Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

Lessons of World War II and Strategic Planning of the Big Three (1945–1949)

https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-3-45-84

Abstract

The paper examines how military and political leaders of the Soviet Union, the United States and Great Britain assessed in the first post-war years and in the face of emerging bipolar world order the lessons of World War II, how the latter influenced their strategic planning and forecasts with the emergence of nuclear weapons. The author outlines the key features of this period (1945–1949), including still fresh memories of the unprecedented destruction and losses of the past war, the US ‘nuclear monopoly’, and the absence of a system for nuclear deterrence. The paper provides a systematic comparison of lessons from the past war, learnt by the Soviet, the US and British establishment, identifies similarities and differences between them. The author concludes that WWII was perceived by the political and military leaders of that time as a model of the eventual ‘great war’ in the future, which almost certainly would be ‘total’ and ‘global’ in scope and would demand both thorough preparations during the peacetime and the militarization of civil life. Indeed, the experience of WWII had greatly influenced the strategic and operational planning in the USSR, the USA and Great Britain in 1945–1949. Moscow prepared to face the potential aggression on its Western borders or in the Far East in order to avoid the mistakes of 1941. In Washington the decisionmakers acknowledged the Soviet superiority in conventional weapons and didn’t exclude the possibility that the Soviet Army could quickly establish control over the Western Europe and that the US military would have to retake it in a ‘new Operation Overlord’. The pessimistic outlook of the ‘defense of the Rhine’ was also shared in London, and the British military planned to evacuate the troops to the British Isles (‘shadow of Dunkirk’) and to focus on strategic bombing of the USSR and its allies. Even the appearance of nuclear weapons, that would dramatically alter the strategic context in the following years, played a relatively minor role in 1945–1949. The author concludes that the shadow of World War II and its lessons had a long-lasting effect on the post-war international relations.

About the Author

I. E. Magadeev
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

Iskander E. Magadeev — PhD (History), Associate Professor at the Department of European and American Studies, School of International Relations

76 Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Baluevskii Yu.N. 2003. Deyatel’nost’ General’nogo shtaba v pervye poslevoennye gody (1946–1953 gg.) [General staff in the first post-war years (1946–1953)]. Voenno-istoricheskii zhurnal, no. 1, pp. 14–19. (In Russ.)

2. Batyuk V.I., Evstaf’ev D.G. 1995. Pervye zamorozki. Sovetsko-amerikanskie otnosheniya v 1945–1950 gg. [The early frosts: Soviet-American relations in 1945–1950]. Moscow, Rossiiskii nauchnyi fond Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Bystrova N.E. 2007. SSSR i formirovanie voenno-blokovogo protivostoyaniya v Evrope (1945–1955 gg.) [The USSR and the formation of military alliances and their antagonism in Europe (1945–1955)]. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russ.)

4. Shoigu S.K. (ed.). 2015. Velikaya Otechestvennaya voina 1941–1945 godov [The Great Patriotic War, 1941–1945]. In 12 vols. Vol. 12. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russ.)

5. Yungblyud V.T. (ed.). 2014. Vstrechnymi kursami: politika SSSR i SShA na Balkanakh, Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke v 1939–1947 gg. [Collision course: The policy of the USSR and the USA in the Balkans, the Near East and Middle East in 1939–1947]. Kirov, Vyatskii gosudarstvennyi gumanitarnyi universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Dundukov M.Yu. 2014. ‘Vam pridyotsya nachinat’ s nulya. U nas net razvedyvatel’noi sluzhby’: razvedka SShA nakanune i v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [‘You’ll have to start from scratch. We have no intelligence service’: The U.S. intelligence services on the eve and during the Second World War]. Voennoistoricheskii zhurnal, no. 3, pp. 41–45. (In Russ.)

