Populism in the 21st century: Today, tomorrow, always?

The concept of populism has been known since Antiquity. However, in recent decades it gained new prominence amongst politicians and political experts. The present paper attempts to reconstruct the image of populism of the 21st century and to assess the viability of populist parties and movements involved in the context of current social and political processes within Western societies. The first section of the paper examines various definitions of populism elaborated by both Russian and foreign political scholars. On that basis the author attempts to identify the core meaning of this phenomenon, its historic roots and psychological underpinnings, as well as a social-political profile today. The author highlights such constituent elements of the populist discourse that crystallized throughout its development, as direct appeal to the public sentiments, oversimplification of reality and the use of manipulative techniques. The second section of the paper examines the origins and characteristic features of the populist wave that spanned across both developed and developing countries in the early 21st century. For that matter, the effects of globalization are considered particularly problematic, as they have uncertain implications for international relations and exacerbate social and economic tensions even within developed societies creating both ‘winners’ and ‘losers’. They also allowed various populist movements to take advantage of the growing social instability in the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008–2009. Additionally, the author links the recent rise in the populist sentiments to the deepening crisis of traditional political party systems, the erosion of principles of parliamentarianism and the development of new information and communication technologies. The author stresses that in these circumstances different charismatic leaders gain new opportunities for mobilizing public support. The research concludes that the prospects for the ongoing populist wave are best described by a formula, proposed by a German political scientist Klaus von Beyme: ‘Populism never lasts very long — but it is somehow always around’.

1. Arendt H. 2014. Between past and future. New York, Penguin Books [Russ. ed.: Arendt Kh. 2014. Mezhdu proshlym i budushchim. Moscow, Institut Gaidara Publ.].

2. Baime K. 2014. Populizm i pravyi ekstremizm v partiinykh sistemakh epokhi postmoderna [Populism and right-wing extremism in postmodern party systems]. Bereginya. 777. Sova, no. 4 (23), pp. 101–109. (In Russ.)

3. Beck U. 1999. What is globalization? Cambridge, Polity Press [Russ. ed.: Bek U. 2001. Chto takoe globalizatsiya? Moscow, Progress-Traditsiya Publ.].

4. Vainshtein G. 2017. Sovremennyi populizm kak ob’ekt politologicheskogo analiza [Modern populism as a subject of political science]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 69–89. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.04.06. (In Russ.)

5. Giddens A. 2014. Turbulent and mighty continent what future for Europe? Cambridge, Polity Press [Russ. ed.: Giddens E. 2015. Nespokoinyi i mogushchestvennyi kontinent: chto zhdet Evropu v budushchem? Moscow, Delo Publ.].

6. Glukhova A.V. 2020. Politicheskie konflikty v global’nuyu ehpokhu (k probleme teoreticheskoi identifikatsii) [Political conflicts in the global era (theoretical approach implementation)]. Politicheskaya nauka, no. 3, pp. 13–14. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2020/03/01. (In Russ.)

7. Glukhova A.V. 2017. Populizm kak politicheskii fenomen: vyzov demokratii [Populism as a political phenomenon and the challenge of the modern democracy]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 49–68. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.04.05. (In Russ.).

8. Glukhova A.V., Savenkov R.V. 2019. Novyi avtoritarizm v pol’skom oblachenii [New authoritarianism in Polish vestment]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 4, pp. 181–191. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.04.13. (In Russ.)

9. Krastev I. 2018. Novye despoty Vostochnoi Evropy: dolgii put’ k upadku demokratii [Eastern Europe’s new despots: The long road to democratic decline]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, no. 120, pp. 140–150. (In Russ.)

10. Krauch K. 2010. Postdemokratiya [Postdemocracy]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki Publ. (In Russ.)

11. Martynov B.F. 2020. Latinoamerikanskii populizm: nekotorye razmyshleniya po povodu [Latin American populism: Some relevant thoughts]. Latinskaya Amerika, no. 2, pp. 19–29. DOI: 10.31857/S0044748X0008142-5. (In Russ.)

12. Mudde K. 2014. Populistskie pravoradikal’nye partii v sovremennoi Evrope [Populist radical-right parties in Europe today]. Bereginya. 777. Sova, no. 4 (23), pp. 91–100. (In Russ.)

13. Urbinati N. 2014. Democracy disfigured: Opinion, truth, and the people. Harvard, Harvard University Press [Russ. ed.: Urbinati N. 2016. Iskazhennaya demokratiya. Mnenie, istina i narod. Moscow, Institut Gaidara Publ.].

14. Fishman L. 2017. Populizm — eto nadolgo [Populism will be long lasting]. Polis. Political Studies, no. 3, pp. 55–70. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.03.04. (In Russ.)

15. Fukuyama F. 2018. Identity: Contemporary identity politics and the struggle for recognition. London, Profile Books [Russ. ed.: Fukuyama F. 2019. Identichnost’: stremlenie k priznaniyu i politika nepriyatiya. Moscow, Al’pina Pablisher].

