Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

Latin America in the 21st Century: Regional Development Trajectories

https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-2-44-70

Abstract

Latin America and the Caribbean region (LAC), which includes more than thirty countries, is traditionally characterized by a complex combination of elements of homogeneity and heterogeneity. The latter, stemming from traditional economic social and political differentiation and ideological polarization, in the modern context strengthens regional contradictions and creates new division lines. At the same time, the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries was marked by a growing integration of the region into the global market and globalization processes in general. In order to provide an outlook on the possible future developments in LAC, the author examines how the key trends of the current world politics permeate the region. The theoretical framework of the paper is based on the methodology proposed by the Russian researcher M.M. Lebedeva who outlines three basic megatrends — globalization, integration, and democratization and their counter-trends — deglobalization, disintegration, and dedemocratization, accordingly. It is within this broader context of a complex interplay of these trends and counter-trends, that the dynamics of regional processes in LAC is conceived. On this basis, the author identifies three possible regional development scenarios. The first one presupposes strengthening of institutional linkages between North, Central, and South America on the basis of Pan-American ideas. The second implies civilizational ‘isolation’ of LAC within large but still only regional integration projects. Finally, the third scenario proceeds from the linear development of the current regional trends. It implies further fragmentation of LAC within subregional organizations and chaotization of regional international relations. The author concludes that currently the regional development is affected predominantly by counter-trends, which are evidenced by increasing isolationism, an impasse facing major integration projects and democratic institutions, and the growth of populist movements. At the same time, all this shows that Latin America is fully integrated in global economic and political processes since these counter-trends characterize the development of a contemporary system of international relations in general.

About the Author

D. A. Kuznetsov
Moscow State Institute for International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

Denis A. Kuznetsov — Lecturer at the Department of World Political Processes, Research Fellow at the Center for Comprehensive Chinese Studies and Regional Projects

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Ataev M. 2012. Latinskaya Amerika v fokuse interesov vedushchikh mirovykh derzhav [Latin America in the focus of interests of leading world powers]. Vlast’, no. 4, pp. 180–182. (In Russ.)

2. Golubev K. 2006. Osobennosti rossiiskogo antiglobalizma [Specifics of Russian antiglobalism]. International trends, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 112–118. (In Russ.)

3. Davydov V.M. 2007. Bespretsedentnii sdvig v politicheskom landshafte regiona [An unprecedented shift in the political landscape of the region]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 7, pp. 19–25. (In Russ.)

4. Edargis A.A. 2016. Voenno-politicheskoe sotrudnichestvo v ramkakh UNASUR [Political and military cooperation in the margins of UNASUR]. Iberoamerican notes, no. 4, pp. 83–87. (In Russ.)

5. Kuznetsov D.A. 2015. Latinoamerikanskaya integratsiya i subregionalizatsiya na sovremennom etape: politiko-ideologicheskoe izmerenie [Latin American integration and sub-regionalization: Political and ideological dimension]. Comparative Politics Russia, no. 3, pp. 65–84. DOI: 10.18611/2221-32792015-6-3(20)-65-84. (In Russ.)

6. Davydov V.M. (ed.). 2009. Latinskaya Amerika v sovremennoi mirovoi politike [Latin America in contemporary world politics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Lebedeva M.M. 2019. Sovremennye megatrendy mirovoi politiki [Modern megatrends of world politics]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 29–37. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-29-37. (In Russ.)

8. Madatov A.S. 2008. Regional’nye osobennosti demokratizatsii: demokraticheskie tranzity i problemy konsolidatsii demokratii v Latinskoi Amerike [Regional particularities of democratization: Democratic transitions and the problems of the consolidation of democracy in Latin America]. Vestnik RUDN, seriya Politologiya, no. 2, pp. 5–19. (In Russ.)

9. Martynov B.F. 2015. ‘Zapad’ i ‘ne-Zapad’: proshloe, nastoyashchee… budushchee? [‘West’ and ‘non-West’: Past, present… future?]. Moscow, ILA RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Lebedeva M.M. (ed.). 2019. Megatrendy mirovoi politiki i ikh razvitie v XXI veke [Megatrends of world politics and their development in the 21 st century]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Shakleina T.A., Baykov A.A. (eds.). 2014. Megatrendy. Osnovnye traektorii evolyutsii mirovogo poryadka v XXI veke [Megatrends. The main development trajectories of the world order in the 21 st century]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Okuneva L.S. 2009. ‘Levyi povorot’ i demokratiya v Latinskoi Amerike [The ‘left turn’ and democracy in Latin America]. International trends, no. 1, pp. 43–53. (In Russ.)

