Foreign Policy of Russia: ‘Soft Power’ of the Regions

As relations between the Russian Federation and the West continue to deteriorate, traditional diplomatic instruments become less eff ective. Conversely, the role of alternative diplomatic channels is growing. However, the Russian foreign policy still tends to underestimate their potential. In particular, the soft power potential of the Russian regions appears to be largerly under-utilized.
The paper starts with a general overview of the specifi c features of sub-state/sub-national actors in the world politics. In particular, the author emphasizes that these actors are synthetic by nature, which predetermines their particular role on the international scene, as they can use policy instruments specifi c to both state and non-state actors. The author provides a model for classifi cation of the Russian regions based on the level of their international activity. The paper examines by what means the international activities of the regions can infl uence the interstate relations and outlines two basic frameworks for joint actions of the federal center and the regions on the international arena: ‘culture and image-building’ and ‘political plus’.
The author emphasizes the importance of the federal-regional cooperation in addressing foreign policy issues, particularly, in response to international crises. The paper assesses the capacity of diff erent Russian sub-national actors to actively participate through their soft power potential in normalization of interstate relations.
The author concludes that this potential could be successfully integrated into the Russian foreign policy strategy. However, in order to improve the quality of the federal-regional cooperation on the foreign policy issues, it is necessary to develop a new framework for interaction between the federal center and the regions of the Russian Federation, based on greater involvement of regional representatives in the decision-making process (which implies reassessment of the entire system of federal relations).

1. Avdeev A.A. 2000. Mezhdunarodnye i vneshneekonomicheskie svyazi rossiiskikh regionov [International and foreign economic relations of Russian regions]. International Aff airs, no. 4, pp. 92–96. (In Russ.)

2. Akimov Yu.G. 2018. Kvebekskii faktor v kanadsko-frantsuzskikh otnosheniyakh [Quebec factor in Canada–France relations]. World Economy and International Relation, no. 7, pp. 93–104. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-7-93-104. (In Russ.)

3. Aleksandrov O.B. 2005. Regiony vo vneshnei politike Rossii. Rol’ SeveroZapada [Regions in Russia’s foreign policy. The role of the North-West]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

4. Barabanov O.N. 2000. Vnutrigosudarstvennye regiony kak aktory v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: zarubezhnye tendentsii i polozhenie sub’ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Domestic regions as actors in international relations: Foreign trends and position of the Russian Federation subjects]. Obshchestvo, politika, nauka: novye perspektivy [Society, politics, science: New perspectives]. Moscow, Moskovskii obshchestvennyi nauchnyi fond Publ., no. 114, pp. 477–501. (In Russ.)

5. Batalov E.Ya. 2005. Antropologiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [The anthropology of international relations]. International Trends, no. 8, pp. 4–16. (In Russ.)

6. Batalov E.Ya., Zhuravleva V.Yu., Khozinskaya K.V. 2009. ‘Rychashchii medved’ na ‘dikom Vostoke’ (obrazy sovremennoi Rossii v rabotakh amerikanskikh avtorov: 1992–2007) [‘Growling bear’ in the ‘Wild East’ (Images of modern Russia in works of American authors: 1992–2007)]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

7. Bogucharskii E.M. 2015. Instituty sovremennoi diplomatii [The institutions of modern diplomacy]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Busygina I.M. 2006. Politicheskaya regionalistika [Political regional studies]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ., ROSSPEN Publ. (In Russ.)

9. Vasilenko I.A. 2017. Sravnitel’nyi analiz sovremennykh modelei rebrendinga rossiiskikh regionov [Comparative analysis of the modern models of Russian regions rebranding]. Vlast’, no. 2, pp. 95–99. (In Russ.)

10. Ivanov I.D. 2000. Rossiiskaya diplomatiya v usloviyakh otkrytoi rynochnoi ekonomiki [Russian diplomacy in the open market economy]. International Aff airs, no. 8–9, pp. 15–26. (In Russ.)

11. Vasilenko I.A. (ed.). 2016. Imidzh regionov Rossii: innovatsionnye tekhnologii i strategii rebrendinga [The image of Russian regions: Innovative technologies and strategy of rebranding]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

12. Vasilenko I.A. (ed.). 2013. Imidzhevaya strategiya Rossii v kontekste mirovogo opyta [Image strategy of Russia in the context of international experience]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Lebedeva M.M. 2019. Transformatsiya roli gorodov i vnutrigosudarstvennykh regionov v mirovoi politike [Transformation of the role of cities and domestic regions in world politics]. Oikumena. Regional Researches, no. 1, pp. 7–16. DOI: 10.24866/1998-6785/2019-1/7-16. (In Russ.)