16. Fukuyama F. 2016. Politicheskii zakat ili obnovlenie Ameriki? Znachenie vyborov 2016 goda [American political decay or renewal? The meaning of the 2016 election]. Russia in Global Affairs, no. 5. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/politicheskij-zakat-ili-obnovlenie-ameriki (accessed: 03.04.2020). (In Russ.)

17. Huntington S.P. 1966. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York, Simon & Schuster [Russ. ed.: Khantington S. 2003. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsii. Moscow, AST Press].

18. Dahrendorf R. 2004. Der Wiederbeginn der Geschichte. Vom Fall der Mauerzum Krieg imIrak. Reden und Aufsatze. Muenchen, C.H. Beck Verlag.

19. Eichengreen B. 2018. The populist temptation. Economic grievance and political reaction in the Modern era. Oxford, University Press. DOI: 10.1162/jinh_r_01413.

20. Gdula М. 2018. Nowy autorytarizm. Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

21. Grant B., Moore T., Linch T. 2019. The rise of right wing populism. Pauline Hanson‘s One Nation and Australian politics. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2670-7.

22. Hendricks V., Vestergaard M. 2017. Verlorene Wirklichkeit? An der Schwelle zur postfaktischen Demokratie. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 67, no. 13, s. 4–10.

23. Kaczyński J., Kaczyński L., Karnowski M., Zaremba P. 2010. Alfabet braci Kaczyńskich. Kraków, Wydawnictwo M.

24. Levitsky S., Loxton J. 2013. Populism and competitive authoritarianism in the Andes. Democratization, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 107–136. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2013.738864.

25. Lochocki T. 2018. The rise of populism in Western Europe. A media analysis on failed messaging. Springer.

26. Macaulay M. 2019. Populist discourse. International perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.

27. Marschall S. 2017. Luegen und Politik im postfaktischen Zeitalter. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 67, no. 13, s. 17–22.

28. Merkel W. 2016. Krise der Demokratie? Anmerkungen zu einem schwierigen Begriff. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 66, no. 40–42, s. 3–11.

29. Merkel W. 2017. Trump, die Rechtspopulisten und die Demokratie. Neue Gesellschaft Frankfurter Hefte, no. 1, s. 26–30.

30. Mounk Y. 2014. Pitchfork politics: The populist threat to liberal democracy. Foreign Affairs, no. 5, pp. 27–36.

31. Müller J.-W. 2016. Populismus. Symptom einer Krise der politischen Repraesentation? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 66, no. 40–42, pp. 24–25.

32. Norris P. 2005. Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. New York, Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615955.

33. Pappas T.S. 2016. Modern populism: Research advances, conceptual and methodological pitfall, and the minimum defi nition. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Available at: http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-17?rskey=A55nhK&result=53aedias (accessed: 19.02.2020). DOI: 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.17.

34. Pappas T.S. 2014. Populist democracies: Post-authoritarian Greece and post-Communist Hungary. Government and Opposition, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2013.21.

35. Pauwels T. 2011. Measuring populism: A quantitative text analysis of party literature in Belgium. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 97–119. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2011.539483.

36. Decker F. von (ed.). 2006. Populismus. Gefahr fur die Demokratie oder nutzliches Korrektiv? Wiesbaden, VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften.

37. Mesežnikov G., Gyárfášová O., Smilov D. (eds.). 2008. Populist politics and liberal democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava, Institute for Public Affairs.

38. Sawer M., Laycock D. 2009. Down with elites and up with inequality: Market populism in Australia and Canada. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 133–150. DOI: 10.1080/14662040902842836Sawer.

39. Snyder T. 2018. Der Weg in die Unfreiheit Russland, Europa, Amerika. München, C.H. Beck-Verlag.

40. Sutowski V. 2018. ‘Guter Wandel’ zum ‘neuen Autoritarismus’ — und wie weiter? Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 68, no. 11, s. 15–18.

41. Szél B. 2019. Neuer Widerstand in Ungarn. Neue Gesellschaft Frankfurter Hefte, no. 4, s. 18–23.

42. Teney C. 2019. Über die Kluft zwischen kosmopolitischen und kommunitaristischen Einstellungen in der Gesellschaft Distanzierung, Mobilisierung, Politisierung. Neue Gesellschaft Frankfurter Hefte, no. 6, s. 27–29.

43. Vittori D. 2015. Is populism changing the political representation of Western democracies? Political Sciences & Public Affairs, vol. 3, no. 1, s. 1–8. DOI: 10.4172/2332-0761.1000140.

44. Weingart P. 2017. ‘Wahres Wissen‘ und demokratisch verfasste Gesellschaft. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, vol. 67, no. 13, s. 11–16.

45. Zürn M., Merkel W., 2020. Die neue Konfliktlinie und die Rolle des Politischen. Neue Gesellschaft Frankfurter Hefte, no. 6, s. 14–23.