7. Egorova N.I. 2020. Istoriya kholodnoi voiny, 1945–1991 gg. [History of the Cold War, 1945–1991]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo Yurait Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Magadeev I.E. 2016. Uroki Vtoroi mirovoi voiny, ‘balans sil’ i strategicheskoe planirovanie Velikobritanii (1944–1945 gody) [Lessons of the Second World War, ‘balance of power’ and the strategic planning of Great Britain (1944–1945)]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya, no. 5, pp. 59–78. (In Russ.)

9. Mal’kov V.L. 2016. Atomnoe oruzhie — detonator kholodnoi voiny. Dve proektsii [Nuclear weapon — a detonator of the Cold War. Two projections]. Rossiya XXI, no. 6, pp. 6–37. (In Russ.)

10. Mal’kov V.L. 1995. ‘Mankhettenskii proekt’. Razvedka i diplomatiya [‘Manhattan project’. Intelligence and diplomacy]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Manykin A.S. 2018. Ot sotrudnichestva k konfliktnomu vzaimodeistviyu: transformatsiya amerikanskikh podkhodov po otnosheniyu k SSSR v 1945–1947 gg. [From cooperation to the conflict interaction: Transformation of American policy towards Soviet Union in 1945–1947]. Prepodavanie istorii i obshchestvoznaniya v shkole, no. 4, pp. 19–29. (In Russ.)

12. Myagkov M.Yu., Rzheshevskii O.A. 2009. Upushchennyi shans: anglofranko-sovetskie peregovory letom 1939 g. i sovetsko-germanskii pakt ot 23 avgusta 1939 g. [A missed opportunity: The Anglo-Franco-Soviet negotiations in the summer of 1939 and the Soviet-German pact of 23 August 1939]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, special issue, pp. 177–184. (In Russ.)

13. Narinskii M.M. 2010. Sovetskoe rukovodstvo i problema granits i sfery vliyaniya SSSR v 1941–1946 gg. [The Soviet leaders and the issues of the Soviet borders and spheres of influence in 1941–1946]. In Torkunov A.V., Naryshkin S.E. (eds.). 65 let Velikoi Pobedy [65 years of the Great Victory]. In 6 vols. Vol. 3. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., pp. 52–61. (In Russ.)

14. Belousov L.S., Manykin A.S. (eds.). 2014. Pervaya mirovaya voina i sud’by evropeiskoi tsivilizatsii [First World War and the destiny of European civilization]. Moscow, MGU Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Orlov A.S. 2000. Tainaya bitva sverkhderzhav [Secret war of the superpowers]. Moscow, Veche Publ. (In Russ.)

16. Pechatnov V.O. 2006a. Ot soyuza — k kholodnoi voine: sovetskoamerikanskie otnosheniya v 1945–1947 gg. [From alliance to the Cold War: Soviet-American relations in 1945–1947]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Pechatnov V.O. 2006b. Stalin, Ruzvel’t, Trumen: SSSR i SShA v 1940-kh gg. [Stalin, Roosevelt, Truman: The Soviet Union and the United States in 1940s]. Moscow, Terra Publ. (In Russ.)

18. Pechatnov V.O. 2009. Uroki Vtoroi mirovoi voiny v voenno-politicheskom planirovanii SShA i SSSR na poslevoennyi period [The lessons of the Second World War in the American and Soviet strategic planning for the postwar period]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 1, pp. 116–133. (In Russ.)

19. Pechatnov V.O., Magadeev I.E. 2015. Perepiska I.V. Stalina s F. Ruzvel’tom i U. Cherchillem v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [Correspondence between I.V. Stalin, F. Roosevelt and W. Churchill during the Great Patriotic War], vol. 1–2. Moscow, OLMA Media Group Publ. (In Russ.)

