Preview

Lomonosov World Politics Journal

Advanced search

From European to World War: Dynamics of ‘Totalization’ and ‘Globalization’ of the Warfare in September 1939 — December 1941

Abstract

Internal dynamics of the warfare and evolution of the general strategic situation in the period of WWII, limited by the German aggression against Poland, on the one hand, and the failure of ‘Barbarossa’ and the U.S. entry into the war, on the other hand, were not so straightforward, as it is sometimes presented in scholarly accounts. This paper underlines ambivalences, intrinsic to the international and strategic situation between September 1939 and December 1941, focusing on the two interdependent though not identical trends of ‘totalization’ and ‘globalization’ of the warfare. To operationalize these processes the author suggests 3 parameters for each of them. As for ‘totalization’, they are: the duration of the war (a short war versus a long war), the degree of economy militarization, the degree of violence and absence of limitation in the warfare. To describe ‘globalization’ of the war the criteria are as follows: the geographical scale, the number of participants and the relative role and place of neutral powers, and, finally, the degree of the ‘bipolarization’ in the form of the two opposing coalitions. This paper concludes that the picture of WWII during the period under research was not identical to its textbook image of the total and global military conflict. Though the elements of the ‘total war’ were evident even in the pre-war period and included the preparation of the powers for the long struggle, a partial militarization of the economies based on the ‘lessons’ of WWI, and the ideological and criminal aims of Nazism, these elements needed time to take their ‘final’ forms and could not be implemented on a click. Moreover, the unexpected successes of the German ‘blitzkriegs’, as it seemed at the epoch, could turn the war into a series of relatively short military campaigns which didn’t demand the ‘total mobilization’. The same dichotomy was evident in the ‘globalization’ of the warfare: though the war was not only European from the beginning, due to the participation of the British and French colonial empires, due to the extension of the warfare to the North and East Africa and the global nature of the naval warfare, there were significant barriers to its extension to the whole world. Some of the Great Powers — the USSR and the USA, first of all — were officially neutral, there were a lot of expectations of the compromise peace and nobody knew exactly the final composition of the opposing blocs.

About the Author

I. E. Magadeev
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
Russian Federation

Iskander E. Magadeev — PhD (History), Associate Professor, Department of European and American Studies, School of International Relations

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454



References

1. Rzheshevskii O.A. (ed.). 2012. Velikaya Otechestvennaya voina 1941–1945 godov [The Great Patriotic War 1941–1945]. In 12 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russ.)

2. Panov V.V. (ed.). 2013. Velikaya Otechestvennaya voina 1941–1945 godov [The Great Patriotic War 1941–1945]. In 12 vols. Vol. 7. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russ.)

3. Gorodeckii G. 2008 [1999]. Rokovoi samoobman: Stalin i napadenie Germanii na Sovetskii Soyuz [Grand delusion: Stalin and the German invasion of Russia]. 2nd ed. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

4. Dashichev V.I. 1965. Problema bor’by na dva fronta v strategii germanskogo militarizma [Two fronts problem in the strategy of the German militarism]. In Еrusalimskii A.S. (ed.). Germanskii imperializm i militarizm [German imperialism and militarism]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., pp. 152–193. (In Russ.)

5. Kokoshin A.A. 2015. Blitskrig i struktura revolyutsii v voennom dele [Blitzkrieg and the structure of revolution in military affairs]. Klio, no. 12 (108), pp. 96–109. (In Russ.)

6. Narinskii M.M., Dembskii S. (eds.). 2009. Mezhdunarodnyi krizis 1939 goda v traktovkakh rossiiskikh i pol’skikh istorikov [International crisis of 1939 in the interpretations of Russian and Polish historians]. Moscow, Aspekt-Press Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Mel’tyukhov M.I. 2000. Upushchennyi shans Stalina. Sovetskii Soyuz i bor’ba za Еvropu: 1939–1941 [Stalin’s missed opportunity. The Soviet Union and the struggle for Europe: 1939–1941]. Moscow, Veche Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Morgan T. 2002. Somerset Moem: biografiya [Somerset Maugham: A biography]. Moscow, Zaharov Publ. (In Russ.)

9. Zolotarev V.A. (ed.). 2015. Natsistskaya Germaniya protiv Sovetskogo Soyuza: planirovanie voiny [Nazi Germany against the Soviet Union: Planning of war]. Moscow, Kuchkovo pole Publ. (In Russ.)

