Russian Strategy for Eurasian Integration: Key Elements, Determinants and Prospects for Development

Eurasia is gradually turning into the point of intersection of various longterm political and economic initiatives undertaken by the leading actors of contemporary international relations, including the Russian Federation, the European Union, the United States and the People’s Republic of China. This trend compounded by a complicated dynamics of integration and disintegration processes in the post-Soviet states further exacerbates tensions in the region, already fraught with conflict. It also poses additional obstacles to the projects of Eurasian integration, promoted by the Russian Federation. In order to provide a better understanding of the specificities and prospects of Russia’s initiatives, the paper examines the origins and the evolution of the Russian strategy of Eurasian integration, and identifies its key elements. The author concludes that fundamental principles of the Russian strategy for reshaping the post-Soviet states have been laid down during the presidency of B.N. Yeltsin and were merely adjusted to meet certain political, social and economic changes both in Russia and abroad. These principles include: 1) commitment to the idea of a multipolar world; 2) creation of supranational Eurasian economic institutions to multiply the economic potential of member-states; 3) prevention of a change of political regimes in neighboring countries if they can bring to power anti-Russian groups; 4) establishment of closer links with China, especially on political, economic and security issues; 5) formation of a new center of political gravity in Eurasia through expanding the capacities of regional political and military organizations which would complement integration processes and ensure regional security. The paper shows that amid growing international tensions in the second half of 2010s the Russian integration initiatives have become increasingly focused on geostrategic, political and military issues. In that regard, the author concludes that, although the development of the Eurasian integration projects enables a wide range of horizontal and vertical economic linkages between the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) memberstates, overtly competitive nature of both the Russian and the Western states’ strategies increases the conflict potential of the region. In the absence of alternative approaches, this conflict could not only become a potential source of new tensions between Russia and the West, but also threatens to reverse the current integration processes within the EAEU. The author emphasizes that the abandonment of excessively politicized and ideologized policies both in Russia and in the Western states, which prevents political elites from finding compromises and developing alternative approaches, is the only way to improve the situation in the Eurasian region.

1. Agafonov Yu.G. 2015. Vliyanie Evropeiskoi politiki sosedstva na politicheskie rezhimy stran Vostochnogo partnyorstva [European Neighborhood policy’s impact on political regimes of Eastern Partnership countries]. World Economy and International Relations, no. 10, pp. 40–49. (In Russ.)

2. Alekseev D.S. 2018. Raspad SSSR i predposylki formirovaniya rossiyskikh podkhodov k vzaimodeistviyu na postsovetskom prostranstve v 90-e gody XX v. [The collapse of the USSR and the sources of formation of Russia’s attitudes toward the international cooperation on the post-Soviet space during the 90s]. Sovremennye evraziiskie issledovaniya, no. 3, pp.71–78. (In Russ.)

3. Babadzhanov A.Ya. 2011. Formirovanie dialogovogo prostranstva ‘NATO — postsovetskie gosudarstva’ [Cooperation between NATO and former USSR states]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.)

4. Batyuk V.I. 2006. Rossiya, SShA i ‘tsvetnye revolyutsii’ [Russia, USA, and the ‘color revolutions’]. RUDN Journal of Political Science, no. 8, pp. 15–26. (In Russ.)

5. Bykov A.N. 2011. Rossiya i SNG v postkrizisnom mire [Russia and the CIS in the post-crisis world]. International Aff airs, no. 4, pp. 86–98. (In Russ.)

6. Vinokurov E.Yu. 2017. Evraziiskii ekonomicheskii soyuz [The Eurasian Economic Union]. Moscow, EABR Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Yaz’kova A.A. (ed.). 2014. Vostochnoe partnerstvo do i posle Vil’nyusa [Eastern Partnership before and after Vilnius]. Moscow, IE RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Charap S., Demus A., Shapiro D. (eds.). 2019. Getting out from in-between: Perspectives on the regional order in post-Soviet Europe and Eurasia. Vienna, FES Regional Offi ce for Cooperation and Peace in Europe [Russ. ed.: Charap S., Demus A., Shapiro D. (eds.). 2019. Vyiti iz ‘promezhutochnogo polozheniya’. Predstavleniya o regional’nom poryadke v postsovetskoi Evrope i Evrazii. Vena, Fond Fridrikha Eberta].

