The European Union’s Policies Towards Iraq (2014–2020)

Political instability in the Middle East and North Africa in the early 2010s, accompanied by an escalation of the terrorist threat and uncontrolled migration, caused serious concern in the European Union about the situation in the Arab world. As a consequence, the EU has noticeably increased assistance to Iraq, providing Baghdad with substantial support in the fight against the Islamic State, preventing the humanitarian crisis, stabilizing the situation and promoting post-conflict reconstruction. However, these efforts have not yet been explored in depth by the Russian experts, who traditionally focus on the EU relations with the Southern Mediterranean countries.

The author aims to reveal the logic behind the evolution of the European Union’s policy towards Iraq since 2014, as well as its impact on the EU assistance programmes to this country. The paper consists of three sections: the first one outlines the evolution of the EU strategic priorities in Iraq during 2014–2019, the second covers the major assistance programmes implemented by the European Union, both bilaterally and multilaterally, in Iraq; the third examines the EU reaction to the rising tensions in Iraq at the turn of 2019–2020.

The author concludes that the EU’s growing interest in Iraq in recent years stems not only from concerns about transformation of this country into a source of cross-border challenges and threats, but also from the conviction of the EU officials that Iraq might potentially become the cornerstone of a new regional security architecture. On the basis of these considerations, the EU provides a comprehensive support to Iraq, including both humanitarian aid and development assistance aimed primarily at eliminating the fundamental causes of instability and radicalization. At the same time while demonstrating its commitment to develop cooperation with both government agencies and non-governmental organizations, the EU clearly prefers to assist Iraq through international organizations, rather than directly. Although the EU’s ability to influence Baghdad remains limited, compared to that of the US and regional actors, the European Union is perceived in Iraq as a neutral player and this might facilitate the achievement of its policy objectives. However, taking into account such factors as a high level of corruption in Iraq, substantial resources for reconstruction already available for the country, as well as Brussels’ focus on Syria, the scope of the EU’s further involvement in Iraq remains unclear.

1. Bartenev V.I. 2018. Pomoshch’ ‘khrupkim gosudarstvam’ skvoz’ prizmu risk-menedzhmenta: labirint ob”yasnitel’nykh gipotez [Aiding ‘fragile states’ through the lens of risk management: Labyrinth of explanatory hypotheses]. International Trends, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 20–41. DOI 10.17994/IT.2018.16.4.55.2. (In Russ.)

2. Vosstanovlenie Iraka posle pobedy nad ‘Islamskim gosudarstvom’: perspektivy mezhdunarodnogo uchastiia [Reconstructing Iraq after the victory over the ‘Islamic State’: Prospects for international engagement]. 2018. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 2, pp. 145–192. (In Russ.)

3. Kuznetsov V.A., Oganisyan L.D. 2018. Dilemmy demokratizatsii: politika Evrosoiuza v Tunise i Egipte posle Arabskogo probuzhdeniia [Dilemmas of democracy promotion: The EU policies in Tunisia and Egypt after the Arab Awakening]. Contemporary Europe, no. 5, pp. 25–36. DOI: 10.15211/soveurope520182536. (In Russ.)

4. Kul’kova O.S. 2019. Pomoshch’ Evrosoiuza stranam Blizhnego Vostoka i Severnoi Afriki posle nachala ‘Arabskogo probuzhdeniia’ (na primere Marokko) [EU assistance to the countries of the Middle East and North Africa after the beginning of the ‘Arab Awakening’ (the case of Morocco)]. In Voda K.R., Godovanyk K.A., Davydov A.A. (eds.). Meniaiushchiisia Zapad i ego rol’ v regulirovanii global’nykh protsessov (Mirovoe razvitie. Vyp. 21) [The changing west and its role in global regulation (Global development. Iss. 21). Moscow, IMEMO RAN Publ, pp. 127–141. (In Russ.)

