Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations
Abstract
Political risk analysis emerged as a distinctive field within applied international studies at the height of the Cold War but recently it has received a new impetus. It was preconditioned by an increasing uncertainty in many segments of world politics after a series of powerful ‘strategic shocks’ (‘Arab Awakening’, ‘Ukrainian crisis’, Brexit etc.) which brought about substantial and often completely unforeseen, direct and indirect consequences for the international business activities all over the world. This paper examines both classical approaches to defining political risk, which were elaborated by the leading experts in this field in the 1970–1980s, and its contemporary interpretations proposed in academic literature, and reports of think tanks and consultancies over the last decade.
The author outlines a new classification of the main definitions of political risks, based on the factors that affect a company, be it the host government’s actions, sanctions or a general destabilization of the business environment as a result of certain political events. The paper identifies the key drivers behind the development of contemporary approaches to defining political risks, including an increasing influence of non-governmental actors, destabilizing processes in certain developed countries, etc. The author shows that these factors have broadened the concept by reinterpreting what generates political risks, in what circumstances and what impact they have on a risk bearer (a foreign company).
About the Author
D. A. Nechkin
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dmitrii A. Nechkin — PhD Candidate at the Chair of International Organizations and World Political Processes, School of World Politics
1 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Afanas’eva D.A. 2018. Kontseptual’nye podkhody k izucheniyu politicheskikh riskov [Conceptual approaches to studying political risks]. In Gulyaev G.Y. (ed.). Innovatsionnye podkhody v reshenii problem sovremennogo obshchestva [Innovative approaches to solving the problems of modern society]. Penza, pp. 222–224. (In Russ.)
2. Babynina L.O. 2016. Znachenie Brexita dlya Evropeiskogo soyuza [The meaning of Brexit for the EU]. Contemporary Europe, no. 4, pp. 21–33. (In Russ.)
3. Baikov A.A., Dymova L.A. 2017. Vykhod Velikobritanii iz Evropeiskogo soyuza i perspektivy ustoichivosti evropeiskoi regional’noi struktury [Great Britain’s withdrawal from the EU and the prospects of European regional structure stability]. Contemporary Europe, no. 3, pp. 37–46. (In Russ.)
4. Naumkin V.V., Popov V.V., Kuznetsov V.A. (eds.). 2012. Blizhnii Vostok, Arabskoe probuzhdenie i Rossiya: chto dal’she? [Middle East, Arab Awakening and Russia: What comes next?]. Moscow, IV RAN Publ. (In Russ.)
5. Bordovskikh A.N. 2009. Politicheskie riski: sovremennye problemy otsenki i teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya [Political risks: contemporary challenges of evaluation and theoretical modeling]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)
6. Bordovskikh A.N. 2016. Politicheskii risk i korporativnaya otvetstvennost’ [Political risk management and corporate responsibility]. Kontury globalnyh transformacii: politika, ekonomika, pravo, no. 2, pp. 67–79. (In Russ.)
7. Bordovskikh A.N., Solov’ev A.I. 2015. Politicheskie seti kak novyi istochnik politicheskogo riska [Policy networks as a new source of political risk]. Public Administration [E-journal], no. 51, pp. 185–212. (In Russ.)
8. Gusev K.N. 2015. Antirossiiskie sanktsii i ekonomicheskaya politika Rossii [The anti-Russian sanctions and the economic policy of Russia]. Contemporary Europe, no. 2, pp. 144–147. (In Russ.)
9. Gusev K.N. 2017. Brekzit i problemy ekonomiki ES [Brexit and the EU economic issues]. Contemporary Europe, no. 1, pp. 158–159. (In Russ.)
10. Dzhus I.V. 2002. Politicheskie riski: otsenka, analiz i upravlenie [Political risks: Evaluation, analysis, and management]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)
11. Dmitriev S.S., Korolev I.S. 2017. Kontury formiruyushcheisya vneshneekonomicheskoi programmy SShA [Contours of emerging U.S. foreign trade program]. World Economy and International Relations, no. 10, pp. 25–36. (In Russ.)
12. Zavarika G.M. 2018. Mezhdunarodnyi terrorizm kak faktor riska dlya turizma [International terrorism as a risk factor for tourism]. Turizm i gostepriimstvo, no. 1, pp. 18–24. (In Russ.)
13. Kadyrbaev I.A. 2016. Stranovoi risk i sovershenstvovanie metodov ego otsenki pri strakhovanii politicheskikh riskov [Country risk and assessment methods improvement for political risk insurance]. Mir sovremennoi nauki, no. 2, pp. 87–92. (In Russ.)
