Eurointegration as a Trigger for the Serbian Ethnic Separatism in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The paper provides a retrospective analysis of the European Union’s policy towards Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and its possible outcomes for BiH progress towards positive sovereignty amid growing international tensions in the Western Balkans. The paper draws on a vast body of both Russian and Western academic literature on the collapse of Yugoslavia, BiH under the Dayton Agreements, the possibilities of democracy building in divided societies, as well as on a range of official documents adopted by various EU institutions. On that basis the author assesses the prospects for BiH to survive in its current administrative-territorial borders. The paper examines the outcomes of the Bosnian War, as well as the main effects of the external governance mechanisms implementation in BiH. This allows the author to trace the evolution of the EU policy towards BiH and to reassess the country’s progress in terms of Eurointegration. Since the EU has refused to grant countries, which do not meet the Copenhagen criteria, the status of a member state ‘in advance’, the main conclusions on the prospects of the BiH accession to the EU are drawn from the European Commission’s 2020 Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Following the logic and the structure of the report, the author assesses the BiH efforts to meet the set targets and criteria, such as establishing a stable democratic political system, promoting the development of civil society institutions and the rule of law, combating corruption and organized crime, ensuring the protection of human rights and freedoms, migration management, strengthening economy and regional cooperation.
The report of the European Commission clearly hints that most obstacles for BiH progress towards EU membership arise from the lack of support from the Republika Srpska and that it is impossible to overcome its obstruction within the framework of Dayton Agreements. However, the author argues that this fixation on revision of the Dayton Agreements, accompanied by excessive pressure on the Serbian community in BiH may provoke protective reaction of the Serbian community, resulting in a rising nationalism and disintegration of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

1. Berezin A.V. 2009. Politika Evropeiskogo soyuza na nachal’nom etape Yugoslavskogo krizisa: 1990–1992 gg. [European Union’s policy at the initial stage of the Yugoslav crisis: 1990–1992]. PhD thesis abstract. Moscow. (In Russ.)

2. Bulannikova Yu.A. 2010. Protsess integratsii stran Zapadnykh Balkan v Evrosoyuz [The process of integrating the Western Balkan countries into the EU]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2, pp. 311–318. (In Russ.)

3. Bulannikova Yu.A. 2011. Strategiya integratsii balkanskikh gosudarstv v ES i NATO: sravnitel’nyi analiz: 1989–2007 gg. [The strategy for the integration of the Balkan states into the EU and NATO: A comparative analysis: 1989–2007]. PhD thesis abstract. Moscow. (In Russ.)

4. Volkov V.K. 2002. ‘Novyi mirovoi poryadok’ i balkanskii krizis 90-kh godov [‘New world order’ and the Balkan crisis of the 90s]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya, no. 2, pp. 11–50. (In Russ.)

5. Glushko V.S. 2002. Politika Evropeiskogo soyuza v otnoshenii Yugoslavskogo krizisa (1991–1995) [European Union’s policy with regard to the Yugoslav crisis (1991–1995)]. PhD thesis abstract. Ekaterinburg. (In Russ.)

6. Glushko V.S. 2016. Politika ES i SShA v uregulirovanii balkanskogo krizisa v ramkakh podgotovki Deitonskogo soglasheniya 1995 g. [EU and USA policy towards the settlement of the Balkan crisis in the framework of the Dayton peace agreement preparaion, 1995]. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal URFU. Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/43622/1/im-14-9-2016.pdf (accessed: 25.12.2020). (In Russ.)

7. Gus’kova E.Yu. 2001. Istoriya yugoslavskogo krizisa (1990–2000 gg.) [The history of the Yugoslav crisis (1990–2020)]. Moscow, Russkoe pravo Publ. (In Russ.)

8. Arbatova N.K., Kokeev A.M. (eds.). 2016. Evropeiskii soyuz na pereput’e: nereshennye problemy i novye vyzovy (politicheskie aspekty) [European Union at the crossroads: Unresolved problems and new challenges]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

9. Kandel’ P.E. 2011. Bosniya i Gertsegovina, ES i NATO [Bosnia and Herzegovina. EU and NATO]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 1 (16), pp. 77–86. (In Russ.)

10. Kondrat’ev S.V., Nelaeva G.A. 2015. Osobennosti vzaimodeistviya Evropeiskogo soyuza i Bosnii i Gertsegoviny [The EU-Bosnia relations in the context of the EU enlargement to the Balkans]. Contemporary Europe, no. 5, pp. 28–35. (In Russ.)

11. Lazovich M. 2018. Rol’ ES v bosniiskom krizise (seredina 1990-kh gg. — n.v.) i sovremennoe sostoyanie otnoshenii BiG s ES v kontekste bosniiskogo uregulirovaniya [The role of the EU in the Bosnian Crisis (from the middle of 1990s till nowadays) and the current state of relations between BiH and the EU in the context of the Bosnian settlement]. Russian International Affairs Council. Available at: https://russiancouncil.ru/blogs/milan-lazovich/34185/ (accessed: 25.12.2020). (In Russ.)

12. Martynova M.Yu. 1998. Balkanskii krizis: narody i politika [The Balkan crisis: Peoples and politics]. Moscow, Staryi sad Publ. (In Russ.)

13. Mladenovich M., Ponomareva E. 2012. Uregulirovanie etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov: balkanskii opyt [Ethnic and political conflicts resolution: The Balkan experience]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, no. 5, pp. 117–132. (In Russ.)

