Public Diplomacy in Slovakia: Past and Present
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-4-201-227
Abstract
In academic discourse, public diplomacy is often regarded as an instrument of foreign policy most suitable for small states, which enables them to compensate for the lack of military and economic capabilities. Paradoxically enough, studies on public diplomacy usually focus on the activities of the leading actors of world politics. However, it is exactly the case of small states that, according to the author, allows better understanding of the role of public diplomacy in the contemporary foreign policy agenda. The author examines the evolution of the Slovak public diplomacy, and distinguishes two stages in it. The firststage (from 1993 to 2004) was characterized by the establishment and consolidation of the Slovak system of public diplomacy, aimed primarily at promoting the main goal of the government — the country’s integration into the European Union. By means of advocacy and cultural diplomacy, in particular through the system of Slovak Institutes, Slovakia tried to convince politicians, journalists, members of the academic and business communities, and non-governmental organization activists in Europe that the country was ready to join the EU. During the second stage (from 2005 to the present day) a national branding, aimed at promoting a positive image of the country has come to play (along with cultural diplomacy) one of the key roles within the Slovak public diplomacy. It was at this time that the government initiated the National Scholarship Program of the Slovak Republic and launched an information campaign with the slogan ‘Slovakia is a Good Idea’, which had made a significant contribution to the dissemination of accurate information about the country and strengthened relations with the neighboring states and trade partners. The author concludes that in nearly three decades Slovakia has managed to establish a modern competitive system of public diplomacy, which possesses the following characteristics: a high level of coordination between the key actors, a wide range of working methods, and an effective dialogue with the people of the country on the main foreign policy objectives (domestic public diplomacy).
About the Author
A. N. MarchukovRussian Federation
Aleksandr N. Marchukov — PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor at the Chair of Foreign History and International Relations
105/42 Bol’shaya Sadovaya st., Rostov-on-Don, 344006
References
1. Vedernikov M.V. 2 020. Slovatsko-rossiiskie otnosheniya: v poiske novykh form sotrudnichestva (2014–2019) [Slovak-Russian relations: In search of the new forms of cooperation]. Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 1. pp. 135–145. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope12020135145. (In Russ.)
2. Gopta I. 2017. Vneshnyaya politika i ekonomika Slovakii: rossiiskii vector [Foreign policy and economy of Slovakia: The Russian vector]. Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, no. 4. pp. 347–355. DOI: 10.24975/2313-8920-2017-4-4-347-355. (In Russ.)
3. Zadorozhnyuk E.G. 2005. Pervoe desyatiletie politicheskoi istorii Slovatskoi Respubliki. 1993–2003 gg. [The fi rst decade of the Slovak Republic’s political history. 1993–2003]. In Mar’in V.V. (ed.). Chekhiya i Slovakiya v XX veke: ocherki istorii [The Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic in the 20th century: Essays on history], vol. 2. Moscow, Nauka Publ., pp. 383–429. (In Russ.)
4. Zadorozhnyuk E.G. 2015. Slovatskaya Respublika [The Slovak Republic]. In Nikiforova K.V. (ed.). Tsentral’naya i Yugo-Vostochnaya Evropa. Konets XX — nachalo XXI v. [The Central and South-East Europe. Late 19th century and early 20th century]. Moscow, Nestor-Istoriya Publ., pp. 284–325. (In Russ.)
5. Marush’yak Yu. 2017. Slovakiya i Rossiya: mezhdu natsional’nymi interesami i identichnost’yu [Slovakia and Russia after the events in Crimea 2014 — between national interests and identity]. Sovremennaya Evropa, no. 7, pp. 66–77. (In Russ.)
6. Sandor F., Gurnak D. 2018. Prostranstvennye aspekty vneshnei politiki Slovatskoi Respubliki v period s 1993 po 2016 god [1993–2016 period Slovak Republic foreign policy spatial aspects]. Vestnik molodykh uchenykh-mezhdunarodnikov, no. 1, pp. 10–28. (In Russ.)
7. Sorochinova M.S. 2019. Publichnaya diplomatiya Slovakii: kontseptsiya, vneshnepoliticheskie tseli i mekhanizm [Public diplomacy of Slovakia: Concept, objectives and mechanism of foreign policy]. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 2, pp. 109–118. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0641.2019.2.29833. (In Russ.)
8. Telushkin A.А. 2017. Razvitie rossiisko-slovatskogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva [Development of economic cooperation between Russia and Slovakia]. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik, no. 5, pp. 120–133. (In Russ.)
