Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

Sanctions studies: more than an instrument — less than an academic field?

https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2026-18-1-9-32

Abstract

The article addresses the disputed issue of whether sanctions studies constitute an independent research field within political science or whether their function is confined to a set of utilitarian solutions that do not transcend middle-range theories. The author summarizes the key arguments that form the basis of an indirect professional discussion on the topic. On the basis of the English-language body of specialized literature, the article covers the linguistic, theoretical-methodological, and institutional aspects of the issue. Special attention is paid to the conceptualization of sanction studies in the Russian academic discourse. The author notes that a key advantage of the Russian approach lies in its reliance on the methodological component, particularly the development of several databases adapted to the nuances of the national sanctions framework and aimed at producing a unique output that surpasses the limitations of foreign counterparts. The author argues that there is potential for the formation of a distinctive Russian school of sanctions studies; however, due to a late start and the largely reactive nature of reflections on this issue, it will not occur quickly. The author concludes that expertise in the field of economic sanctions represents a distinct area of study, marked by practical relevance and a relatively low level of institutionalization within the established framework of academic research. Consequently, the article suggests legitimizing the ‘sanctions studies’ concept within the discourse on relevant issues.

About the Author

B. I. Ananyev
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Boris I. Ananyev — Senior Lecturer at the Department of Political Theory, School of Governance and Politics, MGIMO University.

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Ananyev, B.I. (2019) ‘Sanktsii v teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: metodologicheskie protivorechiya i problemy interpretatsii’ [Sanctions in IR: understanding, defining, studying], International Organisations Research Journal, 14(3), pp. 136–150. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2019-03-07. (In Russian.)

2. Arapova, E.Ya. (2023) ‘Novye modal’nosti global’noi sanktsionnoi politiki’ [New modalities of the global sanctions policy], Journal of International Analytics, 14(1), pp. 37–51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-1-37-51. (In Russian.)

3. Borisov, D. (1936) Sanktsii [Sanctions]. Moscow: Sotsekgiz Publ. (In Russian.)

4. Braterskii, M.V. (2010) Ekonomicheskie instrumenty vneshnei politiki i politicheskie riski [Economic instruments of foreign policy and political risks]. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ. (In Russian.)

5. Korol’kov, V.E., Smirnova, I.A. and Erofeeva, T.A. (2022) Politika sanktsii kak instrument sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [The policy of sanctions as an instrument of contemporary international relations]. Moscow: Prometei Publ. (In Russian.)

6. Solomin, A.S. (2023) ‘Sanktsii kak politicheskii instrument: analiz fenomena sanktsii s tochki zreniya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii’ [Sanctions as a political instrument: analysis of the phenomenon of sanctions from the point of international relations], Political Science Issues, 13(12), pp. 6625–6635. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35775/PSI.2023.100.12.037. (In Russian.)

7. Timofeev, I.N. (2023a) ‘Kak issledovat’ politiku sanktsii? Strategiya empiricheskogo issledovaniya’ [How to study the policy of sanctions? The vision of empirical research], Journal of International Analytics, 14(1), pp. 22–36. Available at: https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-1-22-36. (In Russian.)

8. Timofeev, I.N. (2023b) ‘Politika sanktsii v menyayushchemsya mire: teoreticheskaya refleksiya’ [Policy of sanctions in a changing world: theoretical reflection], Polis. Political Studies, (2), pp. 103–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.08. (In Russian.)

9. Entin, M.L., Entina, E.G., Davranova, S.B. and Nadzharov, A.M. (2024) ‘Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty izucheniya sanktsionnoi politiki Zapada’ [Theoretical and methodological aspects of the Western sanctions policy research], Polis. Political Studies, (1), pp. 7–20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.01.02. (In Russian.)

10. Bapat, N., Heinrich, T., Kobayashi, Y. and Clifton Morgan, T. (2013) ‘Determinants of sanctions effectiveness: sensitivity analysis using new data’, International Interactions, 39(1), pp. 79–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.751298.

11. Buzan, B. and Hansen, L. (2009) The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12. Carr, E.H. (1946) The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939. An introduction to the study of international relations. 2nd edn. London: MacMillan&Co Ltd.