14. Nikiforov K.V. 1999. Mezhdu Kremlem i Respublikoi Serbskoi (Bosniiskii krizis: zavershayushchii etap) [Between the Kremlin and the Republika Srpska (Bosnian crisis: The final stage)]. Moscow, Institut slavyanovedeniya RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

15. Ponomareva E.G. 2010. Novye gosudarstva na Balkanakh [New states in the Balkans]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

16. Ponomareva E.G. 2007. Politicheskoe razvitie post”yugoslavskogo prostranstva (vnutrennie i vneshnie faktory) [Political development of the post- Yugoslavian space (internal and external factors)]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet Publ. (In Russ.)

17. Ponomareva E.G. 2012. Uzly i modeli balkanskikh etnopoliticheskikh konfliktov [The nodes and models of conflicts in the Balkans]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, no. 1 (42), pp. 60–75. (In Russ.)

18. Tuzovskaya Yu.N. 2010. Predely strategicheskogo partnerstva ES i NATO [The limits of the EU-NATO strategic partnership]. Aktual’nye problemy Evropy, no. 3, pp. 63–99. (In Russ.)

19. Tyagunenko L.V. 2001. Priroda Yugoslavskogo krizisa [The nature of the Yugoslav crisis]. Novaya i noveishaya istoriya, no. 3, pp. 28–45. (In Russ.)

20. Entina E.G. 2016. Mezhdunarodnyi kontekst evrointegratsii Zapadnykh Balkan [European integration of the Western Balkans: International Background]. Moscow, Institut Evropy RAN Publ. (In Russ.)

21. Entina K.G. 2020. Osobennosti i predely integratsionnoi politiki ES v Yugo-Vostochnoi Evrope (na primere gosudarstv post”yugoslavskogo prostranstva) [Specifics and limits of the EU integration policy in South-Eastern Europe (on the example of the post-Yugoslavian states)]. Doctor of Sciences thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)

22. Baskin М. 2004. Between exit and engagement: On the division of authority in transitional administrations. Global Governance, vol. 119, no. 10, pp. 119–137.

23. Bennet C. 1995. Yugoslavia’s bloody collapse. London, Hurst.

24. Bildt C. 1998. Peace journey: The struggle for peace in Bosnia. London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

25. Chandler D. 2000. Bosnia: Faking democracy after Dayton. London, Pluto Press.

26. Chandler D. 1998. Democratization in Bosnia: The limits of civil society building strategies. In Burnell P.J., Calvert P. (eds.). Civil society in democratization. London, Portland, Taylor & Francis.

27. Búrca G. de, Scott J. (eds.). 2000. Constitutional change in the EU: From uniformity to flexibility? Oxford, Hart Publishing.

28. Donia R.J., Fine Jr. 1994. Bosnia and Hercegovina: A tradition betrayed. New York, Columbia University Press.

29. Dopita Т. 2020. (Inter)National reconstruction: Revising poststructuralist encounters with the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina. New perspectives, no. 2, vol. 23, pp. 17–48. DOI: 10.1177/2336825X1502300202.

30. Ehrhart Н.-G. 1999. Prevention and regional security: The Royaumont process and the stabilization of South-Eastern Europe. OSCE Yearbook 1998. Baden-Baden, pp. 327–346.

31. Gutman R. 1993. A witness to genocide: The first inside account of the horrors of ‘ethnic cleansing’ in Bosnia. Massachusetts, Elements.

32. Hale H. 2004. Divided we stand: Institutional sources of ethno-federal state survival and collapse. World Politics, vol. 2, pp. 165–193.

33. Hansen L. 2006. Security as practice: Discourse analysis and the Bosnian war. New York, Routledge.

34. Hendrickson R.C. 2005. Crossing the Rubicon. NATO Review. Available at: https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2005/09/01/crossing-the-rubicon/ index.html (accessed: 25.12.2020).

35. Jackson R.H. 1990. Quasi states: Sovereignty, international relations and the Third World. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

36. Kapidžić D. 2011. International role of the European Union in the Western Balkans? Measuring consistency and coherence of value expression in the EU’s external relations. Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 17, no. 62/63, pp. 10–17.

37. Kaplan R.D. 1993. Balkan ghost: A journey through history. New York, Vintage.

38. Kolstø P., Jelovica V. 2014. Conclusions: Success and failure of nation-building. Structural vs. political factors. In P. Kolstø (ed.). Strategies of symbolic nation-building in South Eastern Europe. Farnham, Ashgate, pp. 227–242.

39. Marshall C.B. 1965. The exercise of sovereignty. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press.

40. McGarry J., O’Leary B. 1993. Introduction: The macro-political regulation of ethnic conflict. In McGarry J., O’Leary B. (eds.). The politics of ethnic conflict regulation: Case studies of protracted ethnic conflicts. New York, Routledge.

41. Pejanović M. 2007. The political development of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the post-Dayton period. Sarajevo, TKD Šahinpašić.

42. Rief D. 1996. Slaughterhouse: Bosnia and the failure of the West. New York, Touchstone.

43. Schweller R. 1994. Bandwagoning for profit: Bringing the revisionist state back in. International Security, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 72–107.

44. Smith C. 1996. Conflict in the Balkans and the possibility of European Union Common Foreign and Security Policy. International Relations, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1–21.

45. Spence A., Spence D. 1998. The Common Foreign and Security Policy from Maastricht to Amsterdam. In Eliassen K.A. (ed.). Foreign and security policy in the European Union. London, Sage Publications, pp. 43–58.

46. Horvat S., Stiks I. (eds.). 2015. Welcome to the desert of post-socialism: Radical politics after Yugoslavia. New York, Verso.

47. Woodward S. 1995. Balkan tragedy: Chaos and dissolution after Cold War. Washington.