Contours of the post-war security system in Europe in French strategic and diplomatic assessments (1943– 1949)

The issues of post-war settlement have always attracted the attention of researchers, yet this agenda is becoming particularly relevant amidst the ongoing dramatic transformation of international relations. In this context, the study of the mechanisms and logic behind the advent of the Yalta-Potsdam order is especially relevant. The paper aims to trace the evolution of French strategic and diplomatic assessments regarding the key parameters of the security system in Europe following the Second World War. The case of France can serve as an illustrative example of the process of a former great-power’s painful adaption to the new international realities, associated with the loss of its status. To this end, the paper not only draws on a wide range of rare archival documents, but also adapts a new theoretical framework to explicate the evolution of the French foreign policy during the formation years of the Yalta-Potsdam order — the concept of ‘hysteresis of habitus’. The latter helps to highlight the extent to which the French policy makers at that time tended to reproduce traditional practices, disregarding the changing international context. The first section shows that this political inertia was particularly common to French foreign policy planning in 1943–1944. However, it was already the period of 1945–1947 that the ‘habitus’ transformation began: French diplomacy abandoned attempts to weaken Germany as much as possible in favour of rapprochement with Great Britain and the United States. Meanwhile, the French military increasingly began to focus on the ‘Soviet threat’. The beginning of the Cold War confronted Paris with the need to integrate into the ‘Western consensus’, yet without becoming a satellite of the Anglo-Saxon powers. In these circumstances, French diplomacy in 1948–1949 focused on Western European integration. This conceptual transformation of the foreign policy ‘habitus’ manifested itself in the active engagement of France with the Western military-political blocs: the Western Union and NATO. At the same time, it revealed the fundamental inconsistency of the French foreign policy aspirations. On the one hand, France sought to ensure its independence and avoid becoming the U.S. satellite, on the other, it was in dire need of military and political guarantees and loans from the United States. Finding a balance between these components of France’s new foreign policy ‘habitus’ remained a difficult task for Paris throughout the Cold War. The author concludes that although it is possible to observe the ‘hysteresis of habitus’ effect in the French foreign policy planning during the period under consideration, the country’s leadership also demonstrated the ability to tailor its plans to the logic of the intensifying Cold War. At the same time, a number of basic components of the country’s foreign policy identity, primarily the imperative of restoring ‘greatness’, remained constants of French politics.

1. Arzakanyan M.Ts. 2012. Velikii de Goll’. ‘Frantsiya — eto ya!’ [Great de Gaulle. ‘I am France!’]. Moscow, Yauza, Eksmo Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Belousov L.S., Manykin A.S. 2021. ‘Kholodnaya voina’ kak forma konfliktnogo vzaimodeistviya sverkhderzhav v bipolyarnom mire [Cold War as a form of conflict interaction between superpowers in a bipolar world]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 8: History, no. 5, pp. 97–117. (In Russ.)

3. Boldyreva O.M. 2008. Zhan Monne. U istokov edinoi Evropy [Jean Monnet. Origins of the united Europe]. Elets, Eletskii gosudarstvennyi universitet im. I.A. Bunina Publ. (In Russ.)

4. Bourdieu P. 1989. Le Sens pratique. Paris, Lee Editions de Minuit [Russ. ed.: Burd’e P. 2001. Prakticheskii smysl. Saint Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ.].

5. Belousov L.S., Manykin A.S. (eds.). 2020. Vtoraya mirovaya voina i transformatsiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: ot mnogopolyarnosti k bipolyarnomu miru [Second World War and transformation of the international relations: From multipolarity to bipolar world]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Kaninskaya G.N. 2008. Kolonial’nye voiny v Indokitae i Alzhire i frantsuzskoe obshchestvo [Colonial wars in Indochina and Algeria, and reaction of the French society]. In: Rzheshevskii O.A. (ed.). Voina i obshchestvo v XX veke. V 3 kn. Kn. 3: Voina i obshchestvo v period lokal’nykh voin i konfliktov vtoroi poloviny XX veka [War and society in the 20th century. In 3 books. Book 3: War and society during local wars and conflicts of the second half of 20th century]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., pp. 132–175. (In Russ.)