9. Trukhachev V.V. 2019. Slovakiya v plenu protivorechii [Slovakia: Controversy over Russia]. Perspektivy, no. 2, pp. 76–89. DOI 10.32726/2411-3417-2019-2-76-89. Available at: http://perspektivy.info/upload/iblock/f13/2_2019_1_76_89.pdf (accessed: 12.10.2020).
10. Shcherbakova Yu.A. 2019. Neprostoi put’ Slovatskoi Respubliki v Evropeiskii soyuz [Non-easy way of the Slovak Republic to the EU]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, no. 3, pp. 53–72. DOI: 10.31249/ape/2019.03.03. (In Russ.)
11. Algaerova O. 2011. Public diplomacy in Slovakia: An eff ective new approach. Saarbrucken, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
12. Balogh P., Gyelník T. 2017. Hungarian and Slovak national narratives with a focus on the shared boundary. In Bottlik Z., Gyelník T., Ocskay G. (eds.). Changes in the representation of a borderscape: The case of the Mária Valéria bridge. Budapest, The Central European Service for Cross-border Initiatives Publishing, pp. 61–83.
13. Bátora J. 2014. Lost in translatio Imperii: Slovakia’s layered entry into international society. International Relations, vol. 28, iss. 4. pp. 456–461.
14. Bátora J. 2005. Public diplomacy in small and medium-sized states: Norway and Canada. The Hague, Netherlands Institute of International Relations.
15. Bátora J., Gyárfášová O., Timoracký M. 2013. Branding Slovenska. Od ideového konceptu k posolstvám a komunikácii. Available at: https://www.mzv.sk/documents/10182/12495/BRANDING_SLOVENSKA_studia_komunikacne_posolstva.pdf/675019fa-077d-45ea-9b38-3b01bb71d566 (accessed: 12.10.2020).
16. Bilčík V., Világi A. 2007. Slovakia and the limits of European integration. Study for the project ‘Forum for Europe’. Available at: http://www.idm.at/images/forum_europa/studien/Studie_SFPA_EN.pdf (accessed: 12.10.2020).
17. Christensen C. 2011. @Sweden: Curating a nation on Twitter. Popular Communication, vol. 11, iss. 1, pp. 30–46.
18. Čiefova M. 2019. Cultural diplomacy and foreign trade correlation — the case of Slovakia. Lingua et vita, vol. 16, pp. 16–21.
19. Čiefova M., Goda N. 2019. Cultural diplomacy of selected countries in a comparative perspective. Folia Geographica, vol. 61, iss. 2, pp. 172–189.
20. Cull N. 2009. Public diplomacy: Lessons from the past. Los Angeles, Figueroa Press.
21. Drzka M. 2013. Nation branding as a presentation tool of the Slovak Republic abroad. Conference proceedings from 14th International scientifi c conference on contemporary issues of world economics and politics. Bratislava, The University of Economics in Bratislava, pp. 182–191.
22. Duleba A. 2020. Slovakia’s Eastern policy in 2019: The ruling coalition in cacophony. In Brezáni P. (ed.). Yearbook of Slovakia’s foreign policy 2019. Bratislava, Research Center of the Slovak Foreign Policy Association Publishing, pp. 81–94.
23. Dziedzic E. 2014. Culture as an input into induced destination image: The case of Poland, Czech Republic, and Slovakia. Economic Problems of Tourism, vol. 4, iss. 28, pp. 241–250.
24. Fujita M., Dinnie K. 2009. The nation branding of the Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Poland, and Hungary — contrasting approaches and strategies. Available at: https://www.brandhorizons.com/papers/Dinnie_Czech_Slovak_Poland_HungaryNB.pdf (accessed: 12.10.2020).
25. Gyárfášová O. 2004. Perceptions of European integration in Slovakia. Ethnicity studies. Available at: http://www.ces.lt/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/EtSt_Gyarfasova_2004.pdf (accessed: 12.10.2020).
26. Gyárfášová O., Mesežnikov G. 2016. 25 years of the V4 as seen by the public. Bratislava, Institute for Public Aff airs. Available at: http://www.visegradgroup.eu/documents/essays-articles/25-yearsof-the-v4-as (accessed: 12.10.2020).
27. Henderson K. 2004. EU accession and the new Slovak consensus. West European Politics, vol. 27, iss. 4, pp. 652–670.
28. Kleinová K., Űrgeová J. 2011. Country image and branding of Slovakia. The Scientifi c Journal European Policies, Finance and Marketing, vol. 5, iss. 54, pp. 50–58.
