Promoting Internal Armed Conflict Resolution and Peacebuilding: The Case of the U.S.-Colombia Relations (Part II)

In the present paper the author continues the study of the challenges faced by Colombia in its struggle to overcome the internal armed conflict, as well as the role of the United States in this process. By 2010 the confrontation between the government forces and the armed rebels had reached a breaking point opening the way to a successful conclusion of the Government of Colombia–FARC peace negotiations and the beginning of the country’s post-conflict reconstruction. The paper thoroughly examines the negotiations process, identifies the key disputed issues and the measures outlined for their resolution, including mechanisms of transitional justice, agrarian reform, programmes for demobilization and reintegration of the former combatants. The results of these talks laid the foundation for the historic Peace Accord of September 26, 2016. However, against all hopes and expectations, the agreement failed to bring an end to the long-standing internal conflict in Colombia. The failure of the national referendum, which was designed to approve the agreement, not only revealed deep divisions in the society, but forced the government to make serious concessions to the opponents of the negotiations with FARC. The author emphasizes the growing erosion of the hard-won consensus in the Colombian society, accompanied by the consolidation of the right-wing conservative camp. In this context the role of external sponsors of the peaceful agreement in general and the United States in particular becomes crucial. The paper presents a comparative analysis of approaches to providing aid to Colombia demonstrated by the administrations of Barack Obama and Donald Trump. The author concludes that despite substantial differences, for both administrations the ultimate objective was national security of the United States. That was clearly demonstrated by the fact that the US foreign aid to Colombia focused primarily on the fight against the illegal production of and trafficking in drugs, while the issues of peacebuilding and post-conflict reconstruction received less attention. Assessing Colombia’s experience in overcoming the internal conflict and the role of the United States in that process, the author concludes that although prioritization of security issues may have a considerable organizing potential, at the same time it may be detrimental to the process of post-conflict reconstruction in general.

internal armed conflict, post-conflict reconstruction, Colombia, the United States, foreign aid, fragile states, drug trafficking

1. Bartenev V.I. 2017. Amerikanskie programmy pomoshchi zarubezhnym stranam v oblasti bezopasnosti: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee (chast’ 2) [U.S. security assistance programs: Past, present, future (Part II)]. Moscow University Bulletin of World Politics, no. 1, pp. 93–117. (In Russ.)

2. Bartenev V.I. 2011. Sek’yuritizatsiya sfery sodeistviya mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu: analiz politicheskogo diskursa [Securitization of international development aid: Political discourse analysis]. International Organisations Research Journal, no. 3 (34), pp. 37–50. (In Russ.)

3. Glazova A.V., Burykh D.N., Shishkov A.S. et al. 2018. Politika administratsii D. Trampa v Latinskoi Amerike: smena kursa ili preemstvennost’? [The Trump administration’s Latin America policy: A shift or a succession?]. Problemy natsional’noi strategii, no. 2, pp. 1–43. (In Russ.)

4. Zakhartsova A.S. 2018. Klyuchevye tendentsii razvitiya Kolumbii: otrazhenie vooruzhennogo konflikta [Key tendencies of the Colombian development in the context of the armed conflict]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 9, pp. 44–55. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0000585-2. (In Russ.)

5. Ivanovskii Z.V. 2019. Vnutrennii vooruzhennyi konflikt i problema mnogolikogo nasiliya v Kolumbii [Internal armed conflict and the problem of the multifaceted violence]. Latinoamerikanskii istoricheskii al’manakh, no. 21, pp. 288–306. (In Russ.)

6. Ivanovskii Z.V. 2011a. Kolumbiya: gosudarstvo i vooruzhennaya oppozitsiya [Colombia: State and the armed opposition]. Latinoamerikanskii istoricheskii al’manakh, no. 11, pp. 234–258. (In Russ.)

7. Ivanovskii Z.V. 2011b. Kolumbiya: ot demokraticheskoi bezopasnosti k demokraticheskomu protsvetaniyu [Colombia: de la seguridad democratica hacia la prosperidad democratica]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 5, pp. 18–38. (In Russ.)

8. Ivanovskii Z.V. 2014. Real’naya politika i izbiratel’nye strategii Kolumbii [La polftica real y las estrategias electorales de Colombia]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 11, pp. 17–39. (In Russ.)