7. Kaninskaya G.N. 1999. Radikaly i radikalizm v poslevoennoi Frantsii [Radicals and radicalism in the post-war France]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Magadeev I.E. 2020. Frantsuzskii vektor vneshnei politiki SSSR (fevral’ 1943 g. — fevral’ 1945 g.) [French vector of the Soviet foreign policy (February 1943 — February 1945)]. In: Torkunov A.V. (ed.). Istoriya Velikoi Pobedy. V 3 t. Т. 3. Voina i diplomatiya [History of the great victory. In 3 vols. Vol. 3: War and diplomacy]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., pp. 285–370. (In Russ.)

9. Narinskiy M.M. 2011. Berlinskii krizis 1948–1949 gg. [The Berlin Crises 1948–1949]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 1 (16), pp. 162–172. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2011-1-16-162-172. (In Russ.)

10. Naumova N.N. 2015. Razrabotka evropeiskoi idei v ramkakh frantsuzskogo dvizheniya Soprotivleniya: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Elaboration of the European projects within the French Resistance movement: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference]. In: Karpov S.P., Tuchkov I.I. (eds.) Vtoraya mirovaya voina v istorii chelovechestva. 1939–1945 gg. [Second World War in the human history, 1939–1945]. Moscow, Izdatel’ Stepanenko Publ., pp. 320–326. (In Russ.)

11. Naumova N.N., Falaleev P.I. 2016. Evropeiskaya ideya vo Frantsii v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [The European idea in France in Second World War]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 2, pp. 18–33. (In Russ.)

12. Obichkina E.O. 2012. Vneshnyaya politika Frantsii ot de Gollya do Sarkozi (1940–2012) [French foreign policy from de Gaulle to Sarkozy (1940–2012)]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Soutou G.-H. 2006. ‘Svobodnaya Frantsiya’ i mesto SSSR v evropeiskoi sisteme [‘Free France’ and place of the USSR in the European system]. In: Narinskiy M.M. (ed.). SSSR i Frantsiya v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [USSR and France during the Second World War]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., pp. 154–181. (In Russ.)

14. Falaleev P.I. 2016. Vneshniaia politika Frantsuzskogo komiteta natsional’nogo osvobozhdeniia i Vremennogo pravitel’stva Frantsuzskoi Respubliki (1943–1946 gg.) [Foreign policy of the French Committee of National Liberation and the Provisional Government of the French Republic (1943–1946)]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)

15. Falaleev P.I. 2020. ‘Plan Marshalla’ i zapadnoevropeiskaya integratsiya: evolyutsiya pozitsii Velikobritanii i Frantsii (1947–1948) [The Marshall plan and the European integration: The stance of Great Britain and France (1947–1948)]. Lomonosov World Politics Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 165–190. DOI: 10.48015/20767404-2020-12-3-165-190. (In Russ.)

16. Falaleev P.I. 2019. Pozitsiya Frantsii po voprosu obrazovaniya Severoatlanticheskogo al’yansa — NATO [French position towards the formation of the North Atlantic alliance]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 5, pp. 109–127. DOI: 10.31857/S013038640005855-8. (In Russ.)

17. Cherkasov P.P. 1985. Raspad kolonial’noi imperii Frantsii: krizis frantsuzskoi kolonial’noi politiki v 1939–1985 gg. [Desintegration of the French colonial empire: Crisis of the French colonial policy in 1939–1985] Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

18. Shmelev D.V. 2010. Zhorzh Bido: intellektual, politik, diplomat (shtrikhi k biografii) [Georges Bidault: An intellectual, political leader and diplomat (biographical sketch)]. In: Salakhov M.Kh. (ed.). Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Т. 152. Kn. 3. Ch. 1 [Scholarly memos of the Kazan State University, vol. 152, book 3, part 1]. Kazan’: Kazanskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., pp. 262–273. (In Russ.)

19. Allard M. 2005. La France face à la soviétisation de l’Europe de l’Est: le cas tchécoslovaque (1944–1948). In: Bozo F. (ed.). Relations internationales et stratégie: De la guerre froide à la guerre contre le terrorisme. Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes, pp. 13–28.

