The Republics of the Southern Caucasus on their way to the ‘Socialist federation’ (1917–1922)

As we approach the 100th anniversary of the formation of the USSR, political, military, social, ethnic and other determinants of consolidation of the peoples and territories of the former Russian Empire within the Bolshevik state attract an increasing interest of academic community. In particular, special attention is drawn to the complex and controversial process of integration of the South Caucasus with Soviet Russia. Soviet historiography advanced an official view on the role of the Transcaucasian republics in the formation of the USSR, which came down to a number of ideological clichés that provided an impoverished and partly distorted image of this complex phenomenon. On the basis of a wide range of Soviet, Russian, and foreign researches, as well as recently published primary sources, the author examines the landmark events in the history of the states of the South Caucasus in the period preceding the formation of the USSR. The author highlights both similarities and differences in the views of Soviet and modern historians on the related issues, including the realization of the right to self-determination of the peoples of the South Caucasus in the first years after the October Revolution and the complex impact of international political situation on the regional developments. The author notes that the struggle for spheres of influence between world powers also affected all the Transcaucasian republics, although with different results. The author pays special attention to the process of Sovietization: in the Soviet historiography it was portrayed as a triumphal march of Soviet rule, but, as recent researches has shown, the Bolsheviks actually did not have a clear and consistent plan for the Sovietization of the Transcaucasian republics and the process was accompanied by dramatic events and conflicts. The assessments of the subsequent formation of the Transcaucasian Federation also differ significantly. The Soviet interpretation of this project emphasized its importance for eliminating the consequences of the Civil War and resolving inter-ethnic conflicts. Contemporary historians point to the fact that the unification process was imposed artificially, and even forcefully, according to some assessments, by Moscow, and its unifying effect was rather mixed. In this context, the author emphasizes the need for an impartial and balanced research approach towards the processes that took place in the Transcaucasian republics in the first post-revolutionary years in order to gain a better understanding of their role in the creation of the USSR.

1. Agayan S.P. 1962. Velikii Oktyabr’ i bor’ba trudyashchikhsya Armenii za pobedu sovetskoi vlasti [The Great October and the struggle of the working people of Armenia for the victory of Soviet power]. Yerevan, Armenian SSR Academia of Science Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Azizbekova P.A. 1962. V.I. Lenin i sotsialisticheskie preobrazovaniya v Azerbaidzhane (1920–1923) [Vladimir Lenin and socialist transformations in Azerbaijan (1920–1923)]. Moscow, SSSR Academia of Science Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Alieva S.I. 2020. Natsional’no-osvoboditel’noe dvizhenie turetskogo naroda protiv frantsuzskoi okkupatsii Marasha v sovetskoi istoriografii [National liberation movement of Turkish people against French occupation of Marash in Soviet historiography]. Sovremennaya nauchnaya mysl’, no. 3, pp. 64–77. (In Russ.)

4. Ambartsumyan K.R. 2019a. Vneshnyaya politika Sovetskoi Rossii v svyazi s germanskim voennym prisutstviem na Yuzhnom Kavkaze v 1918 g [Foreign policy of the Soviet Russia in the context of military presence of Germany in the South Caucasus in 1918]. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya, no. 3, pp. 8–15. DOI: 10.37494/2409-1030-2019-3-8-15. (In Russ.)

5. Ambartsumyan K.R. 2019b. ‘Gruziya nuzhna nam kak vremennyi bufer’: mezhdunarodnye faktory bol’shevistskoi sovetizatsii Yuzhnogo Kavkaza (1920– 1921 gody) [‘We need Georgia as a temporary buffer’: International factors in the Bolsheviks’ sovetization of the South Caucasus (1920–1921)]. Novyi istoricheskii vestnik, no. 59, pp. 86–105. DOI: 10.24411/2072-9286-2019-00006. (In Russ.)

6. Ambartsumyan K.R. 2017a. Mesto Yuzhnogo Kavkaza v sovetskoturetskom sblizhenii v 1920–1921 gg. [The South Caucasus in the context of Soviet-Turkish rapprochement in 1920–1921]. Gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie issledovaniya, no. 3, pp. 8–15. (In Russ.)

7. Ambartsumyan K.R. 2017b. Osobennosti sovremennoi istoriografii Bol’shogo Kavkaza kak ob’ekta vneshnei politiki bol’shevikov [Special features of contemporary historiography of Greater Caucasus as an object of Bolsheviks foreign policy]. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza, no. 1, pp. 90–94. DOI: 10.18522/2072-0181-2017-89-1-90-95. (In Russ.)

8. Ambartsumyan K.G. 2021. Politika otlozhennoi sovetizatsii: RSFSR i Gruziya v 1920–1921 godakh [Policy of postponed sovetization: Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic and Georgia in 1920–1921]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 119–132. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2021.2.9. (In Russ.)

9. Ambartsumyan K.R. 2018. Uchastie Rossii i Turtsii v politicheskikh protsessakh Yuzhnogo Kavkaza v 1918 godu [Participation of Russia and Turkey in the political processes of the South Caucasus (1918)]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 166–176. DOI: 10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.2.14. (In Russ.)

