Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

The U.S. factor in the evolution of the regional bipolar system on the Korean peninsula in the 1940s–1970s

https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2025-17-1-203-237

Abstract

The U.S. policies toward the Korean peninsula during the Cold War are usually considered within the framework of the bipolar confrontation and the Soviet-American struggle for spheres of influence. Meanwhile, international interactions at the level of the Korean regional subsystem were not limited to a strict separation of states into two opposing camps and were characterized by greater complexity and unpredictability. This study attempts to show that U.S. policy was a determining, but by no means the only, factor in the formation and development of the regional subsystem of international relations on the Korean Peninsula and was flexible enough to adapt to the actions of other actors. The first section of the article examines how a relatively peaceful situation around Korea in the aftermath of World War II transformed into an intense superpower rivalry and division of the peninsula into two adversarial Korean states. The author notes that this export of bipolarity to Korea was actively promoted by the United States, seeking to prevent the excessive strengthening of the Soviet positions in the region. The second section examines the role of the United States in the Korean War and its subsequent settlement. It is emphasized that already then, contrary to its expectations, the United States faced opposition from a number of regional actors and realized the need to search for alternative strategies to participate in Korean affairs. The third section identifies specific steps undertaken by the United States to reduce its presence in South Korea and analyzes the response of regional actors to the changes in American foreign policy. In particular, it shows how the U.S.-Chinese rapprochement in the 1970s influenced the evolution of the regional security system toward multipolarity and détente. It is concluded that the U.S. regional policy in the 1940s and 1970s tended to be deliberately and gradually decreasing the degree of its involvement in Korean affairs due to the redistribution of commitments between allies and the engagement of new actors in the Korean settlement process. At the same time, the author notes that the strategic approach to Korean policy, chosen by the United States during the Cold War and based on a system of multilateral alliances, has remained relevant so far, helping the American leadership to effectively maintain its presence on the Korean peninsula.

About the Author

D. A. Sadakov
Vyatka State University
Russian Federation

Denis A. Sadakov — PhD (History), Senior Research Fellow at the Department of History and Political Science, 

36, Moskovskaya St., Kirov, 610000.



References

1. Asmolov K.V. 2008. General Pak Chon Khi: Ocherk politicheskoi biografii [General Park Chung Hee: An outline of political biography]. Pravovedenie i politologiya. Available at: https://pravo33.wordpress.com/2008/09/21/k-asmolov-general-pak-chon-khi/ (data accessed: 05.03.2025). (In Russ.)

2. Vorontsov A.V. 1991. ‘Treugol’nik’ SShA — Yaponiya — Yuzhnaya Koreya [The USA — Japan — South Korea ‘triangle’]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

3. D’yachkov I.V. 2014. Yadernaya programma Yuzhnoi Korei: genezis, razvitie, vliyanie na region [South Korean nuclear program: Genesis, development, regional repercussions]. Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities, no. 9 (137), pp. 144–152. (In Russ.)

4. Ivanov V.V. 2022. Osnovnye prichiny vvoda KNR gruppirovok Kitaiskikh narodnykh dobrovol’tsev v Koreiskuyu Narodno-Demokraticheskuyu Respubliku, oktyabr’ 1950 g. [The main reasons for the entry of the PRC groupings of Chinese people’s volunteers to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, October 1950]. In: Kuznetsov D.V. (ed.). Vostok–Zapad: istoriya i sovremennost’: Ezhegodnik [East-West: History and modernity: Yearbook]. Blagoveshchensk, Blagoveshchenskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet Publ., pp. 41–48. (In Russ.)

5. Ivanov V.V. 2020. Osnovnye takticheskie priemy pekhotnykh podrazdelenii Kitaiskikh narodnykh dobrovol’tsev na nachal’nom etape voiny v Koree 1950–1953 gg. (po vospominaniyam uchastnikov sobytii) [The basic tactical methods of the infantry units of the Chinese people’s volunteers at the beginning stage of the war in Korea 1950–1953 (according to the membership of the events)]. In: Koshkin A.P. (ed.). Rossiya i Kitai: mysli o proshlom, vzglyad v budushchee: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Russia and China: Thinking about the past, looking into the future: Proceedings of the International scientific conference]. Komsomol’sk-na-Amure, Amurskii gumanitarno-pedagogicheskii gosudarstvennyi universitet Publ., pp. 306–318. (In Russ.)