20. Bariéty J. 1994. La France et la crise internationale du blocus de Berlin. Histoire, économie et société, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 29–44.

21. Bézias J.-R. 2006. Georges Bidault et la politique étrangère de la France. États-Unis, Europe, Proche-Orient, 1944–1948. Paris, Harmattan.

22. Bézias J.-R. 2005. Prélude au Conseil de l’Europe: la déclaration de Georges Bidault à La Haye (19 juillet 1948). Guerres mondiales et conflits contemporains, no. 220, pp. 115–128. DOI: 10.3917/gmcc.220.0115.

23. Bossuat G. 1999. Aux origines du Plan Marshall. Histoire, économie et société, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 275–296.

24. Bossuat G. 1986. L’aide américaine à la France après la Seconde guerre mondiale. Vingtième siècle, no. 9, pp. 17–36.

25. Bossuat G. 1990. Le rêve français d’une Europe franco-britannique. Matériaux pour l’histoire de notre temps, no. 18, pp. 3–11. DOI: 10.3406/mat.1990.401609.

26. Bossuat G. 1997. L’Europe des Français, 1943–1959: La IVe République aux sources de l’Europe communautaire. Paris, Éditions de la Sorbonne.

27. Bozo F. 2019. La politique étrangère de la France depuis 1945. Paris, Flammarion.

28. Buffet C. 1991. Mourir pour Berlin: La France et l’Allemagne, 1945–1949. Paris, Armand Collin.

29. Ciappi E. 2023. A Reappraisal of the origins of European integration: From wartime planning to the Schuman plan. Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 676–696. DOI: 10.1177/00220094231200453.

30. Ciappi E. 2022. Transatlantic relations and public diplomacy: The Council on Foreign Relations, Jean Monnet, and Post-WWII France and Europe. History of European Ideas, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 848–864. DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2021.2009363.

31. Creswell M., Trachtenberg M. 2003. France and the German question, 1945–1955. Journal of Cold War Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 5–28. DOI: 10.1162/152039703322286746.

32. Davieau-Pousset S. 2015. Maurice Dejean, diplomate atypique. Relations internationales, no. 162, pp. 79–94. DOI: 10.3917/ri.162.0079.

33. Dockrill M. 1990. British attitudes towards France as a military ally. Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–70. DOI: 10.1080/09592299008405782.

34. Doise J., Vaïsse M. 2015. Diplomatie et outil militaire: Politique étrangère de la France, 1871–2015. Paris, Points.

35. Duroselle J.B. 1954. The crisis in French foreign policy. The Review of Politics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 412–437.

36. Duroselle J.B. 1952. German-Franco relations since 1945. The Review of Politics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 501–519.

37. Duroselle J.B. 1951. The turning point in French politics: 1947. The Review of Politics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 302–328.

38. Bossuat G., Girault R. (eds.). 1994. Europe brisée, Europe retrouvée: nouvelles réflexions sur l’unité européenne au XXe siècle. Paris, Éditions de la Sorbonne.

39. Fejtö F. 1976. Un pont qui n’a pu être construit: le projet de traité francotchécoslovaque. Politique étrangère, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 5–11.

40. Bozo F., Wenkel Ch. (eds.). 2019. France and the German question, 1945–1990. New York, Berghahn Books.

41. Heyde V. 2010. De l’esprit de la Résistance jusqu’à l’idée de l’Europe: Projets européens et américains pour l’Europe de l’après-guerre (1940–1950). Bruxelles, P.I.E. Peter Lang.

42. Souriac R. (ed.). 1996. Histoire de France, 1750–1995. In 2 vols. Vol. 2: Société, culture. Toulouse, Presses Universitaires du Mirail.

43. Hitchcock W.I. 1998. France restored: Cold War diplomacy and the quest for leadership in Europe, 1944–1954. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.

44. Hitchcock W.I. 1997. France, the Western alliance, and the origins of the Schuman plan. Diplomatic History, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 603–630.