29. Kóňa A., Hollý J. 2015. Will the internationally recognizable country identity of Slovakia ‘work’ or will the current attempts at unifying the presentation of Slovakia abroad and the search for an attractive narrative end in failure. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 6, pp. 368–371.
30. Macháček L. 2011. Slovak Republic and its Hungarian ethnic minority: Sociological refl ections. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences, vol. 11, iss. 3, pp. 187–210.
31. Marchukov A. 2019. Development of Slovak public diplomacy in the post-independence period. In Apryshchenko V., Karnaukhova O. (eds.). Memory, identity, and nationalism in European regions. Hershey, IGI Global, pp. 78–97.
32. Marušiak J. 2015. Russia and the Visegrad Group — more than a foreign policy issue. International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Aff airs, vol. 24, iss. 1–2, pp. 28–46.
33. Mattoš B. 2015. Challenges and prospects of cross-border cooperation and public diplomacy between Austria and the Slovak Republic after 1989. International Scientifi c Conference Open Europe: Cultural dialogue across borders, vol. 5. Opole, University of Opole Publishing House, pp. 157–170.
34. Mattoš B., Kyška R. 2015. Public diplomacy in the digital age: New perspectives on the dynamics of change in international relations. In Kaplánová P., Pinterič U. (eds.). Selected topics in change management. Novo Mesto, Faculty of Organization Studies, pp. 72–91.
35. Melissen J. 2005. The new public diplomacy: Between theory and practice. New York, Palgrave.
36. Miháliková S. 2012. Changing Slovak memory patterns — seeking a usable past? Politics in Central Europe — The Journal of the Central European Political Science Association, vol. 8, iss. 3, pp. 58–70.
37. Môcová L. 2016. Image of Slovakia in the context of Eastern Europe. Regional Formation and Development Studies, vol. 1, iss. 21, pp. 123–132.
38. Moravčíková V. 2016. Country image and country brand building. Proceedings from International Scientifi c Conference on Megatrends and Media. Trnava, University of SS. Cyril and Methodius, pp. 314–328.
39. Nye J. 2004. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York, Public Aff airs.
40. Ociepka B. 2013. New members’ public diplomacy. In Davis Cross M.K., Melissen J. (eds.). European public diplomacy: Soft power at work. New York, Palgrave, pp. 39–56.
41. Ooi C.-S., Kristensen T., Pedersen Z. 2004. Re-imag(in)ing place: From Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Tourism (Zagreb), vol. 52, iss. 2, pp. 151–163.
42. Pajtinka E. 2015. Cultural diplomacy and its organizational and institutional models in selected states. Journal of International Relations, vol. 13, iss. 2. pp. 111–122.
43. Pamment J. 2014. New public diplomacy in the 21st century. London, Routledge.
44. Pelling J. 2015. When doing becomes the message: The case of Swedish digital diplomacy. In Bjola C., Holmes M. (eds.). Digital diplomacy: Theory and practice. New York, Palgrave, pp. 164–180.
45. Szondi G. 2008a. Central and Eastern European public diplomacy: A transitional perspective on national reputation management. In Snow N., Taylor Ph. (eds.). Routledge handbook on public diplomacy. New York, Routledge, pp. 212–313.
46. Szondi G. 2008b. Public diplomacy and nation branding: Conceptual similarities and diff erences. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Available at: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20081022_pap_in_dip_nation_branding.pdf (accessed: 12.10.2020).
47. Udovič B., Podgornik A. 2016. Cultural diplomacy of Slavic European Union member states: A cross-country analysis. Baltic Journal of European Studies, vol. 6, iss. 2, pp. 117–136. DOI: 10.1515/bjes-2016-0015.
48. Višňovský R. 2020. Visegrad Group and relations with Russia. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 20, iss. 2, pp. 347–355. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-347-355.
49. Vršanský P. 2012. Public diplomacy and pre-accession experiences of the Slovak Republic. Diplomatic academy proceedings of 13th Dubrovnik diplomatic forum on strategic public diplomacy, vol. 9. Zagreb, Croatia, Diplomatic Academy of Ministry of Foreign and European Aff airs of the Republic of Croatia, pp. 61–66.
Review
For citations:
Marchukov A.N. Public Diplomacy in Slovakia: Past and Present. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2020;12(4):201-227. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-4-201-227