Left-wing populism in Spain
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2021-13-2-62-86
Abstract
The paper examines formation, evolution and political perspectives of the Spanish radical left-wing populist party ‘We Can!’ (Podemos) in the face of growing support for populism in the the Southern European countries as well as in the European Union in general. The author identifies the origins and country-specific characteristics of the left-wing populism in Spain and provides the general overview of trends in the country’s party system since the middle of the 2000s, including the growing axiological, generational, political and ideological cleavages in the Spanish divided society. Special attention is paid to the political portrait of the Podemos leader Pablo Iglesias and the prospects for development of political situation in the country after his resignation and subsequent electoral defeat in the Autonomous Community of Madrid in May 2021. As such, this case study can provide some useful insights on the nature of populism in the EU member-states in general. In particular, the paper shows that the fragmentation of traditional political systems and the impacts of the sovereign debt crisis per se do not provide a sufficient explanation for the growing demand for populist rhetoric and charismatic leaders, but rather they have exposed certain structural economic and social imbalances. It is exactly these imbalances which traditional political parties are unable to address that create a breeding ground for various left- and right-wing parties and movements. As a result, the author concludes that populism will remain an essential element of political landscape in Spain despite all scandals that accompany populist politicians as the case of Pablo Iglesias has clearly demonstrated. At the same time the author emphasizes that it is this clear and imminent threat posed by the populist movements that may eventually serve as an impetus for a renewal of traditional parties and of the country’s political system in general.
About the Author
I. L. ProkhorenkoRussian Federation
Irina L. Prokhorenko — Doctor of Sciences (Political Science), Head of the Sector of International Organizations and Global Political Governance
23, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, 117997
References
1. Vernikov V.L. 2019. Pedro Sanches v bor’be za vlast’. Politicheskii portret lidera ispanskikh sotsialistov [Pedro Sanchez in the struggle for power: A political portrait of the leader of the Spanish socialists]. Contemporary Europe, no. 6, pp. 95–104. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope6201995104. (In Russ.)
2. Vernikov V.L. 2021. Politicheskii performans Pablo Iglesiasa [The political performance of Pablo Iglesias]. Analiticheskie Zapiski Instituta Evropy RAN, no. 12 (242). DOI: http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics122021. Available at: http://www.zapiski-ieran.ru/images/analitika/2021/an242.pdf (accessed: 25.04.2021). (In Russ.)
3. Semenenko I.S., Prokhorenko I.L. 2015. Ot proekta elit k massovoi politike: vyzovy politizatsii evropeiskoi integratsii [From elitist project to mass politics: Challenges of politicization to European integration]. World Economy and International Relations, no. 7, pp. 29–40. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2015-7-29–40. (In Russ.)
4. Khenkin S.M. 2016. Fenomen Podemos [Podemos Phenomenon]. Iberoamerikanskie tetradi, no. 1, pp. 15–20. DOI: 10.46272/2409-3416-2016-1-15-20. (In Russ.)
5. Best R. How party system fragmentation has altered political opposition in established democracies // Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics. 2013. Vol. 48. No. 3. P. 314–342. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2013.16.
6. Caiani M., Graziano P. Varieties of populism: Insights from the Italian case // Italian Political Science Review. 2016. Vol. 46. No. 2. P. 243–267. DOI: 10.1017/ipo.2016.6.
7. Caiani M., Padoan E. Populism and the (Italian) crisis: The voters and the context // Politics. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0263395720952627 Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0263395720952627 (accessed: 04.11.2020).
8. Caiani M., Padoan E., Marino B. Candidate selection, personalization and different logics of centralization in new Southern European populism: The cases of Podemos and the M5S // Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics. 2021. DOI:10.1017/gov.2021.9. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/government-and-opposition/article/candidate-selection-personalization-and-different-logics-of-centralization-innew-southern-european-populism-the-cases-of-podemos-and-the-m5s/4F7-2EA841AF3E7779A00806D8F86F196 (accessed: 04.05.2021).