9. Glaz’ev S.Yu., Chushkin V.I., Tkachuk S.P. 2013. Evropeiskii soyuz i Evraziiskoe ekonomicheskoe soobshchestvo: skhodstvo i razlichie protsessov integratsionnogo stroitelstva [The European Union and Eurasian Economic Community: Diff erences and similarities of integration development]. Moscow, Vikor-Media Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Gustov V.A., Man’ko V.Kh. 2007. Rossiya–SNG: sotrudnichestvo vo imya razvitiya i progressa [Russia and the CIS: Cooperation for progress and development]. Moscow, AVOK Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Ermakov S.M. 2010. Politika SShA i NATO na postsovetskom prostranstve [The US and NATO policy in the post-Soviet area]. Problemy natsionalnoi strategii, no. 1 (2), pp. 79–91. (In Russ.)

12. Efremenko D.V. 2019. Novyi etap v razvitii Shankhaiskoi organizatsii sotrudnichestva [New stage in the development of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization]. Kitai v mirovoi i regionalnoi politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’, no. 24, pp. 114–129. DOI: 10.24411/2618-6888-2019-10006. (In Russ.)

13. Inozemtsev V. 2012. Natsionalnye interesy Rossii na postsovetskom prostranstve [Russian national interests in the post-Soviet space]. Rossiya i sovremennii mir, no. 3 (86), pp. 108–121. (In Russ.)

14. Istomin I.A. 2018. Sravnitelnyi analiz prioritetov rossiiskoi vneshnei politiki i nauchno-obrazovatelnogo soobshchestva spetsialistov po mezhdunarodnym otnosheniyam [Comparative analysis of the Russian foreign policy priorities and research interests of the national academic community]. Vestnik RUDN, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 162–185. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-1-162-185. (In Russ.)

15. Li Sin. 2017. Strategiya Kitaya i Rossii v Shankhaiskoi organizatsii sotrudnichestva: sravnitelnyi analiz [The Chinese and Russian strategies in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Comparative analysis]. Sravnitelnaya politika, no. 2, pp. 98–106. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-2-98-107. (In Russ.)

16. Luzyanin S. 2005. Tsvetnye revolyutsii v tsentralnoaziatskoi proektsii: Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan [Color revolutions in the Central Asian context: Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan]. Tsentralnaya Azia i Kavkaz, vol. 41, no. 5. pp. 7–21. (In Russ.)

17. Luzyanin S.G., Klimenko A.F. 2019. Sotrudnichestvo Rossii i Kitaya v ShOS po realizatsii kontseptsii Bolshogo evraziiskogo partnerstva [RussianChinese cooperation in the SCO on the implementation of the greater Eurasian partnership concept]. Kitai v mirovoi i regionalnoi politike. Istoriya i sovremennost’, no. 24, pp. 98–113. DOI: 10.24411/2618-6888-2019-10005. (In Russ.)

18. Mayorov M.V. 2007. Mirotvortsy. Iz opyta rossiyskoi diplomatii v posrednichestve [The peacekeepers. Russian experience in mediation diplomacy]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

19. Marketti A. 2010. Evropeiskaya politika sosedstva — politicheskaya konsolidatsiya s prepyatstviyami [European Neighborhood Policy — political consolidation accompanied by the obstacles]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, no. 2, pp. 77–101. (In Russ.)

20. Matsaberidze M. 2005. ‘Revolyutsiya roz’ i strany Yuzhnogo Kavkaza [The Rose revolution and the South Caucasus countries]. Central Asia and Caucasus, no. 2, pp. 7–15. (In Russ.)