20. Pechatnov V.O., Manykin A.S. 2016. Istoriya vneshnei politiki SShA [History of the US foreign policy]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

21. Simonov N.V. 1996. Voenno-promyshlennyi kompleks SSSR v 1920–1950-e gody: tempy ekonomicheskogo rosta, struktura, organizatsiya proizvodstva i upravlenie [Military and industrial complex of the USSR in the 1920–1950-s: Economic growth rate, structure, production, and management]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

22. Torkunov A.V. 2000. Zagadochnaya voina: Koreiskii konflikt 19501953 godov [Enigmatic war: Conflict in Korea, 1950–1953]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

23. Fes’kov V.I., Golikov V.I., Kalashnikov K.A., Slugin S.A. 2013. Vooruzhennye Sily SSSR posle Vtoroi mirovoi voiny: ot Krasnoi armii k Sovetskoi. Chast’ 1. Sukhoputnye voiska [The military forces of the Soviet Union after the Second World War: From the Red Army to the Soviet Army. Part 1. Ground forces]. Tomsk: NTL Publ. (In Russ.)

24. Khollovei D. 1997. Stalin i bomba: Sovetskii Soyuz i atomnaya energiya. 1939–1956 [Stalin and the bomb: The Soviet Union and atomic energy. 19391956]. Novosibirsk, Sibirskii khronograf strategii Publ. (In Russ.)

25. Zolotaryov V.A. (ed.). 2014. Kholodnaya voina [The Cold War]. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow, Institut ekonomicheskikh strategii Publ. (In Russ.)

26. Alperovitz G. 1967. Atomic diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam. New York, Vintage Books.

27. Aronsen L. 2001. Seeing red: U.S. air force assessments of the Soviet Union, 1945–1949. Intelligence and National Security, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 103–132. DOI: 10.1080/714002887.

28. Baylis J., Stoddart K. 2012. The British nuclear experience: The role of ideas and beliefs (part 1). Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 331–346. DOI: 10.1080/09592296.2012.679488.

29. Betts R. 1987. Nuclear blackmail and nuclear balance. Washington, D.C., The Brookings Institution.

30. Black J. 2010. The age of total war, 1860–1945. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.

31. Borowski H.R. 1982. A hollow threat: Strategic air power and containment before Korea. Westport, Greenwood.

32. Buhite R.D., Hamel Ch. 1990. War for peace: The question of American preventive war against the Soviet Union, 1945–1955. Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 367–384.

33. Carley M.J. 2019. Fiasco: The Anglo-Franco-Soviet alliance that never was and the unpublished British white paper, 1939–1940. The International History Review, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 701–728. DOI: 10.1080/07075332.2018.1458043.

34. Chickering R., Förster S. 2005. Are we there yet? World War II and the theory of total war. In Chickering R., Förster S., Greiner B. (eds.). A world at total war: Global conflict and the politics of destruction, 1937–1945. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.

35. Cohen M.J. 2015. Fighting World War Three from the Middle East: Allied contingency plans, 1945–1954. 2nd ed. London, Routledge.

36. Condit K.W. 1979. The history of the joint chiefs of staff, vol. 2. Wilmington, M. Glazier.

37. Copeland D.C. 1996. Neorealism and the myth of bipolar stability: Toward a new dynamic realist theory of major war. Security Studies, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 29–89. DOI: 10.1080/09636419608429276.

38. Cornish P. 1996. British military planning for the defence of Germany, 1945–50. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

39. Dockrill M. 1990. British attitudes towards France as a military ally. Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 49–70. DOI: 10.1080/09592299008405782.

40. Edgerton D. 2005. Warfare state: Britain, 1920–1970. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

41. French D. 2012. Army, empire, and Cold War: The British army and military policy, 1945–1971. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

42. Goodman M. 2003. British intelligence and the Soviet atomic bomb, 1945–50. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 120–151. DOI: 10.1080/01402390412331303005.

43. Greenwood J.T. 1979. The emergence of the postwar strategic air force, 1945–1953. In Hurley A.F., Ehrhart R.C. (eds.). Air power and warfare. Washington, D.C., Air Force Academy, pp. 215–244.

