The U.S. Assistance to the MENA Arab Countries under the Trump Administration: The Logic of a Diff erentiated Approach

This paper identifi es and explains key changes in the U.S. aid policies towards Arab countries of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) under Donald Trump. It seeks to validate two widespread arguments — the one about the current administration’s revision of pivotal principles of providing foreign assistance, and the other one — about an accelerated disengagement of the United States from the MENA region since 2017. The paper consists of four sections. The fi rst section explores the transformation of the U.S. strategic thinking and regional context under the Trump administration and then posits fi ve hypotheses about possible changes in the volume and composition of the U.S. assistance to the MENA region (in comparison with the fi nal two years of the Obama administration), as well as the diff erences in the executive branch and the Congress’s positions. The second section explains particularities of the statistical data and the methods of its exploration, the third section presents the results of hypothesis testing using aggregated data on aid fl ows to the region, and the fi nal section explains these results, sometimes unexpected, using the data disaggregated by country. Three of fi ve hypotheses proved wrong based on the aggregate data. First, the Trump administration did not cut assistance to the MENA more substantially than to other regions of the globe. Second, it did not ringfence aid accounts which helped yield direct dividends to the U.S. businesses. Third, the Republican Congress was clearly less willing to support the executive’s aid chocies under a new Republican President than during the last years of a Democrat Barack Obama’s second term. Only two hypotheses proved correct — one about a prioritization of security and military assistance under Donald Trump and the other one — about disproportionate cuts of democracy promotion assistance. Such an unexpected result calls for refi ning both aforementioned arguments and taking into account the dissimilarities in the dynamics of assistance to diff erent countries. The United States tends to practice a diff erentiated approach in dealing with two largest Arab aid recipients (Egypt and Jordan) and with other Arab countries. The assistance to Cairo and Amman is ringfenced and protected, while aid to other recipients, including security assistance and FMF grants, is prone to quite drastic cuts. This diff erentiation is explained by the fact that cooperation with Egypt and Jordan rests not only on more solid strategic foundations but also on a strong support within the United States — both from the defense contractors interested in large export contracts and from an infl uential pro-Israel lobby. The U.S. will not abandon this highly diff erentiated approach after the 2020 elections but the structure of assistance to the MENA region might undergo quite a dramatic transformation.

1. Bartenev V.I. 2019a. Amerikanskaya pomoshch’ Egiptu posle nachala ‘Arabskoi vesny’: vnutrennie i vneshnie determinanty [U.S. assistance to Egypt after the Arab Spring: Domestic and external determinants]. USA & Canada: ekonomika, politika, kultura, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 54–74. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680005967-7. (In Russ.)

2. Bartenev V.I. 2019b. Osobennosti fi nansirovaniya programm mezhdunarodnoi pomoshchi pri administratsii D. Trampa: ot inauguratsii do ‘Ukrainageita’ [Specifi cs of foreign assistance allocation under Trump: From inauguration to Ukrainegate]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 68–113. (In Russ.)

3. Bartenev V.I. 2019c. Spetsifi ka podkhodov administratsii D. Trampa k strategicheskomu ispol’zovaniyu resursov vneshnei pomoshchi v nestabil’nykh regionakh mira (na primere Blizhnego Vostoka i Severnoi Afriki) [The Trump administration’s approach towards strategic use of foreign aid resources in unstable regions: The case of the Middle East and North Africa]. In Voda K.R., Godovanyuk K.A., Davydov A.A. et al. (eds.). Menyayushchiisya Zapad i ego rol’ v regulirovanii global’nykh protsessov (Mirovoe razvitie. Vypusk 21) [The changing West and its role in global governance (World Development, Iss. 21)]. Moscow, IMEMO Publ., pp. 168–178. (In Russ.)

4. Beletskaya M.Yu. 2019. Perspektivy uchastiya SShA v sisteme sodeistviya mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu [Prospects of the U.S. participation in the international development assistance system]. USA & Canada: ekonomika, politika, kultura, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 37–52. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300007687-5. (In Russ.)

