Continuity and Change in U.S. Space Exploration Approaches (2017–2025)
https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2025-17-3-179-212
Abstract
In recent years, amid the increasing polarization in American society, the United States has witnessed growing divergences between its key parties on virtually all domestic and foreign policy issues. However, this trend has barely affected U.S. space exploration programs, indicating a degree of continuity between administrations in this area and demonstrating a political consensus regarding its strategic importance, despite some minor interparty differences. To showcase this trend, this article compares the approaches to space policy during the terms of the Republican D. Trump and the Democrat J. Biden The first section examines their initiatives in this field within the context of the traditional narratives of the so-called ‘grand strategy’, such as the ‘American Dream’, ‘exceptionalism’, the ‘frontier’. The second section traces the continuity between D. Trump’s first term and the Biden administration in such areas of space policy as the exploration of the Moon and Mars, airspace traffic regulation, public-private partnership, and asteroid exploration. At the same time, the author indicates new features in the Biden administration’s approaches to the establishment of the U.S. Space Force, outer space demilitarization, and sectoral program implementation to combat climate change and achieve racial and gender diversity. The third section outlines the contours of D. Trump’s second administration’s new space policy. The author concludes that it is the U.S. self-identification as the sole superpower that has a decisive influence on the formation, coherence, and goal-setting of contemporary American space policy, which explains the phenomenon of strategic continuity between different administrations.
About the Author
P. G. KoshkinRussian Federation
Pavel G. Koshkin — PhD (Philology), Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow
2/3, Khlebny, Moscow, 121069
References
1. Agapova M.R. 2025. Natsional’noe pravo Soedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki o kommertsializatsii kosmicheskoi deyatel’nosti i ego sootnoshenie s normami mezhdunarodnogo kosmicheskogo prava [The law of the United States of America on the commercialization of space activities and its relationship with the norms of international space law]. Actual Problems of Russian Law, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 167–181. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2025-173.4.167-181. (In Russ.)
2. Alekseenko A.P. 2016. Razvedka i dobycha kosmicheskikh resursov: opyt zakonotvorchestva SShA [Exploration and extraction of space resources: The record of U.S. lawmaking]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya, no. 5, pp. 34–41. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7136.2016-5-18968. (In Russ.)
3. Bedaev A.I. 2024. Militarizatsiya kosmosa v kontekste sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Militarization of outer space in the context of contemporary international relations]. The Caspian Region: Politics, Econo mics, Culture, no. 2 (79), pp. 7–15. DOI: 10.54398/1818510X_2024_2_7. (In Russ.)
4. Vylegzhanin A.N., Kiseleva O.A., Shtodina I.Yu. 2023. Sostyazatel’noe soblyudenie Rossiei i SShA Dogovora po kosmosu 1967 g. [Competitive observance by the Russian Federation and the USA of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty]. Law Enforcement Review, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 145–154. DOI: 10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(3).145-154. (In Russ.)
5. Danilin I.V., Shavlai E.P. 2022. Politika po razvitiyu indiiskogo ‘Novogo kosmosa’ [India’s policies in support of the New Space]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 113–134. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2022-5-86-113-134. (In Russ.)
6. Zhukov N.S. 2022. Kosmicheskaya gonka mezhdu SSSR i SShA [The space race between the USSR and the USA]. In: Loginov Yu.Yu. (ed.). Aktual’nye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki: Sbornik materialov VIII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoprakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi Dnyu kosmonavtiki: V 3 t. T. 3 [Actual problems of aviation and cosmonautics: Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the Day of Cosmonautics: In 3 vols. Vol. 3]. Krasnoyarsk, Sibirskii gosudarstvennyi universitet nauki i tekhnologii imeni akademika M.F. Reshetneva Publ., pp. 1209–1211. (In Russ.)