10. Patrushev A.I. 2007. Germanskaya istoriya: cherez ternii dvuh tysyacheletii [German history: Through the hardships of the two millennia]. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta v Moskve. (In Russ.)

11. Belousov L.S., Manykin A.S. (eds.). 2014. Pervaya mirovaya voina i sud’by evropeiskoi tsivilizatsii [The First World War and the destiny of the European civilization]. Moscow, Moscow University Press Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Pechatnov V.O., Magadeev I.E. 2015. Perepiska I.V. Stalina s F. Ruzvel’tom i U. Cherchillem v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny [Correspondence between I.V. Stalin, F. Roosevelt and W. Churchill during the Great Patriotic War]. Vol. 1. Moscow, OLMA Media Group Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Reo E. dyu. 2009. Politika Frantsii i franko-sovetskie otnosheniya v pervye mesyatsy ‘Strannoi voiny’ (sentyabr’ 1939 — mart 1940) [The foreign policy of France and the Franco-Soviet relations in the first months of the ‘Phoney War’ (September 1939 — March 1940)]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, special issue, pp. 204–210. (In Russ.)

14. Setov R.A. 2015. Potencial’naya real’nost’ ili neizbezhnost’? K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [Potential reality or inevitability? Discussing the origins the Second World War]. In Karpov S.P., Tuchkov I.I. (eds.). Vtoraya mirovaya voina v istorii chelovechestva. 1939–1945 gg. [The Second World War in the human history, 1939–1945]. Moscow, Izdatel’ Stepanenko Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Sutu Zh.-A. 2006. Vishi i mesto SSSR v evropeiskoi sisteme [Vichy and the place of USSR in the European system]. In Narinskii M.M. (ed.). SSSR i Frantsiya v gody Vtoroi mirovoi voiny [USSR and France during the Second World War]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., pp. 77–105. (In Russ.)

16. Timofeev I.N. 2009. Dilemma bezopasnosti: risk vooruzhennogo konflikta mezhdu velikimi derzhavami [Security dilemma: Risk of military conflict between the Great Powers]. Polis, no. 4, pp. 8–34. (In Russ.)

17. Fomin V.T. 1978. Fashistskaya Germaniya vo vtoroi mirovoi voine. Sentyabr’ 1939 g. — iyun’ 1941 g. [Fascist Germany in the Second World War. September 1939 — June 1941]. Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

18. Chubar’yan A.O. 2008. Kanun tragedii. Stalin i mezhdunarodnyi krizis: sentyabr’ 1939 — iyun’ 1941 g. [On the eve of the tragedy. Stalin and the international crisis: September 1939 — June 1941] Moscow, Nauka Publ. (In Russ.)

19. Yakobsen G.-A. 1995 [1959]. 1939–1945. Vtoraya mirovaya voina. Khronika i dokumenty [The Second World War. Chronicle and documents] In Vtoraya mirovaya voina: Dva vzglyada [The Second World War: Two approaches]. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., pp. 7–374.

20. Aglan A., Frank R. (dir.). 2015a. 1937–1947: La guerre-monde. T. 1. Paris, Gallimard.

21. Aglan A., Frank R. (dir.). 2015b. 1937–1947: La guerre-monde. T. 2. Paris, Gallimard.

22. Bartov O. 1994. Hitler’s army: Soldiers, Nazis, and war in the Third Reich. New York, Oxford University Press.

23. Childs D. 1995. Britain since 1939: Progress and decline. London, Palgrave.

24. Echternkamp J. 2013. 1914–1945: A second Thirty years war? Advantages and disadvantages of an interpretive category. In Torp C., Muller S.O. (eds.). Imperial Germany revisited: Continuing debates and new perspectives. New York, Berghahn Books, pp. 189–201.

25. Fieldhouse N. 1971. The Anglo-German war of 1939–1942: Some movements to end it by a negotiated peace. Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada, 4th series, vol. 9, pp. 285–312.

26. Förster S. 2000. Introduction. In Chickering R., Förster S. (eds.). Great War, total war. Combat and mobilization on the Western front. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.

27. Frank R. 1992. Vichy et les Britanniques: Double jeu ou double langage? In Azéma J.-P., Bédarida F. (dir.). Vichy et les Français. Paris, Fayard, pp. 144–163.

28. Frieser K.-H. 1996. Blitzkrieg-Legende. Der Westfeldzug 1940. München, R. Oldenbourg.

29. Koch Ch. (hrsg.). 2015. Gab es einen Stalin-Hitler-Pakt? Charakter, Bedeutung und Deutung des deutsch-sowjetischen Nichtangriffsvertrages vom 23. August 1939. Frankfurt a/M, Peter Lang.

30. Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt (ed.). 1990 [1990]. Germany and the Second World War, vol. 1. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

31. Militärgeschichtliches Forschungsamt (ed.). 2000 [1998]. Germany and the Second World War, vol. 5, pt. 1. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

32. Echternkamp J. (ed.). 2008 [2004]. Germany and the Second World War, vol. 9, pt. 1. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

33. Geyer M. 1986. German strategy in the age of machine warfare, 1914–1945. In Paret P. (ed.). Makers of modern strategy. Princeton, Princeton University Press, pp. 527–597.

34. Hammond R. 2013. British policy on total maritime warfare and the antishipping campaign in the Mediterranean, 1940–1944. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 789–814. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2012.719196.

35. Harrison M. 1998. The economics of World War II: An overview. In Harrison M. (ed.). The economics of World War II: Six Great Powers in international comparison. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–42.

36. Henig R. 2005 [1985]. The origins of the Second World War, 1933–1941. 2nd ed. London, Routledge.

37. Hillgruber A. 1974. England’s place in Hitler’s plans for world dominion. Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 5–22. DOI: 10.1177/002200947400900101.

38. Hobson R. 2010. Blitzkrieg, the revolution in military affairs and defense intellectuals. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 625–643. DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2010.489717.

39. Jersak T. 2000. Blitzkrieg revisited: A new look at Nazi war and extermination planning. The Historical Journal, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 565–582. DOI: 10.1017/S0018246X99001004.

40. Jersak T. 2003. A matter of foreign policy: ‘Final solution’ and ‘final victory’ in Nazi Germany. German History, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 369–391. DOI: 10.1191/0266355403gh289oa.

41. Kelly B. 2009. Drifting towards war: The British Chiefs of Staff, the USSR and the Winter War, November 1939 — March 1940. Contemporary British History, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 267–291. DOI: 10.1080/13619460903080010.

42. Litsky E.B. 1986. The Murphy–Weygand Agreement: The United States and French North Africa (1940–1942). PhD Thesis. New York, Fordham University.

43. Lukacs J. 2001 [1976]. The last European War: September 1939 — December 1941. 2nd ed. New Haven, Yale University Press.

44. Michel H. 1971. La drôle de guerre. Paris, Hachette.

45. Milward A.S. 2015 [1965]. The German economy at war. London, Bloomsbury.

46. Mitter R. 2013. Forgotten ally: China’s World War II, 1937–1945. New York, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

47. Murray W. 1983. Force strategy, blitzkrieg strategy and the economic difficulties: Nazi grand strategy in the 1930s. The RUSI Journal, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 39–43. DOI: 10.1080/03071848308522215.

48. McDonough F. (ed.). 2011. The origins of the Second World War: An international perspective. London, Bloomsbury.

49. Overy R. 2017 [1987]. The origins of the Second World War. 3rd. ed. London, Routledge.

50. Saul F. 1963. Berlin et le jeu américain à Vichy (septembre 1940 à decémbre 1941). Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Geschichte, bd. 13, heft 3, ss. 339–371. DOI: 10.5169/seals-80527.

51. Scherner J. 2010. Nazi Germany’s preparation for war: Evidence from revised industrial investment series. European Review of Economic History, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 433–468. DOI: 10.1017/S1361491610000122.

52. Searle A. 2017. Armoured warfare: A military, political and global history. London, Bloomsbury.

53. Strachan H. 2010. The First World War as a global war. First World War Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–14. DOI: 10.1080/19475021003621036.

54. Strachan H. 2003. War and society in the 1920s and 1930s. In Chickering R., Förster S. (eds.). The shadows of total war: Europe, East Asia, and the United States, 1919–1939. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–54.

55. Vasquez J.A. 1993. The war puzzle. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

56. Chickering R., Förster S., Greiner B. (eds.). 2005. A world at total war: Global conflict and the politics of destruction, 1937–1945. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

57. Weinberg G. 2010. Hitler’s foreign policy 1933–1939: The road to World War II. 2nd ed. New York, Enigma Books.


Review

For citations:


Magadeev I.E. From European to World War: Dynamics of ‘Totalization’ and ‘Globalization’ of the Warfare in September 1939 — December 1941. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2019;11(1):70-107. (In Russ.)

Views: 329


ISSN 2076-7404 (Print)