Neutrality or Involvement? World War II and Evolution of Foreign Policy Concepts of the Nordic Countries

In the middle of the 20th century a unique subsystem of international relations emerged in the Northern Europe, which has turned it into one of the stablest and most peaceful regions during the Cold War period. Nowadays, rising international tensions bring new relevance to the history lessons of World War II, its origins and aftermaths. The paper examines the evolution of the Nordic countries’ views on the issue of neutrality from mid-1930s to the end of 1940s. The first section considers the approaches of the Scandinavian countries to the establishment of a collective security system in the region in the interwar period. In that regard, the paper focuses on the Swedish project of the Northern defense alliance, which was aimed at deepening military cooperation between the states of the region and strengthening their ability to jointly deter any aggression as the best way to guarantee their neutrality. However, this project had not been implemented, because it faced both cool reactions from the leaders of Norway and Denmark and suspicion from the leading powers. According to the author, the fundamental reason for the failure of that project was that Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland sought support and protection from different, opposing great powers. The latter circumstance had also to a large extent predetermined the fate of the Scandinavian countries during the war years, when almost all of them were in one form or another involved in the conflict. The victory of the anti-Hitler coalition both opened new opportunities and posed new challenges for the states of the region: in the emerging bipolar world they rapidly turned into the subject matter of dispute of the superpowers. In these conditions, Sweden once again put forward the idea that in order to preserve peace in the region, the Nordic countries should be able to defend their neutrality and proposed the establishment of a Scandinavian Defense Union. In the final section, the paper examines the reaction to this project of the Scandinavian countries, the Soviet Union, the United States, and Great Britain. The author shows that although this reaction was more than restrained, and the project was not implemented, Sweden’s initiatives contributed to the creation of a unique security architecture in Northern Europe, where each state of the region had its own role with the neutral Sweden serving as a balancing force.

World War II, neutrality, the Nordic countries, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Northern Defense Alliance, Scandinavian Defense Union, declaration of neutrality, defense, security

1. Baryshnikov V.N. 2016. K voprosu o vykhode Finlyandii iz Vtoroi mirovoi voiny: vizit finskoi pravitel’stvennoi delegatsii v Moskvu v marte 1944 goda I ego znachenie (po materialam arkhiva Ministerstva inostrannykh del Finlyandii) [Finland’s withdrawal from World War II: The visit of the Finnish governmental delegation to Moscow in March 1944, and its importance (On the archival materials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland)]. Trudy kafedry istorii novogo i noveishego vremeni, iss. 16, pp. 140–156. (In Russ.)

2. Baryshnikov V.N. 2015. K voprosu ob ob”ektivnosti vykhoda Finlyandii iz Vtoroi mirovoi voiny na storone Germanii v 1944 g.: ekonomicheskii aspekt [The question of objectivity Finland’s withdrawal on the side of Germany from the Second World War in 1944: The economic aspect]. Sankt-Peterburg i strany Severnoi Evropy, no. 16, pp. 73–87. (In Russ.)

3. Baryshnikov V.N. 2000. O popytke sozdaniya v nachale 1940 g. troistvennogo oboronitel’nogo soyuza severnykh stran [On the attempt to create a tripartite defense alliance of the Northern countries in the beginning of 1940]. Vestnik SPbGU, ser. 2, iss. 2, pp. 18–29. (In Russ.)

4. Baryshnikov N.I. 2006. Povorot v politike Finlyandii v otnoshenii SSSR v 1944–1948 gg. [A turnaround in the Finland’s policy towards the Soviet Union in 1944–1948]. Skandinavskie chteniya 2004 goda. Saint Petersburg, Kunstkamera Publ., pp. 172–175. (In Russ.)

5. Baryshnikov N.I., Baryshnikov V.N., Fedorov V.G. 1989. Finlyandiya vo Vtoroi mirovoi voine [Finland in the Second World War]. Leningrad, Lenizdat Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Ishchenko V.V. (ed.). 2020. Bitva za Sever. 1944–1945 [Battle for the North. 1944–1945]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Verigin S.G. 2016. Sovetsko-finlyandskie diskussii po voprosu demarkatsii granitsy po Moskovskomu mirnomu dogovoru 12 marta 1940 g. [Soviet-Finnish discussions on the question of demarcation of the border under the Peace Treaty of March 12, 1940]. Trudy kafedry istorii novogo i noveishego vremeni, no. 16, pp. 130–139. (In Russ.)

