On the Genesis of the ‘Sustainable Security’ Concept
Abstract
Contemporary specialist in development studies use a variety of similar terms often incoherently. In particular, this observation applies to the concept of ‘security’. While the term ‘sustainable development’ is now firmly established in theory and policy, the ‘security’ concept remains essentially contested. In the relevant literature ‘sustainable development’ may be linked to ‘environmental security’, ‘human security’ or ‘sustainable security’. Acknowledging the existence of an inextricable ‘security — development nexus’, the author traces the modifications of its first element. Examination of the concepts used in an academic discourse over the last three decades — since the emergence of ‘sustainable development’ paradigm allows to reconstruct the genesis of ‘sustainable security’, one of the most recent entries to international development lexicon. This paper demonstrates that initially, when ‘sustainable development’ concept had just emerged, the nexus was seen as a dyad ‘sustainable development — environmental safety’. At the very end of the 20th century, scholars came up with a new modification of the nexus — ‘human security — sustainable development’. However, the process of its conceptualization was disrupted by the so-called ‘securitization of
development’. The international development community’s responded to this disruption with a ‘sustainable security’ concept. Describing the key parameters of ‘sustainable security’, the author emphasizes that a unified and holistic approach to its conceptualization is yet to be formed in the Western development community.
Keywords
sustainable development,
sustainable security,
security–development nexus,
securitization of development,
environmental security,
human security,
climate change,
natural resources,
inequality,
poverty,
globalization,
violence,
conflicts
Supporting agencies: The research has been accomplished with a financial support from the Russian Science Foundation, project № 15-18-30066.
About the Author
E. N. Glazunova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Elena N. Glazunova — PhD (History), Leading Research Fellow, Deputy Director of the Center for Security and Development Studies, School of World Politics1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
Russian Federation
Elena N. Glazunova — PhD (History), Leading Research Fellow, Deputy Director of the Center for Security and Development Studies, School of World Politics1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Astashin V. 2008. Al’ternativnyye podkhody k problemam bezopasnosti v mezhdunarodnykh issledovaniyakh: kontseptsiya chelovecheskoy bezopasnosti [Alternate ways to security problems in international researches: The concept of human security]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 2, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.)
2. Baluev D. 2003. Ponyatiye human security v sovremennoi politologii [The notion of human security in contemporary political science]. International Trends, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 95–105. (In Russ.)
3. Bartenev V.I. 2017. Ot ‘nesostoyavshikhsya gosudarstv’ k ‘neustoychivym sostoyaniyam’: logika ponyatiynoy ekvilibristiki [From ‘failed states’ to ‘states of fragility’: Logic of conceptual acrobatics]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 2, pp. 26–41. (In Russ.)
4. Bartenev V.I. 2015. Svyazka ‘bezopasnost’–razvitie’ v sovremennykh zapadnykh issledovaniyakh: ot dekonstruktsii k kontseptualizatsii [Security-development nexus in Western bibliography: From deconstruction to contextualization]. International Trends, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 78–97. (In Russ.)
5. Bartenev V. 2011. Sek’yuritizatsiya sfery sodeistviya mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu: analiz politicheskogo diskursa [Securitization of international development aid: Political discourse analysis]. International Organizations Research Journal, no. 3, pp. 37–50. (In Russ.)
6. Biktimirova Z.Z. 2002. Bezopasnost’ v kontseptsii razvitiya cheloveka [Security in the on human development discourse]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 6, pp. 135–142. (In Russ.)
7. Zadokhin A.G. 2010. Chelovecheskaya bezopasnost’ kak sostavlyayushchaya strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya [Human security as a part of sustainable development strategy]. In Tsygankov P.A. (ed.). Bezopasnost’ cheloveka v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy politiki: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Human security in the context of international politics: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Moscow University Press. Available at: http://textarchive.ru/c-2775407.html (accessed: 23.09.2018). (In Russ.)
8. Kapitsa L. 2013. Chelovecheskaya bezopasnost’ [Human security]. ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249771346_Celoveceskaa_bezopasnost_-stata_PDF (accessed: 23.09.2018). (In Russ.)
9. , Kochetkov V.V., Pak E.V. 2010. Chelovecheskaya bezopasnost’ v kontekste defitsita vodnykh resursov [Human security in the context of water scarcity]. In Tsygankov P.A. (ed.). Bezopasnost’ cheloveka v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy politiki: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Human security in the context of international politics: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Moscow University Press. Available at: http://textarchive.ru/c-2775407.html (accessed: 23.09.2018). (In Russ.)
10. Roshchina I.V., Dyatlova N.A., Roshchina G.S. 2012. Ustoychivoye razvitiye i ustoychivaya bezopasnost’ monoprofil’nykh munitsipal’nykh obrazovanii [Sustainable development and sustainable security of mainstays municipalities]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 4, pp. 54–63. (In Russ.)
11. Ryzhov I.V., Zolina D.M. 2010. Chelovecheskaya bezopasnost’ v svete sopernichestva mezhdu gosudarstvami Blizhnego Vostoka za vodnyye resursy [Human security in the light of the competition over water resources between the states of the Middle East]. In Tsygankov P.A. (ed.). Bezopasnost’ cheloveka v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy politiki: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Human security in the context of international politics: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Moscow University Press. Available at: http://textarchive.ru/c-2775407.html (accessed: 23.09.2018). (In Russ.)