21. Moroz O. 2013. Yeltsin protiv Gorbacheva, Gorbachev protiv Yeltsina [Yeltsin vs. Gorbachev, Gorbachev vs. Yeltsin]. Moscow, Maska Press Publ. (In Russ.)

22. Charap S., Shapiro D., Drennan D., Chalyi A. (eds.). 2019. A consensus proposal for a revised regional order in post-Soviet Europe and Eurasia. RAND [Russ. ed.: Charap S., Shapiro D., Drennan D., Chalyi A. (eds.). 2020. Peresmotr regional’nogo poryadka v postsovetskoi Evrope i Evrazii. Vena, Fond Fridrikha Eberta].

23. Podberezkin A.I. 2018. Sostoyanie i dolgosrochnye voenno-politicheskie perspektivy razvitiya Rossii v XXI veke [Status and long-term military and political prospects for Russia’s development in the 21st century.]. Moscow, International Relations Publ. (In Russ.)

24. Solovei V.D. 2011. ‘Tsvetnye revolyutsii’ i Rossiya [Color revolutions and Russia]. Sravnitelnaya politika, vol. 2, no. 1 (3), pp. 33–43. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-1(3)-33-43. (In Russ.)

25. Torkunov A.V. 2013. Perspektivy evraziiskoi economicheskoi integratsii [The prospects of Eurasian economic integration]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 4 (31), pp. 9–11. (In Russ.)

26. Tsyplin V.G. 2014. Modeli uchastiya Rossii v integratsionnom vzaimodeistvii v ramkakh EAES v 2015 godu [Models of Russian participation in EAEU integration process in 2015]. Sovremennye evraziiskie issledovaniya, no. 2, pp. 70–77. (In Russ.)

27. Chufrin G. 2017. Evraziiskii integratsionnyi proekt i strategicheskie interesy Rossii [Eurasian integration project and strategic interests of Russia]. Rossiya i novye gosudarstva Evrazii, no. 1, pp. 9–20. (In Russ.)

28. Yun S.M. 2013. Formirovanie kontseptualnykh, organizatsionnykh i fi nansovykh osnov Evropeiskoi politiki sosedstva (2002–2004) [Building the conceptual, institutional and fi nancial framework of the European Neighborhood Policy during the period of 2002–2004]. Tomsk University Review, no. 374, pp. 117–121. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/374/25. (In Russ.)

29. Acharya A. 2001. Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London, New York, Routledge.

30. Auer S. 2015. Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine crisis and the return of geopolitics. International Aff airs, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 953–968.

31. Baev P. 2003. Russia’s policies in the North and South Caucasus. Chaillot Papers, no. 65. Available at https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/chai65e.pdf (accessed: 20.02.2020).

32. Buzan B., Waever O. 2003. Regions and powers. The structure of international security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

33. Cadier D. 2014. Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU–Russia competition in the shared neighborhood and the Ukraine crisis. Global Policy, vol. 5, suppl. 1. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1758-5899.12152 (accessed 20.03.2020).

34. Hettne B., Inotai A., Sunkel O. (eds.). 1999. Globalism and the new regionalism. Vol. 1. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

35. Gorenburg D. 2014. Countering color revolutions Russia’s new security strategy and its implications for U.S. policy. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, no. 342. Available at: http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policymemos-pdf/Pepm342_Gorenburg_Sept2014.pdf (accessed: 20.09.2020).

36. Gretskiy I., Treshchenkov E., Golubev K. 2014. Russia’s perceptions and misperceptions of the EU Eastern Partnership. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, no. 47 (3–4), pp. 375–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.10.006.

37. Haas E.B. 1961. International integration: The European and universal process. International Organization, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 377–379.

38. Herbst J. 2016. Assessing and addressing Russian revanchism. PRISM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 164–181.

39. Hettne B., Söderbaum F. 2008. The future of regionalism: Old divides, new frontiers. In Cooper A., Hughes C., de Lombaerde P. (eds.). Regionalization and the taming of globalization. London, Routledge, pp. 61–79.