10. Arkhipova E.V. 2016. Britanskii sled na Yuzhnom Kavkaze (1918–1919 gody) [British footprint in the South Caucasus (1918–1919)]. Modern and Contemporary History, no. 3, pp. 216–223. (In Russ.)

11. Baberowski J. 2003. Der Feind ist überall: Stalinismus im Kaukasus. Mü nchen, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt [Russ. ed.: Baberovski I. 2010. Vrag est’ vezde. Stalinizm na Kavkaze. Moscow, POSSPEN Publ.].

12. Bagdasarov S.S. 1952. Partiya bol’shevikov — organizator Zakavkazskoi Sovetskoi Federativnoi Sotsialisticheskoi Respubliki (ZSFSR) [The Bolshevik Party as the organizer of the Transcaucasian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (ZSFSR)]. Voprosy istorii, no. 8, pp. 7–24. (In Russ.)

13. Baibakov S.A. 1997. Istoriya obrazovaniya SSSR: itogi i perspektivy izucheniya [History of the formation of the USSR: Results and prospects of the study]. Moscow, Dialog-MGU Publ. (In Russ.)

14. Vdovin A.I. 2021. SSSR. Istoriya velikoi derzhavy (1922–1991 gg.) [USSR. History of a great power (1922–1991)]. Moscow, Prospect Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Werth N. 1992. Histoire de l’Union Soviétique: De l’Empire russe à la Communauté des Etats indépendants (1900–1991). Paris, PUF [Russ. ed.: Vert N. Istoriya Sovetskogo gosudarstva. 1900–1991. Moscow, Infra-M, Ves’ mir].

16. Veselov V.I. 2021. Bol’sheviki v Azerbajdzhane (konets aprelya — nachalo iyunya 1920 goda) [Bolsheviks in Azerbaijan (late April — early June 1920)]. Moscow, Rodina Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Vishnevskii A.G. 1998. Serp i rubl’. Konservativnaya modernizatsiya v SSSR [Sickle and ruble. Conservative modernization in the USSR]. Moscow, OGI Publ. (In Russ.)

18. Gachechiladze R. 2012. Konfliktogennost’ raspada i restavratsii imperii: politiko-geograficheskii podkhod (na primere byvshego rossiiskogo Zakavkaz’ya. 1917–1923 gg.) [The conflict-prone potential of the disintegration and restoration of empires: Political and geographic approach (a case of the Russian Transcaucasia, 1917–1923)]. Kavkaz i globalizatsiya, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 160–174. (In Russ.)

19. Grosul V.Ya. 2007. Obrazovanie SSSR (1917–1924 gg.) [The formation of USSR (1917–1924)]. Moscow, ITRK Publ. (In Russ.)

20. Gukovskii A. 1940. Pobeda sovetskoi vlasti v Armenii v 1920 godu [The victory of Soviet power in Armenia in 1920]. Istorik-marksist, vol. 11, pp. 8–17. (In Russ.)

21. Guliev Dzh.B. 1972. Zakavkazskaya federatsiya — vazhnyi etap na puti k sozdaniyu SSSR [The Transcaucasian Federation is an important stage on the way to the formation of the USSR]. In: Pod leninskim znamenem sotsialisticheskogo internatsionalizma [Under the Lenin’s banner of socialist internationalism]. Baku, Azerneshr Publ., pp. 165–186. (In Russ.)

22. Zhilin P.A. (ed.). 1965. Istoriografiya obrazovaniya SSSR. Ocherki po istoriografii sovetskogo obshchestva [Historiography of the formation of the USSR. Essays on the historiography of the Soviet society]. Moscow, Akademiya obshchestvennykh nauk pri TSK KPSS Publ. (In Russ.)

23. Kacharava Yu.M. 1955. Bor’ba kommunistov Gruzii protiv natsionaluklonizma i obrazovanie ZSFSR [The struggle of the communists of Georgia against national deviationism and the formation of the TSFSR]. In: Trudy Instituta istorii [Proceedings of the Institute of History]. Tbilisi. (In Russ.)

24. Kvashonkin A.V. 1997. Sovetizatsiya Zakavkaz’ya v perepiske bol’shevistskogo rukovodstva. 1920–1922 gg. [Sovietization of Transcaucasia in the correspondence of the Bolshevik authorities (1920–1922)]. Cahiers du Monde Russe, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 163–194. (In Russ.)

25. Kirchanov M.V. 2013. ‘Kavkazskoe’ i ‘Rossiiskoe’ v sovremennom gruzinskom natsionalizme [The Caucasian and the Russian in contemporary Georgian nationalism]. Central Asia and the Caucasus, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 116–125. (In Russ.)

26. Kirchanov M.V. 2010. Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya gruzinskogo natsionalizma v usloviyakh politicheskoi nestabil’nosti. Mezhdu traditsiyami politicheskoi natsii i vyzovami radikalizatsii [The main development vectors of Georgian nationalism in the context of political instability between the traditions of the political nation and the challenges of radicalization]. Central Asia and the Caucasus, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 146–159. (In Russ.)

