext of the growing hybrid threat from the Russian Federation have themselves launched an active information campaign in the spirit of hybrid warfare aimed at demonizing Russia and enforcing on public a Cold War-style black-and-white picture of reality as a ‘zero-sum game’. Moreover, the authors emphasize that this anti-Russian campaign began long before the aggravation of the ‘Ukrainian crisis’. As such, it reflects the American elites’ awareness of the growing decline in the U.S. influence and the erosion of the ‘rules-based order’. The second section examines the specific steps taken by the United States and its allies in order to build up their military and political potential in the Arctic and accelerate the militarization of the region. Special attention is paid to the bilateral agreements on security cooperation between the United States and Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Denmark. According to these agreements, Washington was able to deploy personnel, equipment and weapons in these countries on a permanent basis and conduct military exercises. In these conditions, the main threats to Russia’s military security in the Arctic, according to the authors, include: deployment of the U.S. / NATO military infrastructure and troops in the region; the formation of an anti-Russian bloc of Scandinavian states under the control of the alliance; modernization of the Arctic powers’ armed forces; intensification of naval activities of NATO countries in the Arctic seas. In general, the military-strategic situation in the Arctic has already deteriorated significantly with regard to the national interests of the Russian Federation. However, the authors stress that both the current situation in the region and possible scenarios for its future development cannot be assessed in isolation from the general crisis of international relations, focusing solely on regional aspects of security. Apart from the Arctic, tensions are growing in other regions of the world, which also requires the West to allocate there more resources in order to maintain its influence.

1. Evmenov N.A., Puchnin V.V., Eshchenko Ya.V. 2023. Osnovnye tendentsii izmeneniya kharaktera i soderzhaniya voennykh ugroz Rossiiskoi Federatsii s okeanskikh i morskikh napravlenii [Main trends in the changing nature and content of military threats to the Russian Federation from oceanic and naval directions]. Voennaya ’mysl’, no. 5, pp. 19–25. (In Russ.)

2. Zagorskii A.V., Todorov A.A. 2021. Voenno-politicheskaya obstanovka v Arktike: ochagi napryazhennosti i puti deeskalatsii [Military-political situation in the Arctic: Hotspots of tension and ways of de-escalation]. Arktika i Sever, no. 44, pp. 79–102. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2021.44.79. (In Russ.)

3. Konyshev V.N. 2020. Arktika na grani gibridnoi voiny? [Is the Arctic on the brink of a hybrid war?]. Arktika i Sever, no. 40, pp. 165–182. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.40.165. (In Russ.)

4. Konyshev V.N., Parfenov R.V. 2019. Gibridnye voiny: mezhdu mifom i real’nost’yu [Hybrid wars: Between myth and reality]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 46–56. DOI: 10.20542/0131-22272019-63-12-56-66. (In Russ.)

5. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. 2023. Novoe vino v starykh mekhakh? Ob arkticheskoi strategii Dzh. Baidena [New wine in old skins? On the Biden administration’s Arctic strategy]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 77–87. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-7-63-73. (In Russ.)

6. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. 2018. Rossiisko-amerikanskie otnosheniya v Arktike: sotrudnichestvo ili sopernichestvo? [U.S. — Russia relations in the Arctic: Cooperation or competition?]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 103–111. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-9-103-111. (In Russ.)

7. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. 2024. Rossiisko-amerikanskoe nauchnoe sotrudnichestvo v Arktike v ehpokhu geopoliticheskoi turbulentnosti [Russian-American scientific cooperation in the Arctic in the age of geopolitical turbulence]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 138–144. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2024.1.12. (In Russ.)

8. Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A. 2017. Sovremennaya voennaya strategiya Norvegii v Arktike i bezopasnost’ Rossii [Contemporary military strategy of Norway in the Arctic and the security of Russia]. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 353–368. DOI: 10.24891/ni.13.2.353. (In Russ.)

9. Kostenko A.N. 2024. Natsional’naya bezopasnost’ Rossii i vyzovy novogo vremeni [Russia’s national security and modern challenges]. Voennaya mysl’, no. 1, pp. 6–14. (In Russ.)

10. Mazhuga S.N., Tolstykh V.V. 2023. Kharakternye osobennosti sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i ikh vliyanie na sotrudnichestvo mezhdu gosudarstvami [The characteristics of contemporary international relations and their impact on cooperation between states]. Voennaya mysl’, no. 9, pp. 6–20. (In Russ.)

11. Plevako N.S. 2024. Prezidentskie vybory v Finlyandii 2024 g. [Presidential elections in Finland 2024]. Analiticheskie zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN, no. 7 (339), pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)

12. Sinchuk Yu.V., Zhuravel’ V.P. 2017. Arktika: NATO contra Rossiya [Arctic: NATO contra Russia]. Geopolitika i bezopasnost’, no. 3, pp. 113–120. (In Russ.)