5. Oganisyan L.D. 2018a. Evrosoyuz: politika na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke [The European Union: Policies in the Near and Middle East]. In Evropeiskii soyuz: fakty i kommentarii. Vyp. 90: oktiabr’–dekabr’ 2017 g. [The European Union: Facts and comments. Iss. 90: October–december 2017]. Moscow, Institut Evropy RAN Publ, pp. 66–70. (In Russ.)

6. Oganisyan L.D. 2018b. Evoliutsiia podkhodov ES k vzaimodeistviiu so stranami ‘arabskogo probuzhdeniia’ [Evolution of the EU Policy Approaches Towards the Arab Awakening countries]. In ‘Global’nyi Iug’ v politsentrichnom miroporiadke (Mirovoe razvitie. Vypusk 19) [Global South in the polycentric world (Global development. Iss. 19]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN Publ., pp. 148–156. (In Russ.)

7. Pierini M. 2017. Est‘ li u ES rol‘ v siriiskom konflikte? [In search of an EU role in the Syrian war]. Carnegie Moscow Center Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Solomatin A.I. 2018. Imperativy ukrepleniya gosudarstvennosti v deyatel’nosti Vsemirnogo banka na territorii Iraka v 2014–2018 gg. [Imperatives of strengthening governance in the World Bank’s engagement in Iraq, 2014–2018]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 92–124. (In Russ.)

9. Shumilin A.I. 2018. Evrosoyuz: podkhod k siriiskoi probleme [European Union to raise its voice in approach to the Syrian crisis]. Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik IE RAN, no. 2, pp. 201–209. (In Russ.)

10. Plebani A. (ed.). 2017. After Mosul. Re-inventing Iraq. Institute for International Political Studies (ISPI).

11. Al-Khoei H., Geranmaye E., Toaldo M. 2017. After ISIS: How to win the peace in Iraq and Libya. European Council on Foreign Relations.

12. Balfour R., Fabbri F., Youngs R. 2016. Report on democracy assistance from the European Union to the Middle East and North Africa. European Policy Center.

13. Barnes-Dacey J. 2017. To end a war: Europe’s role in bringing peace to Syria. European Council on Foreign Relations.

14. Calleo D. 2004. The broken West. Survival, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 29–38.

15. Cirlig C.-C. 2015. The international coalition to counter ISIL/Da’esh (the ‘Islamic State’). European Parliamentary Research Service.

16. Dandashly A. 2018. EU democracy promotion and the dominance of the security — stability nexus. Mediterranean Politics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 62–82. DOI: 10.1080/13629395.2017.1358900.

17. Gordon P., Shapiro J. 2004. Allies at war: America, Europe and the crisis over Iraq. New York, McGraw-Hill.

18. Gunter F.R. 2018. Rebuilding Iraq’s public works infrastructure following the defeat of ISIS. Foreign Policy Research Institute.

19. Immenkamp B. 2017. Syrian crisis: Impact on Iraq. European Parliamentary Research Service.

20. Kadhim A. 2019. Rebuilding Iraq: Prospects and challenges. The Cairo Review of Global Affairs, no. 34, pp. 64–69.

21. Kartsonaki A., Wolff S. 2015. The EU’s responses to conflicts in its wider neighbourhood: Human or European security? Global Society, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 199–226.

22. Lafta R., Al-Nuaimi M., Sultan L.R., Burnham G. 2020. Household recovery in Mosul one year after the defeat of ISIS. Conflict and Health, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1186/s13031-019-0247-4.

23. Lewis J. 2011. EU policy on the Iraq war and its aftermath: The breakdown and revival of consensus-based decision-making. In Thomas D.C. (ed.). Making EU foreign policy. National preferences, European norms and common policies. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 70–91.

24. Ways out of Europe’s Syria reconstruction conundrum. 2019. Crisis Group Middle East Report No. 209.

25. Youngs R. 2015. The European Union: Inclusion as geopolitics. In Kausch K. (ed.). Geopolitics and democracy in the Middle East. Artes Gráficas Villena, pp. 115–128.