14. Karyakin M.Yu. 2002. Strakhovanie politicheskikh riskov vneshnetorgovykh operatsii i mezhdunarodnykh investitsii (voprosy teorii i metodologii) [Political risk insurance of foreign trade operations and international investments: Theory and methodology]. Moscow, Avuar consulting Publ. (In Russ.)
15. Panyukov A.Yu. 2015. Stanovlenie ponyatiya ‘politicheskii risk’ v politologii [The formation of the concept of ‘political risk’ in political science]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, no. 2 (30), pp. 99–106. (In Russ.)
16. Podkolzina I.A. 1996. Problemy definitsii i otsenki politicheskogo riska v zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh [Issues of definition and assessment of political risk in foreign studies]. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 12. Political Science, no. 5, pp. 19–33. (In Russ.)
17. Timofeev I.N., Makhmutov T.A. (eds.). 2018. Politika sanktsii: tseli, strategii, instrumenty [Sanctions policy: Goals, strategies, tools]. Moscow, RIAC Publ. (In Russ.)
18. Raizberg B.A. 2008. Slovar’ sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh terminov [Dictionary of contemporary economic terms]. Moscow, Airis-press Publ. (In Russ.)
19. Simonov V.V. 2015. Antirossiiskie sanktsii i sistemnyi krizis mirovoi ekonomiki [Anti-Russian sanctions and the systemic crisis of the world economy]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 2, pp. 49—68. (In Russ.)
20. Timofeev I.N. 2018. Sanktsii protiv Rossii: napravleniya eskalatsii i politika protivodeistviya [The sanctions against Russia: Escalation scenarios and countermeasures]. Moscow, RIAC Publ. (In Russ.)
21. Tikhomirova I.V. 1992. Politicheskii risk i upravlenie sotsial’no-politicheskimi protsessami [Political risk and management of social and political processes]. PhD Thesis. Moscow. (In Russ.)
22. Yakovlev P.P. 2017. ‘Faktor Trampa’ i menyayushchiisya oblik globalizatsii [‘The Trump factor’ and the changing face of globalization]. World Economy and International Relations, no. 7, pp. 5–14. (In Russ.)
23. Aliber R. 1973. The interest rate parity theorem: A reinterpretation. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1451–1459.
24. Clark E., Tunaru R. 2015. Emerging markets: Investing with political risk. Multinational Finance Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 155–173.
25. Graham B.A.T., Johnston N.P., Kingsley A.F. 2016. A unified model of political risk. In De Figueiredo J.M., Lenox M., Oberholzer-Gee F., Vanden Bergh R.G. (eds.). Strategy beyond markets. Bingley, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 119–160.
26. Green R.T., Korth C.M. 1974. Political instability and the foreign investor. California Management Review, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23–31.
27. Jakobsen J. 2010. Old problems remain, new ones crop up: Political risk in the 21st century. Business Horizons, no. 53 (5), pp. 481–490.
28. Jodice D. 1981. An overview of political risk assessment. In Jodice D. (ed.). Political risk assessment: An annotated bibliography. Westport, Greenwood Press, pp. 3–45.
29. Kobrin S.J. 1982. Managing political risk assessment: Strategic response to environmental change. Berkley, University of California Press.
30. Lindeberg M., Morndal S. 2002. Managing political risk: A contextual approach. Stockholm. Available at: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:17037/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed: 15.05.2018).
31. Nehrt Ch. 1970. The political environment for foreign investment. New York, Praeger.
32. Rice G., Mahmoud E.A. 1986. Managerial procedure for political risk forecasting. Management International Review, vol. 26, pp. 12–21.
33. Robock S.H. 1971. Political risk: Identification and assessment. Columbia Journal of World Business, no. 6 (4), pp. 6–20.
34. Root F.R. 1968. US business abroad and political risks. The International Executive, no. 3, pp. 11–12.
35. Simon J.D. 1992. Political risk analysis for international banks and multinational enterprises. In Solberg R.L. (ed.). Country risk analysis: A handbook. London, Routledge, pp. 118–132.
36. Sottilotta C.E. 2013. Political risk: Concepts, definitions, challenges. Roma, LUISS School of Government.
37. Weston F., Sorge B. 1972. International managerial finance. Illinois, Richard D. Irwin Inc.
38. Zarkada A., Fraser C. 2002. Risk perception by UK firms towards the Russian market. International Journal of Project Management, no. 20 (2), pp. 99–105.
Review
For citations:
Nechkin D.A. Evolution of Political Risk Concept: Classical and Contemporary Interpretations. Lomonosov World Politics Journal. 2018;10(4):109-137. (In Russ.)
Views:
363
Email this article 