Protest Wave and Countermeasures of Fear: Lebanese Act of a Global Drama

The paper examines the dynamics of social protests in Lebanon from October 2019 till March-May 2020 when the government imposed unprecedentedly rigorous restrictive measures to combat the spread of COVID-19 infection. The paper identifies the underlying causes of the protests. The author stresses that from the very beginning socio-economic demands of protestors addressed to the executive power (particularly, to grapple with the rising income inequality) were accompanied by calls for democratization on the secular principles and elimination of political confessionalism. At the same time, the author outlines certain specifics of popular uprisings in Lebanon that distinguish them from simultaneous protests in other countries, namely their supra-ethnic, supra-religious and non-partisan character and their remarkable coherence and coordination, given the lack of overall leadership. The author emphasizes that the subsequent change of government has not brought, however, significant changes the protestors hoped for. The new Cabinet was not free from traditional confessional and political bias, whereas legal and administrative measures undertaken by the new government to combat the pandemic were, apparently, also aimed at ‘freezing’ the current situation favorable for both the parliamentary majority and the government. In particular, the recent laws and regulations reflect the Government’s desire to prevent the resumption of protests equivalent to those of the fall of 2019. All these measures did not face serious resistance, even though the economic situation of the population has worsened, and many people have lost their livelihoods. However, the fear of the COVID-19 has proved to be a more efficient means of preventing protests than any punitive measure. The author concludes that the dynamics of inter-party competition even under strict quasi-quarantine measures shows that the hopes of protestors for a genuine transition from a traditional clan and confessional structure of the Lebanese political system to the standards and principles of a developed democracy proved futile.

social protest, political transit, democratization, political confessionalism, global pandemic, quarantine, Lebanon

1. Alaev L.B. 2019. Problematika istorii Vostoka [Problems of the history of the East]. Moscow, Lenand Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Beck U. 2002. Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter: Neue weltpolitische Ökonomie. Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp [Russ. ed.: Bek U. 2007. Vlast‘ i ee opponenty v epokhu globalizma. Novaya vsemirno-politicheskaya ekonomiya. Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya, Territoriya budushchego Publ.].

3. Livanskii variant blizhnevostochnoi demokratii [Lebanese version of Middle East democracy]. 2019. In Baranovsky V.G., Naumkin V.V., Sarabiev A.V. (eds.). Blizhnii Vostok v poiskakh politicheskogo budushchego [Middle East in search of a political future]. Moscow, IOS RAS Publ., pp. 136–166. (In Russ.)

4. Okuneva L.S. 2020. Latinskaya Amerika prishla v dvizhenie: v chem smysl sotsial’nykh protestov oktyabrya 2019 goda? [Latin America has set in motion: What is the meaning of social protests in October 2019?]. Latin America, no. 1, pp. 8–21. (In Russ.)

5. Sarabiev A.V. 2019. Livan: obyknovennaya ‘konsotsional’naya demokratiya’ v regional’nom kontekste [Lebanon: Ordinary ‘consociational democracy’ in a regional context]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 89–112. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2019-4-67-89-112. (In Russ.)

6. Sarabiev A.V. 2015. ‘Seismografiya’ livanskogo sistemnogo krizisa [‘Seismography’of the Lebanese systemic crisis]. In Naumkin V.V., Malysheva D.B. (eds.). Konflikty i voiny XXI v. (Blizhnii Vostok i Severnaya Afrika) [Conflicts and wars in the 21 st century (Middle East and North Africa)]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ.

7. Aboultaif E.W., Tabar P. 2019. National versus communal memory in Lebanon. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 97–114. DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2019.1565183.

8. Alianak S.L. 2014. The transition towards revolution and reform: The Arab Spring realized? Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press.

9. Araji S., Hlasny V., Ichrakieh L.M., Intini V. 2019. Targeting debt in Lebanon: A structural macro-econometric model. Middle East Development Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–104. DOI: 10.1080/17938120.2019.1583508.

10. Awdeh A., Jomaa Z., Zeaiter M.A. 2019. Exploring the effectiveness of financing resources in promoting economic growth in Lebanon. The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 43–57. DOI: 10.1353/jda.2019.0037.

11. Badaan V., Richa R., Jost J.T. 2020. Ideological justification of the sectarian political system in Lebanon. Current Opinion in Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 138–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.033.

12. Fakhoury T. 2019a. Power-sharing after the Arab Spring? Insights from Lebanon’s political transition. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, vol. 25, no. 1. DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2019.1565173, pp. 9–26.

13. Fakhoury T. 2019b. The unmaking of Lebanon’s sectarian order? The October uprising and its drivers. IAI Commentaries, 19/66.

14. Fardoun F., Ibrahim Ou., Younes R., Louahlia-Gualous H. 2012. Electricity of Lebanon: Problems and recommendations. Energy Procedia, vol. 19, pp. 310–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.211.

15. Makdisi S., El Khalil Y. 2017. Lebanon: Sectarian consociationalism and the transition to a fully fledged democracy. In Democratic transitions in the Arab world. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 240–268.

16. Roccu R. 2019. Democratization beyond capitalist time: Temporalities of transition in the Middle East after the Arab uprisings. Middle East Critique, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/19436149.2019.1633054.

17. Salloukh B.F. 2019. War memory, confessional imaginaries, and political contestation in postwar Lebanon. Middle East Critique, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 341–359. DOI: 10.1080/19436149.2019.1633748.

18. Szekely O. 2014. The costs of avoiding transitional justice: Lessons from Lebanon. In Fisher K.J., Stewart R. (eds.). Transitional justice and the Arab Spring. London, Routledge, pp. 94–111.

19. Vaughan K. 2018. Who benefits from consociationalism? Religious disparities in Lebanon’s political system. Religions, vol. 9, no. 2. DOI: 10.3390/rel9020051.