9. Canovan M. Populism. London: Junction Books, 1981.
10. de la Torre C. Is left populism the radical democratic answer? // Irish Journal of Sociology. 2019. Vol. 27. No. 1. P. 64–71, DOI: 10.1177/0791603519827225.
11. de Wilde P. The politicization of European integration: Towards democratic renationalization? // The legitimacy of regional integration in Europe and the Americas. Transformations of the state / ed. by A. Hurrelmann, S. Schneider. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. P. 19–32.
12. Font N., Graziano P., Tsakatika M. Varieties of inclusionary populism? SYRIZA, Podemos and the Five Star Movement // Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics. 2021. Vol. 56. No. 1. P. 163–183. DOI:10.1017/gov.2019.17.
13. Gómez-Reino Cachafeiro M., Plaza-Colodro C. Populist Euroscepticism in Iberian party systems // Politics. 2018. Vol. 38. No. 3. P. 344–360. DOI: 10.1177/0263395718762667.
14. Hopkin J., Blyth M. The global economics of European populism: Growth regimes and party system change in Europe (The Government and Opposition/ Leonard Schapiro lecture 2017) // Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics. 2019. Vol. 54. No. 2. P. 193–225. DOI:10.1017/gov.2018.43.
15. Jagers J., Walgrave S. Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium // European Journal of Political Research. 2007. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 319–345.
16. Kerman C., Alvarez I. Limitaciones y exclusiones en la institucionalización dela indignación: del 15-m a Podemos // Revista Española de Sociología. 2015. No. 24. P. 115–122.
17. Kriesi H. The populist challenge // West European Politics. 2014. Vol. 37. Iss. 2. P. 361–378. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2014.887879.
18. March L., Rommerskirchen Ch. Out of left field? Explaining the variable electoral success of European radical left parties // Party Politics. 2015. Vol. 21. Iss. 1. P. 40–53. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812462929.
19. Miró J. Beyond populism and institutionalism: Anti-populism and the management of austerity in Spain // Constellations. 2018. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12386. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-8675.12386 (accessed: 04.05.2021).
20. Mouffe Ch. For a left populism. London, New York: Verso, 2018.
21. Mudde C., Rovira Kaltwasser C. Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing the contemporary Europe and Latin America // Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics. 2013. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 147–174.
22. Orriols L., León S. Looking for affective polarization in Spain: PSOE and Podemos from conflict to coalition // South European Society and Politics. 2021. DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2021.1911440. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13608746.2021.1911440 (accessed: 04.06.2021).
23. Peña-Ferná ndez S., Larrondo-Ureta A., Agirreazkuenaga-Onaindia I. Etiquetar el feminismo. Análisis de los cibermedios iberoamericanos // Cuadernos.info. 2020. No. 46. P. 47–65. DOI: 10.7764/cdi.46.1456.
24. Podemos and the new political cycle: Left-wing populism and antiestablishment politics / ed. by Ó. García Agustín, M. Briziarelli. Cham (Switzerland): Palgrave Macmillan, Springer Nature, 2018.
25. Sola J., Rendueles C. Podemos, the upheaval of Spanish politics and the challenge of populism // Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2018. Vol. 26. Iss. 1. P. 99–116. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2017.1304899.
26. Twenty-first century populism: The spectre of Western European democracy / Ed. by D. Albertazzi, D. McDonnell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
27. Vampa D. Competing forms of populism and territorial politics: The cases of Vox and Podemos in Spain // Journal of Contemporary European Studies. 2020. Vol. 28. Iss. 3. P. 304–322. DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2020.1727866.
28. Venizelos G. Left-wing populism? In Europe? Yes, please! // European Political Science. 2020. Vol. 19. P. 687–689. DOI: 10.1057/s41304-020-00244-3.
29. Zaslove A., Geurkink B., Jacobs K., Akkerman A. Power to the people? Populism, democracy, and political participation: A citizen’s perspective // West European Politics. 2021. Vol. 44. No. 4. P. 727–751 DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2020.1776490.
Review
For citations:
Prokhorenko I.L. Left-wing populism in Spain. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2021;13(2):62-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2021-13-2-62-86