8. Vekhvilyainen O. 1999. Mir ili peremirie? [Peace or armistice?]. In Zimnyaya voina 1939–1940. Kniga pervaya. Politicheskaya istoriya [The Winter war, 1939–1940. Book one. Political history]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., pp. 362–374. (In Russ.)

9. Belousov L.S., Manykin A.S. (eds.). 2020. Vtoraya mirovaya voina i transformatsiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: ot mnogopolyarnosti k bipolyarnomu miru [The Second World War and the transformation of international relations: From multipolarity to a bipolar world]. Moscow, Moscow University Press Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Ganyushkin B.V. 1958. Sovremennyi neitralitet [Contemporary neutrality]. Мoscow. (In Russ.)

11. Komarov A.A. (ed.). 2020. Zapolyar’e 1944–1945: Voina, povsednevnost’, pamyat’ [The circumpolar North 1944–1945: War, everyday life, memory]. Moscow. (In Russ.)

12. Zaretskaya O.V. 2008. Regionalizm vo vneshnei politike Norvegii i Shvetsii (1945–2000 gg.) [Regionalism in foreign policy of Norway and Sweden (1945–2000)]. PhD Thesis. Arkhangelsk. (In Russ.)

13. Zaretskaya O.V. 2005. Sozdanie Severnogo oboronitel’nogo soyuza: norvezhskaya i shvedskaya politiki v kontse 40-kh godov XX veka [The creation of the Northern defense alliance: Norwegian and Swedish policies in the end of the 1940s]. Skandinavskie chteniya 2005 goda. Saint Petersburg, pp. 81–87. (In Russ.)

14. Kudrina Yu.V., Roginskii V.V. (eds.). 1998. Istoriya Danii [A history of Denmark]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Ken O.N., Rupasov A.I., Samuel’son L. 2005. Shvetsiya v politike Moskvy 1930–1950-e gg. [Sweden in the policy of Moscow, 1930–1950s]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

16. Komarov A.A. 1999. Okonchanie Vtoroi mirovoi voiny i sovetskie interesy v Finlyandii i Norvegii (1944–1947) [The end of the Second World War and the Soviet interests in Finland and Norway (1944–1947]. Severnaya Evropa i Norvegiya: problemy istorii, iss. 3., pp. 220–232. (In Russ.)

17. Komarov A.A. 2011. Severnaya Norvegiya v sovetskoi vneshnei politike [Northern Norway in the Soviet foreign policy]. Severnaya Evropa: problemy istorii, iss. 7, pp. 196–206. (In Russ.)

18. Komarov A.A. 2009. Sovetsko-finlyandskie otnosheniya v 1944–1948 gg. [The Soviet-Finland relations, 1944–1948]. In Rossiya i Finlyandiya v mnogopolyarnom mire: 1809–2009. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi rossiiskofinlyandskoi nauchnoi konferentsii [Russia and Finland in a multipolar world (1809–2009). Proceedings of the Russian-Finland academic conference]. Petrozavodsk, pp. 70–81. (In Russ.)

19. Komarov A.A. 2003. SSSR i Skandinavskii oboronitel’nyi soyuz (19481949) [The Soviet Union and The Scandinavian defense union (1948–1949)]. Severnaya Evropa: problemy istorii, iss. 4, pp. 90–105. (In Russ.)

20. Komarov A.A., Korobochkin M.L. 2019. SSSR i shvedskii neitralitet. 1945 g. — seredina 1950-kh gg. [The Soviet Union and the Swedish neutrality. 1945 — mid 1950s]. In Rossiya v mire: obrazy i grani vzaimodeistviya. Sbornik statei [Russia in the world: images and lines of interaction. Collection of research articles]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., pp. 338–380. (In Russ.)

21. Korunova E.V. 2011. Konferentsii ministrov inostrannykh del stran Severnoi Evropy v 1930-e gody. Poiski garantii bezopasnosti [Conferences of Foreign Ministers of the Nordic states in the 1930s. In search of security assurances]. Severnaya Evropa: problemy istorii, iss. 7, pp. 128–146. (In Russ.)

22. Korunova E.V. 2020. Oslablenie pozitsii Germanii na severnom flange evropeiskoi podsistemy [Weakening of Germany’s positions in the Northern flank of the European subsystem]. In Belousov L.S., Manykin A.S. (eds.). 2020. Vtoraya mirovaya voina i transformatsiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: ot mnogopolyarnosti k bipolyarnomu miru [The Second World War and the transformation of international relations: From multipolarity to a bipolar world]. Moscow, Moscow University Press Publ., pp. 107–123. (In Russ.)