12. Timofeyev G.A., Orlinskaya O.M. 2017. Ekologicheskaya bezopasnost’ v sisteme natsional’noI bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Ecological safety in the system of national security of the Russian Federation]. Vlast’, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 69–74. (In Russ.)
13. Ursul A.D. 2017. Bezopasnost’ i razvitiye: mezhdistsiplinarnyi podkhod i global’noye izmereniye [Security and development: Interdisciplinary approach and global dimension]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 3, pp. 141–160. (In Russ.)
14. Khudaykulova A.V. 2010. Human security v politicheskom diskurse i mezhdunarodnoi praktike [Human security in political discourse and international practice]. In Tsygankov P.A. (ed.). Bezopasnost’ cheloveka v kontekste mezhdunarodnoy politiki: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Human security in the context of international politics: Theory and practice]. Moscow, Moscow University Press. Available at: http://textarchive.ru/c-2775407.html (accessed: 23.09.2018). (In Russ.)
15. Yudin N.V. 2017a. Rasshirenie problematiki issledovanii bezopasnosti [Widening the debate on security]. International Trends, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 60–78. (In Russ.)
16. Yudin N.V. 2017b. Svyazka ‘bezopasnost’–razvitie’: problemy i perspektivy instrumentalizatsii [Security-development nexus: Problems and prospects of instrumentalization]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 16–23. (In Russ.)
17. Abbott Ch., Rogers P., Sloboda J. 2006. Global responses to global threats. Sustainable security for the 21st century. Oxford, Oxford Research Group.
18. Biswas A., Tortajada C. 2016. Water security, climate change, and sustainable development. New York, Springer.
19. Buzan B. 1983. People, states, & fear: The national security problem in international relations. Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press.
20. Buzan B., Weaver O., Wilde J. de. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder, London, Lynne Rienner.
21. Lobell D.B., Burke M. (eds.). 2009. Climate change and food security: Adapting agriculture to a warmer world. Stanford, Stanford University.
22. Dalby S. Security and environmental change. 2009. Cambridge, UK, Polity Press.
23. Khagram S., Clark W.C., Firas Raad D. 2003. From the environmental and human security to sustainable security and development. Journal of Human Development, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 289–313.
24. Krause K. 2007. Towards a practical human security agenda. Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, Policy Paper No. 26. Available at: https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/PP26.pdf (accessed: 21.10.2018).
25. Lama M.P. 2018. Human vs. national security. Global-E. 21st Century Global Dynamics, vol. 11, iss. 22. Available at: http://www.21global.ucsb.edu/global-e/april-2018/human-vs-national-security (accessed: 21.10.2018).
26. Leese M., Meisch S. 2015. Securitizing sustainability? Questioning the ‘Water, energy, and food-security nexus’. Water Alternatives, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 695–709.
27. Matthew R., Harron C., Goodrich K. 2017. The social ecology of the anthropocene: Continuity and change in global environmental politics. The WSPC reference on natural resources and environmental policy in the era of global change. New Jersy, London, Singapore, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taipei, Chennai, Tokyo, World Scientific Publishing.
28. McDonald M. 2016. Ecological security. Global policy. Available at: https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/07/03/2016/ecological-security (accessed: 23.10.2018).
29. Mr. Y. 2011. A national strategic narrative. Washington, D.C., Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
30. Mustafa D., Akhter M., Nasrallah N. 2013. Understanding Pakistan’s water-security nexus. Washington, D.C., Washington Institute of Peace. Available at: https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/PW88_Understanding-Pakistan%27sWater-Security-Nexus.pdf (accessed: 20.10.2018).
31. Mykleby M., Doherty P., Makower J. 2016. The new grand strategy: Restoring America’s prosperity, security, and sustainability in the 21st century. New York, St. Martin Press.
32. Picard L., Buss T., Seybolt T., Lelei М. 2015. Sustainable development and human security in Africa: Governance as the missing link. Boca Raton, CRC Press.
33. Reid J. 2013. Interrogating the neoliberal biopolitics of the sustainable-development-resilience nexus. International Political Sociology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 353–367.
34. Rogers P. 2010. Losing control: Global security in the 21st century. London, New York, PlutoPress.
35. Selby J., Hoffmann C. 2014. Rethinking climate change, conflict, and security. Geopolitics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 747–756.
36. Smith G. 2008. In search of sustainable security. Linking national security, human security, and collective security to protect America and our world. Center for American Progress. Available at: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/security/reports/2008/06/19/4550/in-search-of-sustainable-security/ (accessed: 16.11.2018).
37. Suri J., Valentino B. 2016. Sustainable security. Rethinking American national security strategy. New York, Oxford University Press.
38. Weiss T.G. 2004. The sunset of humanitarian intervention? The responsibility to protect in a unipolar era. Security Dialogue, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 135–153.
Review
For citations:
Glazunova E.N. On the Genesis of the ‘Sustainable Security’ Concept. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2018;10(2):3-32. (In Russ.)
Views:
264
Email this article 