6. Ki Kvan So. 1997. Moskovskoe soveshchanie ministrov inostrannykh del (dekabr’ 1945 g.) i raskol Korei [The Moscow meeting of foreign ministers (December 1945) and the split of Korea]. Far Eastern Studies, no. 5, pp. 97–108. (In Russ.)

7. Denisov V.I., Zhebin A.Z. (eds.). 2008. Koreiskoe uregulirovanie i interesy Rossii [The Korean settlement and the interests of Russia]. Moscow, Russkaya panorama Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Kremenyuk V.A., Lukin V.P. 1978. Evolyutsiya aziatskoi politiki SShA posle Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [The evolution of U.S.’s Asian policy after World War II]. Voprosy istorii, no. 7, pp. 66–83. (In Russ.)

9. Petukhov V.I. 1987. U istokov bor’by za edinstvo i nezavisimost’ Korei [At the origins of the struggle for the unity and independence of Korea]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Bondarevskii G.L. (ed.). 1964. Politika SShA v stranakh Dal’nego Vostoka (Yaponiya, Yuzhnaya Koreya) [U.S. policy in the countries of the Far East (Japan, South Korea)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Popov I.M., Lavrenov S.Ya., Bogdanov V.N. 2005. Koreya v ogne voiny [Korea in the flames of war]. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Sadakov D.A. 2017a. Politika SShA v otnoshenii Korei v 1941–1950 gg. [U.S. policy towards Korea in 1941–1950]. PhD Thesis. Kirov. (In Russ.)

13. Sadakov D.A. 2021. Politika SShA po nuklearizatsii Koreiskogo poluostrova v 1956–1957 gg. [U.S. policy on the nuclearization of the Korean Peninsula in 1956–1957]. USA & Canada: Economics, Politics, Culture, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 110–122. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300013924-6. (In Russ.)

14. Sadakov D.A. 2018. Printsipy organizatsii i rezul’taty sovetsko-amerikanskogo vzaimodeistviya v protsesse koreiskogo uregulirovaniya v 1943–1947 gg. [US-Soviet dialogue on the Korean settlement in 1943–1947: Basic principles and results]. Izvestiya. Ural Federal University Journal. Series 2. Humanities and Arts, vol. 20, no. 2 (175), pp. 23–37. DOI: 10.15826/izv2.2018.20.2.022. (In Russ.)

15. Sadakov D.A. 2023. Trudnyi vybor mezhdu sderzhannost’yu i vozmezdiem: amerikano-severokoreiskii intsident s samoletom EC-121, 1969 g. [The hard choice between restraint and retaliation: 1969 EC-121 shootdown incident]. Koreanology, no. 1 (2), pp. 41–51. DOI: 10.48647/ICCA.2023.94.22.004. (In Russ.)

16. Sadakov D.A. 2017b. Fiksirovanie raskola Korei amerikantsami v 1948 g.: prichiny, metody i rol’ OON [Fixation of Korea’s division in 1948: American reasons, methods and role of UN]. In: Zhebin A.Z. (ed.). Koreya pered novymi vyzovami [Korea facing new challenges]. Moscow, Institut Dal’nego Vostoka RAN Publ., pp. 196–209. (In Russ.)

17. Sadakov D.A., Yungblyud V.T. 2019. SShA i umirotvorenie Li Syn Mana v preddverii Zhenevskoi konferentsii 1954 g. [US policy of appeasement towards Syngman Rhee in the run-up to the 1954 Geneva conference]. Istoriya, vol. 10, no. 11 (85). Available at: https://history.jes.su/s207987840008095-3-1/ (accessed: 05.03.2025). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008095-3. (In Russ.)

18. Stueck W.W. 1995. The Korean War: An international history. Princeton, Princeton University Press [Russ. ed.: St’yuk U. 2002. Koreiskaya voina. Moscow, AST Publ.]. (In Russ.)

19. Tikhomirov V.D. 1998. Koreiskaya problema i mezhdunarodnye faktory (1945 — nachalo 80-kh godov) [The Korean problem and international factors (1945 — early 80s).]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura Publ. (In Russ.)

20. Yungblyud V.T., Sadakov D.A. 2018. Diplomaticheskoe obespechenie vmeshatel’stva SShA v Koreiskuyu voinu. Opyt krizisnogo reagirovaniya [Diplomatic support of US involvement in the Korean War June 25 — July 6 1950: Crisis response experience]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 4 (61), pp. 241–261. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-4-61-241-261. (In Russ.)

