Balances of Power, Threat, and Interests: The Logic behind China-Russia Strategic Alignment in the Post-Cold War Period

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, China-Russia relations have demonstrated a significant and consistent progress on a number of issues advancing to the strategic alliance. However, the existing explanations of such progress have rarely gone beyond simple recognition of the continuous deterioration of relations between these countries and the West, particularly the United States. However, such explanations seem insufficient since they do not reveal the key determinants of the Russian-Chinese alignment and cannot help assess the sustainability of this trend. In order to provide a comprehensive and methodologically consistent assessment of the main drivers of the China-Russia relations within the framework of the post-Cold War international system evolution, this paper draws on the latest findings in the theory of international alliances. To this end, the author harnesses the epistemological potential of the three main approaches to the root causes of interstate strategic alliances, namely the ‘balance of power’, the ‘balance of threat’ and the ‘balance of interests’. The paper examines the Russian-Chinese cooperation both within the framework of each of these three balances separately and in their interrelatedness and interdependence. The author shows that trend towards a closer strategic cooperation between China and Russia in the post-Cold War period stemmed from the inner dynamics of all of these balances. This strategic alignment is based on a complex of shared views on the United States as the main source of threats for national security and the commitment of both states to the idea of a multipolar world. The author concludes that not only will the trend towards strengthening Russian-Chinese cooperation continue, at least in the medium term, but it can receive a new impetus to evolve into a full-fledged alliance.

1. Istomin I. A. 2020. Rossiya kak derzhava status-kvo [Russia as a status-quo power]. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 30-38. (In Russ.)

2. Istomin I. A. 2017. Sovremennaya zapadnaya teoriya voenno-politicheskikh al’yansov: dostizheniya i lakuny [Western theory of international military alliances: The state of the discipline]. International Trends, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 93-114. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2017.15.4.51.6. (In Russ.)

3. Istomin I. A., Baykov А. А. 2020. A l’yansy na sluzhbe gegemonii: dekonstruktsiya instrum entariya voenno-politicheskogo dominirovaniya [Alliances at the service of hegemony: Deconstruction of the military domination toolbox]. Polls. Political Studies, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 8-25. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.06.02. (In Russ.)

4. Istomin I. A., Silaev N. Yu., Sushentsov A. A. 2018. Strategii soyuznichestva kontinental’nykh i morskikh derzhav [Strategies of alliances of continental and sea powers]. International Trends, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 42-62. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2018.16.4.55.3. (In Russ.)

5. Kireeva A. N. 2019. Budushchnost’ rossiisko-kitaiskogo soyuznichestva v kontekste teorii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Theories of international relations and prospects of a military alliance between Russia and China]. International Trends, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 84-114. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2019.17.4.59.6. (In Russ.)

6. Korolev A. N. 2019. Naskol’ko blizki Rossiya i Kitai? Voenno-strategicheskoe sotrudnichestvo v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [How close are Russia and China? Assessing military-strategic cooperation in international relations]. Russia and the Pacific, no. 3. pp. 138-160. DOI: 10.24411/1026-8804-2019-10043. (In Russ.)

7. Lukin A. V., Kashin V. B. 2019. Rossiisko-kitaiskoe sotrudnichestvo i bezopasnost’ v ATR [Russian-Chinese cooperation and security in Asia Pacific region]. Comparative Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 135-151. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2019-10021. (In Russ.)

8. Portyakov V. Y. 2015. Vneshnyayapolitika Kitaiskoi Narodnoi Respubliki v 21-m stoletii [Foreign policy of the People’s Republic of China in the 21st century]. Moscow, Institute of Far Eastern Studies Press. (In Russ.)

9. Fomin I. V., Silaev N. Yu., Makarycheva A. V. et al. 2019. Soyuzniki Rossii: formal’nye obyazatel’stva i fakticheskoe sotrudnichestvo [Russia’s allies: Formal obligations vs. effective cooperation]. International Trends, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 101-130. DOI: 10.17994/IT.2019.17.2.57.6. (In Russ.)

10. Bennett D. S. 1997. Testing alternative models of alliance duration, 1816-1984. American Journal o f Political Science, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 846-878. DOI: 10.2307/2111677.

11. Benson B. V. 2012. Constructing international security: Alliances, deterrence, and moral hazard. New York, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139225694.

12. Benson B. V., Clinton J. D. 2016. Assessing the variation of formal military alliances. Journal o f Conflict Resolution, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 866-898. DOI: 10.1177/0022002714560348.

13. Buzan B., Waever O. 2003. Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

14. Chase M., Mastro O. S. 2018. Long-term strategic competition between the United States and China in military aviation. In: Cheung T. M., Mahnken T. G. (eds.). The gathering Pacific storm: Emerging US-China strategic competition in defense technological and industrial development. New York, Cambria Press, pp. 111-139.

15. Cheung T. M., Mahnken T. G. 2018. Conclusion: The long-term implications of future U. S. strategy for China and Chinese strategy for the United States. In: Cheung T. M., Mahnken T. G. (eds.). The gathering Pacific storm: Emerging USChina strategic competition in defense technological and industrial development. New York, Cambria Press, pp. 239-249.

16. Istomin I. A. 2019. The logic of counterpoint: Aspirations of liberal hegemony and counter-ideological alignment. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 8-34. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-2-8-34.