13. Xueping C., Pecheritsa V. 2024. Militarizatsiya Arktiki i problemy ukrepleniya bezopasnosti [Militarization of the Arctic and security enhancement issues]. Rossijsko-kitajskie issledovaniya, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–68.

14. Todorov A.A. 2020. Shpitsbergen v kontekste voennoi bezopasnosti v Arktike [Svalbard in the context of Arctic security]. Arktika i Sever, no. 39, pp. 127–143. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.39.127. (In Russ.)

15. Trunov F.O. 2024. Osobennosti i perspektivy strategicheskogo proniknoveniya NATO v Arktiku: norvezhskoe napravlenie [Features and perspectives of NATO’s strategic penetration into the Arctic: The Norwegian dimension]. Arktika i Sever, no. 54, pp. 117–139. DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2024.54.117. (In Russ.)

16. Tsyui S., Pecheritsa V.F., Lo S. 2024. Militarizatsiya Arktiki i problemy ukrepleniya bezopasnosti rossiiskogo Severa [Militarisation of the Arctic and problems of strengthening the security of the Russian North]. Rossiisko-kitaiskie issledovaniya, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 57–68. DOI: 10.17150/2587-7445.2024.8(1).57-68. (In Russ.)

17. Chekov A.D., Vorotnikov V.V., Chechevishnikov A.L., Yakutova U.V. 2023. Posledstviya vstupleniya Finlyandii i Shvetsii v NATO dlya natsional’noi bezopasnosti Rossii [Finland and Sweden joining NATO: Consequences for Russia’s national security]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 19–29. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-10-19-29. (In Russ.)

18. Churkin I.P. 2023. Obespechenie bezopasnosti Severnogo morskogo puti silami operativnogo ob’’edineniya VVS i PVO Severnogo flota [Protection of the Northern Sea route by the air force and the anti-aircraft operational group of the Northern Fleet]. Voennaya mysl’, no. 9, pp. 38–44. (In Russ.)

19. Bertelsen R. 2019. The Arctic as a laboratory of global governance: The case of knowledge-based cooperation and science diplomacy. In: Finger M., Heininen L. (eds.). The global Arctic handbook. Cham, Springer, pp. 251–269.

20. Byers M. 2013. International law and the Arctic. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

21. Chivvis C. 2017. Hybrid war: Russian contemporary political warfare. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 316–321.

22. Gjorv G. 2024. Security and geopolitics in the Arctic: The increase of hybrid threat activities in the Norwegian High North. Helsinki, The European Center for Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/20240327-Hybrid-CoE-Working-Paper30-Security-and-geopolitics-in-the-Arctic-WEB-corr.pdf (accessed: 01.03.2024).

23. Götz, E., Staun, J. 2022. Why Russia attacked Ukraine: Strategic culture and radicalized narratives. Contemporary Security Policy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 482–497. DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2022.2082633.

24. Harjanne A., Muilu E., Smith H. 2018. Helsinki in the era of hybrid threats — hybrid influencing and the city. Helsinki, The European Center for Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Helsinki-in-the-era-of-hybrid-threats-%E2%80%93-Hybrid-influencing-and-the-city_ENG.pdf (accessed: 01.03.2024).

25. Kavanagh E. 2024. Arctic governance: An analysis of a treaty-based cooperation hypothesis. Spanish Yearbook of International Law, no. 27, pp. 257–265.

26. Mälksoo M. 2022. The postcolonial moment in Russia’s war against Ukraine. Journal of Genocide Research, vol. 25, no. 3–4, pp. 471–481. DOI: 10.1080/14623528.2022.2074947.

27. Menzel M. 2018. Countering hybrid threats with air power? Making true sense of the ‘hybrid war’ concept. The Journal of the JAPCC, ed. 26, pp. 80–85. Available at: https://www.japcc.org/wp-content/uploads/JAPCC_J26_screen.pdf (accessed: 17.07.2024).

28. Mikkola H. 2019. The geostrategic Arctic: Hard security in the High North. FIIA Briefing Papers. № 259. Helsinki, Finnish Institute of Foreign Affairs.

29. Nuclear energy and the current security environment in the era of hybrid threats. 2019. Research Report. Helsinki, The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats. Available at: https://www.hybridcoe.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Nuclear-Research-Report-2019_web.pdf (accessed: 11.05.2024).

30. Paul M. 2023. U.S. Arctic security policy: North American Arctic strategies, Russian hubris and Chinese ambitions. SWP Comments, no. 40, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/279928/1/1853037338.pdf (accessed: 16.05.2024).

31. Tingstad A., Savitz S., Sacks B. 2023. Report on the Arctic capabilities of the U.S. Armed Forces. Homeland Security Operational Analysis Center. Santa Monica, RAND.

32. Treverton G., Thvedt A., Chen A. 2018. Addressing hybrid threats. Stockholm, Swedish Defense University.