23. Korunova E.V. 2019. Proekt sozdaniya Severnogo oboronitel’nogo soyuza: skandinavskii otvet na krizis Versal’sko-Vashingtonskoi sistemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [The Nothern defense alliance project: The Scandinavian response to the crisis of the Versailles-Washington system of international relations]. In Aktual’nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii i diplomatii (1918 g. — XXI v.): Materialy IV Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Current issues of international relations and diplomacy (1918 — 21 st century). Proceedings of IV international academic and practical conference]. Vitebsk, pp. 90–94. (In Russ.)

24. Korunova E.V. 2017. Skandinavskie strany nakanune i v pervye gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny. V poiskakh formuly bezopasnosti [Nordic countries on the eve and in the first years of the Second World War. In search of a safety formula]. Istoriya, vol. 8, iss. 4 (58). Available at: https://history.jes.su/s2079878400018166-1/ (accessed: 17.11.2019). DOI: 10.18254/S0001816-6-1. (In Russ.)

25. Korunova E.V. 2018. Skandinavskie eks-neitraly posle Pervoi mirovoi voiny: mesto i rol’ v novoi Versal’skogo-Vashingtonskoi sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [The Nordic ex-neutrals after the First World War: Place and role in the new Versailles-Washington system of international relations]. In Itogi i posledstviya Pervoi mirovoi voiny [The outcomes and consequences of the First World War]. Voronezh, pp. 170–179. (In Russ.)

26. Meinander H. 2009. Finland 1944: krig, samhälle, känslolandskap. Stockholm, Atlantis [Russ. ed.: Meinander Kh. 2014. Finlyandiya, 1944: voina, obshchestvo, nastroeniya. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ.]

27. Noskov A.M. 1977. Skandinavskii platsdarm vo Vtoroi mirovoi voine [The Nordic staging ground in the Second World War]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

28. Prusakov Yu.M. 1972. Neitralitet v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [Neutrality in contemporary international law]. Moscow, Znanie Publ. (In Russ.)

29. Rupasov A.I. 2014. ‘Spolzayushchaya maska neitral’nosti’. Sovetskoshvedskie otnosheniya v kontse 1940-kh — nachale 1950-kh godov [‘The mask of neutrality slips away’. Soviet-Swedish relations in the late 1940s — early 1950s]. Noveishaya istoriya Rossii, no. 1, pp. 157–180. (In Russ.)

30. Rupasov A.I., Samuel’son L. 2014. Sovetsko-shvedskie otnosheniya: vtoraya polovina 1940-kh — nachalo 1960-kh gg. [The Soviet-Swedish relations: The second half of 1940s — beginning of 1960s]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

31. Tiunov O.I. 1968. Neitralitet v mezhdunarodnom prave [Neutrality in the international law]. Perm’. (In Russ.)

32. Chernysheva O.V. 1980. Shvetsiya v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny. Ekonomika, politika, rabochee dvizhenie [Sweden during the Second World War. Economy, politics, labor movement]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

33. Andreen P. 1972. De mörka åren. Perspektiv på svensk neutralitetspolitik våren 1940 — nyåret 1942. Lund.

34. Andrén N. 1996. Maktbalans och alliansfrihet: svensk utrikespolitik under 1900-talet. Stockholm, Norstedts juridik.

35. Andrén N. 1967. Power-balance and non-alignment. A perspective on Swedish foreign policy. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.

36. Andrén N., Landqvist Å. 1965. Svensk utrikespolitik efter 1945. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.

37. Bring O. 2008. Neutralitetens uppgång och fall — Eller den gemensamma säkerhetens historia. Stockholm, Atlantis.

38. Carlgren W.M. 1977. Swedish foreign policy during the Second World War. London, Tonbridge, Ernest Benn.

39. Due-Nielsen C., Petersen N. (eds.). 1991. Danmark, Norden og NATO 1948–1962. København, Jurist — og Økonomforbundets Forlag.

40. Häikiö M. 1983. The race for the Northern Europe, September 1939 June 1940. In Hissen H.S. (ed.). Scandinavia during the Second World War. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget. S. 53–98.

41. Harrison D. 2017. Jag har ingen vilja till makt. Biografi över Tage Erlander. Stockholm, Ordfront.

42. Haskel B.G. 1976. The Scandinavian option. Opportunities and opportunity costs in postwar Scandinavian foreign policies. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.