17. Joffe J. 2002. Defying history and theory: The United States and the ‘last remaining superpower’. In: Ikenberry G. J. (ed.). America unrivalled: The future of the balance ofpower. New York, Cornell University Press, pp. 155-181.

18. Johnson J. C., Leeds B. A. 2011. Defense pacts: A prescription for peace? Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-8594.2010.00122.x.

19. Karmazin A., Hynek N. 2020. Russian, US and Chinese revisionism: Bridging domestic and great power politics. Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 955-975. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1776221.

20. Kashin V. 2018. Russian perspectives on the third Offset Strategy and its implications for Russian-Chinese defense technological cooperation. In: Cheung T. M., Mahnken T. G. (eds.). The gathering Pacific storm: Emerging US-China strategic competition in defense technological and industrial development. New York, Cambria Press, рр. 211-239.

21. Korolev A. 2019a. On the verge of an alliance: Contemporary China-Russia military cooperation. Asian Security, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 233-252. DOI: 10.1080/14799855.2018.1463991.

22. Korolev A. 2019b. Russia in the South China Sea: Balancing and hedging. Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 263-282. DOI: 10.1093/fpa/orx015.

23. Korolev A. 2018. Theories of non-balancing and Russia’s foreign policy. Journal o f Strategic Studies, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 887-912. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2017.1283614.

24. Korolev A., Portyakov V. 2018. China-Russia relations in times of crisis: A neoclassical realist explanation. Asian Perspective, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 411-437. DOI: 10.1353/apr.2018.0018.

25. Lai B., Reiter D. 2000. Democracy, political similarity, and international alliances 1816-1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 203-227. DOI: 10.1177/0022002700044002003.

26. Lake D. A. 2009. Regional hierarchy: Authority and local international order. Review of International Studies, vol. 35, no. S1, pp. 35-58. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210509008420.

27. Lalwani S., Byrne H. 2019. Great expectations: Asking too much of the US-India strategic partnership. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 41-64. DOI: 10.1080/0163660X.2019.1666353.

28. Leeds B. A. 2003. Do alliances deter aggression? The influence of military alliances on the initiation of militarised interstate disputes. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 427-439. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5907.00031.

29. Monteiro N. P. 2014. Theory of unipolar politics. New York, Cambridge University Press.

30. Morrow J. D. 1994. Alliances, credibility, and peacetime costs. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 270-297. DOI: 10.1177/0022002794038002005.

31. Owen J. M. 2002. Transnational liberalism and American primacy; or, benignity is the eye of the beholder. In: Ikenberry G. J. (ed.). America unrivalled: The future of the balance of power. New York, Cornell University Press, pp. 239-260.

32. Puthan Purayil M. 2021. The rise of China and the question of an Indo-US alliance: A perspective from India. Asian Affairs, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/03068374.2021.1882139.

33. Ripsman N. M., Taliaferro J. W., Lobell S. E. 2016. Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. New York, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199899234.001.0001.

34. Rosato S. 2015. The inscrutable intentions of great powers. International Security, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 48-88. DOI: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00190.

35. Schweller R. L. 1994. Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 72-107. DOI: 10.2307/2539149.

36. Schweller R. L. 1998. Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s strategy of worldconquest. New York, Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.2307/2585822.

37. Schweller R. L. 1993. Tripolarity and the Second World War. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 73-103. DOI: 10.2307/2600832.

38. Smith A. 1995. Alliance formation and war. International Studies Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 405-425. DOI: 10.2307/2600800.

39. Snyder G. H. 1991. Alliances, balance, and stability. International Organization, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 121-142. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300001417.

40. Swaine D. S. 2012. Chinese leadership and elite responses to the U. S. Pacific pivot. China Leadership Monitor, no. 38. Available at: https://www.hoover.org/research/chinese-leadership-and-elite-responses-us-pacific-pivot (accessed: 19.12.2020).

41. Van Evera S. 1998. Offense, defense, and the causes of war. International Security, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 5-43. DOI: 10.1162/isec.22.4.5.

42. Walt S. M. 1985. Alliance formation and the balance of world power. International Security, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 3-43. DOI: 10.7591/9780801469992-010.

43. Walt S. M. 2002. Keeping the world ‘off balance’: Self-restraint and US foreign policy. In: Ikenberry G. J. (ed.). America unrivalled: The future of the balance of power. New York, Cornell University Press, pp. 121-155. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.253799.

44. Walt S. M. 1990. The origins of alliances. New York, Cornell University Press.

45. Waltz K. N. 2000. Structural realism after the Cold War. International Security, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5-41. DOI: 10.1162/016228800560372.

46. Waltz K. N. 1979. Theory of international politics. New York, McGrawHill.

47. Ward M. D. 1982. Research gaps in alliance dynamics. Denver, University of Denver.

48. Wilkins T. S. 2012. ‘Alignment’, not ‘alliance’ — the shifting paradigm of international security cooperation: Toward a conceptual taxonomy of alignment. Review of International Studies, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 53-76. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210511000209.

49. Wohlforth W. C. 2002. U. S. strategy in a unipolar world. In: Ikenberry G. J. (ed.). America unrivalled: The future of the balance of power. New York, Cornell University Press, pp. 98-120. DOI: 10.1162/016228899560031.

50. Yuen A. 2009. Target concessions in the shadow of intervention. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 745-773. DOI: 10.1177/0022002709339046.