7. Kovalev A.P., Sotnik S.A., Sotnik D.S. 2023. Kosmos kak novaya sfera vooruzhennoi bor’by [Space as a new sphere of armed struggle]. Voennaya mysl’, no. 3, pp. 35–52. (In Russ.)
8. Korobushin D.V., Veiko A.V., Dadashyan A.E. 2018. Chastnyi kosmos v SShA: tendentsii razvitiya [Private cosmos in the USA: Trends of development]. Economic Problems and Legal Practice, no. 3, pp. 107–112.
9. Arbatov A., Dvorkin V. (eds.). 2009. Kosmos: oruzhie, diplomatiya, bezopasnost’ [Outer space: Weapons, diplomacy and security]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)
10. Koshkin P.G. 2021. Ekspertnyi i zhurnalistskii diskursy vokrug vtoroi kosmicheskoi gonki mezhdu Rossiei, SShA i drugimi stranami [Expert and media discourses around the second space race between Russia, the U.S. and other countries]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 313–333. DOI: 10.21638/spbu06.2021.304. (In Russ.)
11. Nikitin A.I., Klinova M.V. 2022. Doktrinal’nye aspekty politiki SShA, NATO i ES v oblasti voennogo kosmosa [Doctrinal aspects of the US, NATO and EU policies in military space]. Comparative Politics Russia, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 45–64. DOI: 10.24833/2221-3279-2022-4-13-45-64. (In Russ.)
12. Panarina D.S. 2010. Frontir kak odin iz faktorov i mifov amerikanskoi istorii [The frontier as one of the factors and myths of American history]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, no. 4, pp. 80–88. (In Russ.)
13. Petrechuk A.I. 2017. Amerikanskaya mechta i amerikanskaya isklyuchitel’nost’. Ot istokov do sovremennosti [The American dream and American exceptionalism. From foundations till nowadays]. Arkhont, no. 3 (3), pp. 51–64. (In Russ.)
14. Ponamareva A.M. 2022. Kosmos kak novoe operativnoe prostranstvo NATO [Outer space as a new NATO’s operational space]. Evropeiskaya bezopasnost’: sobytiya, otsenki, prognozy, vol. 80, no. 64, pp. 6–14. (In Russ.)
15. Prokopenkova I.O. 2021. Transformatsiya kosmicheskoi politiki SShA v XXI v.: promezhutochnye itogi i vyzovy dlya administratsii Dzh. Baidena [Transformation of the U.S. space policy in the 21st century: Provisional results and challenges for the J. Biden administration]. National Strategy Issues, no. 3 (66), pp. 195–220. DOI: 10.52311/2079-3359_2021_3_195. (In Russ.)
16. Kokoshin A.A. (ed.). 2013. Rossiya i mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’ v kosmose [Russia and international security in outer space]. Moscow, KRASAND Publ. (In Russ.)
17. Tomashevskii K. 2020. Mezhdunarodnoe sotrudnichestvo Rossii i SShA v kosmose: kuda my napravlyaemsya? [International cooperation between Russia and USA regarding space exploration. Where are we headed?]. RSUH/RGGU Bul-letin Series ‘Political Science. History. International Relations’, no. 1, pp. 135–146. DOI: 10.28995/2073-6339-2020-1-135-146. (In Russ.)
18. Uvarov V.B. 2021. Kosmicheskoe nasledie Donal’da Trampa: kak naibolee protivorechivyi prezident SShA zalozhil osnovu dlya ekspansii [Donald Trump’s space legacy: How the U.S. most controversial president laid the foundation for expansion]. Russia in Global Affairs, vol. 19, no. 2 (108), pp. 131–146. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/kosmicheskoe-nasledie-trampa/ (accessed: 15.09.2025). (In Russ.)
19. Khlopov O.A. 2023. Kosmicheskie sily SShA: Evolutsiya sozdaniya, tseli i zadachi [US space force: Creation evolution, goals and objectives]. Science. Society. Defense, vol. 11, no. 1 (34), p. 9. DOI: 10.24412/2311-1763-2023-1-9-9. (In Russ.)