13. Charron, A. (2011) UN sanctions and conflict: responding to peace and security threats. London: Routledge.

14. Chen, X. and Garcia, R.J. (2016) ‘Economic sanctions and trade diplomacy: sanction-busting strategies, market distortion and efficacy of China’s restrictions on Norwegian salmon imports’, China Information, 30(1), pp. 29–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X15625061.

15. Clifton Morgan, T., Bapat, N. and Kobayashi, Y. (2014) ‘The threat and imposition of sanctions: updating the TIES dataset’, Conflict Managementand Peace Science, 31(5), pp. 541–558. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213520.

16. Nincic, M. and Wallensteen, P. (eds.) (1983) Dilemmas of economic coercion: sanctions in world politics. New York: Praeger Publishers.

17. Doxey, M.P. (1987) International sanctions in contemporary perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.

18. Drezner, D.W. (1999) The sanctions paradox: economic statecraft and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

19. Asada, M. (ed.) (2020) Economic sanctions in international law and practice. London: Routledge.

20. Farrall, J. (2007) United Nations sanctions and the rule of law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

21. Galtung, J. (1967) ‘On the effects of international economic sanctions, with examples from the case of Rhodesia’, World Politics, 19(3), pp. 378–416. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009785.

22. Giumelli, F. (2011) Coercing, constraining, signalling. Explaining UN and EU sanctions after the Cold War. Colchester: ECPR Press.

23. Giumelli, F. (2012) ‘Da sanzioni comprensive a sanzioni mirate. L’evoluzione di uno strumento fondamentale di politica estera’, in Andreatta, F. and Zambernardi, L. (eds.) La politica internazionale in transizione. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 399–420.

24. Giumelli, F. (2023) Le sanzioni internazionali: storia, obiettivi ed efficacia. Bologna: Il Mulino.

25. Giumelli, F. (2010) ‘The restrictive measures of the European Union. Developing analytical categories to understand functions and utility of EU sanctions’, The International Spectator, 45(3), pp. 131–144. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2010.504629.

26. Giumelli, F. (2013) The success of sanctions: lessons learned from the EU experience. London: Routledge.

27. Hoffmann, F. (1967) ‘The functions of economic sanctions: a comparative analysis’, Journal of Peace Research, 4(2), pp. 140–159.

28. Hufbauer, G.C. and Shott, J.J. (1983) Economic sanctions in support of foreign policy goals. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

29. Hufbauer, G.C., Shott, J.J. and Elliott, K.A. (1985) Economic sanctions reconsidered. History and current policy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.

30. Jaeger, M.D. (2018) Coercive sanctions and international conflicts. A sociological theory. London: Routledge.

31. Martin, L.L. (1993) ‘Credibility, costs and institutions: cooperation on economic sanctions’, World Politics, 45(3), pp. 406–432. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2950724.

32. Mitrany, D. (1926) Le problème des sanctions internationales. Paris: Centre Européen de la Dotation Carnegie.

33. Pape, R.A. (1997) ‘Why economic sanctions do not work’, International Security, 22(2), pp. 90–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539368.

34. Pape, R.A. (1998) ‘Why economic sanctions still do not work’, International Security, 23(1), pp. 66–77. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539263.

35. Renwick, R. (1981) Economic sanctions. Cambridge: Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.

36. van Bergeijk, P.A.G. (ed.) (2021) Research handbook on economic sanctions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

37. Beaucillon, C. (ed.) (2021) Research handbook on unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

38. Taubenfeld, H.J. and Taubenfeld, R. (1964) ‘The economic weapon: the League and the United Nations’, Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting (1921–1969), 58, pp. 183–205.

39. Vaslavskiy, Y., Ananyev, B. and Sergi, B. (2019) ‘The impact of international sanctions on Russia’s sustainable development’, in B.S. Sergi (ed.) Exploring the future of Russia’s economy and markets: towards sustainable economic development. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Ltd., pp. 201–218.

40. Wallensteen, P. (2000) ‘A century of economic sanctions: a field revisited’, Uppsala Peace Research Papers, (1), pp. 1–23.

41. Wallensteen, P. (1968) ‘Characteristics of economic sanctions’, Journal of Peace Research, 5(3), pp. 248–267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336800500303.


Review

For citations:


Ananyev B.I. Sanctions studies: more than an instrument — less than an academic field? Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2026;18(1):9-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2026-18-1-9-32

Views: 106

JATS XML

ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)