9. Ivanovskii Z.W. (ed.). 2017. Politicheskie konflikty v Latinskoi Amerike: vyzovy stabilnosti i novye vozmozhnosti [Political conflicts in Latin America: Challenges to stability and new opportunities]. Moscow, ILA RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Potapov N.A. 2012. ‘Neoparamilitarizm’ v sovremennoi Kolumbii [Neo-paramilitarism in contemporary Colombia]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 12, pp. 20–26. (In Russ.)

11. Pyatakov A.N. 2019. Formy voennogo prisutstviya SShA v Latinskoi Amerike v nachale XXI veka [The U.S. military presence in Latin America in the beginning of the 21 st century]. In Glazova A.V., Shishkov A.S. (eds.). Politika SShA v Latinskoi Amerike: traditsionnye podkhody i novye vyzovy [U.S. policy in Latin America, Traditional approaches and new challenges]. Moscow, RISI Publ., pp. 103–115. (In Russ.)

12. Sereda M.A. 2016. Vliyanie vnutrennikh faktorov na razreshenie vooruzhennogo konflikta v Kolumbii i rezul’tat mirnykh peregovorov 2016 g. [The influence of the internal factors on the resolution of the Colombian armed conflict and the result of the 2016 peace talks]. Iberoamerikanskie tetradi, no. 4, pp. 114–124. (In Russ.)

13. Sereda M.A. 2017. Postkonfliktnyi period v Kolumbii [Post-conflict period in Colombia]. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 1, pp. 99–104. (In Russ.)

14. Martynov B.F. (ed.). 2017. Sovremennaya organizovannaya prestupnost’ v Latinskoi Amerike i stranakh Karibskogo basseina [Contemporary organized crime in Latin America and the Caribbean]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Shishkov A.S. 2015. Politika administratsii B. Obamy v Latinskoi Amerike [The Obama administration’s Latin American policy]. Problemy natsional’noi strategii, no. 4 (31), pp. 44–65. (In Russ.)

16. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A., Santos R.J. 2013. The monopoly of violence: Evidence from Colombia. Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 11, pp. 5–44. DOI: 10.1111/j.l542-4774.2012.01099.x.

17. Barrón M.L. 2015. Las víctimas del conflicto armado colombiano en la Ley de Víctimas y Restitución de Tierras: apropriación y resignificación de la categoría jurídica. Perfiles latinoamericanos, vol. 23, no. 36, pp. 121–145.

18. Long A. (ed.). 2015. Building special operation partnerships in Afghanistan and beyond. Challenges and best practices from Afghanistan, Iraq and Colombia. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation.

19. Ceballos M., Reyes M. 2009. El círculo vicioso del desplazamiento forzado: un reto para los municipios. Bogotá, ACIUR.

20. Chambers P.A. 2014. The ambiguity of human rights in Colombia: Reflections on a moral crisis. Latin American Perspectives, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 118–137. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X13492125.

21. Delgado Ramos G.C., Romano S.M., Ortega Breña M. 2011. Politicoeconomic factors in U.S. foreign policy: The Colombia Plan, the Merida Initiative, and the Obama administration. Latin American Perspectives, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 93–108.

22. Dube O., Naidu S. 2015. Bases, bullets and ballots: The effect of US military aid on political conflict in Colombia. The Journal of Politics, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 249–267. DOI: 10.3386/w20213.

23. Duncan G. 2014. Drug trafficking and political power: Oligopolicies of coercion in Colombia and Mexico. Latin American Perspectives, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 18–42. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X13509071.

24. Ellis R.E. 2019. The U.S. military in strategic objectives in Latin America and the Caribbean. PRISM, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 26–39.

25. Gómez-Suárez A. 2015. The geopolitics of the Santos-FARC peace talks. Self-published.

26. Gómez-Suárez A., Newman J. 2013. Safeguarding political guarantees in the Colombian peace process: Have Santos and FARC learn lessons from the past? Third World Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 819–837. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.800747.

27. Gonzáles C. 2010. Iniciativas de paz en Colombia. Civilizar, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 35–54.