20. Agarwal A. 2021. Outer space mining: An analysis of its legal aspects. International Journal of Law, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 85–90.
21. Ali N., Amin T., Awaan A.K. 2024. The great power space race: How the US, Russia and China competing in space exploration. International Journal of Contemporary Issues in Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 200–207.
22. Bateman A. 2024. Weapons in space: Technology, politics, and the rise and fall of the Strategic Defense Initiative. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
23. Cheng D. 2024. China and the new moon race. Washington, D.C., The Space Policy. Available at: https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.gwu.edu/dist/7/314/files/2025/01/Cheng-D.-China-and-the-New-Moon-Race.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2025).
24. Daniels M. 2020. The history and future of U.S.-China competition and cooperation in space. [S.1], John Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory. Available at: https://www.jhuapl.edu/assessing-us-china-technology-connections/dist/a77e24719d68daf7afd8e91256ffad8a.pdf (accessed: 15.09.2025).
25. Davidian K. 2022. Operationalizing the definition of ‘commercial space’. Acta Astronautica, vol. 198, pp. 541–549. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.06.040.
26. Donou-Adonsou F. et al. 2024. Cointegration analysis of US space activity and its environmental impact. Environmental Pollution, vol. 352. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026974912400856X (accessed: 15.09.2025).
27. Eriksson J., Newlove-Eriksson L.M. 2023. Outsourcing the American space dream: SpaceX and the race to the stars. Astropolitics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 46–62. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2023.2196017.
28. Hickman J. 2019. Research viewpoint: International relations and the second space race between the United States and China. Astropolitics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 178–190. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2019.1672507.
29. Holland D., Burns J. 2018. The American space exploration narrative from the Cold War through the Obama administration. Space Policy, vol. 46, pp. 9–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.03.007.
30. Leon A.M. 2018. Mining for meaning: An examination of the lega lity of property rights in space resources. Virginia Law Review, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 497–546.
31. Mazzucato M., Robinson D. 2018. Co-creating and directing innovation ecosystems: NASA’s approach to public-private partnerships in low-Earth orbit. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 136, pp. 166–177. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.034.
32. Morin J-F., Tepper E. 2023. The empire strikes back: Comparing US and China’s structural power in outer space. Global Studies Quarterly, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksad067.
33. Peeters W. 2021. Evolution of the space economy: Government space to commercial space and new space. Astropolitics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 206–222. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2021.1984001.
34. Pekkanen S.A. 2019. Governing the new space race. AJIL Unbound, vol. 113, pp. 92–97. DOI: 10.1017/aju.2019.16.
35. Sachdeva G.S. 2018. Commercial mining of celestial resources: Case study of U.S. space laws. Astropolitics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 202–215. DOI: 10.1080/14777622.2018.1534312.
36. Shreve B.G. 2003. The US, the USSR and space exploration, 1957–1963. International Journal on World Peace, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 67–83.
37. Spears L., Martin J., Rotham B. 2023. Legality of ownership of asteroid mining results in space based on international law arrangements. Pancasila International Journal of Applied Social Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–24. DOI: 10.59653/pancasila.v1i01.75.
38. Yatin A.S., Hasbiyalloh B.Y., Hanan D. 2024. Redefining American interests: Analyzing U.S. policy shifts during the space race with China (2011–2021). Jurnal Wacana Politik, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 40–50. DOI: 10.24198/jwp.v8i1.49516.
39. Zwart de M., Henderson S., Neumann M. 2023. Space resource activities and the evolution of international space law. Acta Astronautica, vol. 211, pp. 155– 162. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2023.06.009.
Review
For citations:
Koshkin P.G. Continuity and Change in U.S. Space Exploration Approaches (2017–2025). Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2025;17(3):179-212. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2025-17-3-179-212

