43. Hirschfeldt L. 1949. Scandinavien och Atlantpakten. De skandinaviska alliansföhandlingarna 1948–1949. Stockholm, Utrikespolitiska Inst.

44. Holtsmark S.G. 1999. Norge og Sovietunionen — bilaterisering og fellestyre. In NATO 50 år. Norsk sikkerhetspolitikk med NATO gjennom 50 år. Oslo, Den norske atlanterhavskomité. Available at: https://www.atlanterhavskomiteen.no/files/dnak/Documents/Publikasjoner/Sven%20G.%20Holtsmark%20-%20Norge%20og%20Sovjetunionen%20-%20bilaterisering%20og%20fellesstyre.pdf (accessed: 24.08.2020).

45. Karlsson R. 1974. Så stoppades tysktågen. Den tyska transiteringstrafiken i svensk politik 1942–1943. Stockholm, Allmänna Förlaget.

46. Karsh E. 1988. Neutrality and small states. New York, Routledge.

47. Komarov A. 2018. The Soviet view. In Arteus G., Zetterberg K. (eds.). Cold War views on Sweden. Falun, Scandbook AB. P. 81–98.

48. Linder J. 2005. Svår neutralitet. Sverige under två sekel. Enskede, TPB.

49. Lindholm R. 1987. Sveriges neutralitet: Swedish neutrality. Lund, Juridiska Föreningen.

50. Lunde O. 2009. Hitler’s pre-emptive war. The battle for Norway. Havertown, Casemate Publishing.

51. Manninen O. 2004. The Soviet plans for the North Western theatre of operations in 1939–1944. Helsinki, National Defense College.

52. Molin K., Olesen T.B. 1995. Security policy and domestic politics in Scandinavia 1948–49. In Independence versus integration. Denmark, Scandinavia and Western Europe, 1945–1960. Odense University Press, pp. 62–81.

53. Jessup P.C. (ed.). 1936. Neutrality: Its history, economics and law. Vol. IV. Today and tomorrow. New York, Columbia University Press.

54. Nøkleby B. 2016. Hitlers Norge: okkupasjonsmakten 1940–1945. Oslo, Cappelen Damm.

55. Noreen E. 1994. Brobygge eller blockbildning? De norska och svenska utrikesledningarnas säkerhetspolitiska föreställningar 1945–1948. Doctoral Thesis. Stockholm.

56. Noreen E. 1983. The Nordic balance: A security policy concept in theory and practice. Cooperation and conflict, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 43–65.

57. Ottosson S. 2000. Den (o)moraliska neutraliteten: tre politikers och tre tidningars moraliska värdering av svensk utrikespolitik 1945–1952. Stockholm, Santérus.

58. Polvinen T., Kirby D.G., Herring P. 1986. Between East and West: Finland in international politics. 1944–1947. Helsinki, Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö.

59. Rådehed J.-E. 1985. Swedish forces to aid Norway? The Nordic security question 1948–1949. Oslo, National Defense College Norway, Research Centre for Defense History.

60. Rentola K. 2018. The Finnish view. In Arteus G., Zetterberg K. (eds.). Cold War views on Sweden. Falun, Scandbook AB. P. 33–43.

61. Nissen H.S. (ed.). 1983. Scandinavia during the Second World War. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.

62. Skodvin M. 1971. Norden eller NATO? Utenriksdepartementet og alliansesp̈ørsmålet, 1947–1949. Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.

63. Silva C., Jonter T. (eds.). 1995. Sverige inför en ny världsordning, 1945–50. Formativa år för svensk utrikespolitik? Stockholm, Stockholm Utrikespolitiska institutet.

64. Sönsteby G. 2015. Oslogänget: norskt motstånd mot tysk ockupation. Stockholm, Svenskt militärhistoriskt bibliotek.

65. Thulstrup Å. 1950. Svensk utrikespolitik under andra världskriget. Stockholm, Bonnier.

66. Wahlbäck K. 2000. Försvarsförbundsförhandlingarna 1948–49. In Norden i sicksack. Tre spårbyten inom norskt samarbete. Stockholm, pp. 31–45.

67. Wahlbäck K. 1997. Neutralitet och solidaritet: ett dilemma i svensk säkerhetspolitik 1920–1996. Stockholm.

68. Zetterberg K. 2012. Sweden in the shadow of Nazi Germany and Hitler 1939–1945. London, Bloomsbury Academic.