14. Logvinova I.V. 2018. Koordinatsiya mezhdunarodnykh i vnesh neehkonomicheskikh svyazei sub’ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Coordination of international and foreign economic relations of regions of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Loshkarev I.D. 2018. Vneshnie svyazi regionov: osnovnye problemy teorii paradiplomatii [External relations of the regions: The main problems of paradiplomacy theory]. Pravo i upravlenie. XXI vek, no. 3, pp. 99–106. DOI: 10.24833/2073-8420-2018-3-48-99-106. (In Russ.)

16. Makarychev A.S. 2000a. Rossiiskie regiony kak mezhdunarodnye aktory: Analiticheskii doklad [Russian regions as international actors: An analytical report]. Nizhnii Novgorod. (In Russ.)

17. Makarychev A.S. 2000b. Federalizm epokhi globalizma: vyzovy dlia regional’noi Rossii [The Federalism of the epoch of globalism: The challenges for the Russia of regions]. Polis, no. 5, pp. 81–97. (In Russ.)

18. Markushina N.Yu. 2017. Poiski obshchikh orientirov v regione ‘Novyi Sever’: voprosy identichnosti i ‘myagkaya sila’ [The search for common landmarks in the ‘New North’ region: Identity issues and ‘soft power’]. Problemy sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya, no. 10, pp. 112–115. (In Russ.)

19. Markushina N.Yu., Kharlampieva N.T. 2008. Severo-Zapadnyi federal’nyi okrug: vneshnie svyazi [The North-West federal district: External relations]. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg University Press. (In Russ.)

20. Negrov E.O. 2014. Diskurs ‘myagkoi sily’ v prigranichnykh regionakh RF: opyt empiricheskogo issledovaniya [The discourse of ‘soft power’ in border regions of the Russian Federation: The experience of empirical research]. Political expertise: Politex, no. 4, pp. 82–90. (In Russ.)

21. Nikitina Yu.A. 2014. Rossiiskii podkhod k prodvizheniiu ‘miagkoi sily’ v sfere vneshnei politiki [Russian approach to ‘soft power’ promotion: Conceptual approaches in foreign policy]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2, pp. 30–35. (In Russ.)

22. Orlov V.Ya. 2000. Vneshnyaya politika i rossiiskie regiony [Foreign policy and Russian regions]. International Aff airs, no. 10, pp. 45–55. (In Russ.)

23. Plotnikova O.V. 2014. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya gosudarstv i mezhdunarodnye svyazi regionov gosudarstv: obshchee i osobennoe [International relations between states and international connections of their regions: Common and specifi c features]. Vlast’, no. 12, pp. 65–69. (In Russ.)

24. Plotnikova O.V. 2004. Teoriya, sistema i praktika mezhdunarodnykh svyazei regionov [Theory, system and practice of international relations of the regions]. Novosibirsk. (In Russ.)

25. Plotnikova O.V., Dubrovina O.Yu. 2016. Mezhdunarodnye sviazi regionov gosudarstv: kharakteristika i osobennosti [International relations of states’ regions: Characteristics and features]. Moscow, Norma, INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ.)

26. Sergunin A.A. 2001. Mezhdunarodnaya deiatel’nost’ sub’ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii: pravovoe regulirovanie [International activities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: Legal regulation]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, no. 1, pp. 276–283. (In Russ.)

27. Solov’ev A.I. 2007. Politika. In Solov’ev A.I. (ed.). Politologiya: Leksikon [Political science: Lexicon]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., pp. 307–324. (In Russ.)

28. Tolstykh V.L. 2004. Mezhdunarodnaya deyatel’nost’ sub’ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii [International activities of subjects of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya Publ. (In Russ.)

29. Yarovoi G.O., Belokurova E.V. 2012. Evropeiskii Soyuz dlya regionov: chto mozhno i nuzhno znat’ rossiiskim regionam o ES [The European Union for regions: What Russian regions can and should know about the EU]. Saint Petersburg, Norma Publ. (In Russ.)

30. Dickson F. 2014. The internationalization of regions: Paradiplomacy or multi-level governance? Geography Compass, no. 8, pp. 689–700.

31. Friedrich C. J. 1968. Trends in federalism in theory and practice. London, Pall Mall Press.

32. Geddes P. 2015. Cities in evolution: An introduction to the town planning movement and to the study of civics. London, Williams and Norgate.

33. Janczak J. 2017. Town twinning in Europe. Understanding manifestations and strategies. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 477–495. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1267589.

34. Kaisto V. 2017. City twinning from a grassroots perspective: Introducing a spatial framework to the study of twin cities. Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 459–475. DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2016.1238315.

35. Michelmann H.J. 1991. Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units. Canadian Journal of Political Science, no. 4, pp. 865–866.

36. Nye J. 1990. Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. New York, Basic Books.

37. Nye J. 2004. Soft power. The means to success in world politics. New York, Public Aff airs.

38. Reynolds P.A. 1979. Non-state actors and international outcomes. British Journal of International Studies, no. 2, pp. 91–111.

39. Sassen S. 1991. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, Princeton University Press.