13. Okuneva L.S. 2016. Politicheskaya modernizatsiya v stranakh Latinskoi Ameriki [Political modernization in Latin America]. In Voskresenskii A.D. (ed.). Praktika zarubezhnogo regionovedeniya i mirovoi politiki [The practice of regional studies and world politics]. Moscow, INFRA-M Publ., pp. 116–122. (In Russ.)

14. Okheda Kal’yuni E. 2007. Ekonomicheskie reformy i model’ sotsial’no orientirovannogo razvitiya v Latinskoi Amerike [Economic reforms and the model of people-centred development in Latin America]. PhD (Economics) Dissertation. Moscow. (In Russ.)

15. Pyatakov A.N. 2007. Latinoamerikanskaya gran’ mirovogo al’terglobalizma: itogi i perspektivy razvitiya [Latin American facet of world alter globalization: Results and development prospects]. Svobodnaya mysl’, no. 7, pp. 56–64. (In Russ.)

16. Pyatakov A.N. 2018. Latinoamerikanskie podkhody k probleme globalizatsii. Vzglyad skvoz’ XXI vek [Latin American approaches to globalization problem. A look through the 21 st century]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 85–93. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-1-85-93. (In Russ.)

17. Rozov N.S. 1992. Struktura tsivilizatsii i tendentsii mirovogo razvitiya [The structure of civilization and global development trends]. Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)

18. Sudarev V.P. 2016. Latinskaya Amerika pered novymi global’nymi vyzovami [Latin America facing new global challenges]. In Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (ed.). Politicheskaya nauka pered vyzovami global’nogo i regional’nogo razvitiya [Political science facing the challenges of global and regional development]. Moscow, Aspekt Press Publ., pp. 444–460. (In Russ.)

19. Kheifets V., Khadorich L. 2019. Soyuz yuzhnoamerikanskikh natsii: tumannye perspektivy [Union of South American Nations: Clouded prospects]. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 85–93. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-2-85-93. (In Russ.)

20. Allahar H. 2014. Major global megatrends: Implications for advanced and emerging countries. Journal of Management, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1–18.

21. Frank A.G. 1967. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. New York, Monthly Review Press.

22. Spykman H. (ed.). 1944. The geography of the peace. New York, Harcourt Brace & Co.

23. Haslam P.A. 2012. Globalization in Latin America and its critics. International Studies Review, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 331–339.

24. Jiang Shixue. 2010. Latin American politics after the ‘third wave’ of democratization and its future prospects. Procedia ‒ Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 6764–6771. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.022.

25. Mori A., Zanatta L. (eds.). 2017. Latin America at a crossroads. Milano, Ledizioni.

26. McCoy J.L. 2008. Democratic transformation in Latin America. The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, Winter/Spring, pp. 19–29.

27. Myers M. 2018. China’s Belt and Road initiative: What role for Latin America? Journal of Latin American Geography, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 239–243. DOI: 10.1353/lag.2018.0037.

28. Naisbitt J. 1988. Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. Brantford, W. Ross Macdonald School.

29. Nolte D., Comini N.M. 2016. UNASUR: Regional pluralism as a strategic outcome. Contexto Internacional, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 545–565.

30. Riggirozzi P., Grugel J. 2015. Regional governance and legitimacy in South America: The meaning of UNASUR. International Affairs, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 781–797. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2346.12340.

31. Rostow W.W. 1991. The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

32. Theodore J.D. 2015. The process of globalization in Latin America. International Business & Economics Research Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 193–198. DOI: 10.19030/iber.v14i1.9044.

33. Torre de la C. 2017. Populism in Latin America. In Rovira Kaltwasser C., Taggart P., Ochoa Espejo P., Ostiguy P. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 195–213.

34. Waisbord S. 1998. When the cart of media is before the horse of identity: A critique of technology-centered views on globalization. Communication Research, vol. 25, pp. 377–398.

35. Wallerstein I. 2004. World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham, Duke University Press.

36. Yang J. 2018. Political pendulum of ‘left’ and ‘right’ phenomenon in Latin American politics. Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 82–99.


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsov D.A. Latin America in the 21st Century: Regional Development Trajectories. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2020;12(2):44-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48015/2076-7404-2020-12-2-44-70

Views: 1651


ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)