40. Kalinin K. 2019. Neo-Eurasianism and the Russian elite: The irrelevance of Aleksandr Dugin’s geopolitics. Post-Soviet Aff airs, vol. 35, no. 5–6, pp. 461–470. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2019.1663050.

41. Kaluzhnova Y., Lynch D. 2000. The Euro-Asian world. A period of transition. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

42. Katzenstein P. 2005. A world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium. New York, Cornell University Press.

43. Krickovic A. 2014. Imperial nostalgia or prudent geopolitics? Russia’s eff orts to reintegrate the post-Soviet space in geopolitical perspective. PostSoviet Aff airs, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 503–528. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2014.900975.

44. Legvold R. 2014. Managing the new Cold War. Foreign Aff airs, no. 93 (4). Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2014-06-16/managing-newcoldwar (accessed: 20.02.2020).

45. Lynch D. 2001. Managing separatist states. A Eurasian case study. Institute for Security Studies — Western European Union, Occasional Paper no. 32. November, pp. 14–20. Available at: https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/occ32.pdf (accessed: 23.03.2020).

46. Mankoff J. 2009. Russian foreign policy: The return of great power politics. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefi eld.

47. McFaul M., Stoner-Weiss K. 2008. The myth of the authoritarian model. How Putin’s crackdown holds Russia back. Foreign Aff airs, no. 87 (1), pp. 68–84.

48. Mitrany D. 1948. The functional approach to world organization. International Aff airs, vol. 24, iss. 3, pp. 350–363.

49. Morozova N. 2009. Geopolitics, Eurasianism and Russian foreign policy under Putin. Geopolitics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 667–686. DOI: 10.1080/14650040903141349.

50. Nye J.S. Jr. 1971. Peace in parts: Integration and confl ict in regional organization. Boston, Little, Brown.

51. Kanet R.E., Sussex M. (eds.). 2015. Power, politics and confrontation in Eurasia: Foreign policy in a contested region. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

52. Starr S.F., Cornell S.E. (eds.). 2014. Putin’s grand strategy: The Eurasian Union and its discontent. Washington, D.C., Johns Hopkins University & Stockholm Nacka, Institute for Security and Development Policy. Available at: http://www.silkroadstudies.org/resources/1409GrandStrategy.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2020).

53. Rumer E. 2019. The Primakov (not Gerasimov) doctrine in action. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Rumer_PrimakovDoctrine_final1.pdf (accessed: 12.03.2020).

54. Rumer E., Stent A. Russia and the West. Survival, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 91–104.

55. Rynning S. 2019. NATO’s futures: The Atlantic Alliance between power and purpose. NATO Defence College Research Paper, no. 2. Available at: at http://nato-70.upt.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/NATOs_futures_atlantic_alliance.pdf (accessed: 05.03.2020).

56. Söderbaum F. 2009. Comparative regional integration and regionalism. In Landman T., Robinson N. (eds.). The SAGE book of comparative politics. London, SAGE Publications, pp. 477–496.

57. Sussex M. 2015. From retrenchment to revanchism… and back again? Russian grand strategy in the Eurasian ‘heartland’. In Sussex M., Kanet R.E. (eds.). Russia, Eurasia, and the new geopolitics of energy. London, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 19–41.

58. Trenin D. 2006. Russia leaves the West. Foreign Aff airs, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 87–96.

59. Trenin D. 2013. Russia’s relations with the CIS countries: Outlook for 2020. Carnegie Moscow Center. Available at: https://carnegie.ru/2013/03/28/russia-s-relations-with-cis-countries-outlook-for-2020-pub-51395 (accessed: 12.03.2020).

60. Trenin D. 2009. Russia’s spheres of interest, not infl uence. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 3–22. Available at: https://carnegie.ru/2009/09/22/russia-s-spheres-of-interest-not-influence-pub-23863 (accessed: 20.03.2020).

61. Tsygankov A. 2012. The heartland no more: Russia’s weakness and Eurasia’s meltdown. Journal of Eurasian Studies, no. 3, pp. 1–9.