The Belt and Road Initiative and the AIIB: Potential Impact on the Economic Architecture of Asia

Dynamics of economic development in Asia in the first two decades of the 21st century can be visualized schematically as a series of waves with different focuses of economic activities of regional powers and prevailing regional economic agenda. The first decade of this century was marked by an increasing number of bilateral free trade agreements, the establishment of ASEAN+1 free trade zones and very general in nature discussions on the prospects for the establishment of a large regional integration block. The US ‘Pivot to Asia’ has promoted transformation of these abstract discussions into substantive debates on parameters and principles of a broader regional trading and economic cooperation arrangement. The second wave in the development of economic processes in Asia (from 2010 to 2017) was characterized by a ‘soft’ rivalry between the US and China for setting the priority model of economic integration in the region (Trans-Pacific Economic Partnership vs. Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) and for establishing rules of a regional trade and investment system. The third wave followed the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative and AIIB, which expanded the focus of the regional countries’ activities from trade liberalization to promoting regional infrastructure development and connectivity. The author aims to assess the role of the Belt and Road and AIIB initiatives in consolidating China’s position in Asia, as well as their potential impact on the regional economic architecture. The first section outlines economic processes in China and in the region in general, which provided a context for establishing the Belt and Road and AIIB initiatives. The second and third sections examine their impact on regional economic processes and on the PRC’s regional positions. The author accentuates substantive changes that these initiatives underwent in 2013-2019 and identifies their intermediate outcomes. The author concludes that the Belt and Road and AIIB initiatives reflect the PRC’s intent to convert its growing economic and financial capabilities into regional influence. The establishment of new multilateral financial institutions, development of new rules governing trade, investment and economic activities, adoption of new production and technical standards, transformation of the regional transport and logistics system, development of new value chains, and other outcomes of foreign economic activities of China already has the potential to reshape the regional economic architecture.

1. Avdokushin E.F. 2015. Tigr prygnul, drakon vzletel — proekt ‘Odin poyas — odin put’’. Teoriya i praktika [A tiger has jumped, a dragon has fl own up — a project ‘One Belt — One Road’. Theory and practice]. Issues of the New Economy, no. 4 (36), pp. 4–17. (In Russ.)

2. Borokh O., Lomanov A. 2018. Novaya epokha Kitaya: ot obogashcheniya k usileniyu [China’s new epoch: From seeking wealth to gaining strength]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 59–70. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-3-59-70. (In Russ.)

3. Gorbunova M.L., Komarov I.D. 2016. Gibridnye mekhanizmy mnogostoronnego ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva — novoe yavlenie vo vneshnei politike KNR [A hybrid mechanism of multilateral economic cooperation as a new form of foreign policy of China]. International Organizations Research Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 82–98. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2016-03-82. (In Russ.)

4. Davydov A.S. 2018. Transtikhookeanskoe partnerstvo — faktor regional’nogo i global’nogo sopernichestva SShA s Kitaem i Rossiei [The TransPacifi c Partnership — a factor of the US regional and global competition with China and Russia]. In Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskii region: problemy global’nykh i regional’nykh izmerenii bezopasnosti [Asia-Pacifi c region: Issues of global and regional dimensions of security]. Moscow, IFES RAS Publ., pp. 185–194. (In Russ.)

5. Denisov I.E. 2016. Podnebesnaya smotrit na Zapad [The Celestial Empire looks to the West]. Kontury Global’nykh Transformatsii: Politika, Ekonomika, Pravo, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 20–40. DOI: 10.23932/2542-0240-2016-9-6-20-40. (In Russ.)

6. Kireeva A.A. 2019. Initsiativa ‘Odin poyas, odin put’’: soderzhanie, prichiny vydvizheniya, znachenie [‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiative: Its rationale, content, and signifi cance]. In Voskresenskii A.D. (ed.). Model’ razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: otsenki, diskussii, prognozy [The development model of modern China: Estimates, discussions, forecasts]. Moscow, Strategicheskie izyskaniya Publ., pp. 551–580. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-3-61-74. (In Russ.)

7. Kostyunina G.M. 2017. Integratsionnaya model’ ASEAN+1: osnovnye polozheniya soglashenii i vliyanie na vneshneekonomicheskie svyazi [The integration model ASEAN+1: The main norms of agreements and eff ect of foreign economic ties]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 441–457. DOI: 10.22363/231306602017173441457. (In Russ.)

8. Leksyutina Ya.V. 2014. ATR kak avanstsena sopernichestva Kitaya i SShA v XXI veke [The Pacifi c Rim as a bridgehead of rivalry between China and the US in the XXI century]. Asia and Africa today, no. 7, pp. 2–10. (In Russ.)

9. Leksyutina Ya.V. 2019. Kitaiskie initsiativy ‘Poyas i put’’ i ABII: podkhody Yaponii i Indii [China’s Belt and Road Initiative and the AIIB: Approaches of Japan and India]. In Safronova E.I. (ed.). Kitai v mirovoi i regional’noi politike (istoriya i sovremennost’) [China in world and regional politics (History and modern times)]. Moscow, IFES RAS Publ., pp. 145–157. DOI: 10.24411/2618_6888_2019_10008. (In Russ.)

