The Chilean Model Confronting Expectations of Social Justice
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-2-112-141
Abstract
The Chilean development model by objective parameters is a combination of a developed democracy, a targeted social policy, and an effective, competitive economy. However, the protest movement that began in October 2019, which included both peaceful and violent actions, was directed not only against the center-right government of Sebastian Pinera (2018–2022), but also against the entire system as a whole. This movement demonstrated the disillusionment and dissatisfaction of the broad social strata with the results of political and social development and indicated the beginning of a protracted, intractable crisis.
The fundamental reason for the protests was a deep contradiction between economic efficiency and social justice, laid down during the neoliberal modernization of Augusto Pinochet (1973–1990), and not overcome during the 30 years of democratic development, despite a large-scale social policy. The system of ‘elite compromises’, which provided a political basis for the transition from authoritarianism to democracy, also became an object of harsh criticism.
The paper shows the specifics of the Chilean model in historical retrospect, identifies contradictions and issues that have triggered a socio-political conflict, particularly the rise of mass social expectations, strengthened by the reforms of the second government of M. Bachelet (2014–2018), and considers the features of the current crisis.
The fundamental reason for the protests was a deep contradiction between economic efficiency and social justice, laid down during the neoliberal modernization of Augusto Pinochet (1973–1990), and not overcome during the 30 years of democratic development, despite a large-scale social policy. The system of ‘elite compromises’, which provided a political basis for the transition from authoritarianism to democracy, also became an object of harsh criticism.
The paper shows the specifics of the Chilean model in historical retrospect, identifies contradictions and issues that have triggered a socio-political conflict, particularly the rise of mass social expectations, strengthened by the reforms of the second government of M. Bachelet (2014–2018), and considers the features of the current crisis.
About the Author
L. V. Diyakova
Institute of Latin American Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Diyakova — Doctor of Sciences (Political Science), Leading Research Fellow
21/16 Bolshaya Ordynka Str., Moscow, 115035
References
1. Bogush E.Yu., Shchelchkov A.A. 2009. Politicheskaya istoriya Chili XX veka [Political history of twentieth-century Chile]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ. (In Russ.)
2. Dzolo D. 2010. Demokratiya i slozhnost’. Realisticheskii podkhod [Democracy and complexity. A realist approach]. Moscow, SU-HSE Publ. (In Russ.)
3. Diyakova L.V. 2019a. Istoricheskaya pamyat’ i politicheskaya polyarizatsiya v Chili [Historical memory and political polarization in Chile]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 12, pp. 61–73. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0007341-4. (In Russ.)
4. Diyakova L.V. 2019b. Medlennyi reformizm Sebast’yana Pin’ery [The slow reformism of Sebastian Piñera]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 5, pp. 6–30. DOI:10.31857/S0044748X0004715-5. (In Russ.)
5. Diyakova L.V. 2016. Chili na trudnom puti demokratii [Chile on the hard way of democracy]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 5, pp. 52–62. (In Russ.)
6. Diyakova L.V. 2018. Chili: reviziya starykh kompromissov [Chile: Revision of old compromises]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 2, pp. 5–15. (In Russ.)
7. Diyakova L.V. 2013. Chiliiskaya demokratiya: preemstvennost’ i peremeny [The Chilean democracy: Continuity and change]. Moscow, ILA RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
8. Lipset S.M. 1991а. Tret’ego puti ne sushchestvuet. Perspektivy levykh dvizhenii [There is no third way. Perspectives of left-wing movements]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 5, pp. 15–32. (In Russ.)
9. Lipset S.M. 1991b. Tret’ego puti ne sushchestvuet. Perspektivy levykh dvizhenii [There is no third way. Perspectives of left-wing movements]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 6, pp. 19–39. (In Russ.)
10. Lukin A.V. 2014. Vozmozhna li drugaya demokratiya? [Is another democracy possible?]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 1, pp. 10–27. (In Russ.)
11. Lain D. 2014. Mirazh demokratii [The mirage of democracy]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 6, pp. 127–148. (In Russ.)
12. Mart’yanov V.S., Fishman L.G. 2012. Preodolenie kapitalizma: ot moral’nogo kollapsa k moral’noi revolyutsii? [Overcoming capitalism: From moral collapse to moral revolution?]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 1, pp. 63–75. (In Russ.)
13. Semenenko I.S. 2012. ‘Chelovek politicheskii’ pered al’ternativami obshchestvennykh transformatsii: opyt pereosmysleniya individual’nogo izmereniya politiki [The ‘political man’ before alternatives of social transformations: Experience of rethinking the individual dimension of politics]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 6, pp. 9–26. (In Russ.)