45. Hudemann R. 2002. Le général Kœnig commandant en chef français en Allemagne (1945–1949). Revue historique des Armées, no. 227, pp. 85–94.

46. Hüser D. 1996a. Charles de Gaulle, Georges Bidault, Robert Schuman et l’Allemagne 1944–1950. Conceptions — actions — perceptions. Francia, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 49–73. DOI: 10.11588/fr.1996.3.60350.

47. Hüser D. 1996b. Frankreichs ‘doppelte Deutschlandpolitik’. Dynamik aus der Defensive — Planen, Entscheiden, Umsetzen in gesellschaftlichen und wirtschaftlichen, innen- und außenpolitischen Krisenzeiten 1944–1950. Berlin, Duncker & Humblot.

48. Ikenberry G.J. 2019. After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

49. Jackson J. 2018. A certain idea of France: The life of Charles de Gaulle. London, Allen Lane.

50. Girault R., Frank R. (eds.). 1988. La puissance française en question (1945–1949). Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.

51. Macher A. 2010. L’institutionnalisation de la présence culturelle occidentale en Hongrie de 1945 à 1963. In: Dulphy A., Frank R., Matard-Bonucci M.-A., Ory P. (eds.). Les relations culturelles internationales au XXe siècle: de la diplomatie culturelle à l’acculturation. Bruxelles, P.I.E. Peter Lang, pp. 79–112.

52. Margairaz M. 1982. Autour des accords Blum-Byrnes. Jean Monnet entre le consensus national et le consensus atlantique. Histoire économie et société, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 439–470. DOI: 10.3406/hes.1982.1302.

53. Milward A.S. 1979. War, economy and society, 1939–1945. Berkeley, University of California Press.

54. Milza P. 1996. Les relations internationales de 1945 à 1973. Paris, Hachette.

55. Mongin D. 1993. Aux origines du programme atomique militaire français. Matériaux pour l’histoire de notre temps, no. 31, pp. 13–21.

56. Pearson J.L. 2020. The French Empire goes to San Francisco: The founding of the United Nations and the limits of colonial reform. French Politics, Culture & Society, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 35–55. DOI: 10.3167/fpcs.2020.380203.

57. Pinkus B. 2002. Atomic power to Israel’s rescue: French-Israeli nuclear cooperation, 1949–1957. Israel Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 104–138. DOI: 10.1353/is.2002.0006.

58. Ratti L. 2014. Stepping up to reintegration: French security policy between transatlantic and European defence during and after the Cold War. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, vol. 12, pp. 367–378. DOI: 10.1080/14794012.2014.962784.

59. Schirmann S. (ed.). 2008. Robert Schuman et les pères de l’Europe: cultures politiques et années de formation. Bruxelles, P.I.E. Peter Lang.

60. Shennan A. 1989. Rethinking France: Plans for renewal, 1940–1946. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

61. Soutou G.-H. 2008. La France Libre et la place de l’URSS dans le système européen. In: Soutou G.-H., Hivert É.R. (eds.). L’URSS et l’Europe de 1941 à 1957. Paris, Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 137–184.

62. Soutou G.-H. 2018. La Guerre froide de la France, 1941–1990. Paris, Tallandier.

63. Soutou G.-H. 1998. La perception du problème soviétique par le Quai d’Orsay entre 1945 et 1949. Revue d’Allemagne et des pays de langue allemande, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 273–284. DOI: 10.3406/reval.1998.4073.

64. Ulrich-Pier R. 2006. René Massigli (1888–1988): une vie de diplomate. Vol. 1–2. Bruxelles, P.I.E. Peter-Lang.

65. Wall I.M. 2008. France in the Cold War. Journal of European Studies, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 121–139. DOI: 10.1177/0047244108090206.

66. Wall I.M. 1991. The United States and the making of postwar France, 1945–1954. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

67. Williams A. 2017. France and the origins of the United Nations, 1944–1945: ‘Si La France ne compte plus, qu’on nous le dise’. Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 215–234. DOI: 10.1080/09592296.2017.1309880.

68. Young J.W. 1990. France, the Cold War, and the Western alliance, 1944–49: French foreign policy and post-war Europe. New York, St. Martin’s Press.