21. Yungblyud V.T., Sadakov D.A. 2020a. ‘Uslozhnyayushchii faktor’? Koalitsionnaya diplomatiya SShA v Koreiskom voprose. Opyt Zhenevskoi konferentsii 1954 g. [US coalition diplomacy on the Korean issue: Record of the Geneva conference of 1954]. International Trends, vol. 18, no. 4 (63), pp. 81–107. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2020.18.4.63.7. (In Russ.)

22. Yungblyud V.T., Sadakov D.A. 2020b. Yapono-koreiskoe uregulirovanie v politike SShA, 1953–1965 gg. [Japan-Korea settlement in US policy, 1953–1965]. Japanese Studies in Russia, no. 4, pp. 98–118. DOI: 10.24411/2500-2872-2020-10030. (In Russ.)

23. Armstrong Ch.K. 2013. Tyranny of the weak: North Korea and the world, 1950–1992. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

24. Brazinsky G.A. 2017. Winning the Third World: Sino-American rivalry during the Cold War. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.

25. Caldwell D. 2009. The legitimation of the Nixon-Kissinger grand design and grand strategy. Diplomatic History, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 633–652. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7709.2009.00801.x.

26. Ostermann C.F., Person J., Kraus Ch. (eds.). 2013. The Carter chill: US– ROK–DPRK trilateral relations, 1976–1979. Washington, D.C., Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

27. Cha V.D. 2016. Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. alliance system in Asia. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

28. Chen J. 2001. Mao’s China and the Cold War. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.

29. Cumings B. 2002. The origins of the Korean war. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Liberation and the emergence of separate regimes, 1945–1947. Seoul, Yuksabipyungsa.

30. Deane H. 1999. The Korean War, 1945–1953. San Francisco, China Books.

31. Friedman J. 2015. Shadow Cold War: The Sino-Soviet competition for the Third World. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina Press.

32. Goh E. 2005. Nixon, Kissinger, and the ‘Soviet card’ in the U.S. opening to China, 1971–1974. Diplomatic History, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 475–502. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7709.2005.00500.x.

33. Habib Ph.C. 1974. US policy toward Korea. Asian Affairs, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 302–305.

34. Halliday J. 1974. The United Nations and Korea. In: Baldwin F. (ed.). Without parallel: The American-Korean relationship since 1945. New York, Pantheon books, pp. 109–142.

35. Jongsuk Ch. 2002. Unequal partners in peace and war: The Republic of Korea and the United States, 1948–1953. Westport, Greenwood Publishing Group.

36. Lee S.H. 2013. The Korean armistice and the end of peace: The US-UN coalition and the dynamics of war-making in Korea, 1953–76. Journal of Korean Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 183–224. DOI: 10.1353/jks.2013.0018.

37. Lee S.H. 1995. Outposts of empire: Korea, Vietnam and the origins of the Cold War in Asia, 1949–1954. Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press.

38. Matray J.I. 2002. Dean Acheson’s press club speech reexamined. The Journal of Conflict Studies, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 28–55.

39. Nichols M.R. 2000. The Chinese Communist intervention in the Korean War: An exercise in analyzing document. OAH Magazine of History, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 37–39.

40. Oberdorfer D. 2001. The two Koreas: A contemporary history. New York, Basic Books.

41. O’Neill M. 2000. Soviet involvement in the Korean War: A new view from the Soviet-era archives. OAH Magazine of History, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 20–24.

42. Tudda C. 2012. A Cold War turning point: Nixon and China, 1969–1972. Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press.

43. Wagner R.H. 1993. What was bipolarity? International Organization, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 77–106. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300004719.

44. Weathersby K. 1993. Soviet aims in Korea and the origins of the Korean war, 1945–1950: New evidence from Russian archives. Cold War International History Project, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

45. Yafeng X., Zhihua Sh. 2014. China’s last ally: Beijing’s policy toward North Korea during the U.S.-China rapprochement, 1970–1975. Diplomatic History, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1083–1113. DOI: 10.1093/dh/dht120.

46. Zhihua Sh., Yafeng X. 2015. Mao and the Sino-Soviet partnership, 1945– 1959: A new history. New York, Lexington Books.

47. Zornow W.F. 1959. America at mid-century: The Truman administration, the Eisenhower administration. Cleveland, H. Allen.


Review

For citations:


Sadakov D.A. The U.S. factor in the evolution of the regional bipolar system on the Korean peninsula in the 1940s–1970s. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2025;17(1):203-237. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2025-17-1-203-237

Views: 46


ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)