28. Grajales J. 2017. Privatization and fragmentation of violence in Colombia. Revue française de science politique, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.3917/rfsp.672.0329.

29. Grajales J. 2011. The rifle and the title: Paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 771–792. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2011.607701.

30. Gutierrez F., Pinto M., Arenas J.C. et al. 2013. The importance of political coalitions in the successful reduction of violence in Colombian cities. Urban Studies, vol. 50, no. 15, pp. 3134–3151. DOI: 10.1177/0042098013487779.

31. Laplante L.J., Theiden K. 2006. Transitional justice in times of conflict: Colombia’s Ley de Justicia y Paz. Michigan Journal of International Law, vol. 28, iss. 1, pp. 50–108.

32. Leal Buitrago F. 2018. Militares y construcción de paz en la Colombia actual. Nueva sociedad, no. 278, pp. 90–99.

33. Lippe S. 2014. There is no silver bullet and other lessons from Colombia. Interagency Journal, no. 3–5, pp. 23–34.

34. López-López W., Piñeda Marin K., Murcia León M.K. et al. 2013. Forgiving perpetrators of violence: Colombian people’s position. Social Indicators Research, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 287–301. DOI 10.1007/s11205-012-0146-1.

35. MacGinty R. 2010. Hybrid peace: The interaction between top-down and bottom-up peace. Security Dialogue, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 391–412. DOI: 10.1177/0967010610374312.

36. Mateo L.R., Santos A.P. 2014. From the US Department of State, USAID and Washington-Based think-tanks: The search for ungoverned spaces in South America. In Prevost G., Vanden H.E., Campos C.O., Areyre L.F. (eds.). United States national security concerns in Latin America and the Caribbean. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 9–40.

37. Nussio E. 2013. Desarme, desmovilización y la reintegración de los excombatientes: políticas y actores del postconflicto. Colombia internacional, vol. 77, pp. 8–16. DOI: 10.7440/colombiaint77.2013.01.

38. Nussio E. 2012. La vida después de la desmovilización: percepciones, emociones y estrategias de exparamilitares en Colombia. Bogotá, Universidad de los Andes.

39. Paul Ch., Clarke C.P., Serena Ch.C. 2014. Mexico is not Colombia: Alternative historical analogies for responding to the challenge of violent drugtrafficking organizations. Santa Monica, RAND Corporation.

40. Phelan A. 2018. Engaging insurgency: The effect of 2016 peace agreement on FARC’s political participation. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 836–852. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2018.1432027.

41. Muggah R. (ed.). 2009. Security and post-conflict reconstruction: Dealing with fighters in the aftermath of war. Abingdon, New York, Routledge.

42. Segura R., Mechoulan M. 2017. Made in Havana: How Colombia and the FARC decided to end the war. Oslo, International Peace Institute.

43. Suárez-Salazar L., Furio V.J. 2011. Obama’s ‘smart strategies’ against Latin America: Continuity and changes. Latin American Perspectives, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 73–92. DOI: 10.1177/0094582X11406844.

44. Taylor S.V. 2018. Colombia: Using elections and electoral institutions to promote peace. Review of International Affairs, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 93–104. DOI: 10.1353/sais.2018.0008.

45. Taylor S.V. 2016. The state of democracy in Colombia: More voting, less violence? The Latin Americanist, pp. 169–190. DOI: 10.1111/tla.12082.

46. Ugarriza J.E. 2016. When war adversaries talk: The experimental effect of engagement rules on postconflict deliberation. Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 77–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00319.x.

47. Vega Sánchez A. 2012. Internal displacement and urbanization in Colombia: Policy challenges for a country in conflict. Unpublished Master’s dissertation. Ithaca, Cornell University.

48. Vergara Barrios M.J. 2018. The United States international aid to the new stage of Colombia: A new era for bilateral and international cooperation. Revista internacional de cooperación y desarrollo, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 262–281.

49. Wienand S., Tremaria S. 2017. Paramilitarism in a post-demobilization context? Insights from the Department of Antioquia in Colombia. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, no. 103, pp. 25–50. DOI: 10.18352/erlacs.10161.

50. Wolf S. 2011. Post-conflict state building: The debate on institutional choice. Third World Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 10. pp. 1777–1802. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2011.610574.