14. Simonova L.N. 2003. Finansovaya liberalizatsiya: chiliiskii variant [Financial liberalization: The Chilean version]. Moscow, ILA RAS Publ. (In Russ.)
15. Arenas de Mesa A., Gusman Cox J. 2003. Política fiscal y protección social en Chile. Revista de la CEPAL, no. 81, pp. 123–141.
16. Barton J.R. 2002. State Continuismo and Pinochetismo: The keys to the Chilean transition. Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 358–374. DOI: 10.1111/1470-9856.00048.
17. Dahl R.A. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven, Yale University Press.
18. Diamond L. 2015. Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 141–155. DOI: 10.1353/job.2015.0009.
19. Drake P., Jaksic I. 2002. El ‘modelo’ chileno. Democracia y desarrollo en los noventa. In Drake P., Jaksic I. (eds.). El ‘modelo’ chileno: democracia y desarrollo en los noventa. Santiago de Chile, LOM, pp. 11–38.
20. Lagos R.E., Landerretche O.M. (eds.). 2011. El Chile que se viene. Ideas, miradas, perspectivas y sueños para el 2030. Santiago de Chile, Ed. Catalonia.
21. Escalona C. 2008. Chile, 20 aňos después. 1988–2008. Santiago, Diagrama.
22. Fontaine Aldunate A. 1988. Los economistas y el Presidente Pinochet. Santiago de Chile, Zig-Zag.
23. Fukuyama F. 2001. Dealing with inequality. Journal of Democracy, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 79–89.
24. Garretón M.A. 1989. La posibilidad democrática en Chile. Santiago de Chile, FLACSO.
25. Gόmez Leyton J.C. 2007. Chile 1990–2007. Una sociedad neoliberal avanzada. Chile Hoy. Revista de Sociología, no. 21, pp. 57–59. DOI: 10.5354/0719529X.2007.27517.
26. Huneeus C. 2008. El gobierno de Michelle Bachelet a mitad de camino. In Malamud C., Isbell P., Tejedor C. (eds). Anuario Iberoamericano. Madrid, Real Instituto Elcano-EFE, pp. 77–95.
27. Lagos M. 2007. Una prosperidad no democrática. Chile Hoy. Revista de Sociología, no. 21, pp. 139–163.
28. Mainwaring S. 1989. Transitions to democracy and democratic consolidation: Theoretical and comparative issues. Working Paper of Kellog Institute, no. 130. Available at: https://kellogg.nd.edu/sites/default/files/old_files/documents/130_0.pdf (accessed: 09.11.2018).
29. Morandé F. 1993. Del trauma a la serenidad: veinte años de evolución económica y política en Chile. Buenos Aires, CIEDLA.
30. Moulian T. 2002. Chile actual: anatomía de un mito. Santiago de Chile, LOM.
31. Navia P. 2015. Autoridad moral de Bachelet. Available at: http://www.infolatam.com/2015/03/22/ (accessed: 15.04.2015).
32. O’Donnell G., Shmitter P.C. 2013. Transitions from the authoritarian rule. Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, London, The Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Peňa Gonzalez C. 2007. Chile actual: el proyecto político de la Concertación. Chile Hoy. Revista de Sociología, no. 21, pp. 33–45. DOI: 10.5354/0719-529X.2007.27515.
34. Plattner M.F. 2015. Is democracy in decline? Journal of Democracy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 5–10.
35. Rivas P. 2007. Chile, un largo septiembre. Santiago de Chile, LOM.
36. Siavelis P.M. 2002. Continuidad y transformación del sistema de partidos en una transición ‘modelo’. In Drake P., Jaksic I. (eds.). El ‘modelo’ chileno: democracia y desarrollo en los noventa. Santiago de Chile, LOM, pp. 223–239.
37. Silva P. 2002. Searching for civilian supremacy: The concertacion governments and the military in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 375–396.
38. Sniderman P.M., Highton B. 2011. Facing the challenge of democracy: Explorations in the analysis of public opinion and political participation. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
39. Valenzuela A., Dammert L. 2006. Problems of success in Chile. Journal of Democracy, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 65–79.
40. Vasconi A.T., Arancibia S. 1988. Chile: economía y política (1983–1986). La Habana, CEA.
41. Vergara Estévez J. 2007. La ‘democracia protegida’ en Chile. Chile Hoy. Revista de Sociología, no. 21, pp. 45–52.
Review
For citations:
Diyakova L.V. The Chilean Model Confronting Expectations of Social Justice. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2020;12(2):112-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-2-112-141
Views:
394
Email this article 