The U.S.-Turkey ‘Model Partnership’: Testing the Limits (2009–2010)
Abstract
The United States and Turkey have been bound by strong ties of strategic partnership for decades since the dawn of the Cold War. However, the relationship between two NATO allies have become quite strained over the recent years. The root causes of the current contradictions between Ankara and Washington manifested themselves clearly at the beginning of the Obama presidency. This paper examines the reasons behind and the nature of the difficulties that the U.S. and Turkey would confront in 2009–2010 while trying to implement the concept of ‘model partnership’ introduced by the Democratic administration. In particular, it assesses the extent to which the transformation of the Turkish foreign policy strategy modified the logic of its interaction with Washington and reinforced Ankara’s desire to have its national interests recognized and respected by the United States. The differences between the U.S. and Turkish positions are illustrated with the examples of their contradictions about interaction with Israel and Iran. The author demonstrates that various methods of persuasion and coercion practiced by the Obama administration were not necessarily effective and their use led to a deterioration of situation on several occasions. The author also provides a detailed overview of the debates on the prospects of the bilateral cooperation and the foreign policy identity of modern Turkey that took place in the U.S. political and academic circles at that time. The paper also determines the main factors behind a rapprochement of two countries following a temporary estrangement. The conclusion is drawn that a further escalation of tensions was prevented mainly because security factor played a predominant role. The U.S.-Turkish military-strategic cooperation within NATO remained — regardless of divergences on several regional issues and political scandals — the cornerstone of the bilateral relationship. The U.S.-Turkish partnership, though not a model one, passed an endurance test only to face even more complex challenges related to a destabilization of a broader region in the wake of the Arab Awakening.
About the Author
A. I. Aliyeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Altunay I. Aliyeva — Junior Research Fellow, Expert at the Center for Security and Development Studies, School of World Politics
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Svistunova I.A. 2014. Blizhnevostochniy vector turetsko-amerikanskikh otnosheniy [Middle Eastern vector of the Turkish-American relations]. Problemy natsional’noy strategiyi, no. 5 (26), pp. 56–73. (In Russ.)
2. Svistunova I.A. 2016. V poiskakh novoy modeli: otnosheniya Turtsii i SShA v sfere bezopasnosti [The security aspect of Turkey-United States relations: In search for a new model]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 2 (47), pp. 53–61. (In Russ.)
3. Smol’nyak I.V. 2017. Turtsiya v liberal’nykh konstrukttsiyakh SShA v nachale 21 veka [Turkey in the liberal structures of the USA in the early XXI century]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 11, pp. 116–129. (In Russ.)
4. Shlykov P.V. 2017. Blizhnevostochnaya dilemma bezopasnosti Turtsii: ot sotrudnichestva s Zapadom v bor’be s terrorizmom k opore na dzhyhadistov v regional’noy politike [Turkey’s Middle East security dilemma: From cooperation with the West in the fight against terrorism to the reliance on jihadists in regional politics]. Aktual’nyye problemy Yevropy, no. 4, pp. 35–65. (In Russ.)
5. Abramowitz M., Edelman E.S. 2013. From rhetoric to reality: Reframing U.S.-Turkey policy. Foreign Policy Project. October. Washington, D.C., Bipartisan Policy Center.
6. Arbell D. 2014. The US-Turkey-Israel triangle. Center for Middle East Policy. Analysis Paper, no. 34. October. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.
7. Arı T. 2010. Yurkselen guch. Turkiye-ABD ilishkileri ve Orta Dogu [Rising power. Turkey-US relations and the Middle East]. Bursa, Marmara Kitap Merkezi. (In Turkish.)
8. Aslan A. 2012. The foreign policy-hegemony nexus: Turkey’s search for a ‘new’ subjectivity in world politics and its implications for US-Turkish relations. Perceptions, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 159–184.
9. Balcı A. 2013. Turkiye dysh politikasy. Ulkeler, aktorler, uygumalar [Turkey’s foreign policy. Countries, actors, practices]. İstanbul, Etkileshim. (In Turkish.)
10. Barkey H.J. 2010. Turkey’s new engagement in Iraq. Embracing Iraqi Kurdistan. Special Report, no. 237. Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace.
11. Bengür O. 2009. Turkey’s image and the Armenian question. Turkish Policy Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 43–48.
12. Boyer S.P., Katulis B. 2008. The neglected alliance. Restoring U.S.-Turkish relations to meet 21st century challenges. December. Washington, D.C., Center for American Progress.
13. Çakmak C., Güneysu G. 2013. Turkish-American relations during Obama era: Unfulfilled expectations. Turkish Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 193–211.
14. Danforth N. 2008. Ideology and pragmatism in Turkish foreign policy: From Atatürk to the AKP. Turkish Policy Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 83–95.
15. Gordon P.H., Taşpınar Ö., Özel S. 2008. Winning Turkey. How America, Europe, and Turkey can revive a fading partnership. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press.