27. Krasovitskaya T.Yu. 2021. Obrazovanie SSSR: istoriograficheskii kontekst [Formation of the USSR: Historiographical context]. In: Shelokhaev V.V., Savel’ev P.Yu. (eds.). Pust’ gorit svecha [Let the candle burn]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., pp. 279–303. (In Russ.)

28. Merkviladze V.N. 1969. Sozdanie i ukreplenie sovetskoi gosudarstvennosti v Gruzii (1921–1936) [Establishing and strengthening of the Soviet statehood in Georgia (1921–1936)]. Tbilisi, Sabchota Sakartvelo Publ. (In Russ.)

29. Mustafaeva S. 2010. Sovetskaya Rossiya i formirovanie granits mezhdu gosudarstvami Kavkaza (na primere Azerbaidzhana i Armenii) [Soviet Russia and the formation of borders between the Caucasian states (based on a case study of Azerbaijan and Armenia]. Kavkaz i globalizatsiya, vol. 4, no. 1–2, pp. 230–240. (In Russ.)

30. Mukhanov V.M. 2014. K istorii sovetizatsii Zakavkaz’ya (1920–1921) [On the history of the sovietization of Transcaucasia (1920–1921)]. In Degoev V.V. (ed.). Kavkazskii sbornik, vol. 8 (40), pp. 171–228. (In Russ.)

31. Mukhanov V.M. 2019. Kavkaz v perelomnuyu epokhu (1917–1921) [Caucasus at a turning point (1917–1921)]. Moscow, Modest Kolerov Publ. (In Russ.)

32. Mukhanov V.M. 2017. Sovetizatsiya Armenii v 1920 g. i Sergo Ordzhonikidze [Sovietization of Armenia in 1920 and Sergo Ordzhonikidze]. Mezhdunarodnaya analitika, no. 1, pp. 89–98. (In Russ.)

33. Gorin V.A., Nenarokov A.L., Orlova-Chernysheva N.B. 1992. Na puti k ‘sotsialisticheskomu unitarizmu’ (iz novykh dokumentov 1922 g. po istorii obrazovaniya SSSR) [On the way to ‘socialist unitarism’ (on the basis of new documents on the history of the formation of the USSR from 1922)]. Otechestvennaya istoriya, no. 4, pp. 89–116. (In Russ.)

34. Nenarokov A.P. 1988. Dogmaticheskaya kanonizatsiya stalinskikh podkhodov k resheniyu natsional’nogo voprosa i poteri sovetskoi istoriografii ob”edinitel’nogo dvizheniya [Dogmatization of Stalin’s approaches to the national question and the loss of Soviet historiography of the unification movement]. Istoriya SSSR, no. 6, pp. 58–74. (In Russ.)

35. Pipes R. 1990. The Russian revolution [Russ. ed.: Paips R. 2005. Russkaya revolyutsiya. Moscow, Zakharov Publ.].

36. Rashkovskii E.B. 2002. ‘Kavkazskii melovoi krug’: tragicheskie sud’by regiona [‘The Caucasian chalk circle’: The tragic fate of the region]. Pro et Contra, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 163–179. (In Russ.)

37. Rumyantsev S. 2011. Sovetskaya natsional’naya politika v Zakavkaz’e: konstruirovanie natsional’nykh granits, istorii i kul’tur [Soviet national policy in Transcaucasia: Construction of national borders, histories and cultures]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, no. 4 (78), pp. 47–65. (In Russ.)

38. Saparov A. 2018. Grazhdanskaya voina v Zakavkaz’e 1918–1921 s tochki zreniya etnicheskikh, sotsial’nykh i politicheskikh protsessov [Civil war in Transcaucasia 1918–1921 in terms of ethnic, social and political processes]. Peterburgskii istoricheskii zhurnal, no. 3, pp. 224–243. DOI: 10.24411/2311-603X-2018-00060. (In Russ.)

39. Tamazov I.S., Pazov I.S. 2016. Germaniya i obrazovanie nezavisimoi Gruzii v 1918 godu [Germany and formation of independent Georgia in 1918]. Nauchnyi dialog, no. 4 (52), pp. 229–240. (In Russ.)

40. Kharmandaryan S.V. 1969. Lenin i stanovlenie Zakavkazskoi federatsii, 1921–1923 [Lenin and formation of the Transcaucasian Federation, 1921–1923]. Yerevan, Aiastan Publ. (In Russ.)

41. Chugaev D.A. 1962. Obrazovanie Soyuza SSR (istoriograficheskii obzor) [Formation of the USSR (historiographic review)]. Voprosy istorii KPSS, no. 6, pp. 173–181. (In Russ.)

42. Yakubovskaya S.I. 1972. Razvitie SSSR kak soyuznogo gosudarstva. 1922–1936 [The development of the USSR as a union state. 1922–1936]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

43. Yakubovskaya S.I. 1962. Sovetskaya istoriografiya obrazovaniya SSSR [Soviet historiography on formation of the USSR]. Voprosy istorii, no. 12, pp. 3–17. (In Russ.)

44. Smith J. 1998. The Georgian affair of 1922 — Policy failure, personality clash or power struggle? Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 519–544.