5. Baranovsky V.G., Naumkin V.V. (eds.). 2018. Blizhnii Vostok v menyayushchemsya global’nom kontekste [Middle East in the changing global context]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

6. Borovkov I.I., Kosarev V.A., Vilovatykh A.V. et al. 2019. Politika administratsii D. Trampa na Blizhnem Vostoke kak otrazhenie lozunga ‘Amerika prezhde vsego’ [The Trump administration’s Middle Eastern policy as a refl ection of the ‘America First’ slogan]. National Strategy Issues, no. 2 (53), pp. 11–51. (In Russ.)

7. Vosstanovlenie Iraka posle pobedy nad ‘Islamskim gosudarstvom’: perspek tivy mezhdunarodnogo uchastiya [Reconstructing Iraq after the victory over the Islamic State: Prospects for international engagement]. 2018. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–192. (In Russ.)

8. Davydov A.A. 2018. Zarubezhnaya pomoshch’ SShA: gumanitarnaya pomoshch’ v konfl iktnykh zonakh [U.S. foreign aid: Humanitarian aid in confl ict areas]. Pathways to Peace and Security, no. 1 (54), Special issue: Humanita rian challenges, humanitarian support and human protection in armed confl icts, pp. 249–264. DOI: 10.20542/2307-1494-2018-1-249-264. (In Russ.)

9. Zvyagelskaya I.D. 2018. Blizhnii Vostok i Tsentral’naya Aziya. Global’nye trendy v regional’nom ispolnenii [Middle East and Central Asia: Global trends in regional rendition]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Prikhodko O.V., Smirnov P.E. 2018. Prezidentstvo D. Trampa: novizna i preemstvennost’ v amerikanskoi strategii [President Trumps’ strategy: Continuity and new approaches]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 6 (63), pp. 81–109. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2018-6-63-81-109. (In Russ.)

11. Khlebnikova L.R. 2014. Instrumenty vneshnei pomoshchi v kontekste amerikano-izrail’skogo vzaimodeistviya (1948–2014) [Foreign aid instruments in the context of the United States — Israel relations (1948–2014)]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 3, pp. 115–149. (In Russ.)

12. Khlebnikova L.R. 2018. SShA i problemy obespecheniya stabil’nogo razvitiya Iordanskogo Khashimitskogo Korolevstva v istoricheskoi retrospective [The United States and the challenges of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan’s internal stability: A historical retrospective]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 79–120. (In Russ.)

13. Beck M. 2019. US Middle East policy shift: Trump’s administration divergency. RUDN Journal of Public Administration, no. 6 (4), pp. 296–311. DOI: 10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-4-296-311.

14. Berger L. 2012. Guns, butter, and human rights — the Congressional politics of U.S. aid to Egypt. American Politics Research, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 603–635. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X11433767.

15. Goldstein M., Moss T. 2005. Compassionate conservatives or conservative compassionates? US political parties and bilateral foreign assistance to Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1288–1302. DOI: 10.1080/00220380500170949.

16. Gregory Gause III F. 2019. Should we stay or should we go? The United States and the Middle East. Survival, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 7–24. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2019.1662114.

17. Karlin M., Wittes T.C. 2019. America’s Middle East purgatory. Foreign Aff airs, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 88–100.

18. McInerney S., Bockenfeld C. 2017. The foreign aff airs budget. Democracy, governance, and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa. Washington, D.C., Project on Middle East Democracy.

19. Miller A.P., Rand D.H. 2020. Between retreat and overinvestment in the Middle East and North Africa. In Miller A.P., Rand D.H. (eds.). Re-engaging the Middle East: A new vision for US policy. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1–22.

20. Miller A., Ruff ner T. 2018. President Trump’s second foreign aff airs budget. Democracy, governance, and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa in FY19. Washington, D.C., Project on Middle East Democracy.

21. Milner H., Tingley D. 2010. The political economy of U.S. foreign aid: American legislators and the domestic politics of aid. Economics and Politics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 200–232. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2009.00356.x.

22. Tama J. 2019. Anti-presidential bipartisanship in U.S. foreign policy under Trump: The case of the international aff airs budget. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention Toronto, Canada. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3393170 (accessed: 25.07.2019).

23. Travis R., Zahariadis N. 2002. A multiple streams model of U.S. foreign aid policy. Policy Studies Journal, no. 30, pp. 495–514. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2002.tb02160.x.

24. Yom S. 2020. US foreign policy in the Middle East: The logic of hegemonic retreat. Global Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–83. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12777.