10. Leksyutina Ya.V. ‘Odin poyas — odin put’’ — zayavka Kitaya na mirovoe liderstvo? [One Belt, One Way — China’s claim to global leadership?]. RIAS. 22.05.2017. Available at: http://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/odin-poyas-odin-put-zayavka-kitaya-na-mirovoe-liderstvo/ (accessed: 01.01.2019). (In Russ.)

11. Leksyutina Ya.V. 2018. Funktsional’nye izmeneniya uchastiya Kitaya v mnogostoronnikh bankakh razvitiya: ot zaemshchika k kreditoru [Functional changes in China’s participation in multilateral development banks: From borrower to creditor status]. International Organizations Research Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 80–98. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2018-01-05. (In Russ.)

12. Lukin A.V., Luzyanin S.G., Li Sin’ et al. 2016. Kitaiskii global’nyi proekt dlya Evrazii: postanovka zadachi [Chinese global project for Eurasia: Problem statement]. Moscow, Tsentr izucheniya krizisnogo obshchestva Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Lukonin S., Novichkova M. 2019. Zachem Kitayu ‘Odin poyas, odin put’’ i pochemu kitaiskaya initsiativa nakazuema? [Why does China need ‘One Belt, One Road’ and why Chinese initiative can be punished?]. Federalism, no. 1, pp. 147–160. DOI: 10.21686/2073-1051-2019-1-147-160. (In Russ.)

14. Petrovskii V.E. 2018. Rossiya, Kitai i kontury ‘Bol’shogo evraziiskogo partnerstva’ [Russia, China and the contours of the Greater Eurasian Partnership]. Moscow, IFES RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Sazonov S.L. 2016. Ekonomicheskaya paradigma formirovaniya ‘poyasa i puti’ [China’s Euroasian transit transportation routes]. In Strategiya ekonomicheskogo poyasa Shelkovogo puti i rol’ ShOS v ee realizatsii [The Silk Road Economic Belt strategy and the role of the SCO in its implementation]. Moscow, IFES RAS Publ., pp. 131–148. (In Russ.)

16. Sazonov S.L., Zaklyaz’minskaya E.O., Chen’ Syao. 2017. Proekt ‘Poyas i put’’ kak reshayushchii faktor razvitiya ekonomiki Kitaya [The project of ‘Belt and Road’ as a decisive factor in the development of Chinese economy]. Far Eastern Aff airs, no. 3, pp. 82–94. (In Russ.)

17. Trush S. 2014. Amerikanskii proekt Transtikhookeanskogo partnerstva i Kitai [American project of Trans-Pacifi c Partnership and China]. International Aff airs, no. 11, pp. 127–140. (In Russ.)

18. Chubarov I.G. 2018. Pyat’ sostavlyayushchikh vneshneekonomicheskogo kursa Kitaya ‘Odin poyas, odin put’’ [Five connectivity areas of the China’s Belt and Road Initiative]. International Analytics, no. 3, pp. 45–58. DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2018-0-3-45-58. (In Russ.)

19. Shelepov A.V. 2016. Sravnitel’nye perspektivy razvitiya Aziatskogo banka infrastrukturnykh investitsii i Novogo banka razvitiya [Comparative prospects of the New Development Bank and Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank]. International Organizations Research Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 132–152. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2016-03-132. (In Russ.)

20. He A., Malkin A. 2019. China tweaks its Belt and Road Initiative to avoid further backlash. The Hill. Available at: https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/442306-china-tweaks-its-belt-and-road-initiative-to-avoid-backlash (accessed: 02.11.2019).

21. He Ping, Shen Chen. 2013. RCEP and China’s Asia-Pacifi c FTA strategy. China International Studies. May/June, pp. 138–158.

22. Humphrey C. 2015. Developmental revolution or Bretton Woods revisited? The prospects of the BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. ODI Working Paper 418. Available at: https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/9615.pdf (accessed: 21.09.2019).

23. Kawai M., Wignaraja G. 2013. Addressing the challenges of Asian FTAs. East Asia Forum. Available at: http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2013/06/10/addressing-policy-challenges-of-asian-ftas/ (accessed: 19.09.2019).

24. Ra S., Li Zh. 2018. Closing the fi nancing gap in Asian infrastructure. ADB South Asia Working Paper Series, no. 57. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/431261/swp-057-financing-gap-asian-infrastructure.pdf (accessed: 15.02.2020).

25. Schrader M. 2018. Domestic criticism may signal shrunken Belt and Road ambitions. The Jamestown Foundation. Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/domestic-criticism-may-signal-china-scaling-back-its-bri-ambitions/ (accessed: 03.11.2019).

26. Wang Hongying. 2016. New multilateral development banks opportunities and challenges for global governance. New York, Council on Foreign Relation. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12396.

27. Weiss M. 2017. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB). CRS. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44754.pdf (accessed: 09.02.2020).

28. Yoshino N., Helble M., Abidhadjaev U. 2018. Financing infrastructure in Asia and the Pacifi c. Capturing impacts and new sources. Tokyo, ADBI. Available at: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/394191/adbifinancing-infrastructure-asia-capturing-impacts-and-new-sources.pdf (accessed: 20.02.2020).

29. Zhai Kun. 2015. Borrow internationally well-known concepts to introduce the ‘Belt and Road’ strategy. International Understanding, no. 1, pp. 8–12.