44. Greenwood S. 1983. Return to Dunkirk: The origins of the Anglo-French treaty of March 1947. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 49–65.

45. Ham P. 2014. Hiroshima. Nagasaki: The real story of the atomic bombings and their aftermath. New York, St. Martin’s Press.

46. Herken G. 1980. The winning weapon: The atomic bomb in the Cold War, 1945–1950. New York, Alfred A. Knopf. DOI: 10.1086/ahr/87.1.284-a.

47. Hilsman R. 1959. On NATO strategy. In Wolfers A. (ed.). Alliance policy in the Cold War. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 149–183.

48. Holloway D. 2010. Nuclear weapons and the escalation of the Cold War, 1945–1962. In Westad O.A., Leffler M. (eds.). The Cambridge history of the Cold War, vol. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 376–397.

49. Johnston A.M. 2001. The Construction of NATO’s medium term defence plan and the diplomacy of conventional strategy, 1949–50. Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 79–124. DOI: 10.1080/09592290108406204.

50. Karber Ph.A., Combs J.A. 1998. The United States, NATO, and the Soviet threat to Western Europe: Military estimates and policy options, 1945–1963. Diplomatic History, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 399–429.

51. Kimball W.F. 2001. The incredible shrinking war: The Second World War, not (just) the origins of the Cold War. Diplomatic History, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 347–365.

52. Leffler M.P. 2017. Safeguarding democratic capitalism: U.S. foreign policy and national security, 1920–2015. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

53. Lewis J. 2003. Changing direction: British military planning for post-war strategic defence, 1942–1947. 2nd ed. London, Frank Cass.

54. Marks S. 2003. The illusion of peace: International relations in Europe, 1918–1933. 2nd ed. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

55. Porter P. 2011. Beyond the American century: Walter Lippmann and American grand strategy, 1943–1950. Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 557–577. DOI: 10.1080/09592296.2011.625803.

56. Reynolds D. 1990. The ‘Big three’ and the division of Europe, 194548: An overview. Diplomacy & Statecraft, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 111–136. DOI: 10.1080/09592299008405788.

57. Reynolds D. 2006. From World War to Cold War: Churchill, Roosevelt, and the international history of the 1940s. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

58. Reynolds D. 1993. Great Britain and the security ‘lessons’ of the Second World War. In Ahmann R., Birke A.M., Howard M. (eds.). The quest for stability: Problems of West European security, 1918–1957. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 299–325.

59. Roberts G. 2006. Stalin’s wars: From World War to Cold War, 1939–1953. New Haven, Yale University Press.

60. Rosenberg D.A. 1979. American atomic strategy and the hydrogen bomb decision. The Journal of American History, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 62–87.

61. Rosenberg D.A. 1983. The origins of overkill: Nuclear weapons and American strategy, 1945–1960. International Security, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 3–71. DOI: 10.2307/2626731.

62. Rosenberg D.A. 1982. U.S. nuclear stockpile, 1945 to 1950. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 25–30. DOI: 10.1080/00963402.1982.11455736.

63. Ross S.T. 2013. American war plans 1945–1950. 3rd ed. New York, Routledge.

64. Segesser D.M. 2014. Controversy: Total war. International encyclopedia of the First World War. Available at: https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/controversy_total_war (accessed: 22.02.2020).

65. Sherry M.S. 1995. In the shadow of war: The United States since the 1930s. New Haven, Yale University Press.

66. Sherry M.S. 1977. Preparing for the next war: American plans for postwar defense, 1941–45. New Haven, Yale University Press.

67. Zubok V.M. 1999. Stalin and the nuclear age. In Gaddis J.L. et al. (eds.). Cold War statesmen confront the bomb: Nuclear diplomacy since 1945. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 39–61.


Review

For citations:


Magadeev I.E. Lessons of World War II and Strategic Planning of the Big Three (1945–1949). Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2020;12(3):45-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-3-45-84

Views: 572


ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)