16. Gözen R. 2010. Turkish-American relations in 2009. Perceptions, vol. 25, no. 3–4, pp. 49–77.
17. Han A.K. 2010. From strategic partnership to model partnership: AKP, Turkish-US relations and the prospects under Obama. UNISCI Discussion Papers, no. 23, May, pp. 77–112.
18. Kalın I. 2010. US-Turkish relations under Obama: Promise, challenge and opportunity in the 21st century. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 93–108.
19. Kanat K.B. 2015. Turkey and the U.S.: The longest two years of the relations. June, no. 16. Washington, D.C.: SETA.
20. Kardaş Ş. 2011. Turkish-American relations in the 2000s: Revisiting the basic parameters of partnership? Perceptions, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 25–52.
21. Kibaroğlu M. 2011. Turkey, NATO and nuclear sharing: Prospects after NATO’s Lisbon summit. Nuclear policy paper. April, no. 5. Arms Control Association/British-American Security Information Council/Institute for Peace Research and Security Policy at the University of Hamburg.
22. Kramer H. 2010. AKP’s new foreign policy between vision and pragmatism. Working Paper. FG 2, June. Berlin, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
23. Larrabee F.S. 2011. The ‘New Turkey’ and American-Turkish relations. Insight Turkey, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–9.
24. Larrabee F.S. 2010a. Troubled partnership: US-Turkish relations in an era of global geopolitical change. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation.
25. Larrabee F.S. 2010b. Turkey’s new geopolitics. Survival, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 157–180.
26. Murinson A. 2006. The Strategic Depth Doctrine of Turkish foreign policy. Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 945–964.
27. Oğuzlu T. 2013. Testing the strength of the Turkish-American strategic relationship through NATO: Convergence or divergence within the alliance? Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 207–222.
28. Oğuzlu T. 2012. Turkey’s eroding commitment to NATO: From identity to interests. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 153–164.
29. Özhan T. 2010. Turkey, Israel and the US in the wake of the Gaza flotilla crisis. Insight Turkey, vol. 12, no. 3. pp. 7–18.
30. Parris M.R. 2008. Common values and common interests? The Bush legacy in U.S.-Turkish relations. Insight Turkey, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 5–14.
31. Sims J. 2010. Turkey’s maturing foreign policy: A view from the USA. Bilge Strateji, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 169–200.
32. Stein A. 2011. Resetting U.S.-Turkish relations: Charting a new way forward. Journal of Strategic Security, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–18.
33. Tan N. 2010. Turkish-U.S. strategic partnership. Turkish Policy Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 13–21.
34. Taşpınar Ö. 2009. Obama’s Turkey policy: Bringing credibility to ‘strategic partnership’. Insight Turkey, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–21.
35. Taşpınar Ö. 2011. The rise of Turkish Gaullism: Getting Turkish-American relations right. Insight Turkey, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 11–17.
36. Tersch E. von. 2009. Developing a strategic partnership with Turkey. U.S. Army War College Strategy Research Project. Carlisle, PA, U.S. Army War College.
37. Türkmen F. 2012. Kyrylgan ittifaktan ‘Model Ortaklygha’. Turkiye-ABD ilishkileri [From fragile alliance to ‘model partnership’. Turkey-US relations]. Istanbul, Timash Yayinlary. (In Turkish.)
38. Türkmen F. 2009. Turkish-American relations: A challenging transition. Turkish Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 109–129.
39. Üstün K. 2010. Turkey’s Iran policy: Between diplomacy and sanctions. Insight Turkey, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 19–26.
40. Walker J.W. 2010. The United States and Turkey: Can they agree to disagree? Crown Center for Middle East Studies. November, no. 46. Waltham, Massachusetts, Brandeis University.
41. Wexler R. 2010. United States and Turkey: Allies at odds? Insight Turkey, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 9–14.
42. Williams P.A. 2011. Barack Obama and the ‘model partnership’? In Akbarzadeh Sh. (ed.). America’s challenges in the Greater Middle East: The Obama administration’s policies. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 246–254.
43. Yılmaz N. 2011a. Stratejik ortaklyktan model ortaklygha: Turkiyenin baghymsyz dysh politikasynyn etkileri [From strategic partnership to model partnership: Impacts of Turkish independent foreign policy]. Turk dysh politikasy yillyghy 2010 [Turkish foreign policy yearbook 2010]. Ankara, SETAV, s. 551–577. (In Turkish.)
44. Yılmaz N. 2011b. U.S.-Turkey relations: Model partnership as an ‘empty signifier’. Insight Turkey, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–25.
Review
For citations:
Aliyeva A.I. The U.S.-Turkey ‘Model Partnership’: Testing the Limits (2009–2010). Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2018;10(4):41-78. (